User talk:Allblessed

June 2025

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to Priestley Farquharson seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Giant Snowman 18:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois ODP

I saw that you nominated the Illinois Girls Olympic Development Program article for speedy deletion under G11 and A7. This program is not a promotional piece or a non-notable subject. It is a state affiliate of U.S. Youth Soccer and has produced multiple players who went on to compete at the professional and international level—including Olympic medalists like Casey Krueger. The article is being actively revised to remove any non-neutral language and to include coverage from independent and reliable sources. If you feel parts of the article were too close to promotional or lacked sufficient citations, that’s a fair concern—but it’s something that can be improved through editing rather than deletion. I'd appreciate it if you would consider withdrawing the speedy tag to allow for constructive editing, and next time please give an article a few minutes to breathe and be improved before pulling the trigger. Thanks for your time. Milicz (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This revision Here indicates that the piece created isn’t notable enough, it meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion, I see you have been on Wikipedia for years, doesn’t that article look promotional? Wikipedia is not a blog where you list stuffs and its role, its not a place to discuss goals and and objectives of various entries, content should be ENCYCLOPEDIC in writing, the article is poorly structured, wrong use of (=) and so on. It should probably be deleted or better still moved to draft for a fresh start and proper clean up. Allblessed (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Lamere

I do not think that your closure of the deletion discussion for this article was warranted; I have brought the matter upatWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Non-Admin closure of an AfDTheLongTone (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Liz Lamere

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Liz Lamere. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]