User talk:Natg 19

This is Natg 19's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Natg 19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Rosemary Amey 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lebanese Christians (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lebanese Christians (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bio pic

I reply to you at Talk:List of biographical films

Fanoflionking3 (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyginus

Hi Natg 19, I think we've decided that the best solution would be to disambiguate all of the links to head to Gaius Julius Hyginus. If you're still so inclined, that'd be a great help. Thanks! – Michael Aurel (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, edits like this and this are not disambiguation. DuncanHill (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the confusion. That link Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs formerly redirected to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary, so I made the changes to directly link it to Foreign Secretary (United Kingdom). Later on, a different user directly redirected the previous link to FS (UK). Natg 19 (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The confusion is caused by the perennial silly-buggery about capital letters. The SSFCD page should always and only ever link to the page about the British FS. People move things and then don't bother to fix incoming redirects. DuncanHill (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Glenn Knight

On 20 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Glenn Knight, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kim Sae-ron

On 20 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kim Sae-ron, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 23:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Milind Rege

On 24 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Milind Rege, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – robertsky (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Keith Slater

On 27 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Keith Slater, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 11:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Larry Dolan

On 1 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Larry Dolan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Square wave

I guess I owe you thanks for fixing the problem I inadvertently created when I changed Square wave to a DAB page and apologies for not anticipating it. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Selwyn Raab

On 7 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Selwyn Raab, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 08:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Dore Gold

On 10 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dore Gold, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Lincoln Díaz-Balart

On 10 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lincoln Díaz-Balart, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Doyin Okupe

On 11 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Doyin Okupe, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 03:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 07:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Stanley R. Jaffe

On 14 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Stanley R. Jaffe, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 13:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Junior Bridgeman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Slick Watts

On 20 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Slick Watts, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 17:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Korg Polysix added section

hi, indeed the source of it is from the schematic diagram analysis and my personal experience in repairing vintage synths.

Best

Luca Lucasasdelli (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are messaging the wrong editor. I do not know what this is referring to. Natg 19 (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Franz Wagner (disambiguation)

The article Franz Wagner (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frost 15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franz Wagner (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Wagner (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Wagner (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Márquez

Hello. A few days ago, you relisted the discussion of Miguel Márquez because of "confusion". Well... it got even more confusing, so what now? Barr Theo (talk) 03:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Barr Theo We can wait for an administrator to make a decision on the AfD. I personally still think this leans delete, but as a non administrator, I do not have the ability to delete pages. Natg 19 (talk) 03:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imprecise text in the differentiator circuit?

Hi. In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differentiator#Passive_differentiator the text states that the capacitive differentiator is a good differentiator at frequencies well below the filter's cutoff frequency. Shouldn't it be good at frequencies well ABOVE it? I guess it's the same as a pass-high filter. THANKS for your work! 31.171.151.130 (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@31.171.151.130 sorry I'm not familiar enough with this topic to answer this. I only made a minor change recently. Natg 19 (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your edit

Would you care to explain why you made this edit reverting my change of where San Diego, United States directs? Seeing as you only wrote "undo" for an edit summary, it seems reasonable to ask. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:27, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The city in California is already the primary topic for "San Diego", so I believe it is also correct to also direct San Diego, United States to the same target, instead of to the disambiguation page. Additionally, for a 9-year old redirect, I believe Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion is a better place to discuss/change the target of a redirect. Natg 19 (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thank you. I do disagree and have brought it up for discussion here. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:59, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commstock

I smerged and redirected it, in lieu of deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian thanks! Though I am unsure if this concert is still an active event, as mention of it was removed from the high school's article in 2024. Natg 19 (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Delta Air Lines stowaway case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fadedreality556 (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Duncan Campbell (journalist, born 1944)

On 21 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Duncan Campbell (journalist, born 1944), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Benjamin Ritchie

On 23 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Benjamin Ritchie, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 22:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jim Marshall (defensive end)

On 4 June 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Marshall (defensive end), which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 23:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Shigeo Nagashima

On 9 June 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shigeo Nagashima, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 21:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Natg, Thank you for getting me out of the old emails and over to the bookcase. I'm putting the text back on Wes Hildreth's page and citing Nancy Brown's book on her and Wes's activities when she was married to Wes in the 60s - 70s. Might add additional info, like their visit with Chief Justice Douglas. Most cordially yours, RRFWTommartin (talk) 04:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"End of Life on Earth" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect End of Life on Earth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 27 § End of Life on Earth until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further work on Michael Rosen (author)?

Hi, Natg-

I had just started looking at the Michael Rosen moves when you fixed it--thanks so much--but I think there are still a couple of issues. I don't know if you're still looking at this. One is that Michael Rosen is a link to Michael Rosen (disambiguation) instead of the other way around. The other is that because of this, the fact that there are still 436 links to the (redirect to the) DAB is mostly invisible. Is there a request outstanding to swap the DAB and the redirect?

Thanks, Dan Bloch (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the second thing I said probably isn't true. The bot probably will update the DAB with {{incoming links}} but it hasn't gotten around to it yet. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danbloch yeah this does need to be swapped. The original mover created a dab page at Michael Rosen and did not realize there was already a dab page at Michael Rosen (disambiguation). But on 2nd thought, I have been wondering if the author is the primary topic for Michael Rosen, and if the move needs to be reverted / further discussed. Natg 19 (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did wonder about that. Michael Rosen the author has 27 times as many page views as all the other Michael Rosens together. Dan Bloch (talk) 03:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danbloch a request has been opened (not by me) to revert the page move. Natg 19 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Dan Bloch (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Lionsgate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lionsgate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 10 § Lionsgate until a consensus is reached. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 18:41, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard University?

What's the idea of replacing "Harvard College" with "Harvard University" in so many places? Do you plan to do this for people who attended Radcliffe? Or for people who attended the B-school, the med school, the law school, the Kennedy school, etc.? "Harvard College" just fits the bill for people who attended Harvard College. The way that Harvard draws its org chart (I know that not all universities do it this way), Harvard College still exists as an entity, and operates independently of the other schools. Bruce leverett (talk) 01:28, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruce leverett:

I have been trying to "update" prose to match up with infoboxes as many infoboxes say Alma Mater of Harvard University, but in the prose, it just mentions attending Harvard College. Though College may be technically accurate (as the undergraduate college), it seemed odd to me to use the subunit of Harvard College instead of the overall institution of Harvard University. Is it incorrect to say that an person is a graduate or attendee of Harvard University? (vs Harvard College)

I also think that the use of Harvard College could be a mistake by those who intend to refer to the University as a whole.

I have been reverted for this by others as well, so I will refrain from continuing while this talk discussion is ongoing.

(also pinging Hawkeye7, Midnightdreary and WFinch) Natg 19 (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The J. Robert Oppenheimer article originally said "Harvard University", but was changed to "Harvard College" in 2008 with the comment "more accurately". [1] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:31, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining why you were doing this. Of course, if the infobox and the article disagree with one another, either one can be changed.

As far as I know, if a person graduated from Harvard College, it is OK to say that he graduated from Harvard University. But it is also OK to say he graduated from Harvard College.

Regarding the other schools, if a person graduated from Radcliffe, it is OK to say that she graduated from Radcliffe, but since many readers may not immediately know that Radcliffe was part of Harvard University, some of our articles about Radcliffe graduates say things like "Radcliffe College of Harvard University". For example Ursula K. Le Guin says this in the text, but the infobox just says "Radcliffe College". There may be similar situations with, for example, the Kennedy School, and well-known schools in other universities, such as Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Harvard College is really an "undergraduate college". Harvard really is drawing the org chart in a distinctive way, because many professors teach both undergraduate and graduate courses. The implication for us is that if someone went to Harvard as an undergraduate, we can confidently say they went to Harvard College, and if we say that, readers know that that was the person's undergraduate alma mater.

In conversation, when we are describing where someone went to college, we seldom use either "college" or "university". For example, we say "He went to Harvard", or "He went to Pitt". But this is formal writing, where we are expected to say something formal, I suppose.

"Harvard University" may in some cases be anachronism. Harvard didn't become a university until around 1780. I don't think any of your edits so far have dealt with pre-1780 students, but I didn't check closely.

In the edit to Joseph McCarthy, we are paraphrasing some (unnamed) speaker, and I do not know, without access to the cited source, whether the speaker said "Harvard", "Harvard College", or "Harvard University". Since it's in the context of a dinner given by an undergraduate organization, perhaps we should link to Harvard College, but since the speaker probably didn't say that, perhaps we should just pipe that to Harvard.

In Harvard Crimson, we're talking about NCAA varsity sports, which is (correct me if I'm wrong) strictly an undergraduate thing, so perhaps we should stick with Harvard College. In your edit to Harvard University, you were in text that was talking about varsity sports, so again, it is perhaps appropriate for the text to say "Harvard College" rather than "Harvard".

Since either Harvard College or Harvard University is OK to use for someone who attended Harvard as an undergraduate, I would say that if you really want consistency between the text and the infobox, you are free to modify either to match the other. But for the same reason, this consistency isn't necessarily something worth fighting for. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, former Harvard University employee here. Just a quick way to summarize: Not all Harvard University grads are Harvard College grads, but all Harvard College grads are Harvard University grads. --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ian Blair

On 15 July 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ian Blair, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 01:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulak Banerjee (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pulak Banerjee (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swakop (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swakop (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koji Inada (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Koji Inada (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]