Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
![]() | Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
![]() |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary[edit]
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps[edit]
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers[edit]
Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...[edit]
Please do not...[edit]
Suggesting updates[edit]There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
[edit]Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
Sections
[edit]This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
July 4
[edit]
July 4, 2025
(Friday)
Disasters and accidents
International relations
|
July 3
[edit]
July 3, 2025
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
International relations
Politics and elections
|
RD: David Mabuza
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:547C:7432:E984:43D0 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Aficionado538 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former deputy president of South Africa. 240F:7A:6253:1:547C:7432:E984:43D0 (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Billy Hunter
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Bill Hunter, last surviving member of inaugural Orioles team, dies at 97
Credits:
- Nominated by TheCorriynial (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Two MLB Franchises are marking a long time player's death today. Along side later being a Head coach, He was the last living member of the St. Louis Browns (which no longer exist, now the Orioles), and as the source above states, when they moved, also the last of the inaugural Orioles team lineup in 1954. Article is close, but could use a look over. TheCorriynial (talk) 00:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support meets WP:ITNQUALITY- there is 1 cn tag for 4 words of text, but that should not hold up this being posted. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) 3I/ATLAS
[edit]Blurb: Astronomers announce the discovery of 3I/ATLAS, an interstellar object passing through the solar system. (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes, Guardian,
Credits:
- Nominated by Nottheking (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Third-ever confirmed interstellar object (indicated by the "3I") and almost 6 years since the last one. (2I/Borisov) Not confirmed as a comment, but many sources do report this. Also of encyclopediac interest is the extremely high velocity (excess velocity of ~58 km/sec) which makes it more energetic than any other object ever measured in or near the solar system. Nottheking (talk) 21:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Gaining alot of attention on social media, and news reports have stated alot of things about the discovery. Shaneapickle (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Proposal of altblurb+support Altblurb should be shorter, like "NASA announces the discovery of a interstellar comet being the first interstellar comet discovered in 6 years" Shaneapickle (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support - a new 'Oumuamua! Very notable. Khuft (talk) 21:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support: Good-quality article, rare and reported-on event. -insert valid name here- (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support as one of the editors (alongside User:Kheider) actively writing up this article. Lots of media buzz, and a rare event. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 23:34, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 01:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
2025 European heatwaves
[edit]Blurb: Record-breaking heat waves across Europe leave more than 1,200 dead, cause widespread disruption and exacerbate the ongoing wildfire season. (Post)
News source(s): Euronews, The Guardian, BBC News
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Harrz (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Significant event across a whole continent; countless records broken, including highest June temperature in Portugal and Spain; numerous wildfires and deaths; significant disruption in multiple countries. According to MoMo, there have been 553 heat-related deaths in Spain since the start of summer, whilst the LSHTM predicted there would be 570 in the UK between 19 and 22 June. harrz talk 19:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - People really will do whatever it takes to get a ITN nomination. This is completely normal for Europe. 135.180.128.228 (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say it's "completely normal" when records have been broken in at least ten countries... harrz talk 20:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- People love to underestimate the impacts of weather at ITNC. Support as record-breaking and extremely deadly. EF5 20:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The IP is blocked and geolocates outside Europe. What a surprise... Daß Wölf 01:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say it's "completely normal" when records have been broken in at least ten countries... harrz talk 20:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose most of these heatwaves have happened in the last week and finished. Yes there were record breaking temperatures, but no that doesn't mean it meets WP:ITNSIGNIF. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Was thinking the same. Seems like this story is already slightly stale. The lede of the article says
the most severe heatwave so far came in mid-June
. Natg 19 (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2025 (UTC)- I have amended the lead to be more accurate; I wrote that before the current spate of extreme temperatures began. harrz talk 21:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Actually many of them are ongoing, with more extreme temperatures forecasted for weeks to come. Also, it does meet WP:ITNSIGNIF, as countless sources from across the world have been tirelessly reporting on it. Just because the heatwaves have ended in English-speaking areas doesn't mean they have ended everywhere. Greece is currently battling wildfires with over 1,500 evacuated and 20 cities in Italy are on red alert for heat. Please do not say they are "finished" until you have done some research. Also, every item in ITN is over a week old now, so something a bit more recent is definitely due. harrz talk 20:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is extremely hard to justify the annual occurrences of heat waves or wildfires, without something that makes that specific event far more significant than those of previous years. Just because there's a large amount of mainstream news covering it does not make for a good encyclopedic content. Masem (t) 22:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- That is why I said "most" countries it has finished. Of the 21 countries listed on that article, only a few are still affected- and the amount of content on those listed in that article is no more than a couple of sentences anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Was thinking the same. Seems like this story is already slightly stale. The lede of the article says
- 60,000 people died as a result of the 2022 European heatwaves. 47,000 died due to the 2023 European heatwaves. Averaged over 90 days, the average day beats any entire Atlantic hurricane season of this decade. As another comparison, these two years added together have roughly the same death count as the infobox in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict article (1948-present). Croatian state media reports an estimate for 60,000 excess deaths this year, and while it doesn't cite the source, an UK study cites upwards of 3,000 deaths for the last 4 days. While we won't get a study on the excess deaths until next year, with these figures in mind, I see no merit in WP:ITNSIGNIF complaints and no reson not to give it my support.
- As for staleness, it would be very nice if this was the last hot week of the summer, but judging from the past articles and current mid-term forecasts, that's not about to happen. I don't see a problem whether it gets posted now or 15 days from today, considering it will still be an ongoing deadly event with recurring hot days. Daß Wölf 01:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Recognition of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
[edit]Blurb: The Russian Federation became the first country to recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan under its Taliban government. (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:
- Nominated by Noorullah21 (talk · give credit)
Noorullah (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nom is TOOSOON Shaneapickle (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Russia? Let's be serious. Nfitz (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose 2 governments' propaganda is not ITN worthy content- ITN isn't a Russo-Taliban propaganda forum. Also literally no sensible target article for this nomination either, as the recognition article is junk list of reactions. Suggest speedy close as per WP:SNOW. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Kenneth Colley
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British actor, noted for Star Wars Episodes 5 and 6 Ptelford (talk) 20:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: David Lipsey
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Labour peer, member of the House of Lords, former leader of the Fabian Society PtolemyXV (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Michael Madsen
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC L.A. ,The Guardian
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American actor 90.211.54.213 (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Inadequate sourcing. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- More sourcing now regarding his death. ItsShandog (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Gonna take a lot of effort to get that filmography sourced, even if we left the blue links alone. Masem (t) 19:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- It will be hard work... BilboBeggins (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Currently in the process sourcing filmography section ItsShandog (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Or I was in the process but someone removed it again. ItsShandog (talk) 20:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) Stop Killing Games campaign
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The European Citizens Initiative of the Stop Killing Games campaign reaches its objective of one million signatures, meaning it will be considered for debate in the European Commission. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The petition of the Stop Killing Games campaign for the UK Parliament reaches 100,000 signatures, meaning it will be considered for debate in Parliament.
News source(s): "Stop Killing Games". stopkillinggames.com. Retrieved 2025-07-03.Scott, Ross [@accursedfarms] (2025-07-02). "The UK petition has reached 100k signatures! This means it will be brought before Parliament and we can ignore the old garbage answer that didn't address the problem. Will have a video on it later. Keep signing for safety margins!" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 2025-07-02 – via Twitter.
Credits:
- Nominated by NeoGaze (talk · give credit)
- Created by Dabmasterars (talk · give credit)
- Updated by 176.228.5.125 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Oppose This is currently on the main page in DYK and that seems ample exposure for now. It's another form of protest like the other recent nominations and, per WP:ADVOCACY, we should have a high bar for reporting such lobbying. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:52, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose does not meet WP:ITNSIGNIF. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on significance, all this means is that it will be debated. I would be willing to consider blurbing any new laws that result from this, but I don't think the petition itself is important enough. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose LOL Harizotoh9 (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - those are the best sources there is? No wonder there's no stand-alone article. Nfitz (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: André Filipe da Silva
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Kingsif (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Stanley Gordon (talk · give credit) and Unknown Temptation (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Brother of Diogo Jota, had a football career of his own, article newly created and sufficient. Kingsif (talk) 09:58, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose article is a stub and questionable whether he's notable anyway, as notability claim seems to be WP:INHERITED. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- U23s of a major team and regular in the Portuguese second division covers notability easily. Kingsif (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sources are what's needed to pass WP:GNG- and sources about him rather than just being the brother of Jota (which is how mst obitiaries are doing). I will look for sources later today and if I don't believe GNG is met, I will start an AFD. Either aay, nowhere near meeting WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- You’re experienced enough to know that (otherwise suitable) sources which contain significant info on how someone is notable in their own right are always acceptable, even if they all mention the person’s more-famous relative. Notability being inherited is if someone has no claim in their own right and a bio would be all personal information found in sources by association. That clearly isn’t the case - the sources with info on André’s career support his own notability, regardless of mentioning Jota. Kingsif (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is really a debate for the article talkpage or an AFD, but if these sources exist, then add them so it can meet WP:ITNQUALITY. Like I said, I haven't thoroughly checked for sources yet, but the sources on the article currently don't meet WP:SIGCOV about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is moot thanks to expansion, but worth saying to underline ITN’s attitude to new short bios: I know you know that SIGCOV includes sources focused on others if there’s enough info and, at the time you wrote this comment, there was a “who was André Silva” source all about him already used. It was fine, is now better, and notability shouldn’t be brought up for RD unless it is at AfD. Kingsif (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you're referring to this source that was there at time I questioned notability, it's borderline but I don't see it as SIGCOV (as it's mostly basic career facts, a section about his name and confusion with someone else and the accident- which seems somewhat routine to me). Joseph2302 (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is moot thanks to expansion, but worth saying to underline ITN’s attitude to new short bios: I know you know that SIGCOV includes sources focused on others if there’s enough info and, at the time you wrote this comment, there was a “who was André Silva” source all about him already used. It was fine, is now better, and notability shouldn’t be brought up for RD unless it is at AfD. Kingsif (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is really a debate for the article talkpage or an AFD, but if these sources exist, then add them so it can meet WP:ITNQUALITY. Like I said, I haven't thoroughly checked for sources yet, but the sources on the article currently don't meet WP:SIGCOV about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- You’re experienced enough to know that (otherwise suitable) sources which contain significant info on how someone is notable in their own right are always acceptable, even if they all mention the person’s more-famous relative. Notability being inherited is if someone has no claim in their own right and a bio would be all personal information found in sources by association. That clearly isn’t the case - the sources with info on André’s career support his own notability, regardless of mentioning Jota. Kingsif (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sources are what's needed to pass WP:GNG- and sources about him rather than just being the brother of Jota (which is how mst obitiaries are doing). I will look for sources later today and if I don't believe GNG is met, I will start an AFD. Either aay, nowhere near meeting WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- U23s of a major team and regular in the Portuguese second division covers notability easily. Kingsif (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Regardless of the notability argument, the article is well below the minimum size of 1500 bytes of readable prose. We don't post stubs at RD. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Barring any sourcing prior to his death to show significant coverage (Simply playing for a major team no longer is considered sufficient under NSPORT), this is a clear WP:BLP1E failure, particularly as the deaths were from an accident, and unlikely to warrant anything like a "Death of..." article that we'd have for major leaders or extremely visible celebrities. Masem (t) 14:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't doubt notability, as someone who has made pages for players and managers in the Portuguese second division. Notability is a red herring anyway, a topic for WP:AFD. However the page is a stub and should exceed 1,500 characters - preferably more on career. Unknown Temptation (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I had a butcher's and found a source from his lifetime [3] and an obituary, [4] both in Portuguese. This was enough to flesh out with vital statistics and a bit more about the career. All English coverage is inevitably framed around his brother, which isn't helping this page beat the WP:NOTINHERITED allegations. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Based on Unknown Temptation’s expansion, it now meets quality requirements. Kingsif (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article seems better now, but also a comment: This is a very unusal situation. The circumstances of this article's creation imply that we really only found him relevant because he died in an accident with his brother (who happens to be the famous Diogo Jota.) A close reading of WP:ITNRDBLURB would suggest that his death is therefore the main story and would maybe merit blurbing. Would like to hear other editors' thoughts on this because I'm not sure personally. Yo.dazo (talk) 20:24, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I see it as a typical case of users who otherwise prioritise article creation elsewhere (than Portuguese second division footballers) finding motivation from a tragic death to briefly move it up the list. “Deaditing” is a thing for a reason, though ITN has a weird relationship with the concept. Kingsif (talk) 22:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I'm still opposing this posting on quality grounds. Whilst it is 2100 characters- and so more than a stub- the article says very little about his playing career, other than just listing the teams he played for. As such, the article feels incomplete, and does not yet meet WP:ITNQUALITY in my view. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Diogo Jota
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): De Telegraaf, Sky News, The Beeb
Credits:
- Nominated by Jalapeño (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Liverpool forward/left winger. One CN, no orange/yellow banners Jalapeño (u t g) 08:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I see this was already posted. Marking as such. The article is well cited and there are no issues with speedy posting. --Tone 09:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- That was me who added it - apologies as I didn’t follow procedure by posting here but I figured it was an obvious RD to speedily add with a comprehensive and reliably-sourced article. Fish+Karate 13:01, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Post-posting support, article is of sufficient quality. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2
[edit]
July 2, 2025
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Science and technology
|
(Closed) Sean Combs verdict
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The trial of Sean Combs (pictured in 2012) concludes with him being convicted of transportation to engage in prostitution. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Rapper Sean Combs (pictured in 2012) is acquitted on racketeering and sex trafficking charges, and is convicted of transportation to engage in prostitution.
News source(s): NBC, NYT, CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by Jalapeño (talk · give credit)
- Was not expecting to see Diddy at ITN today. Eh, I'm going to weak oppose as I can't remember the last time we posted any legal case involving one person, and I'm especially hesitant to post one about his crimes due to the nature (yes, WP:NOTCENSORED, I know). EF5 18:03, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- OJ'd on most charges. Count Iblis (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose celebrity tried and found guilty of some crimes, news at 11. Not significant in the larger picture. Masem (t) 18:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not of lasting significance. — Amakuru (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.153.225 (talk) 22:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose largely per above. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:35, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:BLP:
it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives
. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:09, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would also oppose this nomination, as this is largely just celebrity news and no overarching significance. However, I see no BLP violation here as we are not spreading unsourced claims or anything like that. Natg 19 (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would tend to agree that strictly, having an article covering the trial and verdict is fine, all that is public info. What I think the intent is is that this type of trial (similar to the Depp/Heard trial or the Dust-set shooting) is leaning on celebrity gossip if we featured it as ITN. Just because something like this gets tons of coverage doesn't necessary make it appropriate content for us to feature on the main page. Masem (t) 01:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would also oppose this nomination, as this is largely just celebrity news and no overarching significance. However, I see no BLP violation here as we are not spreading unsourced claims or anything like that. Natg 19 (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2025 United States wildfires
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Over 1.7 million acres of forests has been burned in the United States this year. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The largest wildfire in U.S. history destroyed more than 3,400 structures, killed more than 280 people, and burned about 1.7 million acres.
News source(s): [5] [6] washingtonpost The guardian
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by CostalCal (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Oppose We already posted the California wildfire when it happened, iirc. The place with big wildfires currently is Europe -- places like Scotland and Turkey. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The BBC News Scotland homepage currently has exactly zero stories relating to wildfires. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- See this, for example. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The BBC News Scotland homepage currently has exactly zero stories relating to wildfires. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose if there's a single ITN worthy US wildfire event currently happening, that should be nominated- but don't believe this is the case. And this article doesn't need posting to ITN. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Largest in U.S. history? Deadliest? Where are you getting these metrics from? Plus, wildfire season hasn’t even started. EF5 12:03, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose wildfires happen every year in many nations. We should only post wildfires that actually have significant impacts like the LA one last year. Masem (t) 13:39, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as stale. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
July 1
[edit]
July 1, 2025
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD:Terry Brown (brothel owner)
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Infamous former South Island sex industry kingpin dies
Credits:
- Nominated by Schwede66 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The source states: Stuff understands he died earlier this week from health complications. His family declined to comment on Wednesday.
If that is correct, he died sometime between 30 June (Mon) and 2 July (Wed). I've slotted this in under 1 July; we can always adjust that once the exact death date becomes known. The article is ready apart from missing categories, which I will now add. Schwede66 05:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Alex Delvecchio
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Boston Globe, NHL.com
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:ADA9:36F:1332:CF6D (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Canuckhead43 (talk · give credit), Jkaharper (talk · give credit), Alexgor23 (talk · give credit) and Connormah (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Canadian Hall of Fame ice hockey player. 240F:7A:6253:1:ADA9:36F:1332:CF6D (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- All time great, loved by the Red Wings community, and lived a long life. Support. 24.77.127.72 (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much unsourced content. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jimmy Swaggart
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Wizzito (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Could use some work with sourcing. wizzito | say hello! 18:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended
[edit]Blurb: Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is suspended by the Constitutional Court of Thailand, with deputy prime minister Suriya Juangroongruangkit taking over as acting leader (Post)
Alternative blurb: Amid a political crisis, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is suspended by the Constitutional Court of Thailand, with deputy Suriya Juangroongruangkit becoming acting leader.
News source(s): [7]
Credits:
- Nominated by Banedon (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Khiikiat (talk · give credit), Preime TH (talk · give credit) and PaperPenguin856 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Banedon (talk) 14:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- oh man this is huge. support!! 196.221.194.165 (talk) 15:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. There is barely one sentence about the suspension in this article. Celjski Grad (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment besides the minimal update, the blurb should explain the reason for the suspension. That said this is an ITNR I think? Masem (t) 15:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes this is ITNR, head of government (though the politics is dominated by the Royal Thai Armed Forces). The monarch has a limited role in Thai politics (well except lèse-majesté in Thailand). Gotitbro (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Technical support this is a change to a head of government and ITN/R... but oppose on content since there is literally just a sentence on this. wait until a full article is made. Scuba 20:29, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality when there's a proper article or a decent amount of content in a relevant existing article, then this should probably be posted. But for now, fails WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Opinion I'd rather 2025 Thai political crisis than Paetongtarn Shinawatra as the targeted article. Support ALT. ArionStar (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
June 30
[edit]
June 30, 2025
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Gamini Lokuge
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Hiru News
Credits:
- Nominated by Titanciwiki (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Sri Lankan Politician, Former Cabinet Minister and MP (1983-2024) Titanciwiki (talk) 19:56, 03 July 2025 (UTC)
Telangana chemical factory explosion
[edit]Blurb: A factory explosion at Sangareddy Telangana, India, kills 39 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 39 killed, 36 injured in Reactor explosion at chemical factory in Telangana, India
News source(s): BBCAl jazeera ReutersCNN]
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Celjski Grad (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: High death toll incident in Telangana, India. Spworld2 (talk) 13:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Poorly written in a weird syntax with grammar errors, etc. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 13:45, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Why was I put as the creator? I had no idea this even happened. EF5 14:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Presumably the user just copied and pasted from a different nomination? Joseph2302 (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry! It was a mistake made when copying and pasting the template, and I will be careful of such editing errors in the future. Thank you Spworld2 (talk) 15:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality and notability. The article is barely more than a stub, and does nothing to demonstrate how this would be anywhere close to WP:ITNSIGNIF either. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Wait The article still needs some structural and sourcing improvements, and I am working on it. However, I strongly believe the subject is clearly notable... a major industrial explosion with 45 confirmed deaths, widely covered by national and regional media including BBC, DW, and Al Jazeera. With some more work, the article can meet ITN standards. Veritasphere (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I've reworked and expanded the article a bit and I'll hopefully add some more info once more news comes out. Scaramouche33 (talk) 17:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability, good start but needs expansion Kowal2701 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability ArionStar (talk) 03:26, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment @Dreameditsbrooklyn @Joseph2302: The article looks to have been redone, pinging in case you want to re-evaluate your opposes since they were based on quality. I'm neutral on posting. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 13:34, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- I am now neutral but it looks like the time has passed imo. thanks for the ping. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 08:30, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support The article’s quality has improved. There is widespread international coverage and the nature of the accident (a chemical explosion) as well as the number of casualties (~40 or more) are unusual for India. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 21:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment It might be better if the article was rewritten to explain the term "reactor" and "reactor unit" because at the moment it reads like the company are denying a nuclear event took place. Black Kite (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think that the article is comprehensive enough for posting. Schwede66 05:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jim Shooter
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ComicBook.com
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:C4BA:A407:B92D:C3EE (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former Marvel Comics editor-in-chief. 240F:7A:6253:1:C4BA:A407:B92D:C3EE (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support; came here to post this. DS (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Same here, but the article still has some unreferenced paragraphs. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
RD: Lajos Sătmăreanu
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.gsp.ro/fotbal/liga-1/a-murit-lajos-satmareanu-818048.html
Credits:
- Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Sebi1990TheSecond (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Romanian footballer. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article is long enough and fully sourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2025 Coeur d'Alene shooting
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Two firefighters are killed and a third critically wounded when a gunman sets a brush fire to ambush first-responders on Canfield Mountain near Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; the suspect is later found dead. (Post)
Alternative blurb: A gunman allegedly lures firefighters to a blaze on Canfield Mountain in Idaho, killing two and wounding another before being found dead after a five-hour manhunt.
News source(s): * The Washington Post – overview and timeline Reuters – confirms two dead, one injured, 300-officer response CNN – on-scene reporting and sheriff’s press briefings
Credits:
- Nominated by Dahawk04 (talk · give credit)
- Opposse - Definitely notable, but two people dying in a non-assassination shooting (because I know that'll be brought up) isn't very significant, especially in the United States. There have been 169 mass shootings up to May 31, what makes this one different besides the targets? EF5 21:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Response to oppose -
- Rare, targeted first-responder attack: deliberate ambushes of U.S. firefighters are almost unheard of; the last fatal case was the 2012 Webster, New York incident—which was posted on ITN.
- Widespread, high-profile coverage: this shooting led national newscasts (AP, Reuters, Washington Post, CNN, BBC) and has already drawn policy commentary on first-responder safety—coverage depth that ITN normally requires. Dahawk04 (talk) 21:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Shootings regularly make the National news and don’t get posted. 2 deaths in a shooting isn’t rare at all; there’s been at least ten deadlier shootings this year. EF5 22:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per EF5. Deadly shootings in the US is routine . _-_Alsor (talk) 21:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Doesn't seem important, and shootings of this caliber are routine in the States. The 2012 Webster shooting had twice as many fatalities and was not posted (see Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/December 2012). Departure– (talk) 22:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Man… forgot about Sandy Hook. Just another example of how common these types of incidents take place in the US. EF5 22:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
RD: Thio Su Mien
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNA
Credits:
- Nominated by Robertsky (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Justanothersgwikieditor (talk · give credit) and Honda Kira (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: First female law dean of National University of Singapore. – robertsky (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose the article is pretty short, so doesn't meet WP:ITNQUALITY. Also, the "Civil activities" section is confusing as it doesn't mention her at all- and nowhere in the article does it specify which of the organisations it's talking about she was affiliated with. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- DYK tool firmly puts the article above stub. As for the rest, thanks for the feedback. – robertsky (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- When I read WP:ITNQUALITY, Robertsky, I sense a higher standard than DYK's minimum prose requirement. Schwede66 05:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure if you missed it, but here in the Civil activities section:
a group of conservative Christian women from the Church of Our Saviour, under the leadership of Josie Lau and Thio
, mentions her as one of the leaders of the church, showing that she was connected with the church and not AWARE. – actuall7 (talk | contrib) 04:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- DYK tool firmly puts the article above stub. As for the rest, thanks for the feedback. – robertsky (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
June 29
[edit]
June 29, 2025
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(new) RD: Stuart Burrows
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Telegraph, BBC, Royal Ballet & Opera
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Martinevans123 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Tenor from Wales, the Mozart tenor of his era, at the greatest opera houses of the world, also had a BBC series under his name for eight years, + charity. There was a lot of article, but few sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article is long enough and fully sourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support Well sourced and much improved. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Sandy Gall
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.itv.com/news/2025-06-30/legendary-itv-news-presenter-sandy-gall-dies-aged-97
Credits:
- Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Journalist. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support The article looks excellent and it's especially good to see that someone has loaded a photo as he was quite a famous face as a newsreader in his day. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Posted The article is exemplary so there's not really any point waiting around for further comments. Black Kite (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
EuroBasket Women 2025
[edit]Blurb: In basketball, the EuroBasket Women 2025 concludes with Belgium beating Spain 67–65 in the Final. Emma Meesseman is awarded MVP. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.fiba.basketball/en/events/fiba-womens-eurobasket-2025/news/ebw2025-final-esp-bel-game-report
Credits:
- Nominated by Zafer (talk · give credit)
- Created by ILoveSport2006 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Pelotas (talk · give credit)
Zafer (talk) 20:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Needs more prose particularly on recapping at minimum the games in the last two rounds of the bracket. (eg semi and finals). Masem (t) 20:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: For those looking for the corresponding male competition, it starts end of August this year. – robertsky (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality - pretty much everything past the "Final draw" section lacks prose. The Kip (contribs) 03:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment How does this compare in significance to to the other continental tournaments 2025 FIBA Women's AmeriCup, 2025 FIBA Women's Asia Cup, and 2025 Women's Afrobasket?—Bagumba (talk) 07:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- EuroBasket Women is the most competitive of all continental championships, although interestingly none of the European teams made it to the semifinals of the 2022 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup.
- With being said, and I know page views don't mean much to some people, but this tournament's page views is pathetic; some volleyball tournaments elsewhere had 10x more views LOL. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The nomination does not provide an independent news source and I'm not finding any coverage in mainstream media. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose both on quality and notability. As per Andrew, no evidence has been given that this is anywhere near the threshold of WP:ITNSIGNIF. In addition, the article is way too much junk tables without any useful prose. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
(Removed) Ongoing removal: Iran–Israel war
[edit]Nominator's comments: The war is clearly over now. FunIsOptional (talk) (please use ping!) 11:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment That should be settled in the article first, currently it's "ongoing" there per this discussion.Brandmeistertalk 12:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)- Support War is over. Grimes2 14:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose - Discussion about whether it's ongoing is still underway; one editor can't determine that. EF5 15:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- To be honest, the war is not over, a ceasefire was established on 24 June, that was broken temporarily short after. But now the ceasefire is effective. Grimes2 15:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not all ongoing conflicts are on the ongoing ticker. Bremps... 15:55, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I’m aware, that’s why I opposed the original ongoing nom. But now it’s up, oh well. EF5 17:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The article is getting more updates and readers than the Gaza War, for example. The action just seems to have switched to a war of words about who won and whether Iran's nuclear program was obliterated or not. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support The war/this ongoing event is over, that is what our article notes and what everyone now reports. The event is no longer "ongoing", any updates now are just analysis of what happened. Our section is anyhow bloated the lesser we have the better. Gotitbro (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Yes, we can't assume the ceasefire will hold, but as it stands, it's been holding for over half a week. Sure, the ceasefire may be violated before some official legal resolution of the conflict (if one is forthcoming), but I'd say the war is not ongoing as of now, and that should be plenty of reason to remove it from the box. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support We’re fast approaching a week of the ceasefire holding and the article treats it as such. The Kip (contribs) 23:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - I opposed this removal a week ago as premature. But things have changed. Meanwhile for the entire length of this crisis, there's also been a blurb in the regular ITN. This should never have been ongoing until it fell off the tracker in the first place (when I originally voted against it). I guess that's a lot of flip-flopping area. Nfitz (talk) 02:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support It's over. (for now) - RockinJack18 05:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ended. ArionStar (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Removed. There's consensus above. And if the war flares up again it can always be renominated if necessary. — Amakuru (talk) 14:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
June 28
[edit]
June 28, 2025
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
|
RD: Ron Johanson
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8], [9]
Credits:
- Nominated by Happily888 (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Happily888 (talk) 03:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
2025 Budapest Pride
[edit]Blurb: Thousands have gathered for Budapest Pride, despite its ban by the Hungarian government. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, AP
Credits:
- Nominated by Norden1990 (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: The greatest LGBT+ march in the history of Hungary, widely covered by international media. --Norden1990 (talk) 09:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- oppose nothing significant.Sportsnut24 (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support I think this news item, which is receiving widespread coverage, encapsulates the concept of “Pride is a protest” to an extent that most regularly-scheduled undisturbed Pride parades don’t at the moment. That any Pride activities were politically banned and censured in Hungary, and this exceeded all past ones anyway, I think puts it in the realm of spontaneous/reactionary protest with immediate political impact, and so ITN-worthy. Kingsif (talk) 14:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Thousands? The No Kings protests had millions iirc and we still didn't post them. This one had Greta Thunberg but we didn't post the June 2025 Gaza Freedom Flotilla either. Protests need something special to cut through here. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - I agree with Kingsif. Sourced and ready as well.BabbaQ (talk) 16:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support The ban makes it significant. A case of moral courage. Grimes2 16:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Thousands? Really? No King’s had millions and still didn’t get a blurb. EF5 16:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per EF5, but No King's literally didnt get a blurb due to it only being notable in ONE country (the United States of America for that matter) And same with this, it is only notable in Hungary. And the supports are forgetting that, 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:8CDD:2D1C:CAC2:3DE7 (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Per WP:ITNCDONT - Please do not... [o]ppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive. I don't like the wording on this but it applies here. Departure– (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Did you see the
per EF5
part? I'll step back now, lol. — EF5 18:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Did you see the
- Comment Per WP:ITNCDONT - Please do not... [o]ppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive. I don't like the wording on this but it applies here. Departure– (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Attendance was nearly 100k, per AP (per the article, above the 35K last year). It appears that this is being reported as anti-government in general, and the article describes it as Hungary's largest anti-government action in some time. Proportionally, that's about 1 in 96 people in the whole country, and I can't recall the last time the US has had a protest that big, especially concentrated in a single city. I don't see any arrests in the article like No Kings in LA. Per WP:WAX, just because one thing wasn't posted doesn't mean another similar thing shouldn't and this is, to me, looking to be significantly more important to Hungary than No Kings was to the US. Article is also up to main page quality. Departure– (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Departure–, over 500 were arrested during the L.A. protests and No King's, which combined (or not combined) were the third largest in United States history. — EF5 17:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I phrased that weirdly. I knew folks were arrested there, and that's why I specified LA; the article on Budapest says explicitly no arrests. Departure– (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'd personally say nobody being arrested makes an event less significant in this context, but that's just me. — EF5 18:02, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I phrased that weirdly. I knew folks were arrested there, and that's why I specified LA; the article on Budapest says explicitly no arrests. Departure– (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Departure–, over 500 were arrested during the L.A. protests and No King's, which combined (or not combined) were the third largest in United States history. — EF5 17:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, No Kings was bigger and we didn't post that. Not all protests are ITN worthy. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think it's been clear that contextless size is not a major criteria in ITN-worthy (especially if we were to go by %ages of cities' populations), but the impact. No Kings was planned and nothing happened. Budapest Pride was banned yet got a larger attendance than ever before, with other European nations celebrating the socio-political development in Hungary it indicates. Kingsif (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. I think it would be worthwhile to have an article for the 2025 event that could make this nom a little better, personally. Obviously not a requirement, but I think it would be nice. In regards to notability, I really think the comments here about the number of people at the event are not helpful. Not only is this only partially a protest we're talking about, numbers don't directly define the impact and viability of civil resistance. The difference between No Kings and something like this is the specific intent - the direct goal of anyone attending this event for the purposes of protesting is doing it because they disagree with Hungary's pride ban. It sends a very direct message; not just "we're unhappy", but "we're unhappy about this in particular". Does this mean there is so much more likely to be an impact, perhaps not, but I'd wager the likely impact is a ticket higher. Just my 2c perhaps. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support why are people comparing with No King's protests? Those protests were loosely organised and tiny for a country of over 300 milion where BLM protests lasted months. They also had no widespread or political support and the Republicans didnt even acknowledge their existence. Also not everything has to be about or compared with the US, there's already an oversaturation of US news, including global headlines such as "Trump used the f word on live TV" for example. Besides even if one believes it should have been posted, we are not here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS; are we going to oppose every protest now unless there's mass casulties involved? For the Hungarian protest, the scale in comparison and the fact it was explicity forbidden beforehand and has popular opposition support, has widespread political implications for Orban's decreasing authoritarian grip on power. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
and tiny for a country of over 300 milion
- It was the third largest in US history. — EF5 20:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)- That's only if you sum them all up, individually they weren't very big or impactful for that matter Abcmaxx (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, that's kind of how nationwide protests work. — EF5 16:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- That's only if you sum them all up, individually they weren't very big or impactful for that matter Abcmaxx (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support Can we please stop comparing everything to the United States of bloody America? The two protests (whilst involving a similar percentage of each countries' population) are completely different things. Did Trump ban the No Kings protest and threaten to send organisers to jail? Black Kite (talk) 20:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- FWIW, he is now [10] Masem (t) 20:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment No comment on whether this is suitable, yet, but it seems odd that the event, which has a page about the (seemingly) annual occurrence overarching event (if it is annual, it was missing several years from 2009 to now), but the details of this event are on the page about the law. I would also argue that the content above the event may be overly detailed for what should be an encyclopedic summary (including the name of every notable person that participated, even if noted by a RS, isn't a good summary of the event, and bulks up the article.) Masem (t) 20:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Standard protest march, nothing really special. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 20:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not seeing any evidence that this is a transformative event. Well attended parades, protests etc don't usually meet the high bar of a blurb. Thriley (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per EF5 - clear precedent for not posting this kind of thing, and no lasting impact. — Amakuru (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Amakuru - very proud of these Hungarians for embarrassing Orban's regime, but there's pretty clear precedent to not post protests/marches at ITNR unless they hold some sort of special notability or absolutely monumental scale. Agree with the comps about how people were against posting the No Kings protests. The Kip (contribs) 03:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support The protest is a proportionally large anti-government action (about 1 in 96 people participating, according to Departure-), is being covered by the media, is made significant by the ban, and the article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Departure and MtPenguin. Worldwide coverage and a disproportionately large protest including recordbreaking numbers for Hungary. "There were more people who attended a protest in a country of 300,000,000" is both a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument and also ignores the basic principle of relative population size: there are more people in the United States than there are in Hungary, so definitionally a smaller protest in Hungary could include a higher proportion of the country's population - in that way having a higher impact on Hungarian society even despite being less attended numerically than No Kings. ITN is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL, but this is a widely covered event with significant social impact. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 06:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Well attended but minimal impact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.153.225 (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Dave Parker
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): SportsNet, MLB, NY Times
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Abebenjoe (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Baseball hall of fame player and World Series champion in 1979. Article is C-level and seems to be adequately referenced Abebenjoe (discuss) 23:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- A few sections missing refs. Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- References should be fine now. Article updated.– Abebenjoe (talk) 08:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Article is well-written and sourced as noted. Jusdafax (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Posted. Black Kite (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
RD: D. Wayne Lukas
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP News, Courier Journal
Credits:
- Nominated by GorillaWarfare (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American Hall of Fame horse trainer. Article was already in pretty good shape, I gave it a little cleanup. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good and is well-sourced. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
June 27
[edit]
June 27, 2025
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Sports
|
Congo–Rwanda peace agreement
[edit]Blurb: Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda sign a peace agreement ending the conflict between them. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda sign a peace agreement.
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
- Nominated by ArionStar (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Important conflict being ended. ArionStar (talk) 20:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- comment rmove "ending the conflict between them" and re-word. This has happened before by angola (failed) and someone else i can't remember. Would need to add the minral element by state.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- support altblurbSportsnut24 (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support The signing of a peace agreement is notable, and the article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose As explained above, there's a repeated history of the DRC and Rwanda agreeing such deals which fail because they don't get major parties like M23 on board. CNN reports "
However, the rebel coalition Alliance Fleuve Congo (AFC), of which M23 is a key member, told CNN it did not participate in the US-brokered peace process between the Rwandan and Congolese governments, but was instead committed to a separate negotiation process mediated by Qatar in its capital Doha.
" The main novelty this time seems to be the involvement of the US so Trump can claim some mineral rights and lobby for the Nobel peace prize again. I reckon we need to see what happens on the ground. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC) - Support - article is ready. And this is a historic agreement.BabbaQ (talk) 08:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Historic? It doesn't have a separate article. It's just a section in an article which goes back to 2022. The article records previous agreements between the DRC and Rwanda in July 2022, November 2022 and November 2023. The article describes this latest deal as "preliminary". That may because there are still peace talks taking place in Doha with AFC/M23, as this agreement recognizes. This still seems quite ongoing and so the verdict of history is pending.
- Moreover the article is clearly not ready as it has had an orange banner tag since April.
- Andrew🐉(talk) 09:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wait Per above. There is no definitive proof that this will ultimately end the current conflict. NotKringe (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wait/Oppose, very unlikely to end the conflict, we should only really blurb a deal that involves M23. Rwandan troops aren't even leaving DRC. We don't have the full details but it looks like a farce Kowal2701 (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wait for the same reasons we rejected posting the Iran/Israel ceasefire immediately - we need to see if it actually holds. The Kip (contribs) 03:23, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wait until both the orange tag is resolved- this currently fails WP:ITNQUALITY and to see the impact i.e. whether it does end it, and if so, a lot more should be added to an article before posting it. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment It seems to be ended. ArionStar (talk) 19:23, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Shefali Jariwala
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNBC TV18
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:8D0C:7F13:7C81:5D9D (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Niasoh (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian actress. 240F:7A:6253:1:8D0C:7F13:7C81:5D9D (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support The article has already been substantially improved. The lead has been rewritten, the structure refined, and multiple reliable sources including regional-language references with English translations, have been added. Veritasphere (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Article now is expanded and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- There is a reference for the date of birth, but I can't see where the date is in that reference. Schwede66 08:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Added source.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Did you perhaps miss the references already provided in the Early life and education section? The date of birth is supported there. Veritasphere (talk) 10:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have said:
There is a reference for the date of birth in the infobox, but …
Schwede66 19:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have said:
- Did you perhaps miss the references already provided in the Early life and education section? The date of birth is supported there. Veritasphere (talk) 10:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Veritasphere. Ready for posting. Jusdafax (talk) 10:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 19:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Ocasional Talento
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Urgente
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Fixer88 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Bolivian rapper. Fixer88 (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Sourced and ready. --BabbaQ (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 05:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Takahiro Shiraishi
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [11]
Credits:
- Nominated by BabbaQ (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
BabbaQ (talk) 06:57, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support Article is long enough and fully sourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support - per QuicoleJR. Jusdafax (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- I couldn't see where the date of birth is referenced. Schwede66 08:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Added source.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 19:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
References
[edit]Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents:
- ^ Trevelyan, Mark; Trevelyan, Mark (2025-07-03). "Russia becomes first country to recognise Taliban government of Afghanistan". Reuters. Retrieved 2025-07-03.