User:Bradv/sandbox/Dashboard

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests	Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Wikipedians looking for help	1
...from administrators	1
Requests for unblock	61
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests	157
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests	54
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests	10
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests	240
Requested RD1 redactions	11
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	0
Candidates for speedy deletion	16
Open sockpuppet investigations	50
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Administrative backlog

All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons

Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Template:Did you know/Queue

Template:DYK queue/backlog

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

• Gcollins94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

FP PhilKnight (talk) 02:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• 69.12.11.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries Attack pages 0 Copyright violations 0 Hoaxes 0 Vandalism 0 User requested 2 Empty articles 0 Nonsense pages 0 Spam pages 6 Importance or significance not asserted 0 Possibly contested candidates 0 Other candidates 9

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: ( source / chronological order / expired ) Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 50 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 152 items Requested RD1 redactions – 11 items Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

User-reported

• Arisgoeswiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) WP:ORGNAME violation, promotional name + promotional edits (created Draft:Akademische Raumfahrt Initiative Schweiz). Toadspike [Talk] 12:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
• Colly Industries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Seems like a company name. I can't say whether the edits they've made break any rules. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 15:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

  They've made one edit which isn't promotional. I'd wait until they make promotional edits. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 03:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

• FardNicker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. "fart n*gger", see also contribs history. Evidently not this user's first rodeo on Wikipedia either. Patient Zero^talk 23:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Mark Pellegrino

• Mark Pellegrino (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous BLP violations. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Wik

• User talk:Wik (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: It may be time to do this, given the long-standing consensus that any message posted to this page gets reverted. (I know this is a bit of an WP:IAR situation, but look at who posted the request to have all new messages removed from this page [Jimbo Wales]... and then you have editors like me who post a message generated by Twinkle ... just to have the message later reverted by another editor, which apparently has been happening for over 20 years per the talk page's edit history.). Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

People's Defence Forces

• People's Defence Forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Edit war and vandalism 83.245.165.19 (talk) 21:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Free Women's Units

• Free Women's Units (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Vandalism 83.245.165.19 (talk) 21:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Kurdistan Region–PKK conflict

• Kurdistan Region–PKK conflict (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Vandalism 83.245.165.19 (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 23:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Draft:West Camp Friends

• Draft:West Camp Friends (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax content from LTA.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Cooper Flagg

• Cooper Flagg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Salleh Said Keruak

• Salleh Said Keruak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 02:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Maximus Ongkili

• Maximus Ongkili (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: vandalism 118.101.143.217 Normal rookie (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

[[1]]

• Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024–25 USL Super League season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: A user: Bilrit67 made several edits that messed up the page which included deleting a significant portion of the page HavanaHeat (talk) 02:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Asian elephant

• Asian elephant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I would like to correct certain scientific data on the page as I am the leading researcher on size in Asian elephants. GDB tusker (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Then you should know that we require published sources and that you have a blatant conflict of interest if you cite your own papers. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 21:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests

Gaza genocide

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add “Forensic Obliterated (including vaporized)” category (~10,000 bodies) in the Death infobox. From high temperature bombs mainly (15% - 25% of total dropped). It’s as important as the “under rubble” category. 2601:645:8500:5960:FDA0:7E8B:C170:A01F (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

You need to provide a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Template:Anontools (request) 2025-05-01 12:08 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces." Sudirman Cup (request) 2025-05-12 09:31 Fully protected, expires 2025-05-17 at 09:48:43 UTC (log) Protected by The Bushranger on 2025-05-10: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

11 template-protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions" Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions" Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template" Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions" Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template" Template:Infobox comics creator (request) 2025-05-08 21:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions" Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-05-10 20:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors" Template:Infobox gymnast (request) 2025-05-11 15:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions" Module:Listen/styles.css (request) 2025-05-12 00:24 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2022-06-26: "Highly visible template, match parent" Template:As of (request) 2025-05-12 02:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors" Template:Album chart (request) 2025-05-13 01:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled (add request · view requests) User:CherryPie94 CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC) One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC) I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC) Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC) User:Kjansen86 Kjansen86 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC) Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC) @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC) @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC) User:-Verso- -Verso- (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) 78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) Seconded. These are well-sourced, well-written, clean articles (with talk pages) being created at a sufficient pace that having the AP flag would help reduce the burden for patrollers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Hteiktinhein Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) At the pace this editor is creating, I would expect granting the flag to help reduce the backlog. These are solid articles; talk pages are created, which helps as well. I am AGF'ing on the Burmese language sources but have no concerns. @Hteiktinhein, a couple nits: on Padein Prince rebellion, the section of "Members" with an unexplained bulleted list is a bit confusing, and on Thetpan Mibaya, the "see also" section should go above the references section per MOS:LAYOUT. But these are just small things to keep in mind for the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Fade258 Fade258 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) Hello fellow New Page Patroller @Fade258! One question I have is: are you going to boost your article creation? I see only one new actual article created since October 2023, so at that pace adding the AP flag wouldn't do much to reduce the backlog. You do seem more active in creating redirects, so once you get to 100 uncontroversial redirects created, you could apply for the pseudo-right at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list, which I would endorse you for and which would autopatrol your redirects and reduce the backlog there. As for your one recent creation, a couple notes. On Saumya Saraswat, the article subject should be bolded at the beginning of the first sentence. Two of your sources are unbylined WP:NEWSORGINDIA sources ([2], [3]), which are of questionably reliability. Hope this helps! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Hi @Dclemens1971, Thank you for reviewing my request and for the feedback! I appreciate your suggestions and I will aim to increase my article creation rate moving forward. Currently, I have some articles on my plate to create but due to my personal reason I am not doing that. In the meantime, I will also focus on creating uncontroversial redirects to reach the 100 mark and apply for the redirect autopatrol pseudo-right as advised. I will also take care to bold article titles properly and be more selective with sourcing and avoiding unbylined or questionable sources. In future , I will also select those references considering the NEWSORGINDIA. Thanks again for the helpful guidance and your offer to endorse! Fade258 (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC) User:MerlinVtwelve MerlinVtwelve (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) Reviewed the last several articles, and while your grasp of notability is strong, I did find an instance of WP:CLOP on your most recent creation that is very close to the line of copyvio if not over it. See Copyvio Detector results. This article is otherwise very well done! Two other things to consider when creating articles: create talk pages (the WP:RATER tool is helpful here) and make sure at least one other page links to yours. If you were to be autopatrolled, orphaned pages would likely stay orphaned longer. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Phantomdj Phantomdj (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) I reviewed @Phantomdj's last 10 article creations, and they are overall quite good. Well-formatted, clean copy. They all appear to be compliant with WP:NASTRO. It would be helpful if they could create talk pages for their creations (the WP:RATER tool is helpful for this) but otherwise I think the project would benefit from Phantomdj being autopatrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Owais Al Qarni Owais Al Qarni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) I spot-checked several recent pages, and they are in good shape: notable topics, in-line citations, MOS-compliant, talk pages created, etc. Eight pages deleted, but the most recent one was nearly three years ago; knowledge of notability appears to have improved as makes sense for a New Page Reviewer. My one suggestion to @Owais Al Qarni: since you seem to create pages with multiple smaller edits, I recommend creating in your user sandbox or in a draft and then moving to mainspace once the page is largely complete. But that's not a requirement and I would support granting this perm. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)  Done please review the notes left by @Dclemens1971:, if you run into any problems feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC) User:Huligan0 Huligan0 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) This user has created a huge number of articles, mostly to do with football in Switzerland. A cursory review shows that the articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, but the subjects are consistently notable and the articles are generally well-researched and -referenced, so I don't see much for NPP to do here. Toadspike [Talk] 15:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done When you say articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, that's the exact opposite of what autopatrolled is for, especially the latter issue. Schwede66 21:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC) @Schwede66 I'm not going to push you to reconsider, but if you don't mind, I'm going to rant a bit. I realize it's been discussed elsewhere and there's no clear community consensus on what "clean" articles means, but I think this is a very clear case where the core functions of NPP are unnecessary and our AP standards reveal themselves to be a romantic fantasy of how patrolling should work. The articles are notable, there are no two ways about it, and they contain a huge number of sources. Take their most recent article, 1961–62_Swiss_Cup, which has 26 sources in various locations; this seems about average for this user. They are not a native English speaker and they put their refs in weird places – so what? An NPPer would, at most, slap on one or two useless tags that will take years to get fixed, if ever; more likely they will punch the review button as fast as they can, while sighing in relief that for once they aren't reviewing AI-generated UPE garbage, and move on without taking any action. These articles even have categories, (auto-generated) shortdescs, and aren't orphans. What more do you expect an NPPer to do here? Toadspike [Talk] 00:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC) The prose of the first two sections of 1961–62 Swiss Cup is completely unreferenced. I would prefer a reviewer to tag that, Toadspike. Not so much so that some random editor fixes that over the next few years, but to communicate to the article creator that unsourced prose isn't ok, so that hopefully they will change their practices. Huligan0, would you mind adding inline referencing to your articles so that there aren't unreferenced sections? Schwede66 00:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC) I understand. The unfortunate reality is that tagging is not a mandatory part of the NPP process, which nowadays means it basically isn't part of the NPP process, especially when inline citations are generally not required. I clicked on three of these cup articles at random earlier, each of which was marked as patrolled by a different reviewer without any edits or tags. (I don't remember which articles they were but I'm sure you can replicate the experiment.) I think our best bet is to encourage editors like Huligan, as you have now done, to make specific improvements to their creation habits, but then to accept that NPP isn't serving any purpose here. Toadspike [Talk] 01:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Huligan0, could you please comment? Schwede66 03:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Hello fellow Wikipedians, sorry, but I have only just noticed this conversation a couple of hours ago. In the meantime I have read your conversation and all the notes concerning autopatrolled. I notice some critic in this discussion and would, therefore, like to clear a fact or two before I start: I was born and breed on the south coast of England, attended school there and studied Business Studies in college there and completed my appenticeship there, so I am indeed a native English speaker, and yes I have lived in Switzerland for about 50 years, so perhaps my English does not always reach the highest level any more. However, further in the critic you state that I put refs in weird places. I do not understand this remark, please explain. To my feelings; my aim is (and been since 15 years) to improve the coverage of Swiss football in the English Wiki. I have writen all the FC Basel seasons, have added some 500 or 600 FC Basel players in this time. I have added all the Swiss 1. Liga seasons and modified all the Nationalliga seasons as well. I am now completing the Swiss Cup seasons. I have always added as many sources as possible and think I have done pretty well. But, I do not want to become an admin. No nothing like that. I am too old for that, how much longer may I live? I am pround to think that someone nominated me to become an autopatrolled editor. However, I would not be disappointed if this was not accepted. All I want to do is continue my project and improve the coverage of Swiss football in the English Wiki. If you have a suggestion or two on how I could improve my edits, then please let me know, any suggestion would be welcomed. I send you friendly greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Greetings from New Zealand to Basel. Thanks for your note, Huligan0. You asked for suggested improvements. Sticking with the example discussed here, i.e. the 1961–62 Swiss Cup, no article should have unreferenced paragraphs. The best improvement you could provide is to add references that confirm the prose that is currently unreferenced. Do you think you could do that? And keep doing that going forward? To have written 500 to 600 bios is quite some achievement. Well done! Schwede66 05:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Kimikel Kimikel (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Recommending Kimikel for autopatrolled. A little over the threshold with 27 articles created, but they are all clean, polished, notable, well-sourced -- and do not require the attention of patrollers. No deletions. Three GAs in the mix, which is where I first encountered this editor. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests) User:Left guide Left guide (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I'd like to remove the link List of NBA regular season records (and its redirect NBA records) which was added en masse by a user in 2023 to hatnotes and "see also" sections across articles in a manner that is unreasonably tangential and irrelevant. Doing it manually would be far too arduous for me. I believe the AutoWikiBrowser right would be a valuable asset in helping me do this. Thanks for considering this request. Left guide (talk) 07:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC) User:VortexPhantom VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC) User:Grapesurgeon Grapesurgeon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Not sure if right place to post this; I already had awb permissions under the username "seefooddiet", but my account was recently renamed to "grapesurgeon". My username needs to be updated in Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON to "grapesurgeon". grapesurgeon (formerly seefooddiet) (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)  Done For the record, there's an adminbot that patrols the list and follows renames, which would have got this in two days. Since you've brought it up here, though, I updated the page manually. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation

Confirmed (add request · view requests) User:Bransonphan239& Bransonphan239& (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting confirmed rights Nickeldeon Bransonphan239& (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed (add request · view requests) User:Tashmetu Tashmetu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([4]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC) @Xaosflux hey, sorry for tagging you. I just noticed you are the only active admin on this thread and I was wondering if you can look into my request or let me know who I can contact to have it looked at. Tashmetu (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC) Tashmetu, the ArbCom remedy requires that Tashmetu shows that they have made 500 substantive edits; all I can see is a statement that you did. While I think it doesn't mean you have to provide a list of all the contributions (that would be hard to review and pointlessly redundant to the full list), I personally think you should explain at least in some detail how you improved the encyclopedia since the revocation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Fair point, I assumed there would be some process for this but I will do my best to explian. So I have worked mostly on the history side of Wikipedia, contributing to the "years in France" series and "years in Iraq " series, writing articles, adding details, events, and references. I have a huge library of history books so I thought that's the best use of my resources. I also try to create and enrich pages of notable Iraqi figures, though not as often because it's harder to find reliable sources for these. One of the issues I ran into while editing Iraqi history pages, because they are more recent, is the continuous topics keep coming up, like it's hard to talk about Iraq in the 90s without mentioning Kurdistan! This one of the reasons I would appreciate having my confirmation reinstated. Tashmetu (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)  Done I reviewed the last 500 edits and they seemed mostly substantive enough to meet the relevant criterion. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC) But please be careful. Don't jump headfirst into controversial areas, even if you now technically can because you're extendedconfirmed. This does not immunize you from sanctions for any future misconduct. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Thank you. Tashmetu (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:IdanST IdanST (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC) Hello IdanST, please describe the meaningful edits and what you'd like to use the permission for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Hey, some of the edits I've made were focused on tidying up articles, such as List of snipers (you can check the history). These edits involved a major overhaul: adding sources, removing false or unsourced information, and fixing sentence structures. I've also made substantial edits to other articles, such as Embraer C-390 Millennium (you can check the history), Tilhas Tizi Gesheften, Oradour-sur-Glane massacre, Ayi Silva Kangani, alongside dozens of other articles where I've made meaningful, though not as extensive, contributions. You should be aware that most of these edits are the result of my work translating articles to the HE Wikipedia, as you can see here. Since my ECP was revoked, I’ve translated over a hundred articles. While reading the English articles before translating them into Hebrew, I also fix any mistakes or make improvements wherever I see the need. IdanST (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Thanks. IdanST, I'll grant the permission. This is neither an endorsement of your contributions nor an invitation to edit extended-confirmed protected pages or topics. It also does not affect your topic ban from the Arab–Israeli conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Thanks ~ ToBeFree. With this ECP granted, I at least have some chance of getting my topic ban lifted. I will request that soon. IdanST (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC) IdanST, if that is the reason behind the request, I'll revoke the permission again. Again, this doesn't affect your ban and is not an invitation to edit extended-confirmed topics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2025 (UTC) I'm sorry, that's not the only reason. I'd also like to edit extended confirmed articles in general (not related to the topic ban). I'd really like to contribute, and as you can see, I've made over 10,000 edits across Wikipedia projects just in the past six months. IdanST (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2025 (UTC) Okay, no worries then, IdanST. I understand that appealing the ban is tempting but I recommend waiting with this for at least half a year and not mentioning the extended confirmation as a reason for the topic ban appeal. This hesitation is because I didn't evaluate the quality of your edits and think extended confirmation should be granted even if someone makes 500 bad edits that are all reverted. Of course, people will notice that you are now extended-confirmed, and they can use that as a reason for themselves when supporting your unban, but this reason shouldn't come from your appeal text, I think. For example, the point shouldn't be "I was banned for not having permission and ignoring this; now that I have the permission, I can't ignore a lack of it anymore". The point should be "I was banned for not having permission and ignoring this. I will not ignore such restrictions anymore. If I am prohibited from doing something, I won't ignore that restriction in the future". You see the difference? 🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)  Already done (automated response) by ToBeFree. — MusikBot talk 19:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC) User:Truth Layer 123 Truth Layer 123 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I was on Wikipedia for around 6 months, why is my account not yet marked as Extended confirmed? Truth Layer 123 (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC) Your account will be automatically marked as extended confirmed once your account is both at least 30 days old (you already meet this) and you have 500 edits. stwalkerster (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done you have not yet met the requirements. — xaosflux Talk 17:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.
Event coordinator (add request · view requests)

Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender (add request · view requests) User:FarmerUpbeat FarmerUpbeat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC) @FarmerUpbeat have you requested any mass messages be sent out yet? It's generally expected you have a few successful requests at Wikipedia talk:Mass message senders#MassMessage Delivery Requests before requesting the permission yourself. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC) @Elli I have :) Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC) You've made one request two months ago, which was processed eleven minutes later. Sorry, I'm not seeing a convincing need for this yet, hence  Not done for now but would be more willing to grant if you make a few more requests and they are fulfilled. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer (add request · view requests) User:GarethBaloney GarethBaloney (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I was once a Wikipedia editing noob. Now I want to help others to get their articles approved, as well as how to fix them. I will be happy to review new pages!. GarethBaloney 22:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has 151 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 22:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC) Thanks for your interest, but you don't appear to meet the WP:NPPCRITERIA.  Not done for now. –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover (add request · view requests) User:Iljhgtn Iljhgtn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC) @Iljhgtn even though the permission gives you the technical ability to move categories, category moves should still go through WP:CFD/WP:CFDS. Do you have uses for the permission other than moving categories? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Sure, for helping draftify of new articles etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC) The scripts: User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft and User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify both look like they would be particularly useful. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests) User:The Seal F1 The Seal F1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)  Done — Wug·a·po·des 23:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC) User:Destinyokhiria Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done for now. You have been editing actively for a little over a month, and the limited number of reverts don't have helpful edit summaries. I'd suggest doing a bit more recent changes patrolling to establish more of a track record of responding to vandalism and other content issues. — Wug·a·po·des 00:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Chippla360 Chippla360 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 21:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC) {{not done}} I appreciate your recent changes patrolling, but I think you should still get more experience. Femke said last time that you need to give user talk warnings after reverting vandalism, and this still is not happening consistently. I also checked some of your reverts and I think you could use more experience. For example, you made this revert saying it's "spammy" but the real issue seems to be WP:BLP vandalism, not spam. — Wug·a·po·des 00:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC) @Wugapodes It’s been over a month, which is the requirements I met after my last decline, I had Minimal reverts as of then. I had to wait for a month. so I gained the experience already and I’m experienced, the checklist says there should be an explanation for reverting edits and I some warn editors also on there talk page , you can further check that, @User:The Seal F1 Has spent equal duration on the platform with me. Here Warning, I have others I’ve warned, I can’t possibly warn all the user I revert there edits on talk page, that should be very stressful. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC) @Chippla360:  Done You're right that you've improved a lot. I checked more of your reverts and they are generally good even if you could be more specific and consistent in your edit summaries and warnings. As a note, you should be warning everyone, especially IPs, and using warning templates like {{uw-vandalism1}} for even simple reverts of potential vandalism. It's helpful for admins and other editors keeping track of issues. You can do this automatically with Twinkle. That aside, I think you'll do a fine job reviewing pending changes. Thanks for following up. — Wug·a·po·des 01:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC) User:SKAG123 SKAG123 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Done — Wug·a·po·des 00:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Lionel Cristiano Lionel Cristiano (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC) User:Yovt Yovt (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello editors, I request permission to review pending changes to help out the community on pages needing the RPC verification; I want to verify good content on the platform and this is one part that I would really appreciate access to. I would be reviewing and approving edits per Wiki guidelines, and I have read all policies on vandalism, copyright, BLP, etc. thanks! 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 02:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC) User:Như Gây Mê Như Gây Mê (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki and here), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted Pending changes reviewer rights on enwiki to make it easier to anti-vandalism here (aside from rollback right). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 10:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback (add request · view requests) User:AllCatsAreGrey AllCatsAreGrey (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Fneskljvnl Fneskljvnl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -‪Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC) User:Như Gây Mê Như Gây Mê (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Nahida Nahida (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[8]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC) See above. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC) User:Faster than Thunder Faster than Thunder (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC) I have used a similar feature with Twinkle, but am prompted to add an edit summary. "Vandalism" doesn't require a summary, but only affects the most recent revision. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC) Effectively canvassing for your RfRollback in an ill-fated RfA nom that you then transcluded against policy does not speak well to your suitability. While that doesn't directly go to rollback-related policies, the main thing we worry about with rollback is people rushing into things without understanding what's going on, and this sure seems like that. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 07:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC) I was going to say much the same thing. FTT seems to be rushing things already; we don't need to enable them to go even faster. I'm also unimpressed with the lack of acknowledging recent errors, and worry that there will be a similar lack of concern if they roll something back with no edit summary incorrectly. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done per concerns expressed above. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC) User:Destinyokhiria Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)  Not done Too little recent anti-vandalism work. Spend some time patrolling vandalism with Twinkle first (Twinkle rollback doesn't require this permission despite the name), and only then request rollback. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Fade258 Fade258 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Rahmatula786 Rahmatula786 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by ToBeFree (expires 17:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC) User:ExplorerofSpace ExplorerofSpace (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am request this right because lately, there has been a lot of vandalism during the evening to night hours. I could not revert all of it because I had to click the article, go to view history, and undo. With this, I could much more easily revert vandalism. Please note that my account is pretty new, but I had an account before with around 1 year experience; that account was when I lived in Chicago, the reason I cannot access the account is because I forgot the username and password (it was a created a while ago). Thank you for your consideration of this request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Do you administrators see this? ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC) Permission requests appear to be currently backlogged. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC) Yes, administrators have seen this. I'm not confident enough to grant rollback myself so am letting another admin handle, but I assure you this request isn't lost. And it's only been 3 days - patience is a virtue. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC) User:Skratata69 Skratata69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC) User:JesusisGreat7 JesusisGreat7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I would like to request rollback rights for my account in order to prevent pages from vandalism etc, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([10][11]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

This dashboard (talk)

---

You can help Wikipedia!

Add a reference to an unreferenced BLP

Articles for Creation

• Category:Promising draft articles
• Category:AfC G13 eligible soon submissions

New Page Patrol

Special:NewPagesFeed

Third Opinion

1. Talk:Emirate of Bari § Black Africans. Does the quoted source support the claim that the Emirate of Bari was "ruled ... perhaps by Black Africans"? (A 3rd opinion was provided but then struck because the opiner was not a neutral, so we never really got one.) 16:11, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

update,

Policies and Guidelines

edit .