User talk:Helper201

Note - I briefly set up the account User:Helper201V2 when I was having trouble logging into this account. That account only ever engaged in talk about my account and never made any edits. I did not make any edits to any pages with it and will not use it to make any edits unless otherwise stated. This is the one and only account I use.

Welcome!

Hello, Helper201! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Pirate Party UK

Hello. The accounts submitted to the EC actually have this membership figure on them. There used to be a citation on the page showing this but it has since been removed - apparently the citation isn't open to the general public yet, but it should be shortly (it's actually over-due but the snap general election has slowed down the electoral commission some what). It's a bit of a waste of time to edit the graph only to change it back in a week or two - especially when I know the information to be valid.

No body

The mention of the body does not say that she is dead. But it does connect to her late father’s wish to give her a proper Christian burial. If you are willing to accept that, pls undo previous edit. If not, pls mention in the Talk.

Thank you dear for updating Awami league page back to original

Dear, I have noticed that you edited Awami League page back to original one and I'm delighted that you have done that. Unfortunately, users like Vif12vf|,Nzs9|, and ShrewMoon| take down good edits. I strongly advice you to monitor, Awami League page. It is being vandalized by users that are putting on false information and arguing about topics that they do not understand.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 18:47 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop Nzs9 from editing

Nzs9|, is keeping on editing on Awami league page. He does it and then even has it undone. I would advice to monitor him and report him so he gets a ban from editing on Awami league page.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 14:27 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:D4B6:874C:1C1F:7A6 (talk)

Local Consensus

Hey there, just an FYI, but just because a local consensus blocked a sourced edit on one page in a manner that appears on the surface to be non-neutral does not mean other pages must reinforce that non-neutral local consensus. I get the sense you were trying to do the right thing but the edit you made to Far-right politics was not required via any Wikipedia policy. Simonm223 (talk) 11:32, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Simonm223. Indeed, however, there has been a lot of controversy and debate over lead images on the page far-right politics anyway, with no consensus for this image. So, if there isn't agreement on its respective page whether or not it is even far-right, then that seems even more of a reason not to use it. I know we aren't required to follow a local consensus, but in this case when there's been so much back-and-forth over the issue of the lead images anyway, it seems messy to include an image of a group there isn't even itself an agreement on. I'd encourage you to go to the talk page of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and advocate for it to only be labelled as far-right if that is what you believe. Helper201 (talk) 11:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Yeah we have some pretty strong sources for them being far-right. The Economist tends not to jump to conclusions, for instance. I know that a lot of pages about Indian politics get brigaded and I have neither the time nor inclination to throw myself into that blender and deal with a half a dozen spurious AE complaints for my trouble. But I will work to keep accurate information on the general politics pages. Simonm223 (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

There is an RFC on whether to simply label it far-right on its talk page at the moment, you could quickly write a supporting vote there if that's what you believe. Helper201 (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2025 (UTC)