Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates
Removing featured lists in Wikipedia This page is for the review and improvement of featured lists that may no longer meet the featured list criteria. FLs should be kept at current standards, regardless of when they were promoted. Any objections raised in the review must be actionable. The FLC director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the exact timing of the process for each nomination. Nominations will last at least 14 days, and longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be kept, consensus must be reached that it still meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the delegates determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list, archived and added to Former featured lists if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:
Nominations may be closed earlier than the allotted two weeks if, in the judgment of the FLRC delegate, the list in the nomination:
Do not nominate lists that have recently been promoted (such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period as featured list candidates) or lists that have recently survived a removal attempt – such nominations are likely to be removed summarily. A bot will update the list talk page after the list has been kept or the nomination has been archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the |
Featured list tools:
Toolbox |
Nomination procedure
|
Nominations for removal
[edit]Per recent consensus that articles of this nature should pursue GA/FA instead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Notified: Raime, Hydrogen Iodide, SportsNerd3000, Chiefmiz, Alaskan assassin, WikiProject Tampa Bay, WikiProject Florida, WikiProject Skyscrapers
This list contains many unsourced entries and it is likely out of date and not comprehensive. Cyrobyte (talk) 23:40, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is often utilized by skyscrapercity.com’s Tampa Forum. The article is quite useful and informative. Chiefmiz (talk) 23:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: The FLRC template is missing from the List’s talk page. ZsinjTalk 01:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Remove I would support a removal from featured list status for now. The lead and history sections can definitely be more detailed, while there are quite a few buildings on the main list that lack citations. There are too many red links as well. Citations are largely missing from the under construction and proposed section. LivinAWestLife (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Image sizes in the tables are also oddly inconsistent. LivinAWestLife (talk) 08:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support delisting. Whole sections toward the end of the article are totally unsourced. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)