User talk:Magnolia677

Userboxes

This user has created 370 articles on Wikipedia.

This user took the red pill, not the blue pill.

On the Internet, nobody
knows you're a dog.

What, exactly, is your issue with Dolton?

If it was up to you, there would have been no mention of Tiffany Henyard's misdeeds. If it was up to you, whenever a Wikipedian does some footwork and contributes a fine picture to the encyclopedia, it would be removed because it is "decorative". If it was up to you, there would be no mention at all in the lead, for a town of about 20K people, that the Pope was raised there. You continually and bewilderingly remove interesting and valid content from the article, and I have to ask: what is your issue? Marcus Markup (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

The picture of the house the Pope was raised in... removing that was the last straw. You need to knock it off. Marcus Markup (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

1289650624

Special:Diff/1289650624 - Both the 2023 estimate and the 2024 estimate are accessible the same way on that page. Why would you prefer to show the 2023 estimate than the 2024 estimate then? Player001eliminated (talk) 01:35, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

@Player001eliminated: Do you have a direct link to the URL where the specific data is available? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Pasco eSchool page

If the Angeline Academy of Innovation page has the same kind of recognitions section, Pasco eSchool should have it too. If you think no page should have it, then delete it on both. Floating Orb (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Also, some of the awards cite to Facebook. I could delete those. The other ones are from better sources. Floating Orb (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@Floating Orb: I have already pointed to a consensus that discourages the promotional edits you are making to the school you attend, yet you keep edit warring to add this puffery. I have cautioned you about COI editing, but you're not getting it. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes. But Angeline Academy of Innovation has the same section. Floating Orb (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the edit war. I removed the information. Can you still take a look at the Angeline Academy of Innovation page? Floating Orb (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Also, what about the COI issue? Is it any better now than before? Floating Orb (talk) 01:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Pasco eSchool COI

Hi @Magnolia677! I wanted to know when the COI tag on Pasco eSchool would be able to be taken down. Floating Orb (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

@Floating Orb: I tagged the article because a major contributor has a close association, but I've never removed one. You may want to make inquiries. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Okay. When could I remove it? Floating Orb (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I suppose when enough content has been added that it's no longer filled with content from a COI editor. But that's just speculation. I'm not really sure what the removal criteria is. That's why I told you to make some inquires. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Okay. But what about if I removed anything that could be considered subjective from the page? Maybe then it wouldn't be considered COI. Floating Orb (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Please stop asking me the same question. I don't have an answer. Ask someone who knows. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do that. Thank you. Floating Orb (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Nina Hartley FSC awards

You agree FSC is notable and they've awarded her two awards (lifetime achievement & leadership) which should be reflected in the article. What justification are you removing one and not the other whilst conceding its notabilty? This is arbitrary and subjective on your part. IPIPIPIP (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

@IPIPIPIP: Please discuss on the article talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Photo doesn't fit in article?

Hello, could you explain what do you mean by "photo doesn't fit in article"? That community has literally two distinctive buildings: Anglican Church and United Church. So, I don't see a reason why you chose to delete the photo (and sourced mentions) of the Anglican Church. --Amakuha (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Amakuha: Thank you for writing. That article is fairly short, and your version disrupts the visual uniformity by sandwiching text, and by pushing a section heading inward (see MOS:IMAGELOC). I would suggest adding a link to the Commons at the bottom of the article, so readers can easily access all the photos related to this article. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

I can see that the article is short. But you made it shorter by deleting the sourced text that I added regarding the church of interest.

Frankly, it's the first time I see "this article is too short for more content" approach. --Amakuha (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Unsourced info in Sneed, AR page

Half of the wikipedia article for Sneed, AR is unsourced info. The tornado that hit it was from 1929 and was barely documented, so I feel as its at least somewhat excusable to add info that was done by original research (more so if its some small fact) and it can be left as true until proven otherwise. MadeForLosers (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure what your question is? Magnolia677 (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

My question is, why remove my edit in Sneed, AR because of unsourced info when half of the article itself is unsourced, as well as the tornado event being more undocumented than not MadeForLosers (talk) 00:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Adding more unsourced content will only make the article less reliable for readers. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hope you're having a good day. My day is good, though I'm in a flood warning (lol). Ignore MAB's crap. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 22:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Babysharkboss2: Thank you so much! Hope you're on high ground. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Still

Hello,

"Still" means it's in the 2023 edition of the book. There's one edition of that book. The 2023 edition.

The claim that Miller has distanced himself from Project 2025 is only valid for the website. Which we don't have anymore. There are many lists online, e.g. Newsweek, and none of them are reliable.

So as a matter of permanent record, Miller's organization is indeed in the list of the Advisory board. There are not 100s, like said on Project2025 dot org.

I'm not sure how you want to play this out, but now you're at 4 reverts. Selbsportrait (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

America First Legal edits

Hi Magnolia677. Hope you're doing well. You might wish to see my last edit of America First Legal. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@Quaerens-veritatem: Clear as a mud-free river. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Re: Johnny Wayne

While I know he lived at 20 Forest Ridge Drive as years ago I met him there on his front lawn, you're quite right that Wikipedia requires citations.

It appears that many of those listed as residing in Forest Hill are there because they attended Forest Hill Collegiate.

1. Rosie Shuster attended high school (verifiable with citation) with Lorne Michaels who verifiably attended Forest Hill Collegiate.

2. It follows that Frank Shuster her father also lived in Forest Hill.

3. I can provide a citation that Frank Shuster lived only a few doors down from Johnny Wayne.

On this basis would you object if I reverted the entry (with the above citations) for Wayne and added Frank and Rosalie Shuster to the list? GelvinM (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@GelvinM: I'm not sure what your question is. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Would you be OK with listing the above people as notable (albeit former) residents of Forest Hill, Toronto, providing the above citations as proof? Since you asked me to discuss this on your talk page I thought it prudent and friendly to consult you about this first. If you have no objection I will go ahead and make the changes, or is there more to discuss?

I also note that none of the following Wikipedia biographies listed (which serve as references) for John Bitove, Shenae Grimes-Beech, Dan Kanter, Michael Landsberg, Stephen Lewis, Peter Munk (only his wife is mentioned as growing up in Forest Hill), Andy Pringle and Valerie Pringle, Colby Rasmus, none of the 3 members of the Rogers family, Perry Rosemond, Joseph Rotman, Isadore Sharp, Larry Tanenbaum, Nelson Thall nor Galen Weston reference the neighbourhood though perhaps one of the supplied references do, so perhaps a {{citation needed}} needs to be added? GelvinM (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@GelvinM: If a notable person only attended school in the city, they should not be included. Any other notable people need a source supporting they were born there, or lived there a significant period of time. Most editors are ok if their is a reliable source on the person's article supporting they lived there. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you clarify as I would prefer a more direct answer - do you mean establishing that they lived in the city or lived in the neighbourhood? Also, would you object to including Wayne and the Shusters as notable residents in the article?

ie: Rosalie Shuster verifiably went to the same high school as Lorne Michaels and was born in Toronto. Her parents never divorced, she obviously lived at home with them and lived there a long time. It's remotely possible that she (and others - it's an excellent school) lived in a different catchment area but she walked to school as Lorne Michaels followed her home at age 14 so it's unlikely. If it's valid to state that she lived in Forest Hill then so did Frank Shuster. https://theneighborhoodnewsonline.net/local-people/interviews/1318-rosie-shuster-saturday-night-live-alumni

Frank Shuster lived just a few doors away from Johnny Wayne. It follows that Wayne lived in the same neighbourhood of Forest Hill. https://www.aaron.ca/living-in-shusters-house/

If living in the same city is not sufficient then marking the names I listed as {{citation needed}} would be reasonable. IMV removing them would be premature. In many cases I suspect that they do live there. A collegial approach would be to show that the entries are likely valid and that a more local reference might exist.

My concern is that I don't want to start a back and forth where I reintroduce or add something and you revert it back. GelvinM (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

See WP:CCSG for inclusion criteria. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

IBET PhD Project Self Published Sources Tag

Hello Magnolia677. I noticed that there is now a self published sources tag on the IBET PhD Project page. I am not entirely sure why. Could you please tell me what needs to be done to remove the message? I am not entirely sure what is an unreliable sources. The article has a lot of citations. And I can't seem to find a clear description of what a Tinkle tag is. Many thank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DasFriskel (talk • contribs) 22:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@DasFriskel: About a third of the sources are published by the university. I'd suggest finding more secondary sources. See also H:MTR. --Magnolia677 (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying. DasFriskel (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Magnolia677, I found citations that were not related to the university, making significant changes. Could you please see if the tag can be lifted - and if not, let me know what else I can do? And if it is not too much of a bother, can you explain why images were lifted as well? It appears that these people are part of this program. Is it a copyright issue? Sorry again. I am trying to learn something new and appreciate your help. DasFriskel

@DasFriskel: I checked one of the new sources you added, and it didn't work. When I figured out the error and accessed the link, it didn't support the content. Adding a bunch of new sources that don't actually support the content is disruptive. Regarding the images, my edit summaries were pretty clear. However, please see MOS:IMAGES, where a consensus of editors agreed that "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative." I interpret this to mean taking pictures of random students and staff, or of a large office building in which the organization's small office is located...does not improve the article. Going forward, please discuss these issues on the article talk page, where other editors can join in. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I will check the link.

DasFriskel (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Waveland Miss.

Yes I believe you made a mistake. We are not talking about a parking ticket or Mrs Jones cat went missing. A civil rights lawsuit in a town of 6K is significant. Local media has covered, did they make a mistake also? So I will be undoing your edit. Wikitrone (talk) 21:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Wikitrone: It would be best if you start a discussion on the article talk page. Also, please see WP:VNOT. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

False revert

Hello @Magnolia677! You reverted my edit saying it had "original research". The citation proves it with words at the bottom. Floating Orb (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

I just used what it said. Floating Orb (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

City names

We've previously discussed whether the lede sentence of articles on cities should state the long name or not. The conclusion was no, but I still feel they're important. Would you be willing to compromise by allowing me to include them in {{efn}} footnotes instead? ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 01:53, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

@Aerrapc: The decision regarding this was made by a consensus of editors at WP:USCITIES#Suggested sections. You will need to start a discussion there to have the guideline changed. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey, the officially city of Tyler is violating the rules

We can't have any rules breakers around here Mr. Mongolia Luka Maglc (talk) 10:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

what are we going to do about this Tyler, Texas Magnolia678 Luka Maglc (talk) 10:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Burlington, Iowa

Hi Magnolia677. I am puzzled by the comment you made when you removed some photos from the Burlington, Iowa article. You stated "Half these photos are already in the article". Examining the version before your edit, it appears to me that none of the photos you removed appeared elsewhere in the article. Am I missing something? PopePompus (talk) 00:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@PopePompus: There is a photo of Snake Alley (Burlington, Iowa) and the Great River Bridge already in the article, and the editor added additional photos of both these to the infobox. How many photos of this street and the bridge does the article need? Magnolia677 (talk) 10:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

what can I do to make it up for you? I'm really sorry. ❤️

You deserve so much recognition. such an editor to admire for us all. Luka Maglc (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I've had a stalker following me for months. I don't need another. Please stop leaving juvenile edit summaries for me on articles, and please stay off my talk page. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:48, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I will not stalk you. I will leave you alone from now on. Luka Maglc (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Flagging vs removing unsourced content

In the future, if you would be so kind as to FLAG unsourced articles rather than simply deleting the content or sourcing it yourself, such as what you did on Heritage Park Historical Village, that would be much appreciated, as it gives other editors a chance to add the needed citations. You can do so using the {{cn}}, {{unreferenced}}, or {{refimproved}} tags.

Thanks,

HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

@HistoryMaker2001: I reverted your edit, and added a warning to your talk page. Adding 8,474 bytes of unsourced "stuff you know" does not improve Wikipedia. Please see WP:BURDEN before reverting again. Thank you for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

I reverted your edit and added Citations Needed tags to the sections in question so that it could be worked on over time. Since Wikipedia provides no work in progress feature for specific pages, edits need to be made to the actual page itself. You should know this. And looking at the talk page and edit history for the article in question, it looks like no attempt was made to offer others the chance to start adding citations before the content was summarily deleted. That's what the tags I mentioned are supposed to be used for, are they not? To flag content for further review and citation?

All the needed citations are available on the park's website in any case. As for "Stuff I know..." 99% of the "stuff" in that 8,474 bytes was by others.

HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 00:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

OK, now I feel like you are just being petty. On July 2, you removed content from the article that was properly sourced. Specifically, in the article, you removed the line "and houses various railway equipment and restored passenger cars." concerning the car shop, while the source material at states specifically the car shop was built "to protect some of the cars in the greatest danger of deteriorating." Six of one, half dozen of the other. And if that's not enough, the source cited for the roundhouse (also in the same line) lists a number of explicitly identified pieces of railway equipment that are contained within the building. Therefore, the citations and reference requirements are well and truly satisfied for a general statement such as the one you removed.

HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 21:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Agree with @HistoryMaker2001: here. You should take his advice as far as it pertains to the Mexican Americans article. In addition, Magnolia, you have a habit of assuming bad faith about other editors and tagging user talk pages with overly serious warnings. I would strongly suggest discontinuing both practices. _pbp 01:15, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Harassment

If you haven't done so already, it might be time for WP:EMERGENCY. - ZLEA _T\^C 00:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I legitimately feel bad for her. The fact that she's able to ignore these threats just shows how impressive she is at avoiding confrontations. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I've done the WP:EMERGENCY part. The /64's been blocked for 36 hours. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:22, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

These IP users who harassed Magnolia677 should revoke talk page access. I feel so disappointing for this user. Fabvill (talk) 12:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

It isn't really practical to do that to an entire /64 range. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

No. Sometimes I protect the talk page as they will sometimes return to one to vent. If it were me I would already have the authorities involved(I know they can't do much, but....). 331dot (talk) 13:15, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Well, I did notify. Sometimes these agencies can do more than we think. A particular IP might be in a broad pool, and it might not be. Ex; a cafe might have an IP pool, and there might be cameras at that cafe. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you all. Some of the IPs routed to US servers, which makes resolving this much easier. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Dade City, Florida

Howdy, @Magnolia677. Is there any particular reason you removed a significant portion of the information listed on the "Dade City, Florida" page. I've spent a lot of time working to make that page as accurate as possible. And as a resident, I feel uniquely qualified to do that. I'd like the page to be restored to its original shape please. Jacobalexander89 (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

@Jacobalexander89: Each of the edits I made was attached to a specific "edit summary", where I listed the policy or guideline I was following. For example, I restructured the article to follow the WP:USCITIES guideline, which suggests not including the official city name, or the geographic coordinates. I also resized the images, per MOS:IMAGES. Going forward, it would be best if you read the edit summaries first, rather than just reverting for reasons which are of no importance on Wikipedia (and after being already cautioned on your talk page about image size by User:Donald Albury). Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Satellite imagery for US city geography

Hello! I noticed you did not like my edit to add a satellite photo to the Geography section of Moss Point, Mississippi. I am new to Wikipedia, and have made similar edits to other cities, because I think a visual reference from space is useful alongside the physical description of the area. Perhaps you could cite a supporting guideline, or otherwise educate me to the appropriate use of such imagery, if you think it is unfit for my stated purpose; I would like to continue adding satellite imagery to articles, but want to do so correctly. Thank you!

- OL25 OceanLoop (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Warning

Alright, whats the problem this time exactly? What edit did I do that caused a problem? JuanBoss105 (talk) 18:50, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @JuanBoss105: All unsourced for one thing, but I'm sure there's other issues. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

How are you going to remove what I put on Denaun Porter's page when I explicitly said he appeared courtesy of Shady and Interscope on the album credits of Straight Outta Cashville? I dont see any sources to verify his other labels but you take my edit down? Really? Explain yourself JuanBoss105 (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

I don't even know you dude Mr. flight time JuanBoss105 (talk) 20:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

@JuanBoss105: Thank you for writing. It's important that all information added to Wikipedia be properly sourced. This enables Wikipedia to be a trusted source of information for readers. Please try to add reliable sources to the information you add. Thank you for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Ok, if my edit has to be removed from Denaun Porter's page, then take anything that doesn't have a source down too. JuanBoss105 (talk) 20:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

I remember saying that once to my grade three teacher; that if I have to stay in for recess for talking, then everyone has to. Want to know what she told me? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

She told me to go to the library and read the first few pages of any history book I could find, because no matter which history book I read, I would come to the same realization: life's not fair. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Consensus

Just a quick comment - when you edit a page to change content that is not a Wikipedia guideline issue (which USCITIES is not), and someone disputes that change, the onus is on you to gain consensus for the change, not the other way around. It's not a big deal to me over at Colorado Springs, Colorado, but worth nothing. It's all part of the WP:EDITCON process and the WP:CYCLE. Always good to see your work improving these pages! glman (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Glman: I'm confused. WP:USCITIES is a guideline. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

US cities is a WikiProject guideline, but it is not a Wikipedia guideline - odd phrasing here, but Wikiproject guidelines do not have the same level that site guidelines do. As is clear in the lead of WP:USCITIES - "While it is just a guideline and there are no requirements to follow it in editing". glman (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Glman: If you look at the first line of WP:USCITIES, it says "This is a guideline for the structure of city articles on Wikipedia, as established through the years by consensus of WikiProject Cities." And if you look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Districts and municipalities task force/guideline, it says it's based on the US guideline. Of special note on both these guidelines is "by consensus". You can split hairs about the powers of guidelines over policies over style guides. Whatever. When hundreds of editors spend years creating a guideline, and reaching a consensus about how US articles should be structured, I would suggest your find a good reason before editing against consensus. US articles look good because hundreds of editors more or less follow this outline for articles. If you don't like the guideline, because "government" should be "government and politics", because that's the way you like it, then gain a consensus to change the guideline. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Again, the lead of the US cities guideline is clear that "here are no requirements to follow it in editing". And again, per WP:EDITCON and WP:CYCLE the onus is on the original bold editor to gain consensus, not the one reverting to the stable version. glman (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Mexican Americans, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. _pbp 00:18, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@Purplebackpack89: You need to calm down. With this edit you reverted accurately sourced content, in order to add back inaccurately unsourced content. I made it clear at Talk:Mexican Americans#Demographic data that your edit was inaccurate...and then I fixed it. But your feelings were hurt, so you reverted the edit back to being inaccurate (and unsourced). Making vexatious edits just because you are angry is not good. Could you please revert your edit? Magnolia677 (talk) 10:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

No. I explained on the talk page why I reverted it. I believe your explanation, using words like "inaccurate" and "unsourced", is an exaggeration bordering on a preveracation. And it's clear that you do this to everyone. _pbp 11:53, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@Purplebackpack89: Please revert this edit. The source cited states that the population number you used was an estimate from 2021, and the source does not even mention Hidalgo County. By reverting my edit, you have made the content less accurate. Clearly, you don't like being corrected, but that's not how Wikipedia works. Will you be willing to revert your edit? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

I said no earlier. It's also clear to me how Census and American Community Survey data works. Please continue this discussion on the article's talk page. _pbp 12:51, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

I see you are now hounding me and calling me "Maggie" at User talk:Mrxocelot and User talk:Septagram. I really don't need another stalker. Please stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Then please stop removing large amounts of content and tagging people's talk pages with exaggerated warnings. You essentially bully me, bully Septa and bully Ocelot. It's gotta stop. Again, the answer is no, I'm not going to stop. _pbp 13:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@Purplebackpack89: Stop following me. Stop reverting my edits on articles you've never edited. Stop going talk pages of brand new editors and adding negative comments about me. Stop reverting my edits to add unsourced content. I'll take you to ANI if you don't stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:12, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

You take me to ANI and you'll be hit by a BOOMERANG so hard it will knock you into Ayers Rock... _pbp 16:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Take care you don't get hit with one yourself. I count at least four requests from Magnolia to "stop stalking" them. It is reasonable at this point to interpret that they're requesting you cease further interaction with them and your refusal to do so as harassment. As a reminder, we define harassment as including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Wikipedia and thus cause disruption to the project. I cannot imagine any good faith reason to refuse to stop calling them a nickname that they've asked you not to call them. That seems like a pretty bright-line example of "repeated unwanted contact or attention". Either take it to a noticeboard or drop the stick. Your choice. Continuing this behavior is not an option. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:51, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@Swatjester: Two-way street. If Magnolia677 doesn't want me to interact with them, they shouldn't interact with me. Not in userspace, not in articlespace, not in talkspace. And making an exaggerated claim of "STALKING" doesn't give their edits a free pass; I'm well within my rights to question ANY of their edits ANYWHERE _pbp 00:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I agree, this is looking like harassment, you are not the sole judge of what is acceptable, and may not name your own terms concerning how you interact with other editors. "I'm not going to stop" is out of bounds. Acroterion (talk) 01:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

@Acroterion: So, Magnolia677 undoes MY edits...and me discussing them undoing them is harassment? Magnolia can make questionable edits and post bad warnings...but saying they're questionable and bad is harassment? The fuck? Is Magnolia someone who is beyond criticism? They toss around the word "harassment", inappropriately I might add, and they're allowed to do whatever they want without anyone questioning them? And, as I said above, this is a two-way street; if Magnolia doesn't want me here, they shouldn't interact with me anywhere. Magnolia is not permitted to edit entirely on their own terms either, except possibly right here. _pbp 01:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

PBP: stop posting here. Acroterion (talk) 02:26, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Inappropriate warnings

This was not appropriate. Adding unsourced content is NOT vandalism and Jimbo did not deserve that kind of warning. _pbp 16:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Stop stalking me. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that you're better than everyone else and your edits are beyond scrutiny? If you weren't filling other people's talk pages with exaggerated and inappropriate warnings, I wouldn't be here _pbp 17:53, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Stop stalking me. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

"Stop stalking me" is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for your inappropriate warnings.

And it's a two-way street: if you can go around to a bunch of pages removing massive amounts of content and tossing around warnings, other editors can undo or question your edits and respond to those warnings. You're not God, you don't get the last word on everything. _pbp 18:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Apologies for having to notify you in this manner, I hate to pile on any additional stress. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 18:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

@Swatjester: Thank you for your help. Really, thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I hope that this isn't causing you undue stress. People can be such dicks sometimes, but I wanted to let you know I have your back. Insanityclown1 (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I reviewed your user page history after reading the latest ANI and noticed that you have been targeted in the past by some serious trolls. I wasn't sure what barnstar was most appropriate, but I definitely think you deserve one for the heat you've gotten defending the Wiki. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 03:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

@GeogSage: Thank you so much. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You deserve happiness and floofs.

Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

@Insanityclown1: Thank you! Magnolia677 (talk) 10:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Mepperelf

Hello. Just a note to say that i have opened an ANI report on Mepperelf. No need for you do do anything, as i say this is simply a courtesy notification as you have commented on the issue on their talk page ~ Lindsay^Hello

@LindsayH: Thank you so much. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

A fox for you!

That was rough, have a fops.

LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 20:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

@LakesideMiners: Thank you so much! Magnolia677 (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

A fox for you!

Hope this ANI discussion would win in your favor soon.

Ahri Boy (talk) 02:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

@Ahri Boy: Thank you. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

A Jambiya for you!

	A Jambiya for you!
	About a year ago, someone used my name to make death threats towards you and your family while appealing their block on the WP:VRTS. As someone who've been (and still is being) harassed on multiple wikis, I sympathize with all the crazy stuff that you've had to deal with. Please accept this (digital) Jambiya as a gift and sign of respect from me 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

@Abo Yemen: Thanks for your kind words. Much appreciated! Magnolia677 (talk) 12:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Commerce City, Colorado

Hi,

The clear natural boundary between the Core City of Commerce City and Commerce City North is the 27 square mile Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge. It is a 15 to 20 minute drive between the core city and Commerce City North. In addition to the refuge separating the 2 areas, each area is within a different school district, has very different demographics, separate recreation centers, people in the north primarily shop at Prairie Center Shopping district while people in the core city shop at Northfield. While this is all one City, there are two distinct areas in Commerce City. Removing this edit is similar to removing a note about Chinatown in Manhattan and just saying that it is all the same are (ok, maybe not to that extreme). 2601:286:C000:290:6127:BAEF:DD77:EA56 (talk) 04:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Could you please discuss on the article talk page. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Consensus

I'm sure that you are correct and there is a consensus to not include the bit about being located on traditional territories (I think I've seen the discussion) but do you know where it is? CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Hey there! Oshawa is up there on Lake Ontario. There's a big GM plant. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't explain myself properly. Do you know where the consensus is to not include the land acknowledgement? By the way, Oshawa, from my POV is in the Deep South. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:40, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: I see there is a distance between these two cities, but both are in Canada and the RFC had good participation. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Do you have a link to the RFC? But now I'm wondering why a small town like Oshawa has a large genetically modified plant. Can it only afford one? CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: here. --Magnolia677 (talk) 21:58, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. That's what I was thinking of. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Holy cow! It averages -34 in January where you are! Do you ever chip your tooth on your morning coffee? Magnolia677 (talk) 22:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

It's not really that bad. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:20, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: I looked at your town here and on Google street view. It looks so peaceful and beautiful. There must be a wonderful sense of community. You're very lucky. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:38, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

There is a good sense of community but it's being eroded by the influx of hard drugs. Violent assaults, alleged drug dealing have Cambridge Bay residents on edge, Cambridge Bay RCMP charge 4 men in connection with violent assault and Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, taking measures to address concerns over drugs, community safety. But we're working to make it better. It was interesting to see how appreciative the community was with the work done by the RCMP to arrest the main people. I guess the three outsiders didn't think that the community would turn them in. When they came out to the airport to leave town someone called the RCMP and the arrests were done before they could get on the plane.

But I'd still rather live here than in the south. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

It's not really that bad. There's a fellow well-acclimatized Canadian if I ever heard one. I still wear shorts when walking the dog at -34 C, but I am pretty far out on the bell curve even for a Canadian. Meters (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

It got to -50 with the wind chill and the government (not the teachers) and hamlet workers got the day off. I understand letting the water and sewage drivers and pumpers off but not the office workers. I walked the 2 km to work in it and all the airline crew worked out on the ramp unloading the plane. Next time it got like that the office workers didn't get the day off. Used to be that -50 was the cutoff point for the primary school to have indoor recess. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:17, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

I’m sorry to see it’s continuing.

You shouldn’t have to have this harassment on your talk page. Very sorry to see it continues. Best wishes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)