User talk:Paper9oll

Status: 🔴 ^[?]

Committed identity: 0de937202d344a1ff750e4a22ad4cbd81b224c6550f10e765abb306e3b377d78c1fbe634497f1ed3a69a74caccfa62807438a29aa3623acb53062bdf2941e62d is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

⚠️ Attention editors

Please ensure that you:

1. are cooperative, civil, and respectful.

2. have sufficient proficiency in English to avoid misinterpretation and/or miscommunication and/or misrepresentation.

Failure to meet the above requirements may result in your comments being rolled back without notice.

Any forms of false accusations and/or personal attacks and/or harassment will be escalated to an Administrator immediately.

Archived discussion: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20

This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III every 24 hours; threads that are stale will be automatically archived. Some exceptions may apply.

Warning wrom usual editor of Wiki

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello. Sorry for talking to you like this but you only one moderator that I knew.

So QubeChiba edited my User page Talk and notified me that I have a First warning. Can she do this? She is not a moderator or admin.

[| First warning by QubeChiba] Илона И (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Илона И Yes, it's allowed. Warnings don't have to come from an administrator (FYI, there are no WP:USERRIGHTS called moderator), and you were likely issued Level 1 warning for disruptive editing. You can read more about warnings at Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings/Usage and layout. You can remove warnings (some exceptions apply) from your talk page after you have read them and are "is aware of its contents"; however note that "any record of past warnings and discussions can [still] be found in the page history if ever needed". Should the warned behavior continue, these diffs would serve as evidence when the user is reported to an administrator (e.g., to WP:ANI). You can read about the removal of warnings at WP:BLANKING. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But why she do it? I did perfectly fine edit with referance links. Mb a bit to detailed, but she could request to me make it more neutral. Can I also make her a warning abt unfriendly behaviour? She is obviously biased. Илона И (talk) 15:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings aren't meant to be personal — they're tools to alert editors when their behavior might not align with Wikipedia's guidelines. In your case, while you added sources, the concern raised wasn't necessarily about the presence of sources, but about how the content was presented — such as tone, neutrality, or undue weight. These are just as important as sourcing. Editors can and often do request changes through talk pages, but if the issue seems like it's recurring or not being acknowledged, issuing a warning is within their rights — again, regardless of whether they are an admin. In your case, your edits could reasonably be seen as continuing to push a particular point despite concerns raised by another editor, which may be viewed as WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. If you believe another editor is being uncivil or acting in bad faith, you can raise concerns — but warnings should not be used in a retaliatory way. Instead, try discussing the issue calmly on the article or user talk page per WP:BRD to build WP:CONSENSUS. If that doesn't help, you can escalate using appropriate dispute resolution processes like WP:DRN or WP:ANI — but that should be a last resort. The best way forward is always to keep things civil, assume good faith where possible, and focus on improving the article together. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:31, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jabs like this is hardly can be seen as civil and on good faith. I will just delete it with note that it was unfair First warning from her. Илона И (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, as mentioned earlier, you're allowed to remove the warning from your talk page per WP:BLANKING. You may also want to review WP:NPA, which reminds editors to "comment on content, not on the contributor". At the end of the day, the best approach is to focus on improving the content, not on the contributors. Even if you disagree with how something was handled, remaining civil and collaborative leads to better outcomes for everyone. With that said, I don't have anything further to add on this topic. If you have questions unrelated to this matter, you're welcome to reach out. Alternatively, if you're unsure about something, the WP:TEAHOUSE is a helpful place for general editing advice 24/7. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:51, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only writing here to note that user Илона И issued me a “Level 1 warning” (Special:PermanentLink/1291491938) in return. QubeChiba (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same advice applies to you. You're allowed to remove the warning from your talk page per WP:BLANKING if you'd prefer not to WP:ENGAGE further and wish to WP:DISENGAGE.

To both involved parties: if inappropriate behavior continues from either side — including but not limited to issuing retaliatory warnings, engaging in WP:EDITWAR, or treating editing as WP:BATTLEGROUND — the best course of action is to bring the matter to WP:ANI. Please be aware that WP:BOOMERANG applies, meaning conduct by any involved party may be scrutinized and sanctioned if necessary, even if you believe you're in the right. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.