User:WereSpielChequers/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 94.174.26.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Why Can't I Wake Up with You (diff): vandalism after final warning. Date-changing vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. The last warning was from May. Re-report after sufficient warnings. Peaceray (talk) 03:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- 220.255.60.227 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) continuing adding unsourced content for months and final warnings. Cassiopeia talk 01:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:CA:4001:AB0:9180:77F8:EA50:7B7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism-only. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Peaceray (talk) 03:27, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- SmileyFace2025 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User talk:SmileyFace2025: Disruptive, not here to build an encyclopedia. GalStar (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. I see level 1 & 2 warnings but no level 3 or 4. Peaceray (talk) 03:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- 89.211.139.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Boyash (diff): vandalism after final warning. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 02:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:268:9869:C4D2:BA3B:DE15:4F35:F8E3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Sock of the other account I reported. 🧙♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- 100.11.10.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block evasion by LTA. Please block for 1 year or more (see blocks of 72.78.143.236 and 98.115.168.68 where editing resumed after shorter blocks). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Usernamepolicy6 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Killersunrise (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Usernameisarealname (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WikiGuyCollege2025 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Echomonke (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "homo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Drjavidiqbalkhan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Impersonation issue - see discussion on my talk page User talk:MCE89#QWP Wikipedia Page. The user says that Javid Iqbal Khan is their friend's uncle and that he does not have access to this account, but userpage and username are both claiming that they are him. MCE89 (talk) 11:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Producerdonfaded (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. Refer to user page. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Bailey Auction Real Estate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ZachH007 23:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- America news world (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Adding links to america112.com, which appears to lead to a website called America News World. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ascolite (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (ascolite.in), see User:Ascolite. Annh07 (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Slow-motion edit war over adding an (unsourced) claim that subject is best known for being a pacifist; see WP:TH#Last edit on Daniele Ganser's wikipedia, WP:TH#Please add "being a pacifist" to Daniele Gansers wikipedias' page, User talk:155.190.35.4#Help me! for a small sample of the users/IPs pushing this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:46, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject to repeated sockpuppet attacks, related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject to repeated sockpuppet attacks, related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: WP:PIA. HumanRight 00:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent additions of information that breaks Wikipedia guidelines (WP:OR and WP:RSOPINION) by an unregistered user or users since 23 June. Helper201 (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editing last warning hopper the same vandalism and attack page edit. Chew Yan Heng (talk) 02:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent WP:Disruptive editing, as well as consistent violations of WP:NPOV and WP:OR, by IP, newly registered editors, and newly registered and confirmed editors. The article's edit history is just editors having to revert the disruptive and violating changes again and again. EarthDude (talk) 03:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article is less than a month old and has no prior protection history. The only recent disrupter was just indef blocked. BusterD (talk) 03:02, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: people who vandalize adding nonsense info that aren't confirmed like adding Kpop girl group Aespa on the "guest(s)" when there's no news about Aespa appearing on running man as per today like between every week or every month. FirePhoenix08 (talk) 04:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Un free Photos being added. - FitIndia Talk (Admin on Commons) 11:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mellk (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 18:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism due to its feature on the front page GiraffeLover19 (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding unsourced content. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 22:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP from Texas has been adding the same paragraph of unsupported text for years. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There is a consistent vandalism on the page to remove cited facts about the individual by different multiple newly registered accounts for the past one year. Instant History (talk) 01:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Frequent unsourced changes to infobox. David O. Johnson (talk) 01:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Let me give me examples before this get's declined, There was someone who put Hindu Nationalism in the info box, on a proposed party in America. Fad8229 (talk) 01:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removal of sourced content. RF23 (talk) 02:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:PIA. HumanRight 02:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:PIA. HumanRight 03:01, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:PIA. HumanRight 03:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of Vandalism in my edits Eshaan the writer (talk) 04:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit-warring from IP, replacing prose with one that is incorrect grammatically. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:40, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
It is cited using the latest 2020 survey, instead hundenvonPG insisted using data from more than 10 years ago.
Reason: To prevent any further and future disruptive editing Eshaan the writer (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Change the current edit protection status to temporary semi-protection (for 1 week) to prevent disruptive editing by registered users, including User:Likebr 20. Like56d (talk) 05:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant IP vandalism, I can't hardly edit the page to fix errors. Moritoriko (talk) 05:58, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- It was supposedly protected on July 3rd but it was vandalised today as well with them reverting my reverts. Moritoriko (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- (Whoops it was protected but the protection ran out.) This page has been attracting vandalism for an extended period so I am hoping to get an extended period of protection to match. Moritoriko (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Reduce to indefinite semi-protection since no other NFL teams' pages are ECP (been in place for 4 years), feels a bit unfair to new users who actually have good edits to make on the team. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case I don't think this username administrator El C is active anymore it has not responded for 3 days according to request lower protection or unprotection says if who ever is no longer administrator, inactive or doesn't respond it can be appeal unless is active then we have to contact username administrator who protect the page. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- El C edits somewhat sporadically. Be patient. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page was protected by User:RHaworth, who is no longer an administrator. Now that my draft article, Draft:Flipline Studios, has been merged into Papa Louie, I want to use this title as a redirect to that article. I want the creation protection removed. EJPPhilippines (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article has been subject to large amounts of vandalism, but indefinite template protection seems either unnecessary or a bit too much. The article still has some problems to be addressed, and I'm currently working on a rewrite. I would suggest that it be changed to pending changes protection. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 15:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Have a look through the page history and suggest how to stop that vandalbot with other means? It hops over open proxies, so CU/rangeblocking is not effective. Extended-confirmed protection didn't work. Materialscientist (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Looking at the history it looks like ECP did work; there were no reverted edits during the ECP period of 17 May to 17 June. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Another period of ECP from 10 to 17 May also yielded no vandalism, but it started right back up the minute this expired. Agree with long-term ECP with the opportunity to bump back up to template protection if any more vandalism comes along. Entranced98 (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Looking at the history it looks like ECP did work; there were no reverted edits during the ECP period of 17 May to 17 June. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Extended confirmed should be sufficient for this level of page. It is rare for a Wikipedia article to be template protected. Interstellarity (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Interstellarity I don't think that is a good idea to Lower it to Extended Comfirmed Protection. The Person that created User:Ujivxbn would probably create another account and will Gaming the system to Get Extend Confirm Rights to Vandalize Hyphen-minus. That why it should remain Template Protected Until September 2025. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Untamed1910: OK, I see. This is my first time seeing an actual Wikipedia article under template protection, so I appreciate you clarifying this. I'll let an admin decide what to do with the page. Interstellarity (talk) 00:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please undo the revert done by Astaire at 20:03, 4 July 2025 as it reverted all its previous changes regarding Doutaghi's academic work, and fixes for the dead links in the article. TechVerdict (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 20 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:53, 7 July 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Ctxz2323 has created nearly 170 articles, none of which were deleted. All the ones I've checked are very solid and well-sourced. Toadspike [Talk] 15:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, my respect to you! I would like to request for getting autopatrolled rights because I contribute interesting articles to both English and Simple Wikipedia. I have over 700 edits, which is over the requirements, and my account is over 3 months old. If I get autopatrolled rights, I will never forget this appreciation I got and I will continue contributing to Wikipedia, and I will also continue to take responsibilities for my actions. Thanks! Waiting for a feedback. :-) Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Need AWB under bot section, per Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CX Zoom AWB 2. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 16:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
I'm co-organizing an edit-a-thon at an academic conference: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/EC_conference/EC'25_Wiki_edit-a-thon?enroll=owsebpjm EC (https://ec25.sigecom.org/) is the main academic conference at the intersection of Economics and Computer Science. We're hosting an edit-a-thon to encourage conference attendees to edit, with a focus on technical entries at the interface of our research and general public interest. Aviad.rubinstein (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover[edit]
I'm requesting the file mover rights as I usually help out here. The backlogs here can take a lot of time. It would be helpful if I'm able to move the files myself. I don't have a lot of uploads (I only have 5-6). I'm familiar with most of the policies of files OPHYRIUS ⚔ 05:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I was granted reviewer rights for two times, both were temporary. I'm here requesting the right again to review the articles and make the burden less for others too. I was not active like before due to some personal issues, but I'm going to be active now. Please consider extending my rights. Thankyou Taabii (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, this is my third time requesting new page reviewer permissions, as the previous two requests were granted on a one-month trial basis and the current trial will end on the 30th of June. I have learnt a lot about the policies for notability and inclusion and will be able to reduce the size of the unreviewed pages backlog significantly. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 06:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
My current NPR rights are due to expire on 1 July 2025. While I may not be reviewing in large volumes, I focus on thorough, policy-aligned reviews that aim to improve or appropriately tag each page. I’d like to keep my NPR rights for continued constructive contributions. Thank You. Ambrosiawater (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm interested in doing NPP reviews. I think I've gone over the rules for creating new pages and and using references pretty thoroughly. ColinSchm (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I want to help out with NPP as there is been a longstanding backlog. I requested this right last year, but was told participate more in AfD discussions. Since, I have participated and as well as nominated for deletions. I think I'm ready now, thanks! Vestrian24Bio 02:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
I saw there was a large backlog and reviewing articles is a nice change of pace. I have review experience from the required review when submitting DYK articles. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 15:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I'm currently an AfC reviewer and would like to request NPP rights. I've been interested in patrolling new pages for a while, thanks for considering! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 09:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting new page reviewer rights because I would like to help reduce the NPP backlog. I've been an AfC reviewer for a few months, and I also participate at AfD. I believe that I know what pages are and aren't acceptable. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 10:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Hi! I have initiated a couple of RMs myself, and participated in many as well. I also make requests at WP:RMT. I also revert undiscussed page moves while patrolling changes. Now, I want to contribute more by closing RMs and helping at WP:RMT and this right would also be useful while reverting undiscussed page moves as well. I have made 170+ RM-related edits and 30+ edits to RMT page. Thanks for considering... Vestrian24Bio 02:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the Page Mover user right to assist in handling page moves that involve redirect suppression, especially in cases where I am working on article namespace organization, cleanup, or disambiguation work. I have been an active editor on Wikipedia and understand the importance of proper page titling and redirect management. I am familiar with Wikipedia's naming conventions, the page move process, and the appropriate use of this permission. I intend to use the Page Mover right to reduce the backlog of move requests and to help in cases where administrative assistance would otherwise be needed just to suppress a redirect. Vikingsam (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Vandalism is a very rampant issue on this wiki, and most of the vandalism are made on biography pages, and I want to revert these vandalized edits. Shaneapickle (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |