User talk:Natg 19

This is Natg 19's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Natg 19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Rosemary Amey 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lebanese Christians (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lebanese Christians (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bio pic

I reply to you at Talk:List of biographical films

Fanoflionking3 (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyginus

Hi Natg 19, I think we've decided that the best solution would be to disambiguate all of the links to head to Gaius Julius Hyginus. If you're still so inclined, that'd be a great help. Thanks! – Michael Aurel (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, edits like this and this are not disambiguation. DuncanHill (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the confusion. That link Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs formerly redirected to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary, so I made the changes to directly link it to Foreign Secretary (United Kingdom). Later on, a different user directly redirected the previous link to FS (UK). Natg 19 (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The confusion is caused by the perennial silly-buggery about capital letters. The SSFCD page should always and only ever link to the page about the British FS. People move things and then don't bother to fix incoming redirects. DuncanHill (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Glenn Knight

On 20 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Glenn Knight, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kim Sae-ron

On 20 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kim Sae-ron, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 23:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Milind Rege

On 24 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Milind Rege, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – robertsky (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Keith Slater

On 27 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Keith Slater, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 11:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Larry Dolan

On 1 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Larry Dolan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Square wave

I guess I owe you thanks for fixing the problem I inadvertently created when I changed Square wave to a DAB page and apologies for not anticipating it. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Selwyn Raab

On 7 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Selwyn Raab, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 08:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Dore Gold

On 10 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dore Gold, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Lincoln Díaz-Balart

On 10 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lincoln Díaz-Balart, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Doyin Okupe

On 11 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Doyin Okupe, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 03:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 07:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Stanley R. Jaffe

On 14 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Stanley R. Jaffe, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 13:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Slick Watts

On 20 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Slick Watts, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 17:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Korg Polysix added section

hi, indeed the source of it is from the schematic diagram analysis and my personal experience in repairing vintage synths.

Best

Luca Lucasasdelli (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are messaging the wrong editor. I do not know what this is referring to. Natg 19 (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Franz Wagner (disambiguation)

The article Franz Wagner (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frost 15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franz Wagner (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Wagner (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Wagner (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Márquez

Hello. A few days ago, you relisted the discussion of Miguel Márquez because of "confusion". Well... it got even more confusing, so what now? Barr Theo (talk) 03:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Barr Theo We can wait for an administrator to make a decision on the AfD. I personally still think this leans delete, but as a non administrator, I do not have the ability to delete pages. Natg 19 (talk) 03:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imprecise text in the differentiator circuit?

Hi. In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differentiator#Passive_differentiator the text states that the capacitive differentiator is a good differentiator at frequencies well below the filter's cutoff frequency. Shouldn't it be good at frequencies well ABOVE it? I guess it's the same as a pass-high filter. THANKS for your work! 31.171.151.130 (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@31.171.151.130 sorry I'm not familiar enough with this topic to answer this. I only made a minor change recently. Natg 19 (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your edit

Would you care to explain why you made this edit reverting my change of where San Diego, United States directs? Seeing as you only wrote "undo" for an edit summary, it seems reasonable to ask. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:27, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The city in California is already the primary topic for "San Diego", so I believe it is also correct to also direct San Diego, United States to the same target, instead of to the disambiguation page. Additionally, for a 9-year old redirect, I believe Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion is a better place to discuss/change the target of a redirect. Natg 19 (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thank you. I do disagree and have brought it up for discussion here. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:59, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commstock

I smerged and redirected it, in lieu of deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian thanks! Though I am unsure if this concert is still an active event, as mention of it was removed from the high school's article in 2024. Natg 19 (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fadedreality556 (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Duncan Campbell (journalist, born 1944)

On 21 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Duncan Campbell (journalist, born 1944), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Benjamin Ritchie

On 23 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Benjamin Ritchie, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 22:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]