User talk:Eva UX

Welcome!

Hello, Eva UX, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Zuck28 (talk) 23:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to I Love the New Millennium—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Eva UX. My edit was most constructive so I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions to I Love the New Millennium—because yours did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. And PS- when you revert a constructive edit with a perfectly clear edit summary, don't forget to explain yourself. That is the bare minimum. Thanks Eva UX (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that your revert reinstated a PROD tag and that is not permitted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Eva UX (talk) 09:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...... Eva UX (talk) 09:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? What "editing privileges" did I "abuse"? Don't you think you are obviously involved, anyway? As this whole thing could seem to be motivated by my mention (and revert) of your evidently hasty revert of a simple (and justified) redirect? A revert with no edit summary and this boilerplate template only to mention it... See above and see the page history of the article in question. This could look like a hasty block to punish someone who (with perhaps some unnecessary sarcasm, I confess, for which, if you indeed felt offended, I sincerely apologise, although I didn't mean to be insulting, just ironic and I honestly really can see no harm in my messages but I may be wrong) just let you know you made a mistake [unjustified and basically undue revert; de facto reinsertion of a PROD tag, etc.] And you inform me of the block after one day only? (thank you @Liz) This seems a bit strange (and that is a huge understatement)... Not to mention the massive rollback of perfectly constructive contributions, always (I think) made in a civil, constructive and respectful spirit. As for multiple accounts, I did in my opinion always follow the rules regarding doppelgänger accounts; I have personal off-wiki reasons to use them; and, but less importantly, cross-wiki ones; if you are really interested in knowing them, please email me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Eva UX (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MULTIPLE is a good start for legitimate usage of multiple accounts but you have to declare them. – The Grid (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've re-read that page and, honestly, it seems to confirm I did not indeed break any rule and did nothing wrong, ["outside of estalished policy"]. And precisely, it says declaring other accounts is recommended, for example. Again, I'd rather discuss private issues by email. [Are you the same user, or just passing by?].

. Eva UX (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just a user passing by. I'll ping Materialscientist on their options. – The Grid (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Their talk page seems to indicate that they are not "pingable" for some reason, from what I gathered (I only had a cursory look at some sections, though). Eva UX (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eva UX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I never "abused" multiple accounts nor did I provoke any disruption that I can think of with any account. I have read multiple times the relevant policies and guidelines and cannot see when I would have made any "inappropriate use of alternative account"(s). Unless I am very much mistaken, I never used multiple accounts on the same page, for example. I had various reasons to create and use other accounts (including frequent travelling) but if that is a problem and creates a climate of suspicion, I can edit only from one account from now on (but that would have to be less and with long interruptions, then, which is fine for me). Thank you. Eva UX (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the CheckUser tool indicates you have used multiple accounts. I am not saying this is abuse, at least not yet, but I think you should come clean and list all of your accounts. If you want you can email me them. PhilKnight (talk) 03:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eva UX (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]