Talk:Interstate 444

Interstate 444 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 9, 2025. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	Interstate Highway System
	Locations
	Oklahoma
	Article recognition
	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 2006.
	Notes and alerts
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

Oklahoma: Tulsa Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Task-force Tulsa (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 444. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080509140019/http://www.tulok.net/s3.html to http://www.tulok.net/s3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 444. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051109215857/http://www.tulok.net:80/s3.html to http://www.tulok.net/s3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. Locust member (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 444/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 06:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a short and sweet article :) Will leave comments later today Locust member (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

including Okmulgee, Oklahoma City, and Sand Springs, Oklahoma, and Joplin, Missouri. - "including Okmulgee, Oklahoma City, and Sand Springs, Oklahoma, as well as Joplin, Missouri." to remove repetition of "and"

The total length of I-444 is 2.51 miles (4.04 km) long - the source states 2.86 miles

These are the only two comments I have! The rest of the article looks broad and references look good when compared to other articles under a similar topic. It is stable and has been relatively unchanged since nomination. There are no copyvio issues and it seems written from NPOV. Tag me once those two comments are addressed Locust member (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: I've fixed them both! I also updated all other instances to 2.86 as well, I was able to confirm that a previous version of that source stated 2.51 which is where that number came from. If you don't mind, before you close this could you spot check a few of the sources so I can claim CUP points for this (or at least confirm that you already have, if you did that in the original review?

Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ahhh yeah. I thought it was implied that the only sourcing issue I had was the one I mentioned but here's me outright stating it:

[2] and [3] confirm the route description as seen in their sources (standard for articles under this topic)
[5] confirms Plans to enclose portions of Tulsa with Interstate Highways existed as early as 1957. Labeled as "Tulsa's Comprehensive Plan", the IDL would develop a beltway around Downtown Tulsa.
[6] confirms Construction on these freeways continued into the late 1970s. The final portion opened on November 5, 1981.
[7] confirms Both I-244 and I-444 initially used exit numbers and milemarkers that continued counting from where they split at I-44. This resulted in I-444 utilizing numbers in the 90s [...] I-444 was later resigned to avoid confusion caused from the previous numbering scheme. In 1995, further confusion between I-244 and I-444 prompted the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) to convert I-444 into an unsigned route in favor of signing its concurrencies instead. At this point, the exit numbers were removed from signs leaving only the lettered suffixes. These letters were also eventually removed from signs
[8] confirms In 2021, the Oklahoma House of Representatives tentatively approved a study to explore future alternatives to the Inner Dispersal Loop due to its appearance and expensive cost to maintain.

I will ✓ Pass this now. Nice work! Locust member (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.