User talk:Prince of Erebor

I did not receive any messages from
2015 to 2021.
The talk archives begin from 2022:

2022—2023．2024

Happy New Year, Prince of Erebor!

Happy New Year!

Prince of Erebor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, D.18th! Wishing you a happy and prosperous new year too!!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papa (2024 film)

On 2 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Papa (2024 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that multiple scenes in Papa feature cotton-tree flowers, even though it was not scripted and the falling cotton simply kept drifting into the shot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Papa (2024 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Papa (2024 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A WAM Barnstar for you!

	Wikipedia Asian Month 2024 contest
	Prince of Erebor Thank you for your additions in Wikipedia Asian Month 2024. 28 of your articles have been accepted. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ZI Jony!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 18:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome! Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Blossoms Under Somewhere

On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blossoms Under Somewhere, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the director-screenwriter of Blossoms Under Somewhere joined Telegram groups that sell used lingerie to conduct field research? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blossoms Under Somewhere. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blossoms Under Somewhere), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Witch (TV series)

I went ahead and published The Witch (TV series) to avoid any further delay. So I hope you don't consider this rude. I wouldn't be offended if someone did similar to a draft I marked for review for similar technical reasons. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 23:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey D, sorry, but I do feel that way. I clearly marked the draft as under review, and the notice allowed for a 12-hour window for the review process. It was only less than two hours after the redirect page sharing the same article title in the mainspace was deleted before I could proceed with the review. I do not see any actual delays here, nor any urgency to move an upcoming television series to mainspace in such a short time. I even did some copyediting and expanded the article during the process, so I see no reason why this review should not be counted under my belt. If you had done so after 12 hours, I would be really grateful and have appreciated your assistance, but it is only 3:10 now. I really do not see any legitimate reason for this to happen. Please avoid taking over others' reviews until the 12-hour period has ended. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 03:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright and noted that. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 07:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind to take a look at this draft I made? I'll appreciate your review. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 07:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey D, I have moved the draft to mainspace. Thanks for putting together the article! (I am a huge fan of the 2007 original!) —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:13, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my! For real? Now I'm gonna watch original film before watching the South Korean remake. Thanks a lot! 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 14:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@D.18th: Yes, the original film has a straightforward plot but a really touching ending, and its theme song is definitely worth looping! I hope you enjoy both films! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help With An Article

Hi Prince Erebor, I hope you’re doing well. I really appreciate the review you wrote on the article I submitted. From your feedback, it seems the main issue with the article is the references I’ve included. Most of the sources I was able to find relevant to the subject are from Baidu Baike. I’ll work on finding more reliable and diverse sources to improve the article. I would truly appreciate your assistance and guidance in making it strong enough for publication. Thank you so much for your time and support! CHIBEZA17 (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CHIBEZA17, that is right. Most of the sources currently in the draft are either primary sources related to the awards or companies associated with the topic, or they come from Baidu Baike, which is not a reliable source. You might try looking for news articles or book coverage on the subject. Feel free to reach out to me here once you have completed the rewrite. I would be happy to take a look. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Prince of Erebor, i have made the edits to the article, if you have the time you can review the draft. will very much appreciate your feedback. CHIBEZA17 (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CHIBEZA17, I took a look at the first ten sources of the article, and I do not believe the issues with the previous nomination have been resolved. All sources except for source 2 focus on Duan's company or the awards she received, with minimal mention of her, while Source 2 is an WP:INTERVIEW. Besides, much of the article is unsourced. (Please see WP:INLINE) If these are the best media coverage available for the subject, I am concerned that she may not have enough notability for a Wikipedia article at this time. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Chinese Barnstar
		For the great dedication made towards Chinese-related articles, I am much impressed by your efforts. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For preventing the deletion of Hong Nga Court by finding related sources and proving its notability. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OMG a double barnstar!!! Thank you so much for not just one but two barnstars, Ilovefood123123! Your kind words truly light me up. I am also impressed by your efforts so far, especially the articles related to the University of Hong Kong. You know I am actually a member of Hornell Hall, and I feel a bit ashamed that I have never considered writing an article for my hall after seeing your well-composed Eliot Hall and May Hall. Thanks again, and I am really looking forward to your amazing articles about Hong Kong as well! Happy editing!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind words and appreciation on my work. I might see if I could create a new article for your hall, which of course you would be much more familiar with and would be best if you could ensure that the information I scavenge are up to date and correct. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ilovefood123123, well, I do not have any books about the history of HKU, so if I were to write about it, I would probably need to rely solely on online resources as well. If you are interested and have the time to write it, I would be very excited to see your work! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 17:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Miss Shampoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

The article Miss Shampoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Miss Shampoo for comments about the article, and Talk:Miss Shampoo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your detailed review of the article, Kusma! Regarding Story in Taipei, I know it is Oscar Chiu's debut role, but actually I only wrote the article for him while getting rid of red links for The Lyricist Wannabe. I have not watched the film yet, so I am certainly not confident in writing about it at this point. I may watch it when I have the time, and if I enjoy it, I will definitely do my best to expand on it! Cheers!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 19:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Last Song for You

On 22 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Last Song for You, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that lead actor Ian Chan also composed, arranged, and performed the interlude for Last Song for You? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Last Song for You. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Last Song for You), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)

Could you please review this: Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 07:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Btspurplegalaxy, I believe this is the first time we have a conversation, so nice to meet you! I reviewed the article and have some reservations about whether the subject currently has enough individual notability for a standalone article. She has not made her solo debut, and her appearances on television shows like Queendom Puzzle are alongside her groupmates, which does not demonstrate sufficient individual notability. I know she has appeared in a couple of web series, but none of those have standalone articles at this time, which might suggest only a very marginal pass on notability. But since she has not made any additional appearances since the article's AFD in September 2024, which resulted in a redirect, and given that the consensus during that discussion was that her appearances were still insufficient for individual notability, I am afraid there are not enough new individual activities to override that conclusion just yet. I would be happy to accept the draft if she releases a solo single or appears in a few more notable TV series individually in the near future! Cheers and happy editing! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review it—I really appreciate your feedback. I'll see what I can do with the draft moving forward, considering that Nana isn't currently engaged in solo activities. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 23:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, Btspurplegalaxy! I appreciate the effort you have put into this article too (as well as so many other K-pop articles). It is definitely not about your editing; the issue is with notability that traps the article in draftspace. In the meantime, perhaps we can sit back and wait for Nana to advance her own career to a point where she achieves sufficient individual notability. Cheers! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GAN backlog drive

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (4 points total) helped reduce the backlog by 185 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, IntentionallyDense! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 07:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming an article

Hello Prince of Erebor, thank you for taking a look at and editing the article for Isaac Hong. I was just enquiring about the rename from Isaac Hong to Hong Isaac. While I understand that in traditional Korean names the family name comes first, Isaac is considered an overseas Korean meaning he follows the last name system wherein his given name comes first. This is reflected across his social media and professional platforms. While his name when written in Korean does have the family name coming first, written in English it is always Isaac Hong. Thus, I believe it would be most accurate to write his name in English as Isaac Hong and his name in Korean as 홍이삭 (Hong Isaac). I was hoping to get your thoughts on this matter as you made the initial change. Thank you again for your work on the article! TheAnnaBanana (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAnnaBanana!! This is a very well-composed article, and I have only made some minor edits, so you deserve the full credit for writing it and I really appreciate your work! I renamed the article in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME, which states that article titles should choose the name most commonly used by reliable sources. (it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources) From what I gathered in the article and through a search on Google News, it seems that most sources use the surname-name order "Hong Isaac", including reputable South Korean outlets like The Korea Times[1], JoongAng Daily[2], and Maeil Business Newspaper[3].

In my review of the first five pages of results for "Isaac Hong" on Google News, I found that most either still used "Hong Isaac" or came from unreliable sources, with no English reliable sources using "Isaac Hong". Please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that the subject's Instagram account also follows the surname-name order. (I believe this is Hong's official account[4].) While I noticed a couple of sources you included use "Isaac Hong" (like Halsug and Hype), and it is true that Hong's YouTube channel uses that name, they seem to be among the few supporting this naming order. So I use "Hong Isaac" as the article's title while moving it into mainspace, both for Wikipedia policies and for searchability (it would be much easier for someone to find this page if they encounter "Hong Isaac" in the news or on social media). But I may be mistaken and could have overlooked some sources, so please feel free to share your thoughts if you disagree with me. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prince of Erebor, thank you for your comments! I am still quite new to editing and writing articles according to Wikipedia's practices, so thank you for clarifying. I also re-reviewed various sites and sources, and you are right it seems that while it tends to alternate the strongest sources use "Hong Isaac". What brought this to my attention was the artist's newest release of the single "Lovers" (which he has been promoting under "Isaac Hong"). But in all honestly if even the artist themselves is alternating, it probably is best to just go with what the bigger media outlets address him by. Thank you again for all your advice and help!!! TheAnnaBanana (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, TheAnnaBanana! Yea, sometimes there are discrepancies in how a person's name is spelled or ordered. The article's title is usually chosen based on the naming conventions of the country (in this case, it would be Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)) or the name most commonly used in reliable sources. If you encounter the same query in the future, consider checking how the person is most frequently referenced in news articles. Great job on the article and I look forward to more excellent contributions from you! Happy editing! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 11:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Draft Draft:Atom Eve (character)

I appreciate your time and feedback on my draft. I have addressed the concerns you raised and made the necessary improvements. Additionally, I have added more information to enhance the article's verifiability. Could you kindly review the draft again to see if it now meets Wikipedia’s guidelines? I’d appreciate any further suggestions you might have. Afro 📢Talk! 09:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Afrowriter! I just checked the article, and the previously unsourced content has indeed been added with citations. Great job! However, I am still not convinced about the real-world notability demonstrated in the reception section. Most reviews, like those from Shacknews and Collider, seem to focus on the video game or TV series rather than the character itself. It appears that only the CBR article specifically discuss the character. However, a recent RFC discussion has labeled their articles as churnalism, which means they can be used to flesh out the article, but are unlikely to be taken into account for notability. I suggest continuing to search for more sources that specifically address the character. If the ones currently in the article are the best available, I regret to say that the subject may not have enough notability for a standalone article at this point. ——👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 10:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Shark News and Collider discussed both the game and TV series, as well as the character. Nowadays, it's rare to come across articles that focus solely on a fictional character. Afro 📢Talk! 11:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Together with the CBR source, that should be sufficient. She has been the subject of numerous discussions and is a well-known character in the Invincible universe. This character has clearly passed GNG and SIGCOV, which alone should be enough to support her notability claim.

don't get me wrong am not trying to argue with you am just saying you cant dismiss the case that she (The Character Atom Eve)

Has been a case of many Non trivial publications not just mentions Afro 📢Talk! 11:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Afrowriter: Yea, sources that discuss a fictional character in isolation are rare, which is why fictional biographies are usually harder to create. I do not believe there is any ambiguity regarding the Shacknews and Collider sources, that they primarily focus on the fictional works with the character being mentioned only in passing throughout the reviews. And as I mentioned, CBR has already been discredited and should not be considered in terms of notability at all. (See WP:VALNET) The three best sources currently in the article are either trivial or unreliable, so I do not find it convincing that the article meets GNG at this point and I doubt it would survive an AFD. Agree to disagree, I will pass this review on to another reviewer to see if there is a third opinion that aligns with yours. ——👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 11:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Prosecutor

On 27 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Prosecutor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the production design team for The Prosecutor was entirely female? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Prosecutor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Prosecutor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for May You Stay Forever Young

On 4 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article May You Stay Forever Young, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that May You Stay Forever Young is the first Hong Kong film to be banned following the amendment of the Film Censorship Ordinance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/May You Stay Forever Young. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, May You Stay Forever Young), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Because you thanked me

Prince of Erebor, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
YOU'RE WELCOME!
It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚)

09:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Randompersonediting has hugged you! Hugs promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better (and hopefully wasn't meant as an invasion of personal space). Spread the WikiLove by hugging at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Hug others by adding {{subst:Hug}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 09:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should be the one expressing my appreciation for your work, Randompersonediting, coming from a fellow Midzy!! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:29, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind words! K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 01:34, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hit N Fun

On 20 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hit N Fun, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lead cast of Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In reunited to star in the unrelated film Hit N Fun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hit N Fun. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hit N Fun), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 00:03, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Way We Talk (film)

On 22 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Way We Talk (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chung Suet Ying has better sign language skills than her character in The Way We Talk, which requires her to sign "worse"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Way We Talk (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Way We Talk (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hey Prince of Erebor, I hope you're doing well. I've noticed that User:Cunard hasn't been active for nearly three weeks now, and I haven't seen you around at Delsort China much lately. Some of the AfDs are at risk of getting kept or deleted entirely without a search for Chinese-language sources. I am doing my best to keep up, but I do not have the search skills of you or Cunard and my capacity to participate in AfDs is limited. If you'd consider devoting some more time to AfD, I would really appreciate it, and I'm sure the closing admins and the project as a whole would too. Toadspike [Talk] 09:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Toadspike! Many apologies for my absence and for leaving you to rescue article at AFD alone. I have always appreciated your excellent efforts in participating and finding sources for all the Chinese-language AFDs! (I was not aware that Cunard has also been absent these past few weeks, I hope everything is going well for them.) I am starting to get a bit busier in real life, and the time I manage to squeeze for Wikipedia has all gone toward article creation (I am trying to nominate a couple of articles before the upcoming GA review drive). So unfortunately, I may still not be able to devote much time to AFD, but I will do my best to keep an eye on articles there. I have provided Chinese sources for two nominations, while for the Harbin Jewish Research Center, I could not find anything useful. However, I did come across an article stating that a scholar from the Center were interviewed by Der Spiegel.[5] I struggled to locate that interview piece since I do not know German, and I wonder if you might be able to find any German sources, considering you know the language. Thanks once again for your efforts in rescuing articles and for reaching out to me here! Cheers and happy editing! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 13:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, putting real life first is important. Thank you for your help and for your generous compliments! Toadspike [Talk] 15:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Erebor and Toadspike (talk · contribs), thank you so much for your hard work in rescuing articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/China! When I edit Wikipedia, I prioritise monitoring the AfDs listed there as well as reviewing proposed deletions listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Article alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Article alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject Macau/Article alerts, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Taiwan/Article alerts. Because of busyness and real-life events, I am sometimes away for a while or have very limited capacity to participate in AfDs even when I'm sporadically available. It is always good to have more editors search for sources at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/China. In the past few years, there have been other editors active at Delsort China AfDs, but they participate much less frequently now. I really appreciate both of you stepping in to help rescue articles and hope to see you both around at AfD, DYK, and other places! Cunard (talk) 08:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your compliments, Cunard! I really appreciate your work in rescuing and deprodding articles as well! Btw, I just came across a 2023 column by Wong Nim-yan [zh] in Ming Pao while working on an article about a Hong Kong-French film, but it is paywalled.[6] I am not sure if you usually access offline newspaper sources through WiseNews or other databases that may or may not have a subscription to Ming Pao. I was wondering if there is any way you could access the article? I would really appreciate your help! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:56, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words! I've saved a copy of the Ming Pao column to this link with an expiration time of one week. The file's password is F4mXPrspie. Cunard (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Cunard!!! I honestly cannot imagine a Wikipedia without you! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 09:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad it's helpful! Same here, I cannot imagine a Wikipedia without you and all your amazing cinema articles and AfD contributions! Cunard (talk) 21:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Little Red Sweet

On 31 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Little Red Sweet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the family drama film Little Red Sweet revolves around red bean soup, as red beans symbolize "longing for family" in Chinese culture? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Little Red Sweet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Little Red Sweet), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Table for Six 2

On 5 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Table for Six 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dayo Wong, the lead actor of the first film, did not return for Table for Six 2 and said that he would not reveal the reason for ten years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Table for Six 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Table for Six 2), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your work

You write excellent articles. I appreciate your contributions. Yue🌙 07:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind compliments and appreciation of my work, Yue! I also greatly admire your work on world history. I have so much to learn from you! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with Draft: Z. Z. Wei

Thank you for reviewing my Draft:Z. Z. Wei! I have edited it to address the concerns you raised. If you have a moment, I'd really appreciate it if you could take another look and let me know if I'm moving in the right direction. Thank you so much for your time and help! TwoTreesOneNest (talk) 03:29, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TwoTreesOneNest! I noticed that you have added some sources, and the article has greatly improved. That is excellent! However, most of the sources are from offline newspapers that I cannot access, and based on their titles, they do not seem to cover the subject directly but rather focus on some exhibitions the subject participated in. For example, source 3 from Seattle Post-Intelligencer appears to be about the Asian Hall of Fame, source 4 from Sing Tao Daily seems to discuss an exhibition in Beijing, and source 6 from Beijing Daily also looks like it covers a sculpture exhibition. Other sources, like 8-13, are primary sources from the exhibitions or are unreliable. The only promising sources seem to be the two Seattle Times articles (source 1 and 7), but since I cannot access them, I cannot determine if they provide significant coverage of the subject. I also did a quick Google News search for Z.Z. Wei, but nothing substantial came up. Unfortunately, I tend to suspect that there are not enough reliable sources to demonstrate the subject's notability at this point. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 11:29, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback and kind encouragement! I will continue to learn and work on it. TwoTreesOneNest (talk) 20:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, TwoTreesOneNest! If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 03:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for To Kill a Mongolian Horse

On 19 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article To Kill a Mongolian Horse, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jiang Xiaoxuan set her debut film, To Kill a Mongolian Horse, in her homeland of Inner Mongolia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/To Kill a Mongolian Horse. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, To Kill a Mongolian Horse), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jason Kwan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jason Kwan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jason Kwan

The article Jason Kwan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jason Kwan for comments about the article, and Talk:Jason Kwan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for reviewing the article, LastJabberwocky!! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2024 Barnstar

Dear Prince of Erebor,

Thank you for joining us in celebrating the 10th year of Wikipedia Asian Month!
We truly appreciate your contributions, and we look forward to seeing more articles about Asia written in different languages.

We also hope you continue to participate each year!

Sincerely,
Wikipedia Asian Month User Group

DYK for Peg O' My Heart (film)

On 30 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peg O' My Heart (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a fictional character from Peg O' My Heart complained about his insomnia with netizens on Threads? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peg O' My Heart (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Peg O' My Heart (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for A New Old Play

On 10 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A New Old Play, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the filming sets of A New Old Play were visibly fake, with shaking white fabrics and plastic bags used to mimic turbulent waves? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A New Old Play. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A New Old Play), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jason Kwan

On 15 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jason Kwan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that cinematographer Jason Kwan, a frequent collaborator with Pang Ho-cheung, made his directorial debut by adapting a novella written by Pang? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jason Kwan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jason Kwan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admin

Hi, can u review and move it to main space Draft:Hacktivist Vanguard (hacker group) Thank you. Rizzzmyzizzz (talk) 12:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rizzzmyzizzz and welcome to Wikipedia! I am not sure where you found me, as I am not an admin, and while I do review AfC drafts, I am not familiar with Indian or computer science topics. It might be better to look for another editor with relevant experience or simply wait for our volunteer reviewers to review your draft. Submissions are usually attended quickly. Cheers and happy editing! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can You move it to article Draft:The Good Man (TV series) Muatsem90 (talk) 07:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify once again, I am not an admin. But I am happy to review your draft, Muatsem90. I agree that it is ready for mainspace given its recent release date announcement. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 09:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muatsem90, I have moved the draft to mainspace. Cheers and keep up the excellent work on K-drama articles!! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 15:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 🤝 Muatsem90 (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Awarded for your fantastic and incredibly detailed List of Hong Kong sources. Keep up the good work! –DMartin 08:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the barnstar and your encouraging words, DMartin!! I hope this list will be helpful to fellow Wikipedians in identifying reliable Chinese-language sources. Cheers and let's build a better Wikipedia together! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 09:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Montages of a Modern Motherhood

On 29 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montages of a Modern Motherhood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hedwig Tam gained 20 pounds to play a postpartum mother in Montages of a Modern Motherhood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montages of a Modern Motherhood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Montages of a Modern Motherhood), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hedwig Tam

On 29 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hedwig Tam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hedwig Tam gained 20 pounds to play a postpartum mother in Montages of a Modern Motherhood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montages of a Modern Motherhood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hedwig Tam), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent delection of a reference source

Hi. I came across the deletion of an "unreliable" source executed by you on the COMAC C919 English Wiki page. In general, I have no quarrel with said deletion (the source was apparently referenced to substantiate the delivery of a C919 jetliner in 2023) since there exist multiple sources, some would say too many sources, on that page which substantiate such jet deliveries. But one aspect of your action is a bit troubling to me: you apparently took this action because the partiuclar source under discussion is "blacklisted" by the "community".

I'm not familiar with the news outlet (dimsumdaily?) that published the relevant article and it's entirely possible, even likely, that it's generally an unreliable outlet; however, the article under discussion is apparently quite innocuous (just a report about the fact that a jet delivery occurred on such and such a date), and in all likelihood, dimsumdaily was simply reprinting a story that it obtained from some other outlet, with minor modifications, as many web-based news outlets are wont to do in the US and elsewhere. Under these circumstances, where a blanket ban is applied to all articles that originate from a proscribed source regardless of the accuracy of its content, a source deletion cannot but be described as censorship of the most severe kind even if the "community" had given prior approval. I know there are a whole bunch of folks on Wikipedia who go around doing such "source-policing" and that there's little that I can do about it even if I had the energy; nevertheless, I'd like you to hear from someone with a slightly different viewpoint.

I think you're likely a well-meaning and (relatively) young HongKonger who is striving for "open and free" Western social ideals, and that this, perhaps paradoxically, is what has motivated you to take actions that others may view as censorship. But as someone who lived briefly under Chiang Kai-shek, waved to Queen Elizabeth II in 1975 as a little kid while she was on her way to Government House in a franchiseless Hong Kong, who cluelessly agreed with the US media when it excoriated China in 1989, who then watched governments which I often voted for ignore voters and bomb innocents (oops collateral damage) across Africa, Europe, and the Middle East over a period of decades, I can tell you that "Western ideals" are very often selectively used by the US (my government) to blacken the reputations of its perceived enemies while a double-standard is applied (or just the ruthless application of wholesale censorship) when its own action arguably falls short (sometimes far short) of such ideals. (I don't know about British Common Law, but in the US, "selective prosecution" is considered to be a defense to criminal charges, possibly by case law). Granted, the fact that the West (and the US in particular) may be falling short of its ideals does not mean that you should curtail the rather commendable goal of building a free and open society; however, I don't think working to enforce a hard ban against a news source (which is not an out-and-out organ of a hate group like the Volkischer Beobachter) on Wikipedia is commensurate with that goal. Note that even the Nazi newspaper organ, as the official publication of the sole legal party of the Dritte Reich circa 1933, can be considered to be a "credible source" with respect to the intentions of Germany during the relevant period, using today's lingo.

I'm sorry I went on-and-on about this stemming from a simple source deletion, but this is something which has been on my mind lately. Do not feel the need to respond. if you disagree with any aspect of my sentiments then just delete this post from your talk page. You seem like a generally considerate pearson, Cheers. Spotty's Friend (talk) 02:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotty's Friend, thanks for sharing your views with me and I understand the perspective behind them, but I believe there has been a misunderstanding regarding the removal of Dimsum Daily. "Blacklisting" on Wikipedia means that a source is deprecated and added to the spam blacklist based on editors' consensus. It is not related to censorship or the personal opinions of individual editors. Recently, Dimsum Daily was blacklisted by the Chinese Wikipedia following thorough discussions among editors. The reasons for its blacklist include its ongoing publication of fake news (e.g., according to FactWire, they fabricated a quote from a Czech TV interview with a scientist who claimed that COVID-19 was created in an American laboratory, but this interview did not exist and the scientist denied making those statements), poor journalistic practices (e.g., they admitted to "always troll people" in one of their apology statements after publishing a misleading report), a lack of editorial independence and oversight (e.g., most contributors are students rather than professional journalists), and a controversial background (e.g., it is controlled by a marketing agency with ties to a social media influencer, raising concerns about paid advertorials). This news blog checks every box for what we would consider an unreliable source on Wikipedia, and I believe you would agree that unreliable sources should be avoided. I have also submitted a request to the English Wikipedia's spam list regarding this source, which means the blog will soon be blocked from our edit filters as well.

Typically, editors or bots that clean up these sources will remove and replace them with a {{cn}} tag or simply delete the entire sentence citing this source. However, I wanted to preserve the content in all 161 articles that cited it, especially since Dimsum lacks original reporting and many of its articles are merely reposts of Chinese-language media in English, so there are likely better sources available and I decided to manually clean up the content, preventing it from being deleted due to lack of sourcing. You can check my editing history, it took me two days (26 to 27 May) to clean them up. In 80% of the cases (with the edit summary of "Replace Dimsum Daily with a better reliable source"), I replaced Dimsum with reliable sources listed in WP:RSP or WP:HKRS. For the remaining 20% (with the edit summary of "Remove sources from Dimsum Daily"), like Comac C919, as those articles cited another source in addition to Dimsum, so I simply removed it. Aside from Khalil Fong where I found the Dimsum source contradicting other reliable sources, not a single word of content in the other 160 articles was deleted. So I would not describe what I did as censorship, rather, I was trying my best to protect our content while adhering to our five pillars. I hope this clears up any doubts you have about the source removal. Cheers and happy editing! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:24, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The First Girl I Loved

On 2 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The First Girl I Loved, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the director of the lesbian film The First Girl I Loved based the plot on true stories gathered from all-girls school graduates he interviewed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The First Girl I Loved. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The First Girl I Loved), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Mitchells vs. the Machines

Since you do not answer me on my talk page, I would like to clarify the reason behind your recent reverts here. For example: why do you consider this a Hong Kong film, when Hong Kong isnt even mentioned in the article? The article clearly describes it as an US production with Sony holding chinese distribution rights, which is the cloesest it comes to even mentioning Hong Kong. If you have proof, that this is indeed a Hong Kong movie, you should probably first edit the article accordingly. Thanks for your attention, and sorry if I did disturb you. Greetings, 2A02:810A:9A5:7A00:C9F6:4DBC:E8BF:A2C6 (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was not aware that you left a reply on your talk page, please ping me if you would like to receive replies from me. The Mitchells vs. the Machines is a Hong Kong-American co-production, produced by the US' Sony Pictures, Columbia Pictures, and Lord Miller Productions and Hong Kong's One Cool Films. This co-production status is well-supported by sources such as The Numbers[7], and One Cool Films's involvement is backed by sources like Screen International[8] and Variety[9]. Since you initiated the removal of categories, the burden of proof is on you. However, I appreciate you pointing out the lack of sourcing regarding the film's production country and I have added the above sources to the article. I believe your concerns about WP:V are now addressed. Cheers and happy editing! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 13:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elegies (film)

On 19 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elegies (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the title of Elegies comes from a suite of poems that its director read during the film's pre-production? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elegies (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elegies (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 00:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Smashing Frank

On 24 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Smashing Frank, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the screenplay for Smashing Frank was developed from an assignment in a filmmaking course? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Smashing Frank. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Smashing Frank), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June Backlog Drive is almost over!

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 900 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Have never thought Erena So became one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025. Thanks for your DYK hook suggestion; it can't be reached that high without your help.

Saimmx (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, Saimmx! I am just offering some suggestions, the credit truly belongs to you for composing such a well-written and interesting article. See you around on both en and zhwiki! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 07:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Yao Yuanjun. This DYK nomination has been stuck for a while now, and input from a Chinese speaker has been requested. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:12, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I have shared my opinion there. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 09:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025 AfC backlog drive award

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This is awarded to Prince of Erebor for accumulating more than 50 points during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your participation! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:28, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Bunnypranav! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Prince of Erebor, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:03, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Rosguill! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 07:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Hi , I need to move the article to articles. Draft:Tempest (TV series) 🙏 Muatsem90 (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Muatsem90, I have moved the article to mainspace. Thanks for all you have done for the K-drama articles. Cheers and happy editing! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 07:42, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 🙏 Muatsem90 (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name change edits

Hi, I saw you you reverted several name edits of User:CLW.Edward tagging them as vandalism. While I find many of their edits problematic, it is correct to use the full legal name in lede per MOS:FULLNAME (see John Lee Ka-chiu for example) and ideally include a {{Family name hatnote}}. WP:ZHNAME governs the article title and is not applicable to the lede or infobox. Northern Moonlight 00:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Northern Moonlight! I remember this user and if I recall correctly, they changed the names of some Hongkongers in the article leads from the hyphenated format to non-hyphenated, without providing any sources to prove that the non-hyphenated version is the common name for the subjects, and I reverted those changes. I was initially a bit confused by your statement. Based on what you wrote and after reviewing some of that user's edit history, it seems that I inadvertently reverted a couple of articles where they had added non-hyphenated full legal names that originally only included the subjects' English names. I mistakenly did this as part of a batch revert, which was not my intention. You are correct that the full legal name should be included in the lead. Thanks a lot for bringing this issue to my attention and for your corrections! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 07:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Thanks for your work. Northern Moonlight 16:02, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:36:10, 30 July 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Kuhkul

Kuhkul (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kan Lai Bing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for your review comment. this is my first wiki page and I really appreciate your professional advice on referencing.

Dr. Kan was a university librarian and her profile and achivements are recorded in university web pages which are being used by me.

say, [ In 2002, she was awarded the HKSAR Medal of Honour for her valuable contribution ... ] , I used a web page from HKSAR, is it good ?

I used HKU & Charles Sturt Univesity web page sources for the Biography of Dr Kan. are those sources reliable?

I would greatly appreciate it if you could point out which sources are not acceptable, so I can learn from my mistakes. Thank you!

Kuhkul (talk) 09:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kuhkul, welcome to Wikipedia! Since the subject has direct ties to HKU, HKU websites would be considered non-independent primary sources in this context. To prove a subject's notability on Wikipedia, at least two reliable, independent, and secondary sources are needed. You may refer to WP:RS for further guidance on identifying reliable sources. I advise you to consider citing articles from newspapers or media outlets that cover the subject. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]