User:Ocaasi/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 95.162.142.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1012:b18a:3184:8086:3639:600c:1654 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2404:1c40:1b8:7f3e:8c7a:bbff:fe61:c862 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Page deleted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:1c00:2730:1e00:6ce2:3c1a:c899:2d50 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:38, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:985:4400:d640:c148:17ef:f1db:3737 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:44, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Letters527 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:11, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 206.83.102.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 24.155.178.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1197 five times in the last 5 minutes (Excessive exclamation marks, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Page deleted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- AlexGustschin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Yungthug4201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Ashish Goyal (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. adding obviously made up imformation to articles. ItsCheck (talk) 04:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- On Dorothy Wilson (actress) (diff): vandalism after final warning after this AIV was made. —tonyst (talk) 04:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Frances Bundan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Internationalrelationsandhistory (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheEditorOFFICIAL101 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jacksonololoisnowingoodfaith (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Nolyspy TV Limited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Alphasigmaskibiditoiletdontstopedgingtomygyatt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Favourorans (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User:Favourorans/sandbox. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 14:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. I'm reading this as a real name, rather than the name of the company which is different. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- NewSilverLending (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Question on creating an article of their company - see "here". Search on web found "here 1" sec.gov company info and (CRD # 324981) indicate company is located in DE, US - see "here 2". Cassiopeia talk 23:35, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Died down a day ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA, should be protected per those arbitration decisions. Thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 185.84.70.137 (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The IP is now stale for blocking and doesn't have a long history of disruption, so I won't do so. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Woxic1589 (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/EE Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper has been vandalizing the page since yesterday. CycloneYoris talk! 11:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 12:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I would appreciate if these could get extended protection as well [1] [2] [3] thanks to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caspidarya. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:15, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, this kind of article needs at least - Pending changes protection. Dasomm (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ZergTwo (talk) 13:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring over whose opinions should and should not be in it. In fact, borderline edit waring in general since it began. Slatersteven (talk) 14:11, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- There's also a relevant ANI discussion adjacent to this - Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ecrusized_and_unilateral_changes
- In that discussion, one proposal other than full page protection was to have "enforced BRD" similar to 2025_Pahalgam_attack Soni (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:13, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. RaschenTechner (talk) 15:35, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Once every half year is not persistent enough, not even for pending changes. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Since network do extensive coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict - it should have indefinite ECP as per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles Cinaroot (talk) 15:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring by IPs. Red Shogun412 (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. per ARBPIA. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 16:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – an IP user disrupt this page few days ago, and few weeks ago as well, temporary protection will be good. Drcarrot.phd (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by user Loaiza3 and an ever-growing list of IP sockpuppets. I recommend Extended Confirmed protection. Temporary protection did not work. The user resumed soon after the page was unprotected. (A sockpuppet investigation was ended because of the temporary protection; don't know if that would have helped anyway.) The article does need improvement, but this user is simply disruptive and uninterested in policy or education, often breaking things, adding Spanish instead of English, and other confused activities in rapid-fire bursts of editing. Jōkepedia (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Two IP editors have made disruptive/promotional edits in the past 24 hours. ForsythiaJo (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also high-risk page RaschenTechner (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing in a week. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is repeatedly having large amounts of content blanked. Muirjohnnyes (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of non-notable people to staff lists. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets are bypassing the semi protection. Isla🏳️⚧ 20:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets are bypassing the semi protection. Isla🏳️⚧ 20:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent recent vandalism - well after recent protection expired, so may need to go for a month or longer. Departure– (talk) 20:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection (2 weeks): High level of IP vandalism since Briatore received a notable job promotion [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Namelessposter (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP edit wars over release date. wizzito | say hello! 23:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of the same content by different IPs. PersusjCP (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of the same content by different IPs. PersusjCP (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive editing, IP and non IP. I would suggest semi protection for 18 Months.Servite et contribuere (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from newly registered users and IPs 2A00:FBC:EEDB:3685:CE0:66BB:63FD:711C (talk) 02:59, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
ADD Lindsley Allen and Joie Shettler (Original and founding members of The Pussycat Dolls I have many links, people and photos as reference.)
1995–2002: Beginnings as burlesque dance troupe Antin began exploring the idea of a modern burlesque troupe during 1990 with Carla Kama, Lindsley Allen, Joie Shettler and Christina Applegate as performers. LindsleyAllen (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done This request has already been made on the talk page of the article in question. --Kinu t/c 01:53, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 17 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to do repitative tasks such as adding wikilinks, fixing typos, etc Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I intend to use AWB to assist with repetitive but useful maintenance tasks such as fixing common formatting issues, updating templates, correcting typos, and performing category cleanups. Similarly, I have also reviewed the guidelines and will ensure all edits follow Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with Wikipedia editing conventions and have made constructive edits. Thank you for considering my request and I hope for positive response. Fade258 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
I wish to become an AutoWikiBrowser user to fix Linter, errors along with many other things that can I assist with, I understand that I may have had problems with admins and acted a bit outrageous, but I understand my actions and now been using Twinke, Ultraviolet, Rater and more, I believe I can be trusted with AutoWikiBrowser rights, as I've waited my time, and today/yesterday is my 2 month anniversary of my account. Feel free to ask me any questions. I also understand that I should be checking every edit before saving it and the other guidelines...
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
Hi! I'm running a Wikipedia training session in central London next Thursday (22/05/2025) with 20 people booked on. Could I be granted Event Coordinator Rights for this to avoid the IP block please? Octavosaurus (talk) 14:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I'm requesting preliminary new page reviewer to help with the backlog drive. Preliminary because I'm not perfect—I've definitely fallen victim to WP:AKON before with my own creations[1], but I also have created a number of articles that stuck, and edited up articles quite a bit[2]. Importantly each process I've learned and grown. I plan to start small and grow over time as I become more and more confident with the process. Just recently attempted to review a draft with obvious advertising and realized the permissions would be good. Thanks, References Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello, I am requesting to be a pending change reviewer. I have around two to three months of experience patrolling RC and approximatly 1,000 edits in mainspace. I constantly find edits to contenuous and controversial pages, and would like to be able to accept or decline them. Toast1454TC 15:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I've been using Twinkle which works very well, but I'd like to try out other tools like SWViewer and Huggle. If you'd like to see additional recent edits or vandalism reversions I understand completely! TonySt (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
 Hi! I am once again peitioning for rollback rights, I currently have 4,000 edits under my belt and edit consistently, though I happen to run into a lot of vandalism. On the articles I edit, it can get excessive and rollback could come in use right about now. Quite frankly, it is quite difficult and time consuming to revert all edits made by a user, who is either vandalising an article or making unconstructive edits, with it also clogging up the edit history. It would be very useful if I could please obtain this tool to make it easier. Also please see the image! Thank you for reading. Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Hey there :3 I'm looking for rollback perms so I can speed up my vandal reversion by using tools such as huggle. I don't have any issues with RedWarn but my more experienced friends tell me that huggle is much nicer and faster to use. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 00:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC) |