User talk:Hammersoft
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
January music
[edit] | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Happy new year 2025, opened with trumpet fanfares that first sounded OTD in 1725 (as the Main page had it). My story today is about a composer who influenced music history also by writing. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
... and today, pictured on the Main page, Tosca, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal author Brian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Today, between many who just died, Tobias Kratzer on his 45th birthday who was good for an unusual DYK mentioning a Verdi opera in 2018, - you can see his work in the trailer of another one that I saw, and my talk page has a third (but by a different director). 2025 pics, finally. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Today I have a composer (trumpeter, conductor) on the main page who worked closely with another who became GA yesterday, - small world! To celebrate: mostly flowers pics from vacation ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Please
[edit]Hey Hammersoft Shit Don't Delete Image 89.199.148.203 (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since you've not made any edits from this IP to anything other than my talk page, I've no idea what you're talking about. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I see now from the filter log that you are referring to the Cahit Irgat image. File:Cahit Irgat.jpg was deleted from Commons because it is a rather blatant copyright violation. We care about that sort of thing here. Your wanting to violate copyright doesn't mean we allow such violations to sustain here. Find a provably public domain or free license image instead. That an image exists on the Internet somewhere doesn't mean it's public domain, and uploading it here or at Commons doesn't mean it's your work. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Pinging and late reply
[edit]My apologies for not seeing your original message [1]. I was active at the time, but didn't see it. I thought that TP was in my watchlist, but evidently it wasn't (not sure if it was taken out on the move or what). Regardless, I didn't see your ping until this morning. Just wanted to apologize for and explain what might have appeared to be ignoring you (which was not my intention). I have responded to the content items at the article TP. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. I just wasn't sure you'd seen it. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
about bandaragama article
[edit]bandaragama.ds.gov.lk/index.php/en/about-us-2/historical-background.html Ashenmaneth (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Speakfor23
[edit]Hello! I didn't know if you have ping disabled as many admins do. I saw that you'd recently given a final warning to a chronic abuser, Speakfor23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He then surpassed mere edit warring and into POV pushing of Confederate ideology. See the edit histories of the three articles I linked at the bottom of his talk page. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 07:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have my pings turned on, and I posted there. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Technical news
- Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
- A '
Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
- A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
- A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.
Technical news
- A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
- Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378
Miscellaneous
- The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.
Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election
[edit]Can you decrease the protection level of the article? I know there is disruptive editing but this article contains important free information that me and other readers use to check the newest polling results and averages. If this is not removed soon enough it would be too difficult to add all the data and update. CS012831 (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- @CS012831: I'm not inclined to do so, barring presentation of a more convincing argument. I don't mean to disparage what you say at all. I'm simply very cognizant for the mass outbreak of edit warring that has occurred on the article which caused the protection in the first place. I was hoping discussion would ensue to hammer things out among the disputants, and at first was dismayed there apparently was just more sand tossing and finger pointing going on in the sandbox (see response to the protection). But, two days into the protection discussion began to help iron this out. I'm happy to see this process begin, but there is as yet no consensus in that discussion. Had consensus already emerged in that discussion (unlikely, given that it's just been 2 days), I would have considered dropping the protection as there would be an agreement with which to move forward. I also don't feel anything is beyond our pool of editors. While it might be more difficult to back-add in data, it will be far from impossible. Much of the notations have already been made at the suggested edit requests. We have 2.5 days of protection left. It's not that long. When the time approaches, I will be placing an additional warning on the talk page of the article to the effect that any resumption of edit warring activities will result in swift blocks of the accounts conducting the edit warring, regardless of who is 'right' or 'wrong' (which is highly subjective in this case). --Hammersoft (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Request sir
[edit]account Unblock request Source delete please help Wikipedia team Today's debates will not touch Wikipedia even by mistake please unblock account Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramkripalyadavgeo/Archive 103.199.180.149 (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- First, you've not given any reason to unblock you, just that you want to be unblocked. Second, you are using an IP address to evade your block...again. Third, per WP:THREESTRIKES, you are now considered banned by the community. No one administrator has the power to unblock you. Even if they did, they can't. This is because you are globally locked. To clear the global lock, you need to appeal to stewards@wikimedia.org. However, such an appeal must actually have a clear reason along with an understanding of what you did wrong and what you intend on doing in the future. So far, you've not provided any reason to be unblocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
RevDel
[edit]Hi, can you RevDel everything for that blocked and glocked user? Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Everything that (I think) should be done has been done. We don't do a blanket suppression of a user. If there's something I missed that you think should be taken care of, let me know. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:19, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! The edit summary deletion was what I was trying to refer to. I’ll be more specific next time. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- No worries! Thanks for alerting me! --Hammersoft (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! The edit summary deletion was what I was trying to refer to. I’ll be more specific next time. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
First edit day
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hammersoft! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Sdkb talk 05:16, 22 March 2025 (UTC) |  |
Sdkb talk 05:16, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hammersoft! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC) | |
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Congrats! - Today, 300 years of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1! - We sang works for (mostly) double choir by Pachelbel, Johann Christoph Bach, Kuhnau/Bach, Gounod and Rheinberger! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Miscellaneous
- Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.
April music
[edit] | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
My music features Bach Bach Bach today ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).
Administrator changes
Rusalkii
NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
- An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
- An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Topic ban of Wlaak
[edit]I just saw this close by you for a topic ban against [2]. Although there is a problem with Wlaak's contributions, I am not convinced that the discussion there was sufficient to justify this action, and wonder whether you could reconsider or re-open. What concerns me are a couple of things. Firstly Wlaak is a pretty new and inexperienced editor. They have been here 10 months now, and with 1000 edits, but that is still not a lot of experience, and a bit of understanding of that would be appreciated. But more concerning, and the reason I wanted to raise this with you, is that most of the supports for a topic ban in that discussion came from people with an opposing POV (and also, generally, with limited experience and none outside of the topic area). If you look at the three supports where this does not apply, two of them stated they would only support the topic ban if it were reciprocal on one of those others.
Could this perhaps be re-opened for more discussion? Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:14, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- The discussion went stale, and had been stale for days. In fact, it was going to be archived without action. Re-opening it for further discussion wouldn't make sense in that context as nobody was commenting anymore anyway. Further, Wlaak was still generating problems during the discussion. There's a point at which failure to get the point needs to be addressed. A topic ban is pretty close to the weakest resolution to an issue that can be applied. I am sympathetic to there being some contrary views (such as Robert McClenon), but in the end there was at best limited opposition. As a result, I'm disinclined to re-open it myself. You are welcome to do so either at WP:AN/I in another subsection of that thread or at WP:AARV. Either way, I'm not going to be upset if you do. I just feel there's limited (at best) grounds to do so. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:48, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't fancy the ANI bear pit, which can be quite adversarial, but if I go to AARV, we could, at least, get some additional views. I'll open a thread there. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's possible that you might receive opposition to starting a thread about this at WP:AARV. If so, you can let people know that I said it was ok to do so. Not that you need my permission :) --Hammersoft (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks. I linked this discussion, but will let them know if they ask. I'll drop the official notification now (sorry! but it's required!). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well that cinches it. Dropping required notices on my talk page? How dare you! :) More seriously; I'll not respond on the AARV thread for now, as I don't want to bias the discussion. I'll observe, and if I think there are points where I could clarify things, I'll comment. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- No problem, and many thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well that cinches it. Dropping required notices on my talk page? How dare you! :) More seriously; I'll not respond on the AARV thread for now, as I don't want to bias the discussion. I'll observe, and if I think there are points where I could clarify things, I'll comment. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks. I linked this discussion, but will let them know if they ask. I'll drop the official notification now (sorry! but it's required!). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's possible that you might receive opposition to starting a thread about this at WP:AARV. If so, you can let people know that I said it was ok to do so. Not that you need my permission :) --Hammersoft (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't fancy the ANI bear pit, which can be quite adversarial, but if I go to AARV, we could, at least, get some additional views. I'll open a thread there. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrative action review regarding an action which you performed.
Inquiry regarding draft of recent content disputes
[edit]Wanted to leave this on your talk page so as not to flood CE's. I mentioned in a posting there that the editor who just received a topic ban (Wlaak) had an article which was the focus of a recent content dispute. This content dispute is now at Village pump awaiting GS to be placed, and I wanted to contribute in a way that could help solve the content dispute while being neutral and non-POV.
After a messy AfD, the article was converted back to draftspace and the closer (Asilvering) said "Editors are free to continue to edit this draft as they wish, to merge sections of it to mainspace articles, and so on." I assumed this applied to practically anyone, but I'm not sure whether they meant specifically editors who were involved in making the draft. One of the things I listed in my message on CE's talk page was to condense the references and merge some of the draft's content to the current Arameans article. In your opinion, would this help or interrupt dispute resolution? I just don't want to continue down this path if others are going to say it's inherently POV-driven, which is not my intention.
Please let me know what you think and I can act as accordingly. Thanks, Surayeproject3 (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't have an opinion one way or another as to how to proceed with dispute resolution on that subject. However, at least two people at the tban discussion recommended topic banning you from the area as well. I could not include you for the topic ban, as that was not the subject at hand in the discussion. Nevertheless, I think it would be a very, very good idea for you to voluntarily step away from the general areas of Assyrian/Chaldean/Aramean/Syriac subjects for the time being. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, I'd like to step out of the general topic area for the time being and get experience elsewhere to take a break from everything. Thanks for the reply, I'll take your advice and work elsewhere for now. Surayeproject3 (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| I truly appreciate your patience and kindness regarding this tban. My first thought upon seeing them Streisand themselves at XRV was something like "oh no, I can't watch!" I'm grateful for your actions, and that you live up to your name. -- asilvering (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |