User talk:2600:1008:B114:D76D:4513:4930:F032:C3E

August 2025

Hello, I'm Raladic. I noticed that you recently removed content from Controversies in autism without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Raladic (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

I did adequately explain why, your just afraid of the pure logic. It's a beautiful thing logic is, and I keep making it. I said, in the talk page "That "Autism Pathology Thing does not actually describe the position", because all I remember reading is something very simple, very rudimentary, "Autism Pathology Takes The Traditional View Of Autism As A Medical Condition" which includes nothing about the actual logic, the actual rationale, the actual drive behind the position. All it ends up saying is that "These guys are inherently prejudiced due to a kneejerk" It's a disease so it's bad reaction" and is only held by some self hating gays and the out-of-touch parents." Which I say, is very biased. Very biased. There's never been something more biased folks. Because the Plane hit the twin towers and I can logically tell you that Osama Bin Laden was not more biased towards his position during that time--then this article was towards the "Neurodiversity is Good Rationale. And I'm perfectly right to use talk to tell you my rationale instead of the Edit Summary. I'm always right, Ive never been wrong, because talk is a forum where people can read, and aspiring editors can divine my reasons perfectly well from something written there and not in Edit summary. 2600:1008:B114:D76D:4513:4930:F032:C3E (talk) 19:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

It's been a couple minutes since I gave my two VERY ADEQUATE responses. Wheres the counter-response. Because I have been very respectful to the laws of God and myself the whole time here, and I think I deserve some real explanation. Where is it, everybody's asking me "Where Are You Peekaboo", and I'm saying "I'm right here, but wheres that response? I Don't see it, the world is constantly turning round and round but what is not constant is the occurrence of a response. Kafka had a very, very beautiful response to his father about why he was afraid of the man. It was 47 Pages. But I'm sitting here and I see two sentences or less? What we are facing here is a conspiracy against my great and righteouss position which flies in the sky over Planet Earth. You know it, we all know it, because we are a beautiful people unified in our love for hating Taylor Swift and loving Taylor Swift! Which is understandable like my position! Where's the response? Where's the beautiful justice of God? I'm looking all over the Good State Of Minnesota, and I'm not seeing it or the response. I see many Seraphims flying above Gods Country, the State Of Israel, but I don't see them flying over your response, because it doesn't exist, because what we have here is a terrible attack against human dignity perpetrated by Satan himself. He is here and telling the world "Don't Respond Too Logical People". I'm telling you it's working! We need to stop this like how we need to stop Taylor Swift. And I must tell you something about that women, her music is terrible! I've listened to it and it is generic Pop, nothing on the level of say 'Dance Macabre or my comment which has still not been responded to. It's just the result of a formula which no-one-is-talking-about! That being her tendency to find a boyfriend, say she loves him, then tease the virgins who watch her with the premise of marriage before breaking up with the guy and writing a song aabout how much he sucks! Which she does every-time, and each time people are fooled and think she'll keep the current guy! Even though a Footballer cannot be compatible with someone who dresses like her, it's impossible. Footballers like commitment to the skin of the game, and her clothes has no commitment to the skin. It is all a very similar occurence to the lack of commitment concerning a response to VERY ADEQUATE responses from myself! 2600:1008:B114:D76D:4513:4930:F032:C3E (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Controversies in autism, you may be blocked from editing. Raladic (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

How did I violate? I see nothing, at, all, in violation. Nothing! Wheres the user I did a personal attack on? Nowhere. He doesn't exist. I'm the least biased person in the world period and that's why those Norwegians in Scandinavia have given me the Nobel Peace Prize twice. 2600:1008:B114:D76D:4513:4930:F032:C3E (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---