User talk:Fade258

Tip of the day...

Displaying one page within another = Transclusion

Including the contents of a template page on a different page (by surrounding the page name with double braces, i.e. "{{}}" and leaving out the "Template:" prefix) is called transclusion.

This allows the other page to be automatically updated whenever the template page is updated.

Besides templates, pages in the following namespaces can be transcluded:

• Category:
• Help:
• Portal:
• User:
• Wikipedia:

The only difference between transcluding these and templates is that you must include the prefix (followed by a colon) with the page's name inside the double braces.

Images also can be transcluded, but this is done using double square brackets instead of braces.

Here are some examples of transclusion:

{{Pic of the day}} · {{Help:Contents}} · [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png]]

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Read more:

Wikipedia:Transclusion  

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338 Online events: New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (events facilitated by others): WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period! 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women) Tip of the month: Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Copyvio at Draft:Samuel Miao-Sin Wu?

Hi,

You declined the submission of Draft:Samuel Miao-Sin Wu indicating it was a copyvio from this page. I was looking over the draft and the journal article and I cannot see where there is a copyvio. Can you please point it out? Thanks. -- Whpq (talk) 03:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Whpq, To be honest, while reviewing that draft I really donot see a copyright vios but when I go through the copyvios detecter then I found 47-50% possible violation on that report. So, I have tagged that draft as a copyright violation and left a comment. You can chek there. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Earwig's copyvio is a tool which helps in detecting copyright issues, but anything it reprts still needs human evaluation. In this case, the only things I see that overlap are the names of publications. That would not be a copyright violation, and that looks like what the tool detected as copied. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

@Whpq, Thank You for letting me know. Fade258 (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Daniel W. Smith (philosopher)

Hi. I see you declined an article I submitted for review with the comment that the "submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article." Daniel Smith is academic and does qualify WP:NACADEMIC, point 1, since his work has been cited over 13000 time, and his book has received multiple reviews as shown by the citations in the article. Once the notability is established, only in the case of academics, their university website can be used as reference, which is why you see the use of his university website as a reference. Why do you say he is not notable?HRShami (talk) 07:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello @HRShami, I appreciate your creation. Yes, probably it passes the WP:NACADEMIC but reason behind the declination of draft is that there isn't sufficient significant coverage in reliable and independent sources to the topic. I noticed that you have taken a Purdue university website as a reference but that wasn't independent reference as I somehow decided that, that reference is connected to the topic. Fade258 (talk) 08:55, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes

Hi. Just want to let you know that I unaccepted a couple of your reviews. This addition of content was entirely unsourced, and this was a spam link disguised as a reference. I understand you're new at this, but I urge you to be more careful in the future. Thanks. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello @CycloneYoris, Thanks for reviewing my work and from next time I will be more carefull. Fade258 (talk) 09:50, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

AVL List - Article Submission to be improved with more sources by others

Hi Fade 258, thanks for you comments how to improve this arcticle. Unfortunatly, there are just a few in depth, neutral or secondary sources on the web. I put them now in the article, but then, I recommenend to submit the article and to invite other people to help to complete. Because there are many articles like here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internorm, which don´t have a single external source - and its online since a long time... I think that one person can`t do this and that is, of course, Wikipedia´s motto - to optimize articles together. But that will just work if others can see it. Is that a way worth to go or how would you proceed further? Thanks, NorbertAdam NorbertAdam1980 (talk) 12:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, @NorbertAdam1980, Well, I appreciate your work. Regarding your draft, I have left my message while reviewing your draft. The reason behind declination of that draft is the lack of independent sources to the subject as I can clearly see there that avl.com isn't a independent sources and regarding your mentioned live article in your message above, I can see that there is a maintenance tag which states that there is not sufficient reliable and independent sources to the subject. If you have further more queries then you can ask me here. Best Regards! Fade258 (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Dear Fade258, thanks a lot for your fast responding. I now eliminated in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AVL_List all references to avl.com in the citation section. There are now 12 references to independent Austrian or International media articles. In my opinion and compared to many other articles on Wikipedia this seems to be enough in the first step. In a second step, it would be useful to complete external sources by other editors who maybe can find more sources or have access to them. I really crawled half the web and can´t find more of them. Isn´t that exactly the idea of Wikipedia? Regards, Norbert NorbertAdam1980 (talk) 12:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

@NorbertAdam1980, Well thanks for your edit. I really appreciate your work but somehow our Wikipedia script tools marked your added references in a orange color which shows AI generated article. As I am not sure whether the article is AI generated or not but still I will review that references whether it is applicable or not. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Fade259, thanks for your as ever superfast answers. Yes, I really tried my best optimizing this article, thanks for suggesting and appreciating it. If there really might be a KI generated source among the references, let´s delete it instantly. I would be glad, if we can launch the article in a while and hopefuly other users help to add more details or sources in order to make it neutral well balanced multi author article. Regards, Norbert NorbertAdam1980 (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Well, I suggest you to not to remove that possibly AI generated source, as I already told you that I am not 100% sure on that as some other user will review that reference whether it is AI generated or not. Please wait for some time. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)