Talk:2025 China–Philippines espionage cases

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2025 China–Philippines espionage cases article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Espionage Low‑importance

	2025 China–Philippines espionage cases is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1 May 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to 2025 China–Philippines espionage cases. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 06:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 China–Philippine espionage cases → 2025 China–Philippines espionage cases exchange – For clarity and per WP:PRECISE, the article is about a phenomenon that appears to be an exchange. Also, without the additional word, the "espionage cases" in the title would come out like a product of a cooperation, as in the title "China–Philippines relations". Bagoto (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Exchange" of what? The proposed title is confusing for another reason. For me it implies that there is a prisoner exchange being negotiated which to my knowledge has not even happened yet. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, as per Hariboneagle927, and for most Wikipedia article titles, "cases" refer to criminal cases, which is the case (pardon the pun) here. See for example Category:Trials in the Philippines. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno if this was bad education leading to bad grammar, but was perhaps the initiator referring to a spy exchange, or to a prisoner exchange? "20xx China–Philippines prisoner exchange" would have been a good title if there already was a prisoner exchange. Obviously, China picked up these Filipinos for the sole purpose of exchange it with the already imprisoned Chinese. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, but that's still speculation at the end of the day, even if it is a reasonable assumption.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the WP:PRECISE term is "prisoner exchange" or "espionage case" if there isn't any exchanges yet, not "espionage case exchange"... that sounds like exchange espionage cases in between justice systems? Are the two countries even cooperating in these cases? Howard the Duck (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as nominated, move to 2025 China–Philippines espionage cases as per below. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, regardless of whether "exchange" should be added, as it has "China" (country), it should use Philippines (country) rather than the demonym Philippine? Dank Jae 23:11, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Imitate China–Philippines relations on this regard. Howard the Duck (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Espionage, WikiProject China, and Tambayan Philippines have been notified of this discussion. HueMan1 (talk) 01:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.