Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Notice board

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Comics

Home Assessments Cleanup Discussion Improvements Notice board Help Popular pages Workgroups
Article alerts · Copyright · Getting Involved · Manual of Style · Naming conventions · Recognized content · References · Statistics · Templates · Userbox

Welcome to WikiProject Comics, a project formed by Wikipedians to increase, expand, improve, and better organize articles related to comics in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world! We rely on comics enthusiasts worldwide to make this the best comics encyclopaedia on the web. If you are interested in participating, why not see how you can get involved?

If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Scope

The scope of WikiProject Comics is improve the vast expanse of knowledge that comics have become. This WikiProject will attempt to cover all comics-related information included on Wikipedia. We will do this through volunteer contributors and editors. If you are interested in joining the WikiProject, please feel free to add your name to the Participants list below, and find yourself an article to adopt.

WikiProject Comics
Information
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, Contents
Threads older than 20 days may
be archived by MiszaBot II.
Departments
Project organization
Resources
Task forces
Comics Portal
Shortcuts

Alerts

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(7 more...)

Proposed deletions

  • 11 Jul 2025 – Bootleg (character) (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by GamerPro64 (t · c): Non-notable comic book character
  • 30 Jun 2025 – Archie's Holiday Fun Digest (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Coeusin (t · c) was deleted

Good article nominees

Requests for comments

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation

Deletion discussions

To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation

Make New Friends but Keep Discord

Make New Friends but Keep Discord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not demonstrated. Ponyville Confidential does not appear to go into depth on the episode (judging from the preview triangulation I was able to do with Google Books), Unleash the Fanboy does not appear to be a reliable site or to indicate notability; it's a defunct "WOW!POP!WTF!"-type blog. WhatCulture is definitely not reliable. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 21:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Unleash the Fanboy had an editorial board, so it was not just a blog. I'm not sure what there is to gain from deleting an article for an episode of a notable show. GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 21:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I searched their website for evidence of an editorial board and couldn't find anything; could you kindly link to that? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 21:35, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, there is evidence of a staff list here from the Wayback machine from 2013: [1], though that is the latest the web archive will go. From looking at other articles from Unleash the Fanboy at the time, there is evidence of an expanded staff list by 2015 (which is when the episode aired) but the Wayback machine did not capture it. I also expanded Connelly's coverage from her book.
    As for WhatCulture, I understand that it is listed as "generally unreliable" under WP:WHATCULTURE, as the concern is that contributors "do not need to have any relevant experience or hold any particular qualifications" and editors note a poor record of fact checking, so that the facts written in an article is unverifiable. But this is an episode of a children's television show we're talking about. Every single statement in the review is verifiable because anyone can watch the episode and confirm what the author is saying. If the subject of the article was a living person then per WP:BLP of course we shouldn't use a generally unreliable source, but I don't agree with not being able to use a single article from a source because it was found to be generally unreliable, especially when the subject in question is not contentious at all. If a source is generally unreliable, why even use the word generally and why not just call it unreliable in that case? GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 21:55, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether the WhatCulture piece contains falsehoods is not in question; it’s just a poor source that cannot be used to establish the notability of a topic. A press release for the episode would have the same problem. As for Unleash the Fanboy, that staff list does not inspire any confidence in the weight of the website in establishing topic notability—it seems to just be some buddies who put a website together. They’re not journalists. I believe that if a TV episode received no more than a few sentences in a book, plus two reviews in poor sources, and no coverage more convincing than that, then it’s not notable. I understand we disagree; others will weigh in. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 00:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:27, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are many notable subjects that did not receive much media coverage (Example? Some mathematicians with many widely cited papers don't meet GNG). They are not notable by WP:GNG, but by just good sense they are notable (and this show is very notable). Everything here is true, so why delete it? It's a clear case of WP:IGNORE. The rules were not made to delete articles like this one. MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll give as example an article I've created: Treatise on Radioactivity. Clearly notable, but doesn't meet GNG. MathKeduor7 (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be arguing that no subject should be deleted on the grounds of non-notability—or that notability guidelines are irrelevant to subject notability. You can argue that at Wikipedia Talk:Notability, but AfD discussions refer to the notability policy.
That mathematicians have their own SNG (WP:ACADEMIC) does not imply that episodes of My Little Pony don’t need to meet any notability guideline to be considered notable. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. I am arguing specifically for these types of articles. MathKeduor7 (talk) 02:42, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll quote what by best friend said: "Rules are not created ex nihilo, "arbitrarily" (at least they shouldn't be). They are created to impartially regulate conduct in similar situations, based on known past cases and attempting to anticipate possible future cases. As new cases become known that represent exceptions to the rule and should be analyzed differently, the rule needs to be constantly refined to take these situations into account and remain true to its original purpose, rather than becoming an instrument of tyranny and oppression." MathKeduor7 (talk) 02:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read about Martin Luther King Jr. and unfair rules. MathKeduor7 (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need criteria similar to WP:BKCRIT for notable show episodes other than GNG, until then this should be speedy keep (maybe) I think. MathKeduor7 (talk) 03:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic season 5#ep98. I like to think I'm more lenient when it comes to keeping episode articles – typically, I look for just two good sources about the specific episode. Unfortunately, I don't see that. Using the reference numbers from this link:
    • Ref 1 is a licensed guidebook, so it's not independent coverage.
    • Ref 2 is routine coverage (most primetime shows get daily Nielsen ratings), so it's not significant.
    • Refs 3-5 are hard to verify, but from a Google Books search, it appears that all mentions are brief and trivial. (Searching "Make New Friends but Keep Discord" returns exactly 3 hits corresponding to the 3 references here. The book has been scoured for any mention of the episode to include, even when the context is about something else, such as ref 5 detailing a character instead of this episode. That's not how significant coverage works.)
    • Ref 6 is from a blog that has a giant "Write for Us" button at the top; to me, it's clearly a fan site, not a professional, reliable source. The generic about us page and the social-media–like staff pages support this (I'm skeptical of any site that gives its editors achievement badges).
    • Ref 7 is more churnalism; like with 6, if anyone can write for them (which is why it's considered unreliable), it's more of a fan site than anything.
I'm not seeing any good sources for this article. There is a clear redirect target, so deletion is a step too far, but there's no good reason to keep this. And for those who think TV episodes should have their own notability guideline, you should know that many WP:TV members have pushed for a stricter guideline here – so sticking to GNG is probably a better route. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eye of Agamotto

AfDs for this article:
Eye of Agamotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very niche fictional object, no evidence of WP:GNG for this topic. Pure plot summary and list of appearances, no analysis/reception. Per WP:ATD-R, maybe redirect this to Agamotto? PS. AfD 10 years ago was dominated by "arguments" like "important in-universe" (doubtful anyway), "no good merge candidate" (really?? It's in the title...) and "covered in dependent picture books calling themselves encyclopedias"). Not much help there... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Doctor Strange. The item is very associated with him in universe and tends to be adapted with him, and what little mentions it discusses it as part of Strange. The redirect is valid and a likely search term so I'd definitely favor it over a deletion. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serpent Crown

Serpent Crown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very niche fictional object, no evidence of WP:GNG for this topic. Pure plot summary and list of appearances, no analysis/reception. Per WP:ATD-R, maybe redirect this to Namor, where this item is mentioned few times in the usual gargantuan plot summary there? Sigh Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Namor. Most of the big details seem to be there, and there's not much that needs to be merged. Valid redirect target as an AtD. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mandarin's rings

Mandarin's rings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Niche fictional object, little evidence of WP:GNG for this topic (there is 2021 ScreenRant: [2] and a weaker 2022 from SR as well: [3]). That said, they are mostly plot summaries anyway (and the odds are good they mostly rewrote Wikipedia and Fandom...); what we have is pure plot summary and list of appearances, no analysis/reception. Slight merge and redirect to Mandarin (character) would suffice instead of hard deletion, per WP:ATD-R. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mandarin (character), since they are very heavily associated with him and lack individual notability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:47, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Norn Stones

Norn Stones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Niche fictional object, no evidence of WP:GNG for this topic. Pure plot summary and list of appearances, no analysis/reception. PS. Item used by several characters, so there's no obvious redirect/merge, although maybe to Loki (Marvel Comics)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Goon characters

List of The Goon characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no sources in this article, little sources exist so most of these entries would be deleted. Therefore, it should be merged with the parent article: The Goon. See WP:FANCRUFT Easternsahara (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rama Duwaji

AfDs for this article:
Rama Duwaji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Didnt meet WP:GNG Bozy Gerry (talk) 08:11, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalie Octavius

Rosalie Octavius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILMCHAR. Sources linked go to articles discussing Doctor Octopus (which is not the same subject as the the film character and fictional husband) and do not mention the subject. It looks like the character was created for the film adaptation and does not exist outside that one movie with minimal scene time. Nothing outside of blogs and Fandom can be found to establish notability. Redirecting to either Otto Octavius (film character) or Spider-Man 2 would be a good ATD. cyberdog958Talk 03:56, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Film, and Comics and animation. cyberdog958Talk 03:56, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Spider-Man 2 (and/or Otto Octavius (film character)). I did see only brief occurences in serious secondary sources, and sadly the Women in refrigerators commentary is unsourced. But a slight expansion at the target is a good WP:Alternative to deletion in my view. Daranios (talk) 10:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Normally I would agree with merging, but since everything on the page is unsourced (because the sources used do not mention the subject), none of the prose should be used. Also, the page creator themselves state I've only really got speculation and pulling writing tropes out of my behind on the talk page of the article which makes me think that it is largely original research. cyberdog958Talk 13:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I did not realize that the second link also does not mention the character. I still think Spider-Man 2#Plot deserves a sentence on Rosie's role (although there's a half-sentence at Cast). Daranios (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Spider-Man 2 - It is somewhat rare for a minor character that only appears briefly in a single piece of fiction to have enough reliable sources to pass the WP:GNG, and I am seeing nothing in searches that would indicate that this one is one of those rare cases that do. While I do not oppose redirecting to the main film article as a reasonable search term, Merging anything would not be appropriate because the only two sources being used here, aside from having reliability issues, do not even mention the character as far as I can see. Rorshacma (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect per Daranios. I don't see WP:SIGCOV either but this is partially covered at the main article about the fiction, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Otto Octavius (film character), since this character is unmentioned at Spider-Man 2. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Hollow (British TV series)

Rocky Hollow (British TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly declined and finally rejected at AfC. Draft:Rocky_Hollow_(TV_series) and Draft:Rocky Hollow. See also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rocky_Hollow.

Author was helped at AFCHD but seems to have no further good sources.

No indication of meeting WP:GNG. qcne (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Goldsztajn (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Masasa Moyo

Masasa Moyo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress who appears to have appeared in several roles, but they were all minor. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:18, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations

List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear WP:NLIST failure - being a team or organization in a Marvel comic is so incredibly common that this is not a unique aspect, nor does the article demonstrate sources that discuss Marvel teams and organizations as a whole. Overall, this is a list more fitting for the Marvel Database wiki and should not be used as a free "dumping ground" for otherwise non-notable teams. Even putting them together, they remain non-notable and only relevant to comic-book superfans. The MCU list article also seems to have the same problem, but due to WP:TRAINWRECK concerns, I am nominating this first. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment To me there seem to be a lot of problems with the nomination rationale with regard to WP:SKCRIT no 3. Being common is to my knowledge not a reason for deletion. We do have things like Lists of companies or Lists of animals, which are arguably much more common than the organizations here. We do have a lot of blue links, so this most likely is a list useful for navigation in accordance with WP:LISTPURP-NAV and WP:CLN. Such lists may even be kept without fulfilling WP:LISTN, depending on consensus. "dumping ground" and "more fitting for the Marvel Database wiki" might be the case if the goal were to collect all teams and organizations. On the other hand, it is totally policy-based to included entities which are not notable enough for a stand-alone article but still do have some coverage or encyclopedic purpose based on editors' disgression and consensus, as specified in WP:ATD-M. "nor does the article demonstrate sources that discuss Marvel teams and organizations as a whole" I believe is correct, but that's again no grounds for deletion according to WP:ARTN, i.e. current article content is not the decisive factor. So before getting into the abovementioned consideration based on the navigation purpose, I would like to know the result of the required WP:BEFORE search on secondary sources not yet in the article. And from the experience that comics have been increasingly analyzed in academia I'd ask to include the Google Scholar search in this consideration. Daranios (talk) 17:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That falls under WP:SOURCESEARCH, or maybe just WP:ADHOMINEM, as you are implying the sources exist and a WP:BEFORE was not performed, without actually stating where they are. You could just actually find the sources before casting aspersions. I certainly don't think all or even most of these teams are notable even as part of a list, and they are largely sourced to primary sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:35, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Zxcvbnm: I apologize, I did not mean to be WP:ADHOMINEM! I don't know yet if there are sources. But as far as I can see you have only commented on sources in the article. As in any deletion discussion involving notability concerns it would really be helpful to get some elaboration on the results of the WP:BEFORE search of the nominator, as a starting point for their own searches of any participant in the discussion. Lack of such elaboration in my view in turn gets into WP:JUSTNOTABLE territory. Daranios (talk) 06:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would say the importance of redirects pointing here, rather than being a WP:POPULARPAGE argument (which is based on view statistics, not directly involved with redirects), is that a) there was consensus at several other discussions that a redirect here is the way to go, which should count for something with regard to the existence of this list and b) that this list does fulfill one of the basic functions of lists at Wikipedia as outlined in WP:CSC, 2., (as well as WP:ATD-M) and thus is very much in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines. Daranios (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep according to WP:SKCRIT no 3.: As discussed above I don't see a policy-based rationale for deletion in the nomination, except for the pure statement "Clear WP:NLIST failure". As this is not at all obvious to me, I believe this falls under WP:JUSTNOTABLE. On the other hand this list fulfills a navigational purpose for encyclopedic content on this topic elsewhere on Wikipedia, as well as being a place for encyclopedic content on the topic which does not lend itself to stand-alone articles, as outlined in WP:ATD-M. It is also a well-warranted WP:SPLIT from Marvel Universe, within which teams and organizations play a vital role, as was also acknowledged in the nomination. Daranios (talk) 15:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If it is "not obvious to you", it does not make it not a policy-based reason, just a policy-based reason you personally think is wrong. Well, not unless you were Galactus and controlled reality. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    So why not just fix the WP:JUSTNOTABLE problem in the nomination as explained in that essay on the deletion policy, as I've requested earlier? Simply claiming something does not make it a reality either (except for Galactus who just makes it so of course...). Daranios (talk) 09:47, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Or, to answer more directly, yes, the nomination contains a reference to a policy. But it does not contain a rationale why this should apply here which is intelligible to me. And if it is not clear to me, then most likely "Clear failure", i.e. not needing further explanation, is not the case. Daranios (talk) 09:52, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Corps

Nova Corps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Niche fictional organization from Marvel universe. Article fails WP:GNG and is just a plot summary and list of appearances; no reception or analysis found, nothing useful in my BEFORE. WP:ATD-R suggests we can pipe this to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations, maybe merge the lead there? (It's unreferenced, unfortunately) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Nova (Richard Rider), who seems to be the primary Nova character. Given the bulk of Nova's notability is due to this character, and the coverage for the Corps is non-existent, it's likely better to redirect here, where the Corps are very relevant as part of the Nova character's backstory. Would also be safer on the chance the teams and organizations list is redirected or deleted via the ongoing Afd. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because a number of editors are recommending a Merge to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations and this article has been brought to AFD. Was there a second possible merge target article if this one gets deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: If it should come to that, List of Marvel Cinematic Universe groups has been suggested as an alternative target once, Nova (Richard Rider) twice. Daranios (talk) 10:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dalek comic strips, illustrated annuals and graphic novels

Dalek comic strips, illustrated annuals and graphic novels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of appearances by Daleks in a specific media type. Having researched this topic extensively, there is no individual coverage of the Daleks in this type of media, and any coverage of the Daleks in it is purely plot summary information. As it stands this list is an WP:INSIDISCRIMINATE failure. I'd suggest a redirect as an AtD to Dalek. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 07:48, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. There is no consensus for deletion, and never will be, because the nomination was for a merge; please use WP:PROPMERGE for merge discussions. There is also no consensus here to merge the article. asilvering (talk) 02:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man's armor (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

Iron Man's armor (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created as a split from Iron Man's armor in other media that was later merged back to Iron Man's armor following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Man's armor in other media. There's no reason for the Marvel Cinematic Universe to be separated from Iron Man's armor anymore. Both articles are short enough that after merge they'd be within WP:PROSESIZE, and the Iron Man's armor contained a lot of unreferenced plotcruft that I recently removed (effectively the 'in other media' stuff). While there are sources that talk about how Iron Man looked in various movies, there's no reason to split this - it's also doing a disservice to the readers, most of whom will end up at the main IMA article and not see the good content in the article here; the Iron Man's armor article now has a tiny, one sentence section on IMA in other media, stating that "Iron Man's armors feature prominently in several films set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe." It should be replaced with the content of this article. I fail to see how the movie-universe armor has separate stand-alone notability versus its basic concept, and why it couldn't be merged. There was a discussion of this previously at Talk:Iron_Man's_armor#Merge_from_Iron_Man's_armor_(Marvel_Cinematic_Universe), but most comments were pretty much "just votes" with no meaningful rationale, IMHO. Anyway, as far reasons for deletions, I want to reiterate that this article is a bad WP:CFORK of dubious stand-alone WP:GNG that failed both in the past and now the logic of WP:SIZESPLIT. The fate of Iron Man's armor in other media was decided at AFD, the fate of the article that was split out of it should follow suit, given the failure of merge discussion to produce meaningful rationales (WP:NOVOTE). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:59, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. This is largely plot summary and nothing more, and I'm not seeing any SIGCOV, either from the keep votes or in the article, regarding this subject. I see no reason for a separation here, and the notability of the armor in the MCU is Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED from the notability of the armor elsewhere. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

another look at the sources, a merger isn't warranted. Darkknight2149 22:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale was as stated: "This was a legitimate split and even the OP admits that there are sources backing up the topic. [T]his nomination reads almost like it's fishing... As far as this one goes, I have no strong objection to it getting merged with another article, but there's not enough here to justify a deletion." Darkknight2149 06:49, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry but all I see is "I have no strong objections to it getting merged but I don't like a deletion". It was not a legitimate split, since this topic has no stand-alone notability, per PROSESIZE, NOTINHERITED and OVERLAP. The practice of splitting bad and good content, creating one better and one bad article is not a good one. Bad content needs to be simply removed. Much of notability of the IM's armor is related to his MCU version, but it deesn't mean we need two articles on this. Simply put, MCU-related coverage made IM's armor notable - it wasn't before. If not for MCU stuff, we wouldn't need an article on this at all. Thanks to MCU, we can cover the topic of IM's armor. No need for a CFORK. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just took another look at the sources and most of them are specifically discussing the MCU iteration of the armor. What do you mean by "bad content" exactly? What part of SIGCOV does it fail? That's such a nebulous statement to make when the nomination already reads like it's fishing. The article goes into detail on the design, conception, and development of the film incarnation of the armor, so there's certainly more here than just fancruft and plot summary. You seem to be under the misconception that NOTINHERITED means "Splitting articles on topics that I don't personally consider important." I suggest you re-read the essays you just cited and take another look at WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Let's not confuse snobbishness for notability guidelines. (Not to mention, the article split was discussed beforehand.) Darkknight2149 00:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 16:18, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Comics and animation proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Templates for discussion

Requested moves, merges, and splits

To edit these sections, see moves, merges, and splits

Requested moves

Proposed merges


Proposed splits

Recent creations

Bot generated

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2025-07-11 20:37 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.

Human generated

To edit this section, go to this page


April 2011

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

Cleanup

Quality

The project has 17 featured articles. 7 of them, or 41.2%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
300 (film) «FA» Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009)
Captain Marvel (DC Comics) «FA, High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008)
Megatokyo «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
Roy of the Rovers «FA» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009)
Superman (film series) «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
Watchmen «FA, High» Articles to be merged (Aug 2009)

The project has 1 featured lists. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

A-Class articles

The project has 2 A-Class articles. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

Good articles

The project has 71 good articles. 7 of them, or 9.9%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
Barbara Gordon «GA» Vague or ambiguous time
Clara Elsene Peck «GA» Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009)
Hergé «GA, High» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007)
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy «GA» Cleanup (Jun 2009)
Michigan State University libraries «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007)
The Transformers (IDW Publishing) «GA» Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009)
Wanted (2008 film) «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)

Importance

Top-importance articles

The project has 57 top-importance articles. 35 of them, or 61.4%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
Alan Moore «Top» Articles with minor POV problems (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
Alternative comics «Top» Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008)
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Archie Andrews (comics) «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jan 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)
Archie Comics «Top» Articles to be split (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008)
Carl Barks «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007)
Cartoonist «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009)
Cerebus the Aardvark «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Jul 2008, Feb 2009, Mar 2009, May 2009)
Comics «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008)
Comics Code Authority «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Comic strip «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Apr 2008, May 2009)
DC Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Nov 2007, Dec 2008, Aug 2009)
Dilbert «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008)
Doonesbury «Top» Articles needing additional references (Jan 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008)
Fantastic Four «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Jan 2009, Feb 2009)
Graphic novel «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Jack Kirby «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Nov 2008, May 2009)
Jean Giraud «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008)
Justice League «Top» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)
Little Nemo «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Mar 2009)
Mad (magazine) «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009)
Manga «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Osamu Tezuka «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2008)
Peanuts «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with dead external links (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2007, Mar 2008)
Penciller «Top» Articles needing additional references (May 2009)
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Robert Crumb «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Apr 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
The Family Circus «Top» Articles needing additional references (Apr 2008)
Will Eisner «Top» Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009)
Wonder Woman «Top» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
X-Men «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2007)

High-importance articles

The project has 378 high-importance articles. 214 of them, or 56.6%, are flagged for cleanup. A detailed listing is suppressed due to size restrictions.

Listing by number of categories assigned

Articles with 13 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Mister Fantastic «High» Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Dec 2008), Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009)

Articles with 12 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Sabretooth (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008, Feb 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009, Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Comics articles needing issue citations

Articles with 11 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Green Goblin «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jan 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)

Articles with 10 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Fictional history of Wolverine Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2008), Articles needing additional references (Jul 2009), Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles to be split (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Juggernaut (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles to be split (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Kryptonite «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Mar 2008, Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Feb 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2008)
Mystique (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Apr 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Super Friends Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
X-Force Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, May 2007, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Sep 2008), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Sep 2008), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup

Articles with 9 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Beast Wars Neo Articles lacking sources (Aug 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2007, Sep 2007), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2007), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Transformers articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Aug 2007), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup
Beavis and Butt-head Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Jan 2009, Jun 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2007, Jun 2009)
Brainiac (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Feb 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Vague or ambiguous time, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jul 2008, Oct 2008)
Dazzler Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Mar 2008, Apr 2008, Jun 2008, Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Jean Grey «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jun 2009)
Krypton (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with too many examples, Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2006, Feb 2007, Feb 2008, Nov 2008)
Luke Cage Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Mar 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Magneto (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008, Jan 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Nick Fury «High» Articles with trivia sections (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Professor X «High» Articles that may contain original research (Nov 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Jan 2008, Aug 2009)
She-Hulk Articles needing additional references (Jul 2008), Articles needing more detailed references, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Dec 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Sovereign Seven Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008), Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Uatu Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that may contain original research (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009)
WildStorm Productions «High» Articles needing additional references (Jun 2007, Aug 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (May 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jun 2007, Feb 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009)

Articles with 8 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Beast (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Bullseye (comics) Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Frank Miller (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2007, Dec 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Oct 2007), Articles to be expanded (Aug 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009), BLP articles lacking sources
Kingpin (comics) «High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2009)
Magik (comics) Articles lacking sources (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Sep 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Nightcrawler (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
S.H.I.E.L.D. Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Jul 2009)
Silver Surfer «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with improper non-free content, Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Superhero «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, Jan 2008, Jul 2008, Jan 2009)
Surge (comics) Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Sep 2007), Comics articles needing cleanup, Comics articles needing issue citations
The Cisco Kid Articles to be expanded (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2009), Wikify (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing rewrite (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Aug 2009)
Thing (comics) «High» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2006), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Jun 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Tokyopop Articles lacking reliable references (Dec 2007), Articles needing expert attention (Feb 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2007, Dec 2007), Miscellaneous articles needing expert attention, Wikipedia articles in need of updating, Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)

Articles with 7 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
A Modest Destiny Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2006, Articles lacking reliable references (Sep 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2007), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007), Cleanup (Sep 2007)
Black Widow (Marvel Comics) Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Cannonball (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Electro (Marvel Comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Forge (comics) Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Hal Jordan «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2009), Articles with dead external links (May 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
Jesse Blaze Snider Articles lacking reliable references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, May 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), NPOV disputes (Mar 2009), Wikify (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
List of characters in Megatokyo Articles lacking reliable references (Jul 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008, Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with trivia sections (Feb 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jul 2008)
List of DC Multiverse worlds «High» Articles with dead external links (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008, Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Jul 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Nov 2008)
List of female comics creators Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Jun 2008, Jul 2008, Aug 2008, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jan 2009)
List of Green Lanterns Articles lacking sources (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Feb 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be merged (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Feb 2009)
Manga outside Japan «High» Articles that may contain original research (Jun 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Vague or ambiguous time
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the Imperfects (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Mary Jane Watson «High» Articles lacking in-text citations (Oct 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Apr 2009)
Meggan Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
One Year Later Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Rachel Summers Articles needing additional references (Apr 2009, May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009)
Reboot (fiction) Accuracy disputes (Apr 2009), Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007, Dec 2007, May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009)
Richard Branson Articles with dead external links (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Jun 2007, Jul 2007, Oct 2008, Aug 2009)
Rogue (comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
X-Men: The Manga Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles to be expanded (Jul 2008, Oct 2008), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Cleanup (Apr 2007, Oct 2008), Wikify (Jun 2008)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Notice_board&oldid=409356299"