Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at the main talk page.

Requests

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Create an account to request permissions.
(add request)
Shortcuts

Review the Criteria before making a request.

  • Administrators and new page reviewers are automatically approved and do not need to be added to the list.
  • If approved, consider adding yourself to the list of reviewers by subject.

April

NPR (April)

User:Iljhgtn

Per a discussion at the Tea house where it was suggested that I may wish to be added to this list. I am therefore seeking inclusion on the list to help. Iljhgtn (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you already have NPR, so you don't need this perm. Go ahead and start reviewing! -- asilvering (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (April)

User:Reywas92

Rerequesting to get back into this. Reywas92Talk 00:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New (April)

User:Poriman55

Done this previously before i lost my account. I'd love to help this project again, it was fun! I still remember how stuff works, but still read the rules again. – User:Poriman55 - Talk 11:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My username has now changed from Poriman55 to EAKI78. This would also have to be changed on the participant list. –– EAKI78 - Contact 13:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- asilvering (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:AllCatsAreGrey

I have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions and am familiar with Wikipedia notability guidelines, so I am requesting afc helper script rights to help review AfC submissions. — AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 00:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Princess of Ara

Real life got in the way last year. Rerequesting this tool. Princess of Ara 22:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hell of a long year, haha. We've all been there. Welcome back.  Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. asilvering (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vivek Rai

Extended break from Wikipedia but now looking forward to becoming active and contributing again! Vivek Rai (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, can you come back when you have some more recent experience with article creation and/or AfD? Thanks for volunteering. -- asilvering (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Asilvering! Thanks - could I request you to reconsider this request? Please feel free to review my contribution history but I've contributed over 40+ live articles (5+ in last week) and would like to be able to assist with improved coverage of Biology and Medicine articles in AfC. Perhaps, I forgot to mention this but I used to be a AfC reviewer but became inactive, if that helps. If you'd like me to re-open the request, please let me know. Thanks Komodo (talk) 20:39, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I think you need some more recent experience before returning to roles like AfC reviewing, especially given the issues other editors have raised on your talk page. A lot of things have changed over the past decade. But when I say "come back", I do mean it. :) -- asilvering (talk) 04:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply! Sounds good - hopefully you'll be better convinced in a few weeks :) Komodo (talk) 07:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cactusisme

Hello, I would like to be a participant in the AFC reviewing process by clear the backlog using the AFC helper script. I believe I have met the following guidline of having a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old, a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles and I have read and understood the reviewing instructions. I also understand the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including notability, notability guidelines. I am also active daily. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 00:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Imwin567

I’m interested to be a part of WikiProject AfC reviewer. I’ve read and familiarized myself with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines plus I carefully evaluate sources in line within notability standards. I’m ready to assist by reviewing drafts whether to accept or reject it and then improving its content. Imwin567 (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:FortunateSons

Hey, I'm interested in reviewing AfCs and would like to request access to this tool, as I believe that I have now gained enough experience to productively contribute here. I read and understood the relevant instructions, policies, and guidelines, and I satisfy the necessary formal requirements. Due to the current backlog, I believe that now would be a good time to start. On the question of relevant experience: I have created or translated eight articles, leading to two DYKs. Particularly in the first half of 2024, I have participated in what I believe is a sufficient number of AfDs (many of which have been contentious); excluding NC, the tool states that I have an 88,5 % match rate. I have also worked within a pretty contentious topic (I/P) without sanctions, and am active at RSN, which should indicate the ability to evaluate sources. Thank you! FortunateSons (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeoGaze

I see there is a large number of waiting draft submissions and I want to contribute to reduce that number. I have created two articles and I have read the reviewing instructions. I have over 900 edits and some recent experience assessing/reassessing articles at WikiProject Wikipedia. NeoGaze (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Setergh

I'll go by the criteria, which I hope is okay.
  • My Wikipedia account is over 90 days old, nearing a year now.
  • I do have 500+ undeleted edits, as of writing this close to 2,000 (98.1% of my total edits, as you can see here on my xtools) [1]
  • I've fully read them, and have enabled the AfC helper script, also having read its instructions on how to use, when to use and why it may be useful.
  • I read through the policies and guidelines in reviewing instructions, ensuring I understand them (including reFill). As for notability guidelines, I read through the main one I hope to be able to do (events, I'll elaborate on this later) and will remember to always refer to any of the notability guidelines in the future.
  • I don't have much evidence of myself often trying to delete articles (at least not recently). However, I made sure to read through all the wikipedia guidelines relating to this and testing out how to use them to ensure I'm not confused when this does become relevant to me.
  • I check Wikipedia quite frequently in case of any changes to for example my edits or mentions for discussions. I respond quite quickly, and I'm not a busy person at all, so I have quite a lot of time to do this.

Further information:
I feel that this project is something that would personally interest me. I've already spent my time before simply assessing articles (though not very recently, though it was definitely around 50 or so?). I do have my experience with helping inexperienced editors try and get into Wikipedia and teaching them multiple things that could help them. As for what I meant by being focused on events, I think you can see by my user profile I primarily deal with history (which I'd definitely say falls under events). I was wondering whether it's okay for me to mainly focus on that? If not for whatever reason, then I'll gladly make sure to spend my time checking out all sorts of articles for creation. However, this is just a personal preference. If you need to ask me anything further about this, go ahead! Setergh (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to add, but I also do definitely have lots of experience with page creation in general and this project itself when I just started Wikipedia. You can see all of my pages (created or heavily revamped) on my userpage. Setergh (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zzz plant

Hello! I am interested in becoming an AfC reviewer. My account recently hit 90 days and I believe I meet the other requirements (details about contributions can be found on my user page). Full disclosure: I have 1 declined draft from when I thought National Academy of Medicine qualified for WP:NACADEMIC C3. If granted AfC permission I would defer to more experienced editors to determine which organizations are prestigious enough for C3, unless they are explicitly listed on the notability guidelines. Thank you for your consideration! Zzz plant (talk) 13:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:MediaKyle

I've been thinking about applying to be an AfC reviewer for some time, but I wanted to wait until I felt I had a sufficient grasp of the applicable policies. I'd say that time has come. See my contributions page to get an idea of my work here. MediaKyle (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:WuTang94

I'd like to assist with reviewing new page creations. As a veteran editor with years under my belt and countless edits, I want to be a resource for new editors who may use the AfC tool to make new pages and want to help provide helpful feedback. Granted, I may not have as much time on my hands now due to other responsibilities in life, but I want to help out where I can. WuTang94 (talk) 05:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:WormEater13

Hi! I would love to volunteer to be a AfC reviewer. I've made over 1,200+ edits and meet the requirements to be an AfC reviewer (500+ article edits and account at least 90 days old). I'm very familiar with WP:N, WP:NPOV, and WP:VERIFIABILITY. I'm usually active in combatting vandalism and proposing AfDs/PROD/CSD, but seeing the massive AfC backlog, I would love to help clean that up as I get more free time. I am aware of the duties of an AfC reviewer, and what to accept/deny (can this draft survive an AfD if accepted?, etc). All of the articles i've proposed to AfC have been accepted, and none of my articles have been deleted. Would love to join the force! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:MangoMan11

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights
I would like to help with reducing the AFC backlog by becoming an AFC reviewer. I have created six articles (one was created from a redirect) and contributed extensively to them to ensure that they do not fall afoul of the deletion policy. I've also experienced situations when new articles do not meet the requirements as, prior to my successful page creations, I had two declined through AFC several years ago and decided to not continue creating them due to a lack of SIGCOV. MangoMan11 (talk) 10:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:IVickyChoudhary

I am requesting AFC Helper Script rights to improve the efficiency and consistency of my AFC reviews. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you do not meet minimum criteria. I'm not sure what you mean by to improve the efficiency and consistency of my AFC reviews - please don't review AfC drafts while you're not a reviewer. You're welcome to help out with improving articles in draftspace, of course. :) -- asilvering (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Protobowladdict

I am requesting afc helper rights because I want to help reduce the backlog of articles waiting for review, as there are currently over 2700 of them. ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Popturtle

I've created ~78 articles since 2023, of which only three have been deleted. I've become more proficient in determining notability over time, exemplified by some of the articles successfully created through AfC. I want to join the project to help reduce the backlog, as its current size is pretty daunting. Popturtle (talk) 23:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:HilssaMansen19

I am actively contributing on Wikipedia now, checking new pages, talking to users about where they can make their articles at par with the guidelines. I have some experience in AfD with many new engagements. I am requesting this right temporarily and I will actively contribute as much as I can for further grant proven by work. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May

Inactive (May)

User:Artem.G

I was a reviewer some time ago, but was inactive for a ~year or so. I have a bit more time now and want to participate as an AfC reviewer again. Thanks! Artem.G (talk) 08:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, welcome back! -- asilvering (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPR (May)

User:Bakhtar40

I have already granted NPP rights. I think i pass the criteria to fulfill AFC reviewer. Please check if i am eligible. Thank You. Bakhtar40 (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You already have NPP rights, so you don't need AFCHP. Just go ahead and start reviewing! -- asilvering (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New (May)

User:GoldRomean

I would love help with the backlog at AfC and to help users learn about our notability/COI/etc. policies. GoldRomean (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:BruceThomson

I have created one article myself that was approved by AfC. I have also participated in AfD. The AfC backlog is getting bigger so I would like to help out. BruceThomson (talk) 11:23, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:AbeerT

I would like to become an AFC Helper and build this help into my weekly routine. AbeerT (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just checking if my request may have been overseen. Happy to explain my request in more depth. Thank you. AbeerT (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; while you might meet the numeric requirements, you have only created one draft (still pending review) and have done almost no editing in the Wikipedia spaces (such as participating in AFD) so I cannot gauge your knowledge of our inclusion, notability, and deletion criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Primefac, understood. With AFD you mean Articles for Deletion, correct? AbeerT (talk) 08:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. -- asilvering (talk) 10:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights : to review article drafts from edit-a-thons Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. asilvering (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mary Mark Ockerbloom, just to ask the cheeky question, I assume you are not requesting this right to just blanket-accept drafts created at edit-a-thons, and are doing your due diligence in reviewing them? Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac, No offense taken; I've gotten frustrated at seeing things that were almost ready stuck in draft space for months or years. Don't worry; I won't be pushing drafts out indiscriminantly. I may be giving them some help to ensure they are ready to go. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Destinyokhiria

I am requesting afc helper rights because I want to help reduce the backlog of articles waiting for review, as there are currently over 3042 of them. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Minimum requirement? Destinyokhiria (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please review the top of this page. -- asilvering (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have reached the EC user right Destinyokhiria (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations. -- asilvering (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Destinyokhiria (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:NAUME GOU

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights NAUME GOU (talk) 21:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 03:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:VortexPhantom

Experienced in mainspace and AFD. I strongly want to demonstrate my knowledge to reduce the backlog in AFC. I too feel to fulfill the all criteria for the AFC reviewer by using helper script. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 01:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 06:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you specify which criteria does I don't meet? @Asilvering. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 06:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You do not have 500 edits to articles. -- asilvering (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok understood, will come back when this requirement is met. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering, Not making new request, continuing in this section only....Come backed after meeting the requirements of 500 edits. Kindly see if I meet the requirements and grant me helper script right...
VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dresq23

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights - Want to approve new pages and edit accordingly. Dresq23 (talk) 22:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum criteria. -- asilvering (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afstromen (1)

I am requesting AfC reviewer rights. I have created 22 articles, all of which are currently live and none have been deleted. This demonstrates a clear understanding of Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. I have participated in several AfD discussions and am familiar with evaluating notability and reliability of sources. I also have a strong knowledge of Indian topics and reliable Indian news sources, which I believe will be especially helpful when reviewing India-related drafts. Afstromen (talk) 11:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 11:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering Hi there, could you please mention the requirements I don't meet?
if i am not eligible then i will do more work i have no issue. Afstromen (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You do not yet have 500 edits to articles. -- asilvering (talk) 15:20, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thank you. will come back :) Afstromen (talk) 16:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:NAUME GOU

I want to be apart of reviewers NAUME GOU (talk) 19:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheNuggeteer

Hi! I'm TheNuggeteer. I'm not really a new user, since I have been in Wikipedia for 1 year (albeit with breaks and other stuff). I'm experienced in notability and page deletion since I have created the deletion pages of about 15 pages. I have also created 86 articles and 7,000 edits. I actually had rights to AFC through being a new page reviewer but have lost them through a topic ban (a fault on my end). I want to regain my reviewing rights to help articles strive in Wikipedia. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 03:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to have to think on this. On the one hand, you were only topic-banned for six months from reviewing pages, but on the other hand you were topic-banned from reviewing pages. There is also the issue of about ~10% of your articles being deleted. That being said your AFD stats are reasonable and it doesn't look like you broke your topic ban at any point. A review-after-trial-period might be in order. I'll try to make a final decision by next weekend, so please be patient. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which I want evaluated at the end of a month of reviewing. This is mandatory - please make a post when the time comes inviting reviews and commentary on your progress. If successful the usual probationary checks will then take place after the usual 3-6 month period. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:WeWake

I confirm that I've reviewed the eligbility criteria for AfC and have refreshed myself with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines as evidenced by >25+ articles (all live and reviewed by NPPs) contributed within past month and 1000+ edits with participitation in RfCs, AfDs, and talk page discussions. Thanks!— WeWake (talk) 02:24, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:HerBauhaus

I'm requesting AfC reviewer permissions based on my experience with article expansion and review, particularly in science and technology. Over 90% of my edits are in the main namespace, and I've actively contributed to over 50 articles with 10+ edits each. I've participated in nearly 50 combined AfD, PROD, and AfC discussions, with a 92.9% alignment with final closures (excluding "No Consensus"). My approach to AfD is preservation through improvement where reliable sources exist, while at AfC, I focus on ensuring well-sourced content and supporting new editors. Being bilingual (English and German) helps with sourcing. I enjoy editing and appreciate the chance to make a meaningful impact. Given the backlog of over 3,000 pending AfC submissions, I believe I can help maintain high quality while reducing the queue. Thank you for your consideration. HerBauhaus (talk) 08:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pedantical

I’d like to help with reviewing new page creations; there are many new articles being created and I’m sure most of them are wonderful and deserve to be reviewed as possible additions. I’ve been an editor for a few years now, and I’d like to think I communicate well with others, which I’ve always appreciated when folks give me feedback (both on and off Wikipedia). I hope to lean into that strength a bit and use it encourage meaningful improvements to drafts when it seems like an article just needs that extra little bit of attention before hitting the main space. Not everything is worthy of addition of course, but I always appreciate the potential of someone new to a group/area/job/team who has that spark of “new-person-energy” that might just need some light steering into the proper direction where they can really shine. Pedantical (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mikeycdiamond

I want to use my experience to help with the backlog. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, too many issues including not knowing GNG existed until two months ago. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to state that in that message I mixed up Wikipedia:Game Guide with WP:GNG. I didn't notice that I mixed up the two in my message until it was too late. I knew about GNG, but didn't know about GAMEGUIDE. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, and I thought that was odd, but it was more the cherry and not the cake. Primefac (talk) 10:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afstromen (2)

I would like to request AfC reviewer rights. Initially, I misunderstood the requirement, thinking it pertained to 500 total edits. I have since learned that it specifically requires 500 undeleted edits in the article (main) namespace. I have now met this criterion. I have read and understood the reviewing instructions and am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including notability and verifiability. I am eager to assist in reviewing pending AfC submissions. Afstromen (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Hi there, just checking in on my AFC reviewer request. I’ve noticed that some users who applied after me have already been approved, so I was wondering if there’s a reason for the delay in my case. I’d appreciate any update when you get a chance. Thanks!
Afstromen (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I think I saw your initial decline and when editing the page I just scrolled past your name when I saw it down here. Will take a look shortly. Primefac (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. I totally understand.and thanks for granting me this right.
Afstromen (talk) 14:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Justier100

Hi, I am requesting for this position because I want to help for reviewing the sources and article if does contain any same information afc helper script rights. Thank you Justier100 (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many issues, especially with 20% of your creations deleted and more moved to draft for being unready for article space. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:DankPedia

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I would like to help review articles on Wikipedia. DankPedia (talk) 19:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements. -- asilvering (talk) 22:20, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why? I have the 500 edits. DankPedia (talk) 23:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You do not. You need 500 edits to articles. -- asilvering (talk) 00:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Destinyokhiria

I would like to help review articles on Wikipedia. Destinyokhiria (talk) 04:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Corruptcopper

I have had a long period away from the wiki community and I am looking to reignite my helping on the wiki. Corruptcopper (talk) 12:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; while you do technically meet the numeric threshold, you met that requirement in 2009 and haven't really edited since 2012. The article creation rules and guidelines have changed significantly since then, so you should really get some more experience with the new norms before re-requesting. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grumpylawnchair

I want to help out with the massive backlog. I've been editing for a little over 2 years and amassed over 10000 edits and 2 GAs, so I'm confident that I know the policies well enough to contribute positively to this effort. I've read over the guidelines for reviewing, and I think I'm up to the task. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:PunjabiEditor69

I'm an experienced editor with over 500 edits (mostly in article space) and a solid understanding of Notability guidelines and deletion policies, I've even deleted non-notable pages myself through AfD. I've created 25 main-space articles, all of which have been reviewed. I'd like to take on AFC Reviewer rights to help ease the workload by reviewing submitted drafts, providing feedback, and approving those that meet our guidelines. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, does not meet minimum requirements (you're close though) -- asilvering (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering now? I have completed the requirements. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Cheers. -- asilvering (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tarlby

I'd like to try my hand at reviewing upcoming articles and lowering the giant ass backlog with probation. I've read and understood the reviewing instructions and am a Teahouse host (I'm also a Rollbacker if that means anything). Tarlby (t) (c) 20:14, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. XTools won't display this stub I converted from a redirect (Flock (video game)). Thanks. Tarlby (t) (c) 20:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tenshi Hinanawi

I'd like to be able to review AfC drafts and also participate in the upcoming AfC review backlog drive. Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:VortexPhantom

Reapplying after meeting the criteria, want to reduce backlog in aFC, please grant me AFC helper script... VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 04:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, I am concerned with your multiply-declined draft in a short span of time. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I understand your concern, but I want to clarify that the "multi-declined" draft was due to my early misinformation (which I’ll explain). If you look at the data, all those issues happened within my first month on Wikipedia, when I was just exploring as a newcomer with very little experience.
When I joined, I wanted to create an article using the Article Wizard, and I chose my school—not knowing that doing so was a COI. I wasn’t aware of the relevant policies or guidelines back then. I submitted the draft, it was rejected, and I resubmitted it without changes. Again rejected. I contacted the reviewer, who said it lacked reliable sources with significant coverage. I didn’t understand what that meant, especially as no policy links were provided.
Later, while editing my userpage, I clicked a red link and accidentally published a new page. I thought it was a shortcut to bypass draft review and publish directly. It was quickly flagged for speedy deletion. Then I created the draft again, which got a PROD notice. I removed the tag, thinking I needed to explain, but it was taken to AfD and flagged with multiple issues. That's when I finally understood it didn't meet Wikipedia’s standards—so I didn’t contest the AfD.
Since then, I’ve studied the guidelines and actively participated in AfDs, which I believe shows my improved understanding.
VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 15:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@VortexPhantom, this really sounds like LLM output. -- asilvering (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 19:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is, I used LLM to make my clarification shorter. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
in short, I would like to say that the drafts declining happens when I was a newcomer, it doesn't apply to knowledge of deletion process and relevant policies, that I have now. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Astra Travasso

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: to expedite new articles for wider public access. Astra Travasso (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johnjbarton

I occasionally review new articles in science by posting in the Draft Talk page. If I was officially allowed, then I could include a summary in the proper place. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pegnawl

Interested in new activities within Wiki, have noticed lengthly backlog for new articles, hope I can help. Pegnawl (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bryanmackinnon

I have been an active Wikipedia editor, creator, and contributor since 2006. During this time, I have learned significantly. I have a strong belief in the mission of Wikipedia and wish to continue to contribute by also being active in the AFC process.

While I have interests in a very wide variety of topics, I have significant experience in technology, scientific research, banking/finance, and historical research and wish to contribute in anyway I can. I have reviewed the reviewing instructions, notability guidelines, and the deletion policy. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:GregariousMadness

I would like to request AfC helper rights. I've been creating much of the math and My Little Pony articles and I believe I now have a good grasp of what AfC reviewing entails. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 21:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noxoug1

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Noxoug1 (talk) 05:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Laura240406

I want to help with the AfC process (primarily with chemistry related drafts) and I've read most of the guide/policy pages Laura240406 (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants&oldid=1293025630"