Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To report an error in content currently or imminently to appear on Main Page, use the appropriate section below. Reports should contain:

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation using {{!xt}} of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible using {{xt}}.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 02:34 on 8 August 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Actual errors only. Failures of subjective criteria such as interestingness are not errors.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

[edit]
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

[edit]

Errors in "Did you know ..."

[edit]

Errors in "On this day"

[edit]
  • I just pushed out a substantial improvement to the article Wren Building. Since the 330th anniversary of this building's foundation being laid is tomorrow, I would appreciate it running as one of the blurbs. Below is my proposed blurb.
Please ping me if you have any questions. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Ikhouvanjou14, who worked on the 2025 refresh. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
should change "is" to "was", otherwise no problem Pbritti. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Too right. Done. Schwede66 23:05, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1991 entry: "an error in exchanging the guys on the highest stock of the mast". Is "stock" the right word here? I couldn't find this usage in a dictionary. It is not used in the target article, which talks only of replacing a "main cable". So that might be better terminology to use in any case. JMCHutchinson (talk) 19:45, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The "main cable" is a guy-wire. "Stock" refers to the hardware mounted on telecommunications masts, like antennas and microwave dishes. Schwede66 22:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've dealt with both the items above: added the Wren Building and copy-edited the Warsaw radio mast item. Schwede66 22:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
(August 8, today)
(August 11)
[edit]

The text says "The summer form (prorsa) has black wings, while the winter form (levana) – adapted for diapause – has red wings", and later "This map, in the prorsa form, was photographed..." -- but the picture shows a red-and-white winged butterfly. Suspect it is a levana form, not a prorsa form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.86.3.5 (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know almost nothing about butterflies, but I think the caption is correct -- this is the levana form, and it looks quite different (note that the "spots" are darker than the rest of the wing). Whether the description ought to be updated, I'll leave to the experts -- specialists' ideas of colour, shape etc don't always exactly match how those terms are used in everyday speech, and of course there's the lighting of the photo and so on to consider. UndercoverClassicist T·C 16:51, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any other Main Page errors

[edit]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.