User talk:Tarlby

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

• Special report: Wikipedian and physician Ziyad al-Sufiani reportedly released from Saudi prison

• In focus: WMF to explore "common standards" for NPOV policies; implications for project autonomy remain unclear

• In the media: Indian judges demand removal of content critical of Asian News International

• News and notes: 35,000 user accounts compromised, locked in attempted credential-stuffing attack

• Op-ed: How crawlers impact the operations of the Wikimedia projects

• Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas

• Debriefing: Giraffer's RfA debriefing

• Obituary: RHaworth, TomCat4680 and PawełMM

• Traffic report: Heigh-Ho, Heigh-Ho, off to report we go...

• News from Diff: Strengthening Wikipedia’s neutral point of view

• Comix: Thirteen

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2025 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2025 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April 2025 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2025 coordinator election, Wracking stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, and Mox Eden were reelected coordinators, and IQR and WikiEditor5678910 were newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 55 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive 33 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 611,404 words in 237 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 14 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 10 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 46,749 words in 18 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 47 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. 28 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 479,172 words in 207 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 13 to 19 April. Barnstars will be awarded here. Progress report: As of 9:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 89 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,264 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, IQR, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and WikiEditor5678910. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Vandalism vs errouneous

Hello! At this page, you reverted a change with the description: "Vandalism". I was thinking it was an errouneous change, not vandalism. Can you please tell me what is the difference between that edit and an errouneous one?

Best regards, --Dimitrie569 (Talk) 15:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

@Dimitrie569 WP:VANDALISM is defined as deliberately defying the purpose of Wikipedia, for example, writing absolute nonsense on an article. I find that replacing the subject's name in an article with this [1] is, frankly, impossible to be in good faith. Therefore, it's vandalism. Keep in mind that we're obligated to leave warnings on the user's talk page where they have the perfect opportunity to explain what they were doing if it happened to not be vandalism.

Cheers. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 16:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your response! But my question was: when changing a person's name with another is it an errouneous or vandalism? --Dimitrie569 (Talk) 18:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

To clarify, "erroneous" isn't a policy, so maybe you've been a little misled. It'd just be vandalism in this case. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 18:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

hmm okay! :) Dimitrie569 (Talk) 18:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Hi Tarlby! I noticed that you recently made an edit at KineMaster and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. TzarN64 (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Authorship

Hello! How do you check for authorship again, as you've done for the GAN review for Balatro? I have seem to forgotten... TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 15:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

https://xtools.wmcloud.org/authorship :) Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 20:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 20:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

• News and notes: India cut off from Wiki money; WMF annual plan and Wikimedia programs seek comment

• In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status

• Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom

• Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions

• Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man

• Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media

• News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan

• Humour: Crisis erupts as furious admins, functionaries complain about crappy t-shirts

• Comix: By territory

• In focus: Using AI on the Russian Wikipedia: opportunities or challenges?

• Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia

• Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing

• Gallery: Meet the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024

• Obituary: JarrahTree, JohnClarknew and Yashthepunisher

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. λ NegativeMP1 01:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)