Jump to content

User:Peridon/links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 59
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 17
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 36
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 204
Requested RD1 redactions 17
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 18
Open sockpuppet investigations 83
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]
Template:AIW A false positive, more or less. Sort of playing around, but it seems to be good faith experimenting to learn how the Wikipedia user interface works. I think one to watch for a while, rather than to take action immediately. JBW (talk) 21:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 1
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 1
User requested 7
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 2
Other candidates 6
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 231 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 104 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 17 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


Official Gabriel1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  • This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
    information Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Indefinite full protection: Page transcluded on the main page. See NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS and NUMBEROFARTICLES. Interstellarity (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Just reverted most of the edits, but would like to know if this article needs to be protected after the vandalism had occured... DJ Baguio (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent WP:LOUTSOCK activity from Phạm Văn Rạng and/or Sotavino. Jay8g [VTE] 20:59, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Every time this page is unprotected, User:AttackTheMoonNow immediately resumes to sockpuppet behaviour. BangJan1999 21:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 22:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring, possibly involving IP vandalism. 174.34.38.219 (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 23:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 23:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR -- the subject of this article is a Russian military unit created about a year ago, apparently exclusively engaged in the Russo-Ukrainian War. tony 00:25, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Chaelo86 (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. WP:CT/SA 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 02:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced or poorly sourced content 2601:206:8101:DFC0:1546:A9B2:8811:899B (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock edits to this page. Yuthoob (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: An RM has resulted in a move to its current target. Restore protection when disruptions resume, but for now I don't see it! Intrisit (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

May 23 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I am drawing el C's attention here, the protecting user, instead at their TP due to their moderate activity nowadays. I am requesting for a downgrade in the edit-protection level from indef semi to indef PC because I reckon that it has been protected long enough since 2019.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

No editing activity ever since that link was converted into a redirect 4 years ago. This is also not to mention the fact that the target page isn't facing vandalism and that the protecting user is inactive.154.108.26.212 (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment:A lack of disruption is not a reason to remove protection. Do you have a reason to edit it? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to edit warring/content disputes. 1. There was confusion about the film's language, it has been sorted out, I agree with the other user. 2. A user was removing Mahavatar Cinematic Universe info and said that there should be seperate page. It was created later. Please remove protection from the page and set the protection level to no protection. There was no request for semi protection, please do not set it to semi protection. Many protected edit requests are pending in the talk page such as budget and box office. Please remove the protection. Optim594 (talk) 03:22, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Pinging protecting admin PhilKnight. Seems it will expire tomorrow anyway so it may not matter much. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
I'm being lazy and waiting for the protection to expire. If you want to remove the protection early, be my guest. PhilKnight (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Nah that was my inclination as well. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Please remove the following templates from the page (because WP:PROD is only for mainspace articles and files):

{{Strip categories|
{{Proposed deletion/dated
  |concern = Probable hoax - there is no Beach City in Fayette County, nor does the claimed reference exist.
  |timestamp = 20250618002141
  |nom = Pi.1415926535
  |help = 
}}
{{Prod2|[[WP:TNT]]}}
{{prod3|There is no Beach City in Georgia and searching returns nothing useful.}}
}}
GTrang (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Mahavatar Narsimha (request) 2025-08-06 10:06 Fully protected, expires 2025-08-11 at 16:15:52 UTC (log) Protected by PhilKnight on 2025-08-04: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Tarleton helmetTarleton helmet (request) 2025-08-08 19:53 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ohnoitsjamie on 2024-01-17: "Persistent sockpuppetry"
Wikipedia:Copyrights (request) 2025-08-10 17:53 Fully protected (log) From Wikipedia:Copyrights: Modified by Moonriddengirl on 2010-05-28: "I disagree. It was fully protcted in 2008 for its legal concerns."
Skydance Media (request) 2025-08-10 22:17 Fully protected, expires 2025-08-12 at 05:37:36 UTC (log) Protected by Slakr on 2025-08-09: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Module:Message box/ambox.css (request) 2025-08-11 03:44 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:52, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
9 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:ODNBsub (request) 2025-07-13 21:49 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Spain metadata Wikidata (request) 2025-07-24 16:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2019-04-29: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Peer review (request) 2025-08-01 09:05 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Template:Hidden archive top (request) 2025-08-03 09:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-08-01: "Highly visible template: per WP:RFPP request"
Template:Infobox court case/images (request) 2025-08-04 20:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:WikiProject Germany (request) 2025-08-05 14:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:IPA vowels/table (request) 2025-08-07 17:34 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Taxonomy/Teleostomi (request) 2025-08-10 19:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Taxonomy/Osteichthyes (request) 2025-08-10 19:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
The sourcing provided here does not appear to meet WP:NORG, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Can you provide sources that establish the notability of this organization? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
I agree some of the sourcing used is WP:CORPTRIV — the foundation has extensive coverage in Korea. I've just added some stronger pieces. The pre/post interview text in this Forbes feature is one with significant secondary coverage. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Support I also found no major issues with this user’s creations. Then, I saw a DYK review they did and it was evident that they indeed know exactly what a quality article looks like; evidence of a good comprehension of reliable sources, notability, and manual of style. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I checked three of TinaLees-Jones's recently-created articles at random. One had not yet been reviewed, so I reviewed it and found a significant issue with source-text integrity. I recommend waiting for her reply here before this request is actioned.
Separately, some of her articles have been nominated for deletion; it's hard to tell exactly how many, since her user talk page is archived by a bot, but the archives are not linked. One was recently deleted and one ended in no consensus. (I believe I have !voted in AfDs on her articles, presumably mostly to keep, but I can't tell because of the weird archiving.) I do think the vast majority of articles she creates are unquestionably notable, mostly on variations of NPOL, but as some have been questioned recently I'm not sure if granting AP now is appropriate. Toadspike [Talk] 13:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. TinaLees-Jones, thanks for your contribution closing coverage gaps on Wikipedia! To get autopatrolled there shouldn't be any issues with sourcing anymore in new creations. Could you please set up archiving in a more standard manner? It's difficult to find information (relevant to giving out permissions) when each archive contains just a single discussion. Thanks! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.

In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.

Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.

I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.

I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.

I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Sweetabena: I’ve gone through some of the articles you’ve created, including Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy. I noticed that these pages have been tagged for AI-generated content (WP:LLM). Could you please clarify this? Additionally, the article on Bright Owusu has a notability issue. Have you made any efforts to address or fix that? I also noticed that most of your articles are about politicians or MPs, which is generally a relatively easier area for a New Page Patroller. Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Jannatulbaqi,
Thanks for your response and for reviewing my request.
I've now gone through the articles you mentioned; Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style.
Regarding Bright Owusu, I realized that the subject is better known publicly as “C-Confion,” which is the name used in most reliable sources. I initially created a redirect page under that name, and since C-Confion better reflects WP:COMMONNAME, I’ve submitted a technical move request at WP:RM/TR to move the article accordingly.
While many of my articles are in the political space, I’ve focused on that area because it's typically easier to demonstrate notability. That said, I’m open to expanding into other areas and continuing to improve the range and quality of my contributions.
I appreciate your time and consideration, and I remain committed to constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you so much.Sweetabena (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
I don't think answers the implicit question, Sweetabena, which is "did you use AI" in the first place? Also, I confess parts of your comment seem a little LLM-y particularly and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style, although the misuse of the semicolon before the list of articles looks like a legit human error. Please divulge the extent to which you have used AI in your editing. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 00:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi Cremastra Yes, I have used ChatGPT to assist with drafting some article content. However, I review, fact-check, and revise it to ensure it maintains a human-authored standard and aligns with Wikipedia's content policies. I see AI as a support tool, not a replacement for editorial responsibility.Sweetabena (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Link to their first request. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I've created a large number of My Little Pony and mathematics articles. I have over 6,700 edits and will continue to edit for as long as I can. I'm requesting autopatrol permissions so that the NPP backlog will be less cluttered with my articles. I believe I've demonstrated a solid understanding of the policies and guidelines with my articles, particularly with my coverage of various aspects of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, since four years ago, I have started over two dozen meticulously crafted articles, which are free of issues. Most of these are Japan or Shinto-related, and are primarily about geographical features and historical figures. There was only one draftified article from a while ago, which I quickly learned from and have since created only notable topics with sufficient sources. I'm familiar with Wikipedia's core policies and copyvio guidelines. Yenistardom (talk) 06:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Yenistardom -- I'd like nothing more than to give you Autopatrolled as I have no doubt you're the ideal candidate for it, but you've only (by my count and this might be slightly off) created one WP:BLP and made 31 BLP edits. One of the standards (and, frankly, the most important one) for autopatrolled is "demonstrated" familiarity with BLP. I personally have no doubt you're familiar with BLP policies and guidelines, however, I'm required to observe a "demonstration" of said familiarity. If you could knock out another couple BLPs (even stubs) that would probably be sufficient demonstration. Chetsford (talk) 06:13, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

I have created more than 25 articles, over several years. I learnt over time to understand the notability criteria well. My new pages do not require attention from patrollers. Only one page I created is marked as deleted (it was recreated under a slightly different name). I have overall over 1000 edits. Thank you for the consideration. Queenofboston (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@Queenofboston: Thank you for your contributions. Spot-checking one of your creations at random, Michelle Meagher, indicated direct copying from a source (report) and non-neutral prose ("Meagher was confronted with a crisis of consciousness", also closely paraphrased from the source). I'll leave a message on your talk page with more information about copyright considerations on Wikipedia, and I would recommend reading about the encyclopedic tone that should be used in articles. For these reasons, I don't think autopatrolled would be appropriate for you at the moment. Please let me know if you have any questions. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
@TechnoSquirrel69 the article you singled out for copyright issues was published in 2024. The Michelle Meagher Wikipedia entry was created by me in 2023 with the contested phrase in it. So the 2024 article copied the 2023 Wikipedia page not the other way round. I did not infringe any copyright of the 2024 article as it did not exist at the time of the page creation. Queenofboston (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
I'm not seeing a date on the Green European Journal page, although it was only archived in the Wayback Machine in 2024. Even leaving that aside, though, there remain the issues of neutrality and close paraphrasing.
I looked at another one of your creations for more information. Your most recent one, Aline Blankertz, has statements without citations, and doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability — the existing sources are either primary sources, like interviews or podcast appearances, or don't have significant coverage of the subject. However, I will note that I found no copyright-related issues here. I maintain that it would be beneficial for your creations to get a once-over from new pages patrol. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
The information you flagged as missing citation was contained in the sources cited immediately prior, I now double-cite them in the two instances you flagged.
I am not saying that my pages cannot be improved but my pages bring additions to Wikipedia. I focus on women as it is an objective of Wikipedia to re-balance the coverage away from a bias favoring pages of men Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, I believe this is valuable contribution. There are profiles of Aline Blankertz in leading German media outlets, only one source is a podcast and it is produced by an established German media outlet, that is a valid source in my understanding, it is not a podcast produced by the subject. None of the sources in that article are authored by the subject of the article. My pages do not have copyrights issues, as now clarified. I use some sources in foreign languages but it is not the policy of Wikipedia to disregard or downgrade sources that are in foreign languages for purposes of notability. Queenofboston (talk) 09:13, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

I've been editing for more than 2 years now, and I noticed recently that reviews take longer than before. I was shocked by the workload waiting reviewers here. Besides my editing experience expanding and improving articles, I created and published 77 articles. For 2 years, only 1 out of 78 articles I created was deleted. I created 4 B-class articles, 37 C-class articles, 15 Start-class articles, and 2 Stubs.

I believe having autopatrolled rights would reduce the review burden on NPP volunteers, as my articles typically include proper sourcing, formatting, and categories from creation. Particleshow22 (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done by User:Sohom Datta Chetsford (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you! Particleshow22 (talk) 11:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

I frequently write articles (most of which nowadays are above start-class and I aim for GA on all of my tornado articles) so maybe having this right would help patrollers. The only article of mine that was AfD’d this year that I can remember is Casualties of the 2011 Super Outbreak (which was deemed to still have some useful info in it that was merged into 2011 Super Outbreak). I don't think any of my last 100-or-so articles are orange-tagged, although I don't frequently check them if they aren't being improved. EF5 17:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC) EF5 17:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done, I've seen your work around in the WX space and have been impressed. Taking a cursory look at your other creations, I don't see any major problems that would necessarily impede me giving you WP:AP. Sohom (talk) 19:31, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]

I intend to use AutoWikiBrowser for repetitive maintenance tasks such as fixing formatting, correcting common typos, and improving consistency across multiple articles. I am familiar with Wikipedia's editing guidelines and will use AWB in accordance with its rules and best practices. User404found (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done owing to lack of experience Salvio giuliano 12:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

I have been correcting checkwiki ISBN errors (Wikipedia:CHECKWIKI/WPC 069 dump) and will use AWB to help with that work Lexiconaut (talk) 18:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

ETA: I previously worked under two IP accounts:
176.108.139.1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
76.14.122.5 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
--Lexiconaut (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

[edit]

Just proposed a large WikiProject merge here, and intend to propose more in the future of similar scale. I would rather prefer avoiding the trouble of sending individual notifications (in this case to 55 WikiProject talk pages) and don't want to be a bother constantly spamming the talk page with requests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

@AirshipJungleman29: Do you anticipate needing mass message permissions again in the future? If it's just a one-time thing, leave the details in a request at WT:MMS and I'd be happy to sort it out! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:26, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Hello. I'd like to renew my patroller rights, as they expired today. ColinSchm (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to request temporary rights as trial. Though I haven't written any article other than Jean-Noël Fenwick or participated at AFC, I'm familiar with the deletion processes & have . I want to help out with the backlog. I have some experience in patrolling with the Special:NewPagesFeed. Please feel free to ask me any questions. Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
T • C • G
) 14:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]

I attempt whenever possible to correct article titles to sentence case when necessary, but am frequently unable to do so because of the existence of a single-edit redirect. I've been advised at "Requested moves" just to ask for the pagemover right already after 75,000 edits in nearly 11 years.

A perfect current example: Sweet and Sour Pork, which I can't move to Sweet and sour pork without requesting the move and making someone else do my work for me.

Thanks for your consideration! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Note that Sweet and Sour Pork and Sweet and sour pork was actually unfortunately not a great example to make a case for page mover permissions - on review, you’ll find that there is a a long history at the latter as it was merged to Sweet and sour in 2013, as well as a whole mess as the former was (re-)created as a move from Gu Lao Rou, which in turn was only created in 2024 as a manual fork of Sweet and sour.
So what we have here is now a pretty mess of “admin required” for histmerge as well as a few “{{copied from}}” on the relevant talk pages and review of the page edit histories to make sure attributions are placed as needed. I’ll copy this over to RM/TR, since I can’t action on the admin required histmerge review. (Edit): posted at RMTR. Raladic (talk) 07:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I am fairly active at WP:NPP these days, and Kj cheetham has reminded me that having PM permissions would allow me to draftify articles without leaving a cross-space redirect that needed to be deleted per WP:R2. I was granted the PM permission back in 2022 for the same reason (among others), but it expired in 2024 because I took a wikibreak. JBchrch talk 11:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Salvio giuliano 12:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
I am in the process of mass-moving pages on Roman Catholic dioceses in accordance with this discussion. I have needed to send a large portion of my moves so far to WP:RM/TR due to redirects. Having page mover permissions would hopefully help me continue with tasks such as these. funplussmart (talk) 23:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I would like to request reviewer rights and help flag vandalism across Wikipedia. I believe in Wikipedia’s core mission of neutrality, reliability, and free access to knowledge. I aim to contribute by reviewing pages for quality and sourcing, and to help maintain article integrity by countering vandalism. I have studied Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, notability, and civility, and am eager to support content moderation. Thank you for considering my request.

Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Alephjamie (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 04:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Oops, my notification didn't notice that reply. I'm sorry for it. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]

    Things I might need.

    [edit]

    Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English

    administrators' how-to guide

    administrators' reading list

    new admin school

    Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

    Special:Block

    Wikipedia:Keyboard shortcuts

    Wikipedia:Protection policy

    Wikipedia:Requested moves

    Wikipedia:List of policies

    Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses

    Wikipedia:IP block exemption

    Wikipedia:Committed identity

    Special:RecentChanges

    Wikipedia:Deletion_review

    Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc

    Wikipedia:Vandalism

    http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Vandalbot

    Wikipedia:Dispute resolution

    Wikipedia:Revision deletion

    Category:Wikipedia backlog

    "If you add the following single line to your javascript page at Special:MyPage/skin.js;

    importScript('User:Gracenotes/rollback.js'); "

    Wikipedia:New admin school/Granting and revoking rollback

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/delete

    {{Subst:UsernameBlocked}}

    Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves {{Persondata}} https://reftag.appspot.com

    {{subst:submit}} AfC

    User:Peridon/links/delname

    /Mass destruction

    User talk:Ryan (Wiki Ed) WP:Student assignments Educational project stuff