Wikipedia:XfD today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 23	June 25 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Galil cheese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has all of the same issues as with Shifra Cheese (see here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shifra_cheese), which was created by the same editor. Truthnope (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Israeli cheeses. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 03:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Movement for the Unity of the Communists

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic fails WP:ORG. Tried to find reliable, English- and Portuguese-language sources online but did not. The organisation existing only in 2005 means there may be print sources I do not have access to, but given this splinter group existed for less than a month, I doubt that is the case. Yue🌙 02:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Brazil. Yue🌙 02:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Megan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is only talked about in terms of her husband and her late son (who is primarily mentioned because of his dad). As notability is not inherited this subject does not have any sources of her own. In my before search I couldn't find anything else. I would be okay with a redirect to Aidonia Moritoriko (talk) 02:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, Internet, and Jamaica. Moritoriko (talk) 02:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli feta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many problems with the references. For one, no page numbers are given. I cannot find the books "Cheese from the Land of Milk and Honey: A Guide to Israeli Cheese". I also can't find "Food in Israel: A Mediterranean Journey." or "The Secret Life of Cheese: The Complete Guide to Cheese and Cheese-Making in Israel", although the authors exist (Mayer-Chissick appears to be an Israeli author and is listed by the National Library of Israel (https://www.nli.org.il/en/a-topic/987007462694605171) but this particular book is not mentioned). The source by Gur exists (and can be found here https://archive.org/details/bookofnewisraeli0000gurj/page/220/mode/2up?q=feta) and has a section on cheese but does not mention Israeli feta. The same is true for the source by Nathan (https://archive.org/details/foodsofisraeltod0000nath/page/242/mode/2up) which is cited for a claim about bourekas, ziva, and borek, but does not mention any of these dishes, at least from a quick search. As such, it appears difficult to verify any of these claims, unless somebody can provide page numbers. ISBNs would also help.

The creator of this article also created the article Shifra cheese, which shares many of the same issues and which I also nominated for deletion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shifra_cheese). Truthnope (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Violence in Decadence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an essay and the topic does not appear to be itself notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shifra cheese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All seven references are used simultaneously for every section. Verifiability for these claims is questionable. No page numbers are given for any of these books. The two links given are dead and cannot be recovered from the wayback machine.

Furthermore, the citations for the books seem off. For example, there is a Daniel Rogov who writes guides on Israeli wine, and there was a version published in 2005, but the title The Ultimate Guide to Israeli Wines isn't used (there is a The Ultimate Rogov's Guide to Israeli Wines from 2011) and they seem to be published by Toby Press, not Gefen Publishing House. There is also a book called "The New Middle Eastern Vegetarian: Modern Recipes from Veggiestan", but the author is listed as Sally Butcher, not Gil Atlas. I cannot find the Schreiber or Lewin books anywhere. Only the Solomonov and Cook reference has no apparent flaw. If anybody can find a few of these sources (perhaps they're in Hebrew), I'll withdraw this nomination, but as is, the article appears to be built on almost nothing. Truthnope (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ToTheBones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utter lack of WP:SIGCOV. Potentially UPE. jellyfish ✉ 00:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. jellyfish ✉ 00:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salisbury Municipal Incinerator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an ordinary municipal incinerator. Sources are all run-of-the-mill local coverage or do not discuss this specific incinerator; I can't find any significant coverage outside the local paper. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Satoru Makino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8 professional league appearances. Fails GNG. RossEvans19 (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. RossEvans19 (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 03:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files

Redirects

KenTacoHut

KenTacoHut → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Ken Taco Hut → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Ken Taco Huts → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
KenTaco Huts → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
KenTacoHuts → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
KenTaco Hut → Yum! Brands (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Steel1943 (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Appears to be a restaurant featuring three of Yum's franchises in one. I think it's a meme? Does not appear to be notable enough to add to the Yum article. Rusalkii (talk) 21:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These seem to be a thing, or was a thing. Googling "ken taco hut" turns up quite a bit of results. Since this is/was a Yum! triple-franchise outlet, the origin of wanting to make these redirects seems clear. I'm not sure it has to be mentioned in the article, but it seems to be clearly a subtopic, if a very minor one. The main question for me is whether this is a worthwhile search term. Pageviews on these appear to be sparse. Stefen 𝕋ower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 00:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KenTaco Hut (not part of the nomination and should be bundled) was an article that was merged to the same target per its AfD. The paragraph on KenTaco Hut was removed from the target with summary editing for style; copyediting. Jay 💬 09:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Added KenTaco Hut to the nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flagstaff war.

Flagstaff war. → Flagstaff War (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unlikely typographical error, but not eligible for R3 as a redirect has existed here since 2013 204.111.137.20 (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Coahuila Challenger 604 Crash

2019 Coahuila Challenger 604 Crash → 2019 Coahuila Bombardier Challenger crash (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
2019 Coahuila Bombardier Challenger 604 crash → 2019 Coahuila Bombardier Challenger crash (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The crash actually involved a Bombardier Challenger 601, so these redirects are inaccurate. Delete. Mr slav999 (talk) 19:41, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2019 Coahuila Challenger 604 Crash, article was at this location for two years and it could break incoming links. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:51, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The pageviews for 2019 Coahuila Challenger 604 Crash could have been from Bombardier Challenger 600 series which had a link, which I have just removed. Wait a few months and check again. Delete 2019 Coahuila Bombardier Challenger 604 crash. The article was at this title for only 18 minutes. Jay 💬 02:09, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Influencer Smurf

Influencer Smurf → Smurfs (film) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Meme about a smurf from the trailer of this movie, not mentioned in the target page. Possibly merits a mention (see e.g. [1] [2]), in which case the redirect should be kept, but I believe the character was replaced for the actual movie. Rusalkii (talk) 19:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 12:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of The Smurfs characters as {{R from list entry}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The table there has 117 smurfs listed, but not one of them is cited. I have added nom's source there though. Jay 💬 09:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 03:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Doctors (series 1)

The Doctors (series 1) → List of Medics (Polish TV series) episodes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is ambiguous and should be deleted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Doctor#Series as a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Doctors series 1 as I don't see the ambiguity. Nothing else at Doctor#Series seems to have something called "series 1". -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Which Doctors?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re Tavix: The Doctors (2000 TV series), The Doctors (1963 TV series), The Doctors (1969 TV series) and The Doctors (talk show) at least all have multiple series/seasons ("series" is always a plausible search term for "season" and vice versa). This is a plausible search term for the first series/season for all of them. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show evidence of usage of "series 1" for any of those shows? If yes, add a hatnote. If no, don't add one. So long as Doctors series 1 is at the base title, it is the de facto primary topic. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at both suggested targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Googling "The Doctors series 1" the top three results are for the 2020 TV series, The Doctors (South Korean TV series), Doctor Who: The Doctors, and a book series by Louise Bay (both of which might be notable) also appear on the first page. Searching for "The Doctors" "Series 1" Doctors (2000 TV series) is the top hit, with the 2020 TV series and the talk show also making an appearance on the first page. All the evidence I can see points to there being no primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If anything, this is solid evidence that Google results should not be used to determine primary topic. The first three things you list are a series that only has a single season and a couple of things that don't have articles. None of those things are useful for the question at hand. Instead of regurgitating, can you try analyzing these results? How is "series" used in this context? -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In all cases "series" is used in the plain English sense. It is not our job to say that people using "series 1" in relation to a TV programme that didn't have a series 2 is wrong, it is our job to enable people to find the content they are looking for (not the content we think they should be looking for). It is very clear that people using the search term are not looking for a single topic, but multiple different ones. I have analysed all the information available, and it all points to the same conclusion: there is no primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saying "plain English" isn't helpful because 'series' has multiple uses in (plain) English. In television, series can be synonymous with the American English usage of season or it can be synonymous with program. I'm asking for your evidence because I do not believe you have analyzed your regurgitation of Google results to filter for the correct context. Better evidence would be linking to the specific results that uses "The Doctors series 1" to refer to each series in question. I also disagree with your assertion that Google results can be used to deduce what someone would be searching for in Wikipedia. Google's algorithm prioritizes giving a searcher a variety of different results; this is so a searcher doesn't have to scroll through a bunch of similar results to find a minority topic. This is not compatible with Wikipedia's preference to use primary topic. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've presented all my evidence and explained to you my methodology and reasoning. It's now up to you to actually provide some evidence that there is actually a primary topic, rather than just repeatedly asserting I'm wrong without backing that up. Thryduulf (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the burden of proof, I cannot provide evidence of absence. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:47, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking you to provide evidence of absence, I'm asking you to provide evidence of the primary topic you repeatedly claim exists. Thryduulf (talk) 11:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made no such claim. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? You've spent this entire discussion opposing the view that there is no primary topic. Either there is a primary topic or there isn't, if you reject the evidence showing there is no primary topic then (assuming you are acting in good faith) you can only be asserting that there is a primary topic. Are you commenting in good faith? Thryduulf (talk) 11:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you recall my original !vote, my rationale was I don't see the ambiguity. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC only comes into play where there's ambiguity. -- Tavix ^(talk) 12:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have objectively demonstrated that ambiguity exists, everybody else commenting sees ambiguity exists, so I was assuming good faith that your comments were are difference in opinion regarding the presence or absence of a primary topic - it now seems that assumption was incorrect. Thryduulf (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Doctor#Series No clear primary topic. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First choice - Delete per nom because of the ambiguity. Second choice - retarget to Doctors series 1 per Tavix, and tag as {{R from incorrect name}} and {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} to a properly titled article per WP:TVSEASON. We don't have any specific article on the series 1 of any "The Doctors" shows, and we have The Doctors (TV series) for anyone interested in any other show with the name. Jay 💬 08:36, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie Weinroth

Maggie Weinroth → Colorado State Fair (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, useless. K1 does not apply because this should never have been an article in the first place and it has no useful history. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 03:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Manupur (1748)

Battle of Manupur (1748) → Battle of Lahore (1748) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I intend to make the page for this, I'd also like to have the "Battle of Manupur" redirect thus also deleted.

This currently redirects to an earlier 1748 battle. Noorullah (talk) 01:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Manupur. @Star Mississippi:, as closer of the previous discussion, do you have any thoughts on this? BD2412 T 01:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@BD2412 thanks for the ping. I'm guessing I went delete and redirect as a viable ATD but to remove the copyvio concerns. Have no objection with @Noorullah21 overwriting the redirect with a new article. There's always the risk of another AfD and I don't have the time tonight to review the sources they put forward at the AfD to see if they overcome the issues raised by those who argue not to retain. I see no one has edited it since my creation following the AfD. If my G7ing the redirect solves this, I'm happy to save you seven days. Star Mississippi 02:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Redirects

KenTacoHut

Flagstaff war.

2019 Coahuila Challenger 604 Crash

Influencer Smurf

The Doctors (series 1)

Maggie Weinroth

Battle of Manupur (1748)

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review