User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 2001:d08:1c13:8790:2f91:be6b:acb2:7908 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. KylieTastic (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2.98.114.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:40E5:1136:7B6E:8000:0:0:0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Devendra Fadnavis was changed by 2409:40E5:1136:7B6E:8000:0:0:0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891573 on 2025-08-09T08:38:22+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 203.211.108.152 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. KylieTastic (talk) 12:48, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:4090:f108:9204:40cf:fc93:5e71:3aa3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:13, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. KylieTastic (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- RAJAMELAYU1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 50 five times in the last 5 minutes (Shouting, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:29, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. KylieTastic (talk) 12:44, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Quackyisland (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- AK108B (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 173.189.40.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 117.20.116.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2A06:61C0:229A:0:CC06:A5C3:61D4:BEC7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Minions (film) was changed by 2A06:61C0:229A:0:CC06:A5C3:61D4:BEC7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.989039 on 2025-08-09T21:56:58+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 178.223.41.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1362 (LTA 1362, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Chickenjockey1308 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 547 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 547, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 42.105.141.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 984 (AIV / Noticeboard disruption 2, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:34, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 208.77.56.242 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Disspm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Repeated disruptive editing on List of cities with the most skyscrapers specifically to change Mumbai's number without consensus; doesn't contribute to the talk page and leaves no edit summaries. His talk page suggests a history of disruptive editing. LivinAWestLife (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. KylieTastic (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 46.197.74.185 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Laden Briggs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On List of programs broadcast by PBS Kids (diff): User has removed the Fetch! with Ruff Ruffman podcast from the list, either without explanation [1] [2] or while falsely claiming it's "not a real podcast" [3] or that it "never had a podcast by or from PBS" [4], despite the entry being sourced to prove its existence. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:52, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. @The Grand Delusion: This is not obvious vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- At what point does it stop being merely a content dispute and becomes disruptive editing? Because I'm pretty sure this content removal is disruptive. I already explained why I feel it's disruptive, and I even included the following message when I warned them back in May: The Fetch! with Ruff Ruffman podcast is, in fact, real. Yet you completely disregard the citations provided proving its existence - [5], [6] - to remove its entry on the article and make the patently false claim that it's "not a real podcast". Please do NOT remove it again. Fast-forward to now, and they have decided not to listen to me and go ahead and remove it again. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 19:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- @The Grand Delusion: Not all disruptive editing is vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- @The Grand Delusion: While reporting this to WP:ANEW might be an option, I think it's worth making a more concerted effort to resolve this through discussion. It's also good to assume good faith, especially when most of the edits from someone appear to be good faith edits. The other factor here is that the only communication attempts have been edit summaries and templated warnings without any talk page discussions about the content itself (either on the article talk page or their user talk page). That's why I recommended WP:DR. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan: Except that the edits weren't made within a span of 24 hours as outlined in the three-revert rule (only four such edits were made by this user between March 14 and now), and this is a user removing properly sourced content for no reason/for blatantly false reasons multiple times despite being warned and/or told to stop. This isn't merely a disagreement, this is disruptive editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 21:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- @The Grand Delusion: Again, I'm not recommending WP:ANEW as the next step. I'm recommending dispute resolution. WP:3O is a good option. You could also try communication. Beyond that, as mentioned on WP:EW,
it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so
. And if you want to treat this as WP:DE then read the suggested steps on WP:DDE. You don't need to slavishly follow those steps, but you're jumping straight past the first several steps to warnings and trying to get the other user blocked and you're doing it on the wrong noticeboard. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- @The Grand Delusion: Again, I'm not recommending WP:ANEW as the next step. I'm recommending dispute resolution. WP:3O is a good option. You could also try communication. Beyond that, as mentioned on WP:EW,
- @Daniel Quinlan: Except that the edits weren't made within a span of 24 hours as outlined in the three-revert rule (only four such edits were made by this user between March 14 and now), and this is a user removing properly sourced content for no reason/for blatantly false reasons multiple times despite being warned and/or told to stop. This isn't merely a disagreement, this is disruptive editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 21:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- At what point does it stop being merely a content dispute and becomes disruptive editing? Because I'm pretty sure this content removal is disruptive. I already explained why I feel it's disruptive, and I even included the following message when I warned them back in May: The Fetch! with Ruff Ruffman podcast is, in fact, real. Yet you completely disregard the citations provided proving its existence - [5], [6] - to remove its entry on the article and make the patently false claim that it's "not a real podcast". Please do NOT remove it again. Fast-forward to now, and they have decided not to listen to me and go ahead and remove it again. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 19:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1008:B114:D76D:4513:4930:F032:C3E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:NOTHERE. Raladic (talk) 19:42, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Qoo2Qoo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism; persistent removal of content without clear explanation. Xexerss (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Coolbutafool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Remsense 🌈 论 23:09, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:281:D881:7F10:C8B1:97BB:DEF7:AC0F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Plasticwonder (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 14.231.172.181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Wikipedia:LTA/PVR. Remsense 🌈 论 23:30, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 2400:9800:108:1AD3:2D6A:FB44:85F9:8FC1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On President of Indonesia (diff): IP deliberately targets Indonesia-related articles to vandalize them. —Krsnaquli || Contact - 23:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 42.1.77.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Wikipedia:LTA/PVR. Remsense 🌈 论 23:44, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- 66.169.120.109 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:LTA/BMX. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- 213.226.119.161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Rapidly going to drafts and submitting them, including ones that are clearly not ready. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:37, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- BeneathTheBrand (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Https://beneaththebrand.co.uk/. Theroadislong (talk) 06:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- It appears that the editor is based in the US per their talk page discussions. They might represent a different company than the website you've linked. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 08:05, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also the existence of a website with the same name does not prove they are connected. Secretlondon (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:17, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- TiniesSupport (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 08:47, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. KylieTastic (talk) 12:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Awiggingsf (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Edits solely to or about Addison Wiggin. May be that person, or their agent. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:50, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Mfield (Oi!) 21:04, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Noting discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_223#Addison_Wiggin -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Teamsdu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promotional edits to Serhat Durmus. Tacyarg (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Consultingnetwork (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 21:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by a LTA banned user. 198.103.184.76 (talk) 20:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users changing the country of origin as a political statement or protest. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 01:37, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Aleain (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant ip vandalism. A person of sorts (talk) 05:00, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:04, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Nthep. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Go through the edit history and you will see a large number of anonymous editors who add unsourced claims (this page receives a lot of traffic as it is about the killer of The Notorious BIG) Sallyboy's Knowledge (talk) 06:17, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: For years, a dynamic IP from Brazil has been vandalizing the site. It must be one and the same user.78.1.107.227 (talk) 11:35, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Five different accounts used to write about someone completely different in 72 hours. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Frost 14:53, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kim Nhật Chính (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Kim Nhật Chính: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced changes, vandalism and other poor quality edits, though a few recent IP contributions are good faith. Entranced98 (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement: WP:GS/KURD and also WP:GS/ACAS. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing 185.240.17.37 (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:31, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP-hopping editor has been persistently removing an external link from the article since 18th July. I believe the link I restored is consistent with ELYES, and another editor agrees with me at the discussion on the talk page: Talk:Julie_Christie#Screenonline. The constant reverting is becoming tedious. Blocking would be pointless given the IP hopping. Semi-protecting the article for a few days would give the discussion time to progress and force the IP editor to participate. Betty Logan (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- The editor has finally come to the talk page. I am happy for this request to be closed without prejudice and we'll see how it plays out. Betty Logan (talk) 21:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism of the page of a recently deceased voice actress with the latest edit claiming she died in 2026. 2BitSalute (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 21:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. A replacement fix (talk) 23:09, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. A replacement fix (talk) 23:11, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High levwl of ip Vandalism. Caaqilka5 (talk) 23:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Caaqilka5: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
'' Reason:' High level of IP Vandalism. Caaqilka5 (talk) 23:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC) {{subst:void ka fogow lama badali karo page kan | after changing the text above, click the blue "Publish changes" button below.}}
- Automated comment: @Caaqilka5: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Not done. This is the English Wikipedia, and you appear to be requesting protection for a page in a different language project. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:00, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 00:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 00:22, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: An RM has resulted in a move to its current target. Restore protection when disruptions resume, but for now I don't see it! Intrisit (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
May 23 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I am drawing el C's attention here, the protecting user, instead at their TP due to their moderate activity nowadays. I am requesting for a downgrade in the edit-protection level from indef semi to indef PC because I reckon that it has been protected long enough since 2019.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
No editing activity ever since that link was converted into a redirect 4 years ago. This is also not to mention the fact that the target page isn't facing vandalism and that the protecting user is inactive.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please remove the following templates from the page (because WP:PROD is only for mainspace articles and files):
{{Strip categories| {{Proposed deletion/dated |concern = Probable hoax - there is no Beach City in Fayette County, nor does the claimed reference exist. |timestamp = 20250618002141 |nom = Pi.1415926535 |help = }} {{Prod2|[[WP:TNT]]}} {{prod3|There is no Beach City in Georgia and searching returns nothing useful.}} }}GTrang (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC) |
13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creator[edit] |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia. In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support. Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing. I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles. I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role. I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I've created a large number of My Little Pony and mathematics articles. I have over 6,700 edits and will continue to edit for as long as I can. I'm requesting autopatrol permissions so that the NPP backlog will be less cluttered with my articles. I believe I've demonstrated a solid understanding of the policies and guidelines with my articles, particularly with my coverage of various aspects of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Toadboy123 has created 193 articles of consistently high quality; none have been deleted, while quite a few have gone through DYK and appeared on the Main Page, often with excellent hooks. I do not think we need to keep reviewing their creations. Toadboy123 was warned twice for copyright violations by Diannaa in 2022, but she and I have both taken a look at several articles created since then and haven't found further issues (discussed here, after which I spot checked six recent creations). Additionally, DYK checks each nomination for copyright violations. Thus, I believe they have taken that feedback to heart. Toadspike [Talk] 12:52, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi, since four years ago, I have started over two dozen meticulously crafted articles, which are free of issues. Most of these are Japan or Shinto-related, and are primarily about geographical features and historical figures. There was only one draftified article from a while ago, which I quickly learned from and have since created only notable topics with sufficient sources. I'm familiar with Wikipedia's core policies and copyvio guidelines. Yenistardom (talk) 06:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 articles, over several years. I learnt over time to understand the notability criteria well. My new pages do not require attention from patrollers. Only one page I created is marked as deleted (it was recreated under a slightly different name). I have overall over 1000 edits. Thank you for the consideration. Queenofboston (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing for more than 2 years now, and I noticed recently that reviews take longer than before. I was shocked by the workload waiting reviewers here. Besides my editing experience expanding and improving articles, I created and published 77 articles. For 2 years, only 1 out of 78 articles I created was deleted. I created 4 B-class articles, 37 C-class articles, 15 Start-class articles, and 2 Stubs. I believe having autopatrolled rights would reduce the review burden on NPP volunteers, as my articles typically include proper sourcing, formatting, and categories from creation. Particleshow22 (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
I frequently write articles (most of which nowadays are above start-class and I aim for GA on all of my tornado articles) so maybe having this right would help patrollers. The only article of mine that was AfD’d this year that I can remember is Casualties of the 2011 Super Outbreak (which was deemed to still have some useful info in it that was merged into 2011 Super Outbreak). I don't think any of my last 100-or-so articles are orange-tagged, although I don't frequently check them if they aren't being improved. EF5 17:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC) EF5 17:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I intend to use AutoWikiBrowser for repetitive maintenance tasks such as fixing formatting, correcting common typos, and improving consistency across multiple articles. I am familiar with Wikipedia's editing guidelines and will use AWB in accordance with its rules and best practices. User404found (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
Requests for mass message sender |
---|
Mass message sender[edit]
Just proposed a large WikiProject merge here, and intend to propose more in the future of similar scale. I would rather prefer avoiding the trouble of sending individual notifications (in this case to 55 WikiProject talk pages) and don't want to be a bother constantly spamming the talk page with requests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I attempt whenever possible to correct article titles to sentence case when necessary, but am frequently unable to do so because of the existence of a single-edit redirect. I've been advised at "Requested moves" just to ask for the pagemover right already after 75,000 edits in nearly 11 years. A perfect current example: Sweet and Sour Pork, which I can't move to Sweet and sour pork without requesting the move and making someone else do my work for me. Thanks for your consideration! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I would like to request reviewer rights and help flag vandalism across Wikipedia. I believe in Wikipedia’s core mission of neutrality, reliability, and free access to knowledge. I aim to contribute by reviewing pages for quality and sourcing, and to help maintain article integrity by countering vandalism. I have studied Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, notability, and civility, and am eager to support content moderation. Thank you for considering my request. Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
May I reapply? 200 mainspace edits |
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 58 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 9 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 3 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 599 |
Templates for deletion | 164 |
Categories for deletion | 135 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 38 |
All redirects for discussion | 406 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 26 |
Possible copyright violations | 38 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 206 |
All files proposed for deletion | 21 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 196 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 388 |
Unknown copyright status | 28 |
Unknown source | 17 |
No non-free use rationale | 0 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,261 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 455 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,589 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 33,832 | 0.48 |
All articles needing rewrite | 6,296 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,327 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 41,942 | 0.6 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,650 | 0.17 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 554,557 | 7.88 |
All articles lacking sources | 48,248 | 0.69 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 137 | 0.01 |
All articles needing additional references | 500,282 | 7.11 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,793 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 107,537 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 314,689 | 4.47 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 132 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 19 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,215 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 818 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
Stub categories | 20,348 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 204 | 0 |
All orphaned articles | 54,283 | 0.77 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,164 | 0.03 |
All articles with style issues | 19,697 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,639 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,600 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 381 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 3,837 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,790 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 7 |
All articles to be expanded | 65,486 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |