Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Tasks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MainTalkAssessmentParticipantsShowcaseTasksResourcesTemplatesHelpPortal

This is the a list of tasks that either need regular attention for WikiProject Animation.

To do list

[edit]

Cleanup listing

[edit]

A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

This is the list of Unreferenced BLPs automatically generated by DASHBot.

There are no unreferenced BLPs tagged by Template:WikiProject Animation.

Requested articles

[edit]
Requested articles
Experimental animation
Films
The King's Beard, Timothy Tweedle the First Christmas Elf, The Return of the Prodigal Parrot [ru]
Television
Cyboars, Louie (animated show), Simsalagrimm, Brainphreak
People
Andrew Kepple, Chasen Kay, Vince Collins, Corin Hardy, Kondoh Akino
Studios
Studio CGI
edit


New articles

[edit]
New articles by topicNew articles (Animation)

The following articles have been identified by InceptionBot as potentially being within the scope of the project, based on the Animation ruleset. It is likely that some of them are false positives; please examine the log if you have any questions.

This page lists recently created Animation-related articles. Remember to nominate the best new articles at Template talk:Did you know so Wikipedia can highlight them on the main page.

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2025-08-09 19:26 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.
















Article alerts

[edit]

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(11 more...)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Files for discussion

Good article nominees

Featured article reviews

Featured list removal candidates

(5 more...)

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

(14 more...)

Articles to be split

(11 more...)

Articles for creation

Deletion discussions

[edit]
To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation
The Condor (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable direct-to-DVD film. A BEFORE shows minimal coverage beyond streaming sites and movie databases. I only found a couple or reviews [1] [2] [3] in obscure blogs. Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of adult animated feature films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NLIST Launchballer 11:59, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in The Loud House franchise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a kiddie show trivia site. From my interactions IRL, The Loud House has no lasting cultural impact or relevance outside its target demographic of kids (who eventually grow out of it, like any kiddie show) or the (very small in comparison to other fandoms; I know more bronies, both IRL and online, than "Loud Crowd" members, and MLP:FiM's been concluded since 2019) "periphery demographic" on sites like Deviantart and etc. Also there is a loud house wikia site, and TVtropes has extensive character listings for every cartoon under the sun including this one, so there is no need for a Wikipedia article. I'm surprised this hasn't went through any prior AfDs, not gonna lie, given that it is plain WP:FANCRUFT. Kinopiko talk 06:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the nominator's rationale seems to boil down to Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEIT and Wikipedia:ITSNOTNOTABLE. A brief search through Scholar yields a lot of promising results, and while I can't access it all, there's a lot of content on LGBTQ+ characters, female characters, and more. These seem to also be focused on these characters as a set and not just on one or two particular characters, such as Howard and Harold McBride. Though I can't access all of it, it looks promising, and I feel it safely meets notability guidelines for now, per Wikipedia:LISTN, which states that the list subject's set needs to be notable. Let me know if I'm wrong obviously, but I feel as of now it's one of the recent rare cases of a franchise character list being brought here that's actually notable. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:18, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Burgerboss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an episode of Bob's Burgers, a TV show where every episode has a Wikipedia article, although most episodes do not have WP:SIGCOV. This article is an example: only two sources, one source is just about ratings so trivial coverage and the other to a review on The A.V. Club, which I see does generally count as a reliable source.[4] WP:EPISODE states that you shouldn't have individual articles for episodes that only contain "one or two reviews" and that use "the overall production information about the season that isn't specific to any one episode". I found a previous AfD discussion about another episode of Bob's Burgers where the result was keep[5], but that episode seems to have had more coverage than this. Lijil (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic Cube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rather lengthy plot summary and list of appearances, but no reception/analysis and my BEFORE fails little of use, so the usual WP:GNG / WP:ALLPLOT issues arise. There is a significant overlap here with a more notable (and GA-level) Infinity Stones (it seems that one of the Stones is the Cube, aka Tesseract). Some content from here could be merged there, or otherwise a redirect will do. Tesseract (Marvel Cinematic Universe) already redirects to IS, not here. I will ping the editor who got IS to GA (User:ZooBlazer) for their thoughts. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Infinity Gems, the comic counterpart, where the Cube seems to make more sense to be discussed given its increased prominence in comics compared to film. There's a big overlap in coverage here, and I see no reason for this to be split. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:29, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment These aren't the same things. While it would be no big deal to excise the MCU content here, there's a good bit of comic-specific content that I do not see reflected in the proposed merge target. Jclemens (talk) 06:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The Cosmic Cube is in fact independently notable. It gets a page length explanation in the secondary source "Marvel Arms and Armor: The Mightiest Weapons and Technology in the Universe" (2023) p.96, several pages of explanation in "100 Things Avengers Fans Should Know & Do Before They Die" (2015) p.84-86, and this article in CBR (which is considered reliable pre Valnet purchase, and the site was relaunched in August 2016 - the article is from June). Ironically, there also appears to be significant notability for a real-life supercomputer also called Cosmic Cube. There is more than one Cosmic Cube, so it doesn't fit into Infinity Stones as an overlap, either. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The first seems to be a guidebook produced in collaboration with Marvel. Even if it's produced by a different publisher the fact it's all plot and published as an official spin-off work makes it PRIMARY media. Is this explanation in the second source just plot info? In conjunction with the CBR source this is still failing Wikipedia:NOTPLOT since I see no analysis or developmental info beyond just mere plot summary and appearance listings. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shaper of Worlds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Marvel character. Almost a stub, short plot summary and list of appearances, no reception/analysis, and nothing in my bio. Suggests WP:ATD-M to the List of Marvel Comics characters: S, where there is a section but no content - the lead or even most of the plot summary from here could be copied there. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:18, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Nullifier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional gadget from the Marvel universe. The article is just the usual plot summary/list of appearances, with zero analysis/reception, and my BEFORE fails to find anything. WP:ATD-R/M to the List of Marvel Universe features, perhaps - it is listed there, with no description (guess we can copy the lead over there...). PS. AfD 10 years ago ended at keep, several sources were cited, but only one linked and described as solid: [6] - but I see only a plot summary there. Other stuff mentioned then seems even less relevant/reliable, or hard to identify :( Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:37, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/Merge to Galactus. There seems to be a bit of commentary on the subject but I'm not convinced it's independently notable of the wider topic of Galactus, which it seems to be heavily associated with in the sources provided. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:10, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Pokelego ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋23:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Galactus per the above. It is a Galactus-themed item. BD2412 T 01:01, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Anime and manga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why do we need this article its unneeded as we already have articles on anime and manga Isla🏳️‍⚧ 23:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Destrii (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like Izzy Sinclair, this character really only has one strong hit: [7]. Barring the brief mentions here, Destrii is only briefly mentioned in sources, and one source is not enough to build an article on. All other sources in the article are PRIMARY ones. I'd suggest a redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters as an AtD, as she is already mentioned and discussed there. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alpine (G.I. Joe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character from the G.I. Joe universe with no indication of real-world notability. Tagged as of questionable notability for over a year. He gets some hits on Google Scholar, but, as far as I can see, nothing more than a passing mention; the first hit, for example, is from Analyzing the Marvel Universe, and the full extent of the mention is "Other African Americans were the winter warfare expert (Iceberg) and mountain war expert (Alpine), either role not ordinarily associated with African Americans in war comics." Josh Milburn (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve Brothers in Silk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor set of characters from DC Comics. A search yields quite literally nothing bar trivial mentions in announcements and VALNET listicles, and the current article cites no sources whatsoever. Clearly non-notable. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:27, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'Redirect per above. There is a basic WP:GNG failure but redirect is good for the search term. Archrogue (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'm going to have to agree with Pokelego999 above that Redirecting really doesn't work in this case. The group is not mentioned in the target article at all so having it redirect there just would not make sense for anyone searching for the term. And given that this article has zero sources, and the general complete lack of notability of the group, any kind of a merge would not be appropriate. Rorshacma (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, mainly because of strong disagreement over whether or not this article should be Redirected. Maybe an editor can take the initiative and include a mention on the target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Parallax Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed alleging sources exist; no specific sources demonstrated that may prove notability, however, only a vague wave. Fails WP:NCORP/WP:CORPDEPTH with a dearth of significant coverage not specifically about games they developed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:48, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comics and animation proposed deletions

[edit]

Categories for discussion

[edit]

Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Templates for discussion

[edit]