User talk:ElijahPepe

Concern regarding Draft:Response to the 2024 Venezuelan presidential election

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Response to the 2024 Venezuelan presidential election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Political activities of Elon Musk has been accepted

Political activities of Elon Musk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeju Air Flight 2216 response.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeju Air Flight 2216 response.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Troy Edgar. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 in United States politics and government has been accepted

2025 in United States politics and government, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:OFFICIAL TRUMP has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OFFICIAL TRUMP. Thanks! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trump Meme has been accepted

Trump Meme, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do have permission to use it

public domain if you check Vances pic dude 2603:8001:BA00:23BC:3158:603B:B3ED:8635 (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you're referring to here. The federal government did not take either photograph. The copyright is held with Trump's inaugural committee. End of story. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/copyright/ Xoontor (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ElijahPepe Xoontor (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That language is from prior whitehouse.gov websites and clearly has faults. For instance, this image is a photograph from Trump's social media accounts, which is not labeled appropriately. Until further clarification has been provided, the status quo should remain. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Didn’t the White House technically just release these pictures under CC BY 3.0 US? They might have acquired the copyright for them. Xoontor (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In cases where it is unclear whether or not a photograph was released or if copyright was released, it is better to be safe and assume that only permission was granted. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Visitors to this website agree to grant a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to the rest of the world for their submissions to Whitehouse.gov under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License."

It is pretty clear to me. Either the photographer provided the picture to the White House under the CC BY 3.0 US license, or the White House used the picture without the photographer's knowledge. I believe the former is more likely. Xoontor (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That clause details user-generated content, for instance, the contact the president form. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting me. You were right about this, I think I should have quoted this portion instead:

"Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License."

I do not see any notice under any of these pictures: https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/. Xoontor (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy stop removing the 2025 Trump Portrait

just stop it 31.214.141.76 (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maura Burns (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:BASIC. A brief mention in an independent source, and a longer text in a non-independent, primary source are not sufficient. In addition, the draft contains no information – if this is all that can be said about the person, it would make more sense to include the information in the article about the Central Intelligence Agency (or about its director).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maura Burns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElijahPepe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 20:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect against opposition

Can you explain the logic behind this redirect[1]? It seems you redirected the article the day after you opened a talk page discussion[2] in which you failed to get consensus to redirect. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immigration policy of the second Donald Trump administration has been accepted

Immigration policy of the second Donald Trump administration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 09:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Attack on Paul Pelosi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Attack on Paul Pelosi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Anne drew -- Anne drew (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DeepSeek R1 (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DeepSeek R1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One would think after the ANI you would be more careful. This is exactly the problem, your draft does have significant content. It should not have been put through AFC. Esolo5002 (talk) 05:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One would think that you would take the high road, but instead you are continuing to talk about an issue that was settled months ago. Nothing to gain in this talk page. I requested G7 deletion given that it has been several hours and the only content I could add is from the paper itself. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United States federal government grant pause (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article on the same subject. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to be a minor event, just looking at the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United States federal government grant pause and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help put the link In

https://www.wvtm13.com/article/what-we-know-about-plane-crash-washington-dc/63611771 166.199.242.114 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Trump tariffs has been accepted

Second Trump tariffs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

charlotte ^👸♥ 22:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Attack on Paul Pelosi

The article Attack on Paul Pelosi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Attack on Paul Pelosi for comments about the article, and Talk:Attack on Paul Pelosi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Anne drew -- Anne drew (talk) 02:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"US–Canada relations during Trump's second presidency" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect US–Canada relations during Trump's second presidency has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 3 § US–Canada relations during Trump's second presidency until a consensus is reached. -1ctinus📝🗨 13:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dismantling of the United States Department of Education (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dismantling of the United States Department of Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs. Thanks! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United States federal government layoffs (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ToThAc: This is not a singular event, it is an ongoing event that has significance. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United States federal government layoffs (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Once again, might be TOOSOON. Might be compelled to accept if it actually has any impact. See WP:NEXTBIGTHING.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Economic policy of the second Donald Trump administration (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Donald Trump. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a collection of notes and opinions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Economic policy of the second Donald Trump administration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 United States federal government layoffs. Thanks! ToThAc (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Caine

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dan Caine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of EF5 -- EF5 (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Caine

The article Dan Caine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dan Caine for comments about the article, and Talk:Dan Caine/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of EF5 -- EF5 (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 Southern United States measles outbreak has been accepted

2025 Southern United States measles outbreak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 23:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Southwest United States measles outbreak

Great job! Bearian (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing great work!

Wow, I am impressed by how much you have accomplished regarding our task force.

Someone is making unhelpful and misleading or entirely unsourced edits to some high profile task force BLPs. I first noticed today when checking on Dan Caine. Then I checked this contribution history. There is much more, mostly for BLPs. Is there anything to be done about this sort of biased editing other than try to reverse it as we find it? It is very disheartening. Thanks for your time.-- FeralOink (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidentally, I was working on Brooke Rollins as you were writing this and I noticed that her introductory sentence read "conservative legal activist", which I removed in my rewrite. Looking at this user's edits, I get the sense of their personal beliefs towards certain subjects, which is not ideal. This discussion should not be occurring in this talk page, but rather theirs. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but they (he?) are going to fight us tooth and nail. I see that editor and many others here making objections similar to those that led to me abandoning my efforts with most task force related articles during the past 8 years, e.g. I worked a lot on the Peter Navarro BLP too and Steele Dossier and Christopher Steele and Hunter Biden and created Devon Archer and it was a constant battle with reverts ad infinitum. idk... Things have changed but not here so much...--FeralOink (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, that editor removed Brooke Rollins graduation from college cum laude without any explanation in edit log and contrary to sources. See what I mean?--FeralOink (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All my edits updating Peter Navarro's BLP in October 2024 have been successively reverted by various editors since then, with the old outdated and wrong content reinserted. Throughout 2018, I argued and made edits to that page that were reverted. Then I spent hours and hours and hours in October last year. This is awful. They hate Donald Trump and will keep doing this. I just waste my time trying to fix things I care deeply about.--FeralOink (talk) 23:56, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Arrest of Rodrigo Duterte

On 12 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Arrest of Rodrigo Duterte, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mollie Kathleen Gold Mine incident

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mollie Kathleen Gold Mine incident, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Evan Gershkovich memoir

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Evan Gershkovich memoir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Canada–India diplomatic crisis (2023–present)

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canada–India diplomatic crisis (2023–present), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kash Patel and conspiracy theories

I get that you have a draft that you feel pretty good about, but would you please refrain from making edits around conspiracy theories on the Kash Patel page, at least until the RfC is closed? As a showing of good faith, I'll fix up the citations and place attributive language around any of the more "opinion-y" pieces that come from reliable sources. Carlp941 (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I understand I'm walking on eggshells with the RfC that I believe I have commented on. Please notify me when the RfC closes. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton for waiting, sorry I didn't get around to fixing those citations. Just finished reviewing your changes, and your edits look great. Thanks again! Carlp941 (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryan Bedford has been accepted

Bryan Bedford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Israeli retaliation against Iran

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Israeli retaliation against Iran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reference lists

ElijahPepe, much as I appreciate the effort you have put into transforming the reference list at articles like Pete Hegseth, I think you've already read my complaint on the hassle of trying to find the correct place to insert a new reference alphabetically into the giant list of references, because the last name is not at the start of the reference. Now I see that Howard Lutnick and Kash Patel suffer from the same problem, and User:ElijahPepe/Marco Rubio as well. I'm not sure if I missed any other article, perhaps I have. Could you kindly fix this issue for Lutnick, Patel and Rubio? I am unsure if I have the willpower to fix this issue in three more articles, which is an issue of your creation. Since you obviously advocate for this format, I believe it is your responsibility to make it editor-friendly. Thank you. starship.paint (talk / cont) 08:26, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will try. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:42, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ElijahPepe. I will help you out with some changes to Howard Lutnick until I am bored, not sure if I will complete the whole reference list. I see that on Lutnick's article you sorted alphabetically by publisher if no last name is available (e.g. Bloomberg), but that fails to render alphabetically on Wikipedia, as the title comes before the publisher. I will be fixing that (sort by title if no last name is available), as it can really cause confusion in where to insert references. starship.paint (talk / cont) 03:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I finished Lutnick. I did a tiny bit on Rubio and Patel. My brain said enough. Please finish the rest. starship.paint (talk / cont) 06:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ElijahPepe - how's it going for Kash Patel's references? starship.paint (talk / cont) 03:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have been left out of commission for a few days. I should be able to work on the article sometime next week. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I hope that you can bounce back as well as ever, if you're not already doing that! starship.paint (talk / cont) 04:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ElijahPepe. In case you've forgotten about Kash Patel's references... starship.paint (talk / cont) 03:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the Signal Chat leak

Isn't 2025 Military leak a bit ambiguous? Wouldn't signal chat leak be clearer? I am asking here because I do not want to revert your edit without consulting you. I sell eggs (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Signal as a word is not immediately clear to most readers. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, maybe, but I do think it should be a bit less ambiguous I sell eggs (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 United States military plan leak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 United States military plan leak. Thanks! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United States military plan leak (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abo Yemen was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at United States government Signal group chat leak instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United States military plan leak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please, provide the WP Policy to support your revert of a citation.

You edit summary "Images are unacceptable for citations." The citation I provided was to a file page on Wikimedia Commons that includes metadata, description, source information as well as a photograph that directly supports the claim made in that sentence. Additionally, this Official photo by the Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense was used by national news outlets as visual proof to verify the accuracy of this story.

I do not see any prohibition of Wikimedia Commons files at WP:SOURCE.

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pete_Hegseth&diff=1282986378&oldid=1282966699

Ooligan (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARY prohibits using primary sources for synthesis without a reliable source that corroborates it. This is an exception claim and a singular image is not sufficient here. The existing citation is fine and a second one is not needed. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cory Booker's marathon speech has been accepted

Cory Booker's marathon speech, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:The New York Times, January 13, 2024.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The New York Times, January 13, 2024.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 21:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Brand

Hey ElijahPepe, I think you did great work regarding this subject and the Pete Hegseth article and was wondering if you wouldn't mind having a look at the Russell Brand page if you have time?

The main issue I have is that, while long, the sexual misconduct allegations section lacks almost any detail from the extensive Times report, including the women's accounts. I think that they're of more immediate relevance to the article than the instances where he made inappropriate jokes to female TV presenters.

There's no mention of the corroborating accounts from people close to the women or who worked with Brand, supporting documentation from the investigation, such as the text messages between Brand and the woman pseudonymised as "Nadia" (the phone number he used to send the messages was verified by multiple sources) and the letter she wrote him.

Nadia's friend, who took her to the Rape Treatment Center at UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center the same day as the assault, provided The Times with medical records. She had therapy there for the following five months during which records show she contemplated criminal/civil proceedings.

"Alice", who Brand apparently referred to as "the child", also had a family member corroborate her account of being groomed by him to The Sunday Times.

He threatened the women with legal action, yet hasn't pursued libel charges against News UK despite stringent UK laws that would favor him if the accusations were unfounded (laid out here). Here, The Times journalists explain themselves the foolproof measures they had to take before publishing the report.

Regards, GhulamIslam (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2020 in California

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 in California, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Evan Gershkovich memoir

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Untitled Evan Gershkovich memoir".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mario Vargas Llosa

On 16 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mario Vargas Llosa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 03:50, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Anthony Salisbury. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Needs sources that cover him in depth and content developed from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2025 Ecuadorian general election

On 17 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Ecuadorian general election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 05:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvard University in the second Trump administration (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While WP:RSSM explicitly says that the Crimson is reliable, it is insufficient to establish notability regarding this subject. Additionally, since there is not sufficiently independent sourcing that establishes that the events are correlated in a significant way, this is functionally a WP:COATRACK. There is potential here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harvard University in the second Trump administration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Shapley has been accepted

Gary Shapley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lefcentreright Discuss 20:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Israeli retaliation against Iran

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Israeli retaliation against Iran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025 Karoline Leavitt: Tag: Disambiguation links added

Hi ElijahPepe (he/him). I'm Quaerens-veritatem. Regarding your Karoline Leavitt revision as of 00:44, 20 April 2025, I noticed that a "Tag: Disambiguation links added" was added to your edit summary. I looked briefly but couldn't find any disambiguation links, but I don't have time to thoroughly review the article for them, so you might want to review your edit for any links to disambiguation pages. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Caine

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dan Caine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Caine

The article Dan Caine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dan Caine and Talk:Dan Caine/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Health and Human Services has been accepted

President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Health and Human Services, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 00:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Caine

The article Dan Caine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dan Caine for comments about the article, and Talk:Dan Caine/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Virginia Giuffre

On 27 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Virginia Giuffre, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2024 Israel–Hezbollah ceasefire

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Israel–Hezbollah ceasefire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nunez v. New York City Department of Correction

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nunez v. New York City Department of Correction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"2024 Iran plane crash" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2024 Iran plane crash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 1 § 2024 Iran plane crash until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 16:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Waltz

Sorry to bring this to your talk page. Just wanted to explain that reporting on the subject is pretty clear that Waltz is still in as National Security Advisor, but that he will leave the role once Trump properly nominates him as ambassador to the UN. Even once he is nominated, describing him as an ambassador is incorrect: he would still need to be approved by the senate. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that Waltz is still the national security advisor. There are many articles for Trump nominees that had "presumptive nominee" in the infobox. It is not improper to include. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone being a presumptive nominee is a empty status. That's not appropriate to add to an infobox. The status parameter is for things like incumbent, not an unofficial declaration of intent. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you inappropriately restoring a challenged addition to a BLP? That's not acceptable per WP:ONUS and WP:BRD. Please self-revert immediately. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Valorrr

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Mike Waltz. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 22:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 in California

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2020 in California".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2024 South Korean government crisis

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 South Korean government crisis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a throw

Saw you'd applied for GA class review on Casey Means; I granted a week of semi-protection from ips. I've also applied the CT-AP notice to talk. Good luck. BusterD (talk) 15:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United States Department of Justice purges (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft's subject seems to be notable, but more context and sources are needed, specially to offer a more neutral view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United States Department of Justice purges and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 14:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert O'Harrow Jr.

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert O'Harrow Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cory Booker's marathon speech

On 11 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cory Booker's marathon speech, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cory Booker delivered the longest recorded individual speech in United States Senate history while protesting the second presidency of Donald Trump? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cory Booker's marathon speech. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cory Booker's marathon speech), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Anne Carter (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Anne Carter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:KC Crosbie

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KC Crosbie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2024 Israel–Hezbollah war

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2024 Israel–Hezbollah war".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:46th Canadian federal election

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "46th Canadian federal election".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Masohpotato (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Casey Means

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Casey Means you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Andrew Davidson -- Andrew Davidson (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Donald Trump tax break and spending bill

When you moved this from Draft to Article space there was an incomplete section. Please make sure to check that before moving articles. Thank you! Esolo5002 (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dan Newlin

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dan Newlin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

On 16 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aaron Siri

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Siri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Privatization of the United States Postal Service

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Privatization of the United States Postal Service, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Sharp Walsh

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward Sharp Walsh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Lamelas

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Lamelas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Franklin Fire

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Franklin Fire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:News media litigation of Donald Trump

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:News media litigation of Donald Trump, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stacey Feinberg

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stacey Feinberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Sinwar

There has been no confirmation either by Israel or Hamas that he is dead. Media claims don't count as confirmation. Hamas has denied that he is dead. So please don't show him as dead. Linkin Prankster (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David A. Fink

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David A. Fink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew McKenna (business executive)

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew McKenna (business executive), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Proposed merger of Honda and Nissan

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proposed merger of Honda and Nissan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2024 Israel–Hezbollah ceasefire

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2024 Israel–Hezbollah ceasefire".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Arrigo

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Arrigo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Somers Farkas

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Somers Farkas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nunez v. New York City Department of Correction

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nunez v. New York City Department of Correction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2025 United States debt-ceiling crisis

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 United States debt-ceiling crisis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Martin (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samoht27 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references are not cited properly. Cite the articles directly instead of linking to the articles in another section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margo Martin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 03:54, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2024 South Korean government crisis

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2024 South Korean government crisis".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Martin has been accepted

Margo Martin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 20:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donald Trump's memecoin dinner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump's memecoin dinner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's memecoin dinner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, June 2025 Los Angeles County protests

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, June 2025 Los Angeles County protests. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – June 2025 Los Angeles protests. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at June 2025 Los Angeles protests. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dahawk04 (talk) 01:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Melania Trump documentary

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Melania Trump documentary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Resignation of Justin Trudeau

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resignation of Justin Trudeau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert O'Harrow Jr.

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert O'Harrow Jr.".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MAHA Commission for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MAHA Commission is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAHA Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2025 Los Angeles wildfires

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Los Angeles wildfires, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for June 2025 Israeli strikes in Iran

On 13 June 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article June 2025 Israeli strikes in Iran, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 04:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kingsley Wilson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kingsley Wilson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dan Newlin

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dan Newlin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kingsley Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingsley Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Privatization of the United States Postal Service

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Privatization of the United States Postal Service".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kingsley Wilson

The article Kingsley Wilson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kingsley Wilson and Talk:Kingsley Wilson/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 03:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:News media litigation of Donald Trump

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "News media litigation of Donald Trump".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stacey Feinberg

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stacey Feinberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest: Retsef Levi

ElijahPepe You might be interested in this recent article I created: Retsef Levi (a scientist, COVID-19 vaccine skeptic, and former IDF intelligence officer who was appointed by RFK Jr. to the controversial ACIP). I could use some help expanding the article and this seemed to fit some of your focus areas. GuardianH 23:19, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I planned on writing some articles on the new advisory committee members, though I also have my own projects to work on. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reconstruction of the Gaza Strip

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blocking of TikTok in the United States

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blocking of TikTok in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David A. Fink

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David A. Fink".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for June 2025 United States strikes on Iran

An article that you have been involved in editing—June 2025 United States strikes on Iran—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Super Goku V (talk) 01:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Salesses

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Salesses, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maura Burns

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maura Burns, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Second United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Second United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United States withdrawal from the World Health Organization

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States withdrawal from the World Health Organization, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kash Patel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kash Patel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PickleG13 -- PickleG13 (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Proposed merger of Honda and Nissan

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Proposed merger of Honda and Nissan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United States House Select Subcommittee on the January 6 Attack

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States House Select Subcommittee on the January 6 Attack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Arrigo

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "John Arrigo".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Somers Farkas

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Somers Farkas".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2025 United States debt-ceiling crisis

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2025 United States debt-ceiling crisis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Canada–United States trade war

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canada–United States trade war, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of America Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article America Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Is la🏳️‍⚧ 23:00, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Melania Trump documentary

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Untitled Melania Trump documentary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Resignation of Justin Trudeau

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Resignation of Justin Trudeau".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2025 Los Angeles wildfires

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2025 Los Angeles wildfires".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:My View with Lara Trump

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My View with Lara Trump, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United States proposal to end the Russo-Ukrainian War

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States proposal to end the Russo-Ukrainian War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trump v. United States (disambiguation)

The article Trump v. United States (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to other uses.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trump–Powell conflict for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump–Powell conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump–Powell conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Esolo5002 (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Kingsley Wilson has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Kingsley Wilson has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at Pete Hegseth

I think you are at risk here. You need to go to talk. Good luck. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 17:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You listed four unrelated edits, two of which were reverted. I didn't see that consensus had been reached to mention the inauguration tattoo incident, but you seem to be the only one who has taken issue with my recent edit. Remember thanked me for my edit. I already explained my changes. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of shortened footnotes for citations

I saw that Reywas92 voiced frustration about this in a deletion discussion, which wasn't the right forum for it. I'd like to echo what they said. There's no reason to use Template:Sfn when one is not aiming to specify varied page numbers for a single source (as with a book), and unless there's good reason to use it, readers also shouldn't have to click twice to see the actual citation. It's also a pain for editors using the visual editor. I encourage you to stop doing this in the many articles where it's not necessary. FactOrOpinion (talk) 22:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where I can't use it. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say or suggest that you can't use it. I gave you 2 specific reasons that it's often not good to use it, and noted that you're using it in many situations where it doesn't do anything more than what you'd get with a normal citation. Do you think it's irrelevant readers may not understand that they have to hover over the Sfn output in order to see the actual citation? Do you think it's irrelevant that you're creating extra work for all of your fellow editors who use the visual editor? FactOrOpinion (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ElijahPepe, I posted in a section above but you didn’t respond. You still haven’t listed the reference last names first at Kash Patel given the above shortened footnotes, while you’re doing quite a bit of editing on other topics. I think I have been patient but this has been months. Remember that I actually helped you fix it for other articles. starship.paint (talk / cont) 02:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did list them. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:25, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. ElijahPepe, I apologise for my oversight and my erroneous accusation. My bad. starship.paint (talk / cont) 09:08, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Emil Bove is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Emil Bove is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Irruptive Creditor -- Irruptive Creditor (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Economic policy of the second Donald Trump administration

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Economic policy of the second Donald Trump administration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reconstruction of the Gaza Strip

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Reconstruction of the Gaza Strip".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Salesses

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Salesses".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maura Burns

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maura Burns".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United States withdrawal from the World Health Organization

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "United States withdrawal from the World Health Organization".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of 2025 visit by Donald Trump to the Middle East has failed

Your good article nomination of the article 2025 visit by Donald Trump to the Middle East has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Energy Dominance Council

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Energy Dominance Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United States House Select Subcommittee on the January 6 Attack

Hello, ElijahPepe. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "United States House Select Subcommittee on the January 6 Attack".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ukraine–United States mineral agreement

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ukraine–United States mineral agreement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI infrastructure firm and founder

Hi ElijahPepe, recently I posted two suggested updates. The first is a new draft proposal for Nebius Group, an Amsterdam based AI infrastructure company and the second is some suggestions for the company founder's page, Arkady Volozh, due to WP:RELEVANCE. I am reaching out to you as I saw that you participate in WP:COMPSCI and related fields. I was in discussion with other editors but as they have not been back online, would you be willing to review them? This is the suggestion for Nebius Group and this is the suggestion for Arkady Volozh. Thank you very much for looking at these requests. Wikigracht (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3-3-3 plan

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3-3-3 plan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Emil Bove has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Emil Bove has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Pleasant editing, Irruptive Creditor (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Emil Bove has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Emil Bove has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Irruptive Creditor -- Irruptive Creditor (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]