User talk:Cactusisme

This is Cactusisme's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 7 days

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brillant 755 has been accepted

Brillant 755, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Second Review After Edits

Hi @Cactusisme, thank you for your earlier review and feedback. I’ve fully rewritten the draft with a strict focus on neutrality and encyclopedic tone. The new version removes all promotional language and now cites multiple independent, reliable third-party sources: Jewish News (UK) Jewish Press (USA) KosherLDN (industry-specific news) Business Mole (partnership announcement)

All claims are now directly backed by these sources, and there is no reliance on the company’s own website beyond the homepage. I am encouraged to see a kosher food business working to improve access and innovation in a sector that has often lagged digitally. That's why I have been trying to create a page on this. I'd be very grateful if you would consider taking another look when you have time.

Many thanks! Eph EphGross (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EphGross You need to declare if you have a Wp:COI with the article. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:35, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit the draft for review if you would like another review, but I suggest on working on something else as it is ‘’highly’’ unlikely it would get accepted Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme, Thanks for your response. To clarify: I have no connection to Sabeny.com. I’m not employed by or affiliated with the company in any way.

I’m simply a kosher consumer who works in tech and has long been frustrated by the lack of digital innovation in the kosher food space, particularly in the UK. When I came across Sabeny, I saw it as one of the few companies moving things forward, and indeed saw that it has already received some independent coverage.

The draft is based entirely on third-party sources. Notably, The Jewish Press which is one one of the oldest and most influential Jewish newspapers in the US, ran a news report on the company’s partnership with Uber Eats, in the context of antisemitism and Jewish safety concerns. Jewish News (UK) and KosherLDN have also all reported on Sabeny. These are both independent publications with editorial standards, and none of the coverage appears to be paid or promotional.

I’ve aimed to write in a strictly neutral tone and understand the importance of verifiability and notability. I appreciate your time and guidance in the review process EphGross (talk) 10:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EphGross Based on a quick glance, I feel like the Services section could be wp:neutral. I can give a more comprehensive review later, but a bit busy right now. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A duplicate citation appears in the History section and should be removed. The Services section is too limited and would benefit from more detail on delivery areas, timelines, and operational specifics. In Media coverage, some phrasing—such as describing a service as “safer”—could be interpreted as non-neutral and should be reworded or more clearly attributed. The article also lacks context on Sabeny.com’s position within the broader kosher grocery market, including competitors or scale of operations Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme Thanks, will work on it. 92.27.246.58 (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cactusisme, thanks for your earlier feedback.

I’ve now revised the draft to address the points you raised:

1)Removed the duplicate citation

2)Expanded the Services section with more operational detail

3)Reworded the phrasing and ensured attribution

4)Added market context, including competitor references and scale of operation

I have also resubmitted the draft for review. If you’re able to take another look when you have time, I would appreciate it.

Thanks again EphGross (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Viva (Brazil) page move

I just noticed at the talk page that you close the discussion of page move as "No consensus". However, aside from the result of discussion, it now appears that the page move from Viva (Brazil) to Viva (Brazilian TV channel) is deemed no longer relevant or moot, because whenever there's a disagreement regarding Viva (Brazil) or Viva (Brazilian TV channel), the channel themselves is now rebranded as Globoplay Novelas (see Telenovelafan215's argument). So, could you evaluated again the result of move discussion, especially about post-June 9 rename as "Globoplay Novelas". 103.111.102.118 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@103.111.102.118 Sure will take a look. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I took a look, I suggest starting a new discussion so that more people would participate in the discussion and there would be more things to work with. Many thanks, Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]