User:Zsinj
You're reached Zsinj's userpage. If you'd like to leave me a message, you're more than welcome to.
Current Focus
[edit]
| ||
| ||
|
- Improve Brevard County, Florida to
B-ClassGA-Class- Work through the cheat sheet
- Inspiration: Warren County, Indiana, GA Places
- A Florida-related article to Good Article
- Maybe 1935 Labor Day hurricane
- Category:CS1 errors
- Updating article assessments within the WikiProjects I associate with
- Tending to the admin backlogs below
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- PARYAANTARYA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Surdash Tahseen Obaid Salih (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- RAWDKILLER (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- MOHD PERVEZ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- GERARDAIRFORCE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1376 (Unusual edit count activity, details). Note: This filter has some false positives. Use caution before taking any actions. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- JP Magalhaes dos Santos Jr 55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Nahid bin hasan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Srn6791 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. user seems to be well intentioned Mfield (Oi!) 04:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- MontyFury1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) SPA vandal and sock use of IP to add to this at Talk:Suleiman Obeid. One other past edit that's possible COI, all round clearly NOTHERE. Kingsif (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. New user and no warnings. I doubt this is overt vandalism. If issues remain after sufficient warnings... WP:ANI <<< is that way. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 1 |
| Hoaxes | 0 |
| Vandalism | 1 |
| User requested | 7 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 4 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 2 |
| Other candidates | 11 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 232 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 104 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 16 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
- Fistingtrap (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fisting" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:20, 10 August 2025 (UTC)- Message left on talk page. UndercoverClassicist T·C 19:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Official Gabriel1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- WikinonBot4 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 02:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Calling yourself a "nonbot" is only misleading if you are, in fact, a bot. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:20, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- True. But also, calling yourself a "bot" is misleading if you are not, in fact, a bot. :) DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Joking aside it looks like it is claiming to be a bot from someone called Wikinon, and is editing warring. Secretlondon (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- They responded to a username warning saying there's nothing wrong with their username. Although there are other issues now. Lavalizard101 (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'm surprised that this editor isn't already blocked for a username violation. I read about them on ANI. Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, when I made the ANI, I made reference to the report here. Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:01, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'm surprised that this editor isn't already blocked for a username violation. I read about them on ANI. Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- They responded to a username warning saying there's nothing wrong with their username. Although there are other issues now. Lavalizard101 (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Calling yourself a "nonbot" is only misleading if you are, in fact, a bot. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:20, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Advanktmul (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Creating (declined) draft article on company of same name Draft:Advan-kt. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Milfhunter420 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – sexually explicit username 🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 22:09, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. (It has in fact been unused in 8 years and has 11 total edits so I see no reason to block). CoconutOctopus talk 22:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Shippit Australia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 02:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite full protection: Page transcluded on the main page. See NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS and NUMBEROFARTICLES. Interstellarity (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Just reverted most of the edits, but would like to know if this article needs to be protected after the vandalism had occured... DJ Baguio (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent WP:LOUTSOCK activity from Phạm Văn Rạng and/or Sotavino. Jay8g [V•T•E] 20:59, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Every time this page is unprotected, User:AttackTheMoonNow immediately resumes to sockpuppet behaviour. BangJan1999 21:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 22:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring, possibly involving IP vandalism. 174.34.38.219 (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR -- the subject of this article is a Russian military unit created about a year ago, apparently exclusively engaged in the Russo-Ukrainian War. tony 00:25, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Chaelo86 (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. WP:CT/SA 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 02:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced or poorly sourced content 2601:206:8101:DFC0:1546:A9B2:8811:899B (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock edits to this page. Yuthoob (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: An RM has resulted in a move to its current target. Restore protection when disruptions resume, but for now I don't see it! Intrisit (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
May 23 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I am drawing el C's attention here, the protecting user, instead at their TP due to their moderate activity nowadays. I am requesting for a downgrade in the edit-protection level from indef semi to indef PC because I reckon that it has been protected long enough since 2019.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
No editing activity ever since that link was converted into a redirect 4 years ago. This is also not to mention the fact that the target page isn't facing vandalism and that the protecting user is inactive.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment:A lack of disruption is not a reason to remove protection. Do you have a reason to edit it? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to edit warring/content disputes. 1. There was confusion about the film's language, it has been sorted out, I agree with the other user. 2. A user was removing Mahavatar Cinematic Universe info and said that there should be seperate page. It was created later. Please remove protection from the page and set the protection level to no protection. There was no request for semi protection, please do not set it to semi protection. Many protected edit requests are pending in the talk page such as budget and box office. Please remove the protection. Optim594 (talk) 03:22, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin PhilKnight. Seems it will expire tomorrow anyway so it may not matter much. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'm being lazy and waiting for the protection to expire. If you want to remove the protection early, be my guest. PhilKnight (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please remove the following templates from the page (because WP:PROD is only for mainspace articles and files):
{{Strip categories|
{{Proposed deletion/dated
|concern = Probable hoax - there is no Beach City in Fayette County, nor does the claimed reference exist.
|timestamp = 20250618002141
|nom = Pi.1415926535
|help =
}}
{{Prod2|[[WP:TNT]]}}
{{prod3|There is no Beach City in Georgia and searching returns nothing useful.}}
}} GTrang (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:52, 11 August 2025 (UTC) |
| 9 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC) |
No RfXs since 14:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |