Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors
![]() | Please submit error reports only for content that is currently or will imminently appear on the Main Page. For general discussion about the Main Page, kindly use its talk page. |
![]() | National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 05:44 on 23 June 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Actual errors only. Failures of subjective criteria such as interestingness are not errors.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of the featured article
[edit]Errors with "In the news"
[edit]Should probably not say "airstrikes" when referring to United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites since aircraft only struck two of the sites and the other was struck by missiles (not normally considered an airstrike). UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Good point. Could you provide some alternatives?
- "missile and airstrikes" - wordy but accurate
- "missile and bombstrikes" - wordy but accurate
- "The United States attacks three nuclear facilities in Iran" - less wordy, more vague, but accurate
- Others? - Fuzheado | Talk 22:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've changed it to just say strikes since that's what the article title is, and it covers both the aorstrikes and other strikes. — Amakuru (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Good idea. I've added "military strikes" for cross-linguistic clarity, especially useful for machine or human translation. - Fuzheado | Talk 23:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've changed it to just say strikes since that's what the article title is, and it covers both the aorstrikes and other strikes. — Amakuru (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- The phrase "carries out military strikes" contains a lot of words but conveys very little notable details. It basically sanitizes what is happening verging on bias. I suggest changing to simply "bombs" which at least conveys the mode of attack and is much more economical with words. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've restored the previous discussion and pinged everyone via edit summary but overlooked Amakuru. Schwede66 03:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Errors in "Did you know ..."
[edit]"... that the TV show Ancient Aliens speculated that the CIA caused Hillary Clinton to lose the 2016 U.S. presidential election in order to foil UFO disclosure?"
Ancient Aliens has been widely criticized since its inception for not being a reliable discussion on anything halfway factual, being full of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. I'm not quite sure why we're including their usual spew of unreliable information on the main page as if it was a significant viewpoint, especially since it seems to be only Ancient Aliens discussing this theory and nobody else, judging by the article, and the theory spun by Ancient Aliens was not discussed in any significant manner beyond acknowledgement that Ancient Aliens did in fact talk about this. Even ignoring the fact this is an unreliable source, this is giving heavy WP:UNDUE weight onto one particular viewpoint, which doesn't quite seem wise given this subject's real-world significance.
Do let me know if I'm doing something wrong here since I'm admittedly not too familiar with this process, but this is equivalent to putting an opinion from an unreliable source on the main page, and I'd highly suggest it be pulled, especially given the lack of an ALT hook in the original nomination. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Errors in "On this day"
[edit]Errors in the summary of the featured list
[edit]Errors in the summary of the featured picture
[edit]I seem to have messed up the formatting of the protected version somehow. Please fix it to show the correct row formatting. Jay8g [V•T•E] 01:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Jay8g, could you please check whether I've done this right? There's every chance that I mucked something up. Schwede66 02:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm still struggling with the intricacies of the different POTD templates (hence how I messed it up in the first place!), but I think it looks right now, other than the image somehow being smaller (which I'm not sure how to fix). Thanks! Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've made it larger but without any clue how the image size is normally chosen. Schwede66 03:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm still struggling with the intricacies of the different POTD templates (hence how I messed it up in the first place!), but I think it looks right now, other than the image somehow being smaller (which I'm not sure how to fix). Thanks! Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Any other Main Page errors
[edit]Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.