Jump to content

User talk:TheDoctorWho/archive13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!

[edit]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty series 4

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Line of Duty series 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty series 4

[edit]

The article Line of Duty series 4 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Line of Duty series 4 and Talk:Line of Duty series 4/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Line of Duty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty

[edit]

The article Line of Duty you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Line of Duty and Talk:Line of Duty/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty series 4

[edit]

The article Line of Duty series 4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Line of Duty series 4 for comments about the article, and Talk:Line of Duty series 4/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Torchwood episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extraterrestrial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Line of Duty

[edit]

The article Line of Duty you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Line of Duty for comments about the article, and Talk:Line of Duty/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Space Babies

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Space Babies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Sitcom -- Mr Sitcom (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Space Babies

[edit]

The article Space Babies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Space Babies for comments about the article, and Talk:Space Babies/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Sitcom -- Mr Sitcom (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Your GA nomination of Legend of the Sea Devils

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Legend of the Sea Devils you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prince of Erebor -- Prince of Erebor (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Legend of Ruby Sunday

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Legend of Ruby Sunday you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Legend of the Sea Devils

[edit]

The article Legend of the Sea Devils you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Legend of the Sea Devils for comments about the article, and Talk:Legend of the Sea Devils/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prince of Erebor -- Prince of Erebor (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Doctor Who specials (2022)

[edit]

On 10 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doctor Who specials (2022), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the producers of Doctor Who only wrote a queer romance into the programme's 2022 special episodes after viewers began shipping two characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doctor Who specials (2022). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doctor Who specials (2022)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]

Your GA nomination of The Power of the Doctor

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Power of the Doctor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 09:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Power of the Doctor

[edit]

The article The Power of the Doctor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Power of the Doctor and Talk:The Power of the Doctor/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Doctor Who series 14

[edit]

On 19 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doctor Who series 14, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Susan Twist portrayed seven different roles in the eight episodes of Doctor Who's fourteenth series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doctor Who series 14. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doctor Who series 14), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Power of the Doctor

[edit]

The article The Power of the Doctor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Power of the Doctor for comments about the article, and Talk:The Power of the Doctor/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Legend of Ruby Sunday

[edit]

The article The Legend of Ruby Sunday you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Legend of Ruby Sunday for comments about the article, and Talk:The Legend of Ruby Sunday/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joy to the World (Doctor Who)

[edit]

On 21 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joy to the World (Doctor Who), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Disney+ released a promotional poster for the Doctor Who Christmas special "Joy to the World" with the title spelled incorrectly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joy to the World (Doctor Who). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joy to the World (Doctor Who)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 8,044 views (670.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, TheDoctorWho! The list you nominated, List of Torchwood episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Line of Duty

[edit]

On 24 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Line of Duty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that BBC One initially passed on Line of Duty, whose finale would become its highest-rated drama in 19 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Line of Duty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Line of Duty), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 12:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Station 19 episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Healy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

readded
removed Euryalus

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed

Technical news

  • Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
  • A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration


The Signpost: 7 February 2025

[edit]

DYK for Abbott Elementary and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia crossover

[edit]

On 9 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abbott Elementary and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia crossover, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the unlicensed Willy's Chocolate Experience in Scotland led to a crossover event between the American television series Abbott Elementary and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abbott Elementary and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia crossover. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abbott Elementary and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia crossover), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article People Watching (Conan Gray song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article People Watching (Conan Gray song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:People Watching (Conan Gray song) and Talk:People Watching (Conan Gray song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article People Watching (Conan Gray song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:People Watching (Conan Gray song) for comments about the article, and Talk:People Watching (Conan Gray song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey there, I saw that you were a frequent reviewer at Featured Lists. I have two lists that are pending and seem to be going nowhere. I thought Ukrainian Figure Skating Championships was about wrapped up, but it seems to be stuck in limbo. And I nominated European Figure Skating Championships a little while ago and have received only one set of feedback. Perhaps if you have a chance, you could take a look at them and let me know? Thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: Can't say I'm too knowledgeable on the topic, but I'll try to see if I can give a review in the next few days . TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You’ll be more knowledgeable after reading them. 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: I left reviews on both nominations, I know it's not much, but I hope they're helpful. I suppose I'm slightly more knowledgeable, I typically just seem to have trouble reviewing articles that aren't entertainment-related. 😅 TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your input and your votes of support. Public interest in figure skating peaks every four years, and that peak is about one year away, so I want these flagship articles (Worlds, Europeans, U.S., and Canada) at featured status by then. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: Being completely honest, I don't think I ever realized it was such a huge deal outside of the Olympics. Regardless, don't hesitate to drop me a message if you ever need a review on any similar (or even completely different) lists!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I really want to get The Amazing Race 1 to featured status, but that's not a list, and I think featured articles are actually more difficult to get passed. Anyway, Canada is ready to go once these two are processed, with Worlds probably very close. I'm working on U.S., and Estonia may need only a little bit more work. And Germany... God bless their record-keeping; they made sourcing so easy. 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:02, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: I always tell people there's a reason why I only have one FAC 😅. I'm sure TAR1 could get there eventually. It looks rather decent on a first glance, but there is some room before it'd be at FA standards. I'll try to keep my eyes on the FLC page for those then, I'm usually there at least once every other day. TheDoctorWho (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COLHEAD issues

[edit]

Hey TDW. Continuing on the above discussion on how {{Episode table/part}} template is apparently an accessibility issue per MOS:COLHEAD, I'm wondering how |ShortSummary= in {{Episode list}} does not cause the same accessibility issue. Does you know anyone with COLHEAD knowledge that would understand this? -- Alex_21 TALK 06:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 and PresN: were the two to first bring it up to me an FLC of mine. If anyone can tell us if it's an issue, it's likely one of them? TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful, thanks for pinging them. To give context, both the /part template and ShortSummary parameter can be seen at Doctor Who series 14#Episodes. -- Alex_21 TALK 07:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So. In a technical, specific sense, that kind of "it's a new row that doesn't correspond to any of the column headers" isn't correct. So, not 100% accessible. That said, however, when you dig into it, "accessibility", even on-wiki, is nowhere near 100%, so there are compromises when it comes to "still very usable by humans even if it doesn't meet the spec". In this case, even though the summary row doesn't correspond with any of the column headers, it isn't really any harder for screen-reader users to understand than it is for sighted-users. So it's not a big deal. So, even FLC, which is much further ahead than the rest of wiki for enforcing this stuff, doesn't try to forbid this kind of thing description field. Pseudo-column headers, despite looking similar, are much worse, because they're not just contextual to the previous row like this case but instead are a context for every row thereafter and there's no programmatic way to carry that context through. Tl;dr you're fine. --PresN 19:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping @Alex 21: to the above response just in case they're not watching/subscribed. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw it, thanks. Gonna see if I can change the two types of row-spanning columns into the same non-header format. -- Alex_21 TALK 06:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully it works out! It'd definitely be nice to keep something closer to the /part format. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, TheDoctorWho! The list you nominated, List of Station 19 episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, TheDoctorWho! The list you nominated, List of Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

[edit]

Hi, TheDoctorWho. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Torchwood episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) I didn't realized this had been promoted, TDW - amazing work! -- Alex_21 TALK 22:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so so much, truly means a lot! :) TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

[edit]

WikiCup 2025 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of House Made of Bongs

[edit]

The article House Made of Bongs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:House Made of Bongs and Talk:House Made of Bongs/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elora's Dad

[edit]

The article Elora's Dad you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elora's Dad and Talk:Elora's Dad/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elora's Dad

[edit]

The article Elora's Dad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elora's Dad for comments about the article, and Talk:Elora's Dad/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous


Your GA nomination of House Made of Bongs

[edit]

The article House Made of Bongs you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:House Made of Bongs for comments about the article, and Talk:House Made of Bongs/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Deer Lady

[edit]

The article Deer Lady you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Deer Lady and Talk:Deer Lady/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Deer Lady

[edit]

The article Deer Lady you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deer Lady for comments about the article, and Talk:Deer Lady/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Writer's Barnstar
Well done for your amazing work on Reservation Dogs episodes and getting them to GA - I enjoyed reviewing them and was very happy I was able to pass them. I have really enjoyed learning about the episodes and their context and it is so important that more stories about indigenous people are told, so please do carry on with your amazing work! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Thank you for the barnstar, it truly means so much! I'm not indigenous myself, but as an Oklahoman (where the series is filmed), I've found the series to be crucial for the stories it's told. I hope to make more episode articles for the program soon. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User script

[edit]

Hey, @TheDoctorWho! I saw that you recently started a source review but didn't mention the duplicate references in the list. Do you have User:Polygnotus/DuplicateReferences? If not, you should get it as it spots duplicates very easily. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not used it, but I will definitely take a look at it. Thank you! TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Myers-Briggs fan?

[edit]

Hi, TheDoctorWho ... I noticed you identified yourself as an INFJ on your User page, though you had a T out to the right of the J. As someone very much into the MBTI and other similar assessments, as well as a sharer of three of your four letters, I'd be interested to take this forward in conversation, if you're up for it. I identify as INTJ, but my J is just over the middle line and so I often say I'm INTX. I think I understand now why I felt so in tune with your writing as I copy edited it. :) Augnablik (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Augnablik: Apologies for the delayed response, I have been sidetracked with some on- and off-wiki projects. We took Myers-Briggs tests and discussed the results in-detail in a college psychology course of mine. The T at the end stands for "turbulent" and is a further subtype of INFJ that you can read more about here if you're interested! It's interesting how close our personality types are. TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This Turbulent and Assertive breakdown is fascinating, and I'm surprised I hadn't heard of it before because the MBTI was one of the assessment tools I studied extensively when I was doing my doctoral work on cognitive and learning styles, and related tools — then continued with that area of interest in the world of education and training for quite a while.
This breakdown must have come later, when I more or less stopped keeping up with the area. All because of running into you, and through you, this, I'll look into it.
Is there a T and A for each letter? Augnablik (talk) 03:18, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Augnablik: I honestly wasn't sure at first, but a quick search of the website does make it appear so. Here's the further T/A breakdown for INTJ. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I followed the link you gave me two days ago somewhat further, and even took this company's version of the assessment tool. This time I ended up over on the P side of the dividing line, though only by one point ... so again I think it's fair to claim an X as my fourth letter, all the more because in my earlier assessment, I was a J by only three points.
And like you, I found that I also ended up as a T!
Incidentally, although this new assessment places me in the Logician category, I feel much at home as an Explorer. I don't feel comfortable with the cold feel of being labeled a Logician! And I'm definitely no mathematician or physicist, just someone who seeks truth, accuracy, and clarity above most everything else. Augnablik (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A perfect example of my T, if it hasn't already occurred to you: this quest for clarity about what happened to my edits of your article that Mox Eden picked up on in the Guild of Copy Editors! 😂 Augnablik (talk) 07:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for People Watching (Conan Gray song)

[edit]

On 18 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article People Watching (Conan Gray song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lyrics in Conan Gray's song "People Watching" were based on things he heard while eavesdropping on couples? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/People Watching (Conan Gray song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, People Watching (Conan Gray song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elora's Dad

[edit]

On 18 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elora's Dad, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ethan Hawke and Devery Jacobs smoked CBD while filming the Reservation Dogs episode "Elora's Dad"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elora's Dad. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elora's Dad), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to leave a smart comment about Oklahoma being just one giant ghost town, and then I saw you were from Oklahoma...

All kidding aside, that's a neat article and I will take a closer look when I get home this afternoon! Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: The state practically is a ghost town if you don't live in OKC or Tulsa. That's the reason why the tornadoes only ever make cows fly and why Missouri has a warning sign up about us. /j 😂 TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article looks good! Since you're practically a figure skating expert at this point, I currently have World Figure Skating Championships up for FL review. Fun fact: the World Championships are next week in Boston and I'll be there! Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: I'll absolutely give it a review, I'll try to get to it sooner rather than later and put myself a placeholder down there. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate that, especially your rebuttal of that ridiculous Oppose. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: Yeah, I'm not really sure why that oppose was necessary. The list is likely 75%+ of the article size, and it's understood that background context is necessary. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, TheDoctorWho! The list you nominated, List of Stranger Things episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

[edit]

Undefined sfn references in List of ghost towns in Oklahoma

[edit]

Hi, in this edit to List of ghost towns in Oklahoma you use {{sfn|Schmidt|1978|pp=104–106}} and {{sfn|Schmidt|1978|pp=51–54}}. Unfortunately there is no work "Schmidt 1978" listed, so nobody can look the references up, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing source it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks! TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 03:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

[edit]
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:QuicoleJR submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Television shows and their associated articles get a lot of attention, and we need editors to make those articles high quality. TheDoctorWho is one of those editors. With one featured article, five featured lists and over 30 good articles, he has massively improved our coverage of several TV shows and their season and episode articles, including Hawaii Five-O, Magnum P.I., and (of course) Doctor Who. TheDoctorWho certainly deserves this award for his efforts.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Downtown Oklahoma City
TheDoctorWho
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning March 23, 2025
Editors are needed to assure that television shows and their associated articles TDW is one of those editors. With one featured article, five featured lists and over 30 good articles, he has massively improved our coverage of several TV shows and their season and episode articles, including Hawaii Five-O, Magnum P.I., and (of course) Doctor Who.
Recognized for
improving TV coverage
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster7 Chat 18:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR and Buster7: Thank you both so much, this truly means a lot! TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Deer Lady

[edit]

On 24 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deer Lady, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an attempt to use automated dialogue replacement in the Reservation Dogs episode "Deer Lady" failed because the voice sounded too much like Yoda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deer Lady. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deer Lady), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoctorWhoFan91

[edit]

I see from the posts at the head of User talk:DoctorWhoFan91 that you have agreed to take on editing certain pages on their behalf. I feel I should point out to you that the next day DoctorWhoFan91 was blocked for 6 months. Please be most careful that you only make edits which you stand behind yourself and do not unintentionally end up PROXYING. I'm not sure I need to tell you this but between me and another Admin the others mentioned have been notified. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For complete transparency (for you or anyone else), I have actually declined to make edits on behalf of DWF91 that they've requested off-wiki. The only thing I've taken on is their Good Topic nom, which I was already contributing to prior to the initial AN thread that kicked off all this drama, and that was of my own interest in seeing this promoted. Time stamps of my involvement in that topic area prior to the ban can be seen in the editing history at WP:WHO/G. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated, thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not restore the celebrity runners-up to {{Big Brother in the United States}}. Per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 11#Template:Celebrity Big Brother and Template talk:Big Brother in the United States#Celebrity HouseGuests (which you were a part of the discussion), it was agreed that only winners could be included. --woodensuperman 07:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while, I can't remember every discussion that I was a part of 7 years ago. I probably wouldn't have reverted had you pointed to that discussion rather than a vague guideline that doesn't directly address the situation. Thanks for bringing it back to my attention though, I'll try and keep my on it from here on out to make sure no one beyond winners are included for CBB TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :) --woodensuperman 07:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Maybe I'm just impatient, but it seems like there's a backlog at the Featured List project? Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: The "Older nominations" section does seem a tad long right to me right now, but I'm not a coord there so I'm not really sure what could be done. The instructions do say "Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred", but there's no maximum length, so it would appear that everything is on the up and up. The most recent archiving was done less than a week ago. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Dennis Brown
removed

Bureaucrat changes

added Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

added 0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

removed GB fan
readded Moneytrees

Miscellaneous


[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Sarah Jane Adventures serials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumously.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstate 444

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 444 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]

Your GA nomination of Interstate 444

[edit]

The article Interstate 444 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 444 for comments about the article, and Talk:Interstate 444/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WIkiProject Doctor Who: March 2025 Newsletter

[edit]
The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume III, Issue I — March 2025
Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who

One hell of a newsletter.
Geronimoooo!
Apparently this newsletter the queen of outer space... wait... no, sorry; that's Belinda! Swashbuckle your seatbelts because this newsletter is full of information regarding recent happenings in the Doctor Who WikiProject. You'll also find updates on the upcoming series and elsewhere the expanded Whoniverse.

Series 15

The fifteenth series of Doctor Who is set to begin this Saturday with "The Robot Revolution" on 12 April and will conclude eight weeks later after "The Reality War" airs on 31 May. It will once again be accompanied by a new series of Doctor Who: Unleashed. Draft articles for all eight episodes have already been created, the links to which can be found here. New novelisations adapting the first three episodes of the series are set to be released on 10 July.

Recent Article Regenerations

Since the last Newsletter, we've had a whole heap of quality content added to the Project. The articles Thasmin, "Joy to the World", Vislor Turlough, "Space Babies", "Legend of the Sea Devils", Weeping Angel, Doctor Who series 13, Pyramids of Mars, "The Legend of Ruby Sunday", "The Power of the Doctor", The Twin Dilemma, "The Husbands of River Song", "Demons of the Punjab", Doctor Who Live, "The Return of Doctor Mysterio", and Attack of the Cybermen have all been improved to GA-level quality. List of Torchwood episodes and List of Doctor Who episodes (2005-present) have been improved to FL-level quality, while the Doctor Who specials (2022) and Doctor Who series 14 Good Topics have been successfully promoted.
An additional good topic covering the series articles from 2005–present has been nominated and is currently receiving feedback. Though content creation has slowed in recent months, content improvement should hopefully see an increase as series 15 ticks ever closer.

Future Project Goals

The WikiProject will once again be working in collaboration to complete a Good Topic encompassing the series and its related articles. Any contributions will be greatly appreciated. Several editors have planned upcoming work for Doctor Who-related character, episode, and performer articles. More information, as well as where you can find out how to help, can be found it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who/Goals.

We Want You... To Help With The Newsletter

Due to the departure of previous newsletter contributors, the Newsletter is beaming out a message from Stonehenge requesting your help. If anyone would like to help actively contribute to the Newsletter's content updates, please let us know, as we are willing to accept anyone who is interested in helping with writing the Newsletter. We'll all stories in the end... make sure the newsletter is a chapter in yours.
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network

Contributors

If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]