User:Doug Weller
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 63 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 153 |
| Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 59 |
| Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 12 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
| Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 234 |
| Requested RD1 redactions | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 10 |
| Open sockpuppet investigations | 59 |
| Click here to locate other admin backlogs | |
Administrative backlog
Reports
User-reported
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 49 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 163 items Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-reported
- Arisgoeswiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) WP:ORGNAME violation, promotional name + promotional edits (created Draft:Akademische Raumfahrt Initiative Schweiz). Toadspike [Talk] 12:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Colly Industries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Seems like a company name. I can't say whether the edits they've made break any rules. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 15:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- They've made one edit which isn't promotional. I'd wait until they make promotional edits. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 03:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Fakir Agro (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Referentis (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- HitIerisgay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Referentis (talk) 04:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Paintwaint (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (paintwaint.in), see User:Paintwaint/sandbox. Annh07 (talk) 04:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vision Quest DP (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Referentis (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Skitash (talk) 12:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ethno-nationalist POV (Bengali) pusher not abiding by WP:NOINDICSCRIPT and WP:ETHNICITY/WP:NATIONALITY policies. They used an ID yesterday [1] [2], today using IPs and a new ID for edit warring [3] [4] [5]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
The same happening in:
- Mahasweta Devi - New ID edits - [6], edit war using IPs - [7] [8] [9]
- Radabinod Pal New ID edits - [10]; IP and new ID edits - [11] [12] [13].
SO a case of IP-socking as well. Requesting page protection for these two articles as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- More edit warring using newer ID and IP socks - [14] [15] [16]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- More socking [17]. Note the newer sock ID has opened a new PP request Radabinod Pal here. -
Reason: Disruptive editing from one user:Fylindfotberserk 2603:7000:2300:1697:2C43:FFDD:F75E:1657 (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- You are the sock puppet POV pushing ethnicity and Bengali-Assamese script in the lead/IB which is against Wikipedia guidelines and policies (WP:NOINDICSCRIPT and WP:ETHNICITY). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing 2603:7000:2300:1697:2C43:FFDD:F75E:1657 (talk) 13:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in the last few months. WiiUf🐉 13:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued BLP birth date, age vandalism see Ticket#2025051010005616. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated IP disruption. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been almost nothing but vandalism since last protection expired. Nswix (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalic edits by sock accounts. Fade258 (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The discussion has been closed properly, and at least one of the socks has been blocked, so there's no need for protection anymore. Nyttend (talk) 01:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to repetetive cases of vandalism. Apsa 54 (talk) 18:06, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Same IP sock who caused the last protection increase a month ago is back at disruptive editing Alawadhi3000 (talk) 18:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As this appears to be a single IP editor, WP:AIV may be more appropriate for the correction of vandalism issues here. However, given that this is a BLP, I've applied a short period of protection to allow a cushion to advance a better remedy. Chetsford (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Significantly concerning recent political IP vandalism; consider raising protection to edits by registered users only Chat-qui-Aboie (talk) 21:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I think we've got a slow-motion edit war going on, and it's possible that the players have real-world connections to this subject. We've got a discussion going on the talk page, but I think it would actually help a lot if we could get the page SEMI'd for maybe two weeks. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Protection would improperly favor one side in the dispute. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Rsjaffe, The dispute is between an IP and a new editor. Extended confirmed would stop both of them from editing, but I think semi would be enough, because that could get the IP to the talk page (they have no incentive to discuss now, and probably haven't figured out how to) as well as stop the new editor from worrying about the ongoing reverting. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- The protection policy guidance for administrators (Wikipedia:Protection policy#Guidance for administrators) states:
Semi-protection should not be used ... to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes.
I'm not going to semi-protect the article, and extended confirmed protection seems excessive currently. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- The protection policy guidance for administrators (Wikipedia:Protection policy#Guidance for administrators) states:
- @Rsjaffe, The dispute is between an IP and a new editor. Extended confirmed would stop both of them from editing, but I think semi would be enough, because that could get the IP to the talk page (they have no incentive to discuss now, and probably haven't figured out how to) as well as stop the new editor from worrying about the ongoing reverting. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip's and new accounts not adhering to NPOV. Requesting protection per BLP. Knitsey (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:PIA all articles related to the conflict should be protected by default Rainsage (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Disruptive sockpuppetry from a user who is gaming the system. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 02:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – From different IPs this page is being vandalized!. Aadirulez8 (talk) 04:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's time for permanent protection for this page. Nearly all of the edits to this page for a very long time now are just adding the same Kaiserreich edit which is then removed. GraziePrego (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of two years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: I know it was vandalism by two accounts but No One requested indefinitely protection on this talk page at Mtattrain it was indefinitely protection by Pppery which this username violated against the rules on protection request after waited 2 days to be protected it has no expired set so I'm trying to lift the protection on this talk page cause other new username or IP address needed to edit this page for help or conversation. 68.129.82.66 (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not only does this request make no sense, the fact those two accounts are globally locked as long-term crosswiki abusers justifies the indefinite semi. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
OK fine Jeske Couriano I'm not gonna argue with you but we will leave it to administrator. 68.129.82.66 (talk) 22:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that a talk page be opened on the International Court of Justice talk page with regards to editing the first sentence "The International Court of Justice (ICJ; French: Cour internationale de justice, CIJ), or colloquially the World Court, is the only international court that adjudicates general disputes between nations, and gives advisory opinions on international legal issues." Specifically in terms of dispute around the idea that it is the "only international court that adjudicates general disputes between nations" as in line with the page on international courts other international courts adjudicate general disputes, for exaple as the international court page says the Caribbean Court of Justice's subject and scope is "General disputes within the Caribbean Community" which i believe also fit this definition. Furthermore there is no source on the claim that the ICC is the "only international court that adjudicates general disputes between nations" and the ICC themselves do not claim such on any source i could find. Finally i dont think the wording of "general disputes" is specific enough to meaningfully differentiate it from other courts jurisdictions. For example, the European Court of Justice's subject matter and scope of "interpretation of European Union law" also covers disputes that could be described as general, between nations. This is my first ever contribution to Wikipedia i apologise if i got the formatting wrong. SolidarityForever113 (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- SolidarityForever113, are you asking that we start a discussion at Talk:International Court of Justice? No worries about formatting; I just want to make sure I'm understanding you rightly. Nyttend (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Not done because there is nothing to do, no specific proposal has been made for a change. @SolidarityForever113: The talk page Talk:International Court of Justice is not protected. You can make an edit request there. This page isn't the venue for discussions about the article. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the article of Pope Leo XIV, i didn't mean to add some points, but i want to develop the article in indonesian version. Kayanad (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Kayanad: Then you'd need to handle that on the relevant Wikipediae, not here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. This is not an edit request. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the article of Pope Leo XIV, i didn't mean to add some points, but i want to develop the article in indonesian version by copy it. Kayanad (talk) 22:51, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Kayanad: See WP:Translate us. This is not something that involves the English Wikipedia all that much. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. This page is for proposing changes to an article on the English Wikipedia where the talk page for such an article has been protected. Such is not the case with Talk:Pope Leo XIV. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
This user has created a huge number of articles, mostly to do with football in Switzerland. A cursory review shows that the articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, but the subjects are consistently notable and the articles are generally well-researched and -referenced, so I don't see much for NPP to do here. Toadspike [Talk] 15:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I'd like to remove the link List of NBA regular season records (and its redirect NBA records) which was added en masse by a user in 2023 to hatnotes and "see also" sections across articles in a manner that is unreasonably tangential and irrelevant. Doing it manually would be far too arduous for me. I believe the AutoWikiBrowser right would be a valuable asset in helping me do this. Thanks for considering this request. Left guide (talk) 07:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Not sure if right place to post this; I already had awb permissions under the username "seefooddiet", but my account was recently renamed to "grapesurgeon". My username needs to be updated in Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON to "grapesurgeon". grapesurgeon (formerly seefooddiet) (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I was on Wikipedia for around 6 months, why is my account not yet marked as Extended confirmed? Truth Layer 123 (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
|
#File:Syrian_Petroleum_Company_Logo.png){kind=link}
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am retired and enjoy using my free time to contribute to Wikipedia and make it more enriching. GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm still unsure if this is the right time for me to apply but, I trust my gut enough in this situation. I'm a current student in the CVUA, currently going through a trainer switch. I've taken the past several weeks to familiarize myself with CSD and AfD. Although I haven't written any articles, I do like to take the pride on looking at ongoing AfD's, which has helped in my study in different polices. I also do a good amount in copyvio work, using CopyPatrol. I work well with other editors and I hope to reduce the NPR workload. I love to welcome new users, when I come across them, as I member of the welcome committee. I'm civl and I always apologize and fix my mistakes with haste. I've never been blocked, nor any restrictions, although I've made a few mistakes (i.e accidental reverts, which only really happened in the beginning of my RCP experience), which I fixed, apologized, and most importantly, moved on. I only took the pride to apply (even though I wanted to before) because of the May 2025 backlog drive. I'm eager to help in the backlogs and, I also think this will be a great chance for me to connect with other editors. If you don't feel as if I'm ready, I understand and I'm OK if I'm placed on a trial aswell. Thank you! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 22:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I am currently an AFC reviewer and is familiar with the deletion processes such as AfD, PROD, and CSD. I would like to help clear the backlog. I believe I meet the criteria for this right. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
I was once a Wikipedia editing noob. Now I want to help others to get their articles approved, as well as how to fix them. I will be happy to review new pages!. GarethBaloney 22:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [25]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[26]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I am request this right because lately, there has been a lot of vandalism during the evening to night hours. I could not revert all of it because I had to click the article, go to view history, and undo. With this, I could much more easily revert vandalism. Please note that my account is pretty new, but I had an account before with around 1 year experience; that account was when I lived in Chicago, the reason I cannot access the account is because I forgot the username and password (it was a created a while ago). Thank you for your consideration of this request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights for my account in order to prevent pages from vandalism etc, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC) |
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
|
Barnstars
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) |
- Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedia administrators
- British Wikipedians
- Wikipedia oversighters
- Wikipedians who use Discord
- Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
- WikiProject Archaeology participants
- Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team members
- Wikipedians by alma mater: Yale University
- Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests
- Wikipedians with MS degrees
- Wikipedians who have access to Project MUSE
- Members of the Ten Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedians by alma mater: London School of Economics
- American Wikipedians