User talk:Percy James91
Hi Percy James91! I noticed your contributions to Hairy Maclary and Friends and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do not add a period (full stop) after a sentence fragment. See MOS:PERIOD. CodeTalker (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Toy Story 2, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
HI, Percy James91, welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been deleting information in infoboxes from a number of biographical articles based on "unknown parameters". However, there are a number of infoboxes for individuals, with different parameters. The basic one is "Template: Infobox person", but there are also more specific ones, dealing with officeholders, politicians, and musical artists, to name a few. Those templates generally have more specific parameters, so changing the infobox makes the parameter work. Also, sometimes the parameter name was not listed properly by whoever added the information, so fixing the parameter name makes it work (eg by changing "sister" to "relatives"). I've gone through your edits and have restored a lot of the information, sometimes by changing the infobox, and sometimes by correcting the parameter name. May I suggest that in the future, if you find a non-functioning parameter, you see if there is a way to fix the parameter description, or by changing the infobox to a more specific one? We're here to build an encyclopedia, and if the information about a person is accurate, we should investigate to see if there's a way to include it in the infobox, rather than just deleting it. Best wishes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
In general, we do not use titles like "Reverend" when referring to people, even if they are named that way on books they wrote. See MOS:REVEREND. Thanks, Opolito (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Tube of Light. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Talking Tom & Friends (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 04:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to India, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:37, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Additionally, the article is a Contentious topic, where sanctions are applicable. Thanks. — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Iiii I I I. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iiii I I I (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)