User talk:Cactusisme/Archive 2

Biographies

Anne Demerson

Improved on

Virginia Moore

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334

Online events:

New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing,
and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks

Moving the needle:^[1]

27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)
23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Why

Did you make this revert? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peace_%26_Dialogue_Leadership_Initiative&diff=prev&oldid=1277314360

It obviously was not vandalism. Yet you reverted - without any edit summary. That is not appropriate. See Wikipedia:FIES.

It obviously was appropriate text. Simply read the first sentence of the article.

I would urge you to self-revert. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 23:09, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D wrong link? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:06, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D, Really sorry, I was using SWVIEWER and made the undo on the wrong wikipedia, thanks for spotting it out. — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:04, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:BC7A:7C81:F7C1:E537 (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you Cactus, for your guidance in creating a new category! Thanks! :) SunnyBoi (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SunnyBoi, Thanks!! — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 07:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bulbinella rossii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ostjuden on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mademoiselle Mante (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Remsense was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NACTOR. It is demonstrated that she has had several roles in notable works, but not that they were major roles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mademoiselle Mante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About the "Infinite void of blackness" page

The only reason the redirect got declined was because a user named Nmammad vandalized it. I don't think it was a fair decline. Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, I will take a look again — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, It still seem to be an unlikely search term? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keppel Coastal Trail (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keppel Coastal Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justi yaya 04:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Massacre in Budy on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2006 Yemen prison escape on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CHU/S

Clerking at CHU is welcome, please use the clerk communication templates when appropriate. Please do not mark requests as {{done}} or {{notdone}} as the archiving bot will not recognize them unless a renamer posts it. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 04:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright. Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime what are the templates? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The clerking templates appear in the page header while the edit window is open. {{CHU/doc}} - FlightTime (open channel) 04:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 06:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keppel Coastal Trail (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keppel Coastal Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ktkvtsh, Can you take a look and show me some examples? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The elevated boardwalk section is one example. It reads as promotional rather than encyclopedic. AI usually words sentences this way. I could be wrong.

Could you work on dialing back the promotional tone and focus on making it objective and encyclopedic. Best, Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktkvtsh now? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly resubmit it for review and another reviewer will take a look. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 08:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Oversighter changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.

Technical news

A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

@Remsense, I pretty sure she is notable and she played a few major roles in some of the films — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to more than one dictionary would help very much to establish that fact. Remsense ‥ 论 11:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, dictionary? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to the single dictionary you have cited in the article. Remsense ‥ 论 11:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, https://lesarchivesduspectacle.net/s/71294-Mademoiselle-de-Belle-Isle — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, ? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? There's exactly one source of substance in the article; this is just a record as far I can tell, and isn't verifying anything than a particular role she played, which wasn't the concern. Remsense ‥ 论 03:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Omilteme cottontail on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Lebanon on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Weather of 2008 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Royal Foundation on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Xanthoria parietina and Talk:Spilonema revertens on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peltula and Talk:Lecanora albellula on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Croatian Committee on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:B. R. Ambedkar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Caccothryptus yunnanensis and Talk:Caccothryptus on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kabwe 1 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Massacre in Budy on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aaron Burr on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hi Cactusisme! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Sam Sulek and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Justjourney (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if it's the the tool you're using, but if someone forgets to add a source, I don't think you should check the minor edit box. Justjourney (talk) 23:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh swviewer auto marks all edits as minor edits @Justjourney Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 23:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh, I see. Justjourney (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Justjourney (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Antennacanthopodia on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Transgender health care misinformation on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arthropleura on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyclone Chido on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Cactusisme! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You declined a redirect, asking for a source .. but ..

the source was already supplied in the request, for Zioness. Exactly as is the norm in redirect requests. Relevant aspects below.

Target of redirect: Amanda Berman

Reason: She is the founder and director of Zioness, which does not have its own article

Source (if applicable): [1] "Amanda Berman, Founder of Zioness ..."

2603:7000:2101:AA00:3007:95C2:F1D4:565E (talk) 19:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC) ...

Declined. The title you suggested seems like an unlikely search term. Could you provide a source showing that it is a commonly used alternative name or related topic? (Zioness) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch  10:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Kindly reconsider and approve. Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:BC5F:5D0F:C933:525E (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you post this on? Please provide diff link Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the request redirect page. We ran into another problem very much like this recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2025-03#Redirect_request:_Zioness,_Zioness_Movement 2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please submit a new request Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really necessary? I did it correctly the first time. It seems like needless hoops for editors to have to resubmit requests that have been properly submitted in the first instance. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 If you don't submit a new requests, I can't do anything. It doesn't take that much time. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 22:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it. Thanks.But it does strike me that editors should not have to do the work of finding the ref to the error when the specifics were pointed out. And refile. When the error was not theirs. If it does not take much time, I was thinking the person making the error could themselves make the submission that "doesn't take much time" . --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulbinella rossii

Hi Cactusisme. I would like to remind you about the ongoing review on the Bulbinella rossii article. I understand you might be busy (or focused on other articles at the moment). I will likely be off-wiki this weekend. Thanks. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Cactusisme. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Joyous! Noise! 03:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File rename requests

Just a FYI, there is no need to sign the template, page history logs who is placing the request. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime Alright, thanks. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 01:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:FMNN, some of your requests are just styling fixes which is discouraged. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax Just a question, is fixing pokemon to Pokémon part of this? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:16, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, yes. It doesn't change anything other than adding diacritics. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 15:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Illegal immigration to the United States on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

175.1175. 175.157.189.125 (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336

Online events:

New: Alphabet run G & H | Business
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025

Tip of the month:

When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Swamp rabbit on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Emirate of Erzincan on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

Dennis Brown

Bureaucrat changes

Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

GB fan

Moneytrees

Miscellaneous

Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Forspoken on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission: Draft:Junghun Choi – revised with inline citations and reliable secondary sources

Hello,

I’m following up regarding the draft Draft:Junghun Choi, which was previously declined due to a lack of inline citations and sufficient secondary sources.

The article has now been substantially revised and improved:

- All major claims are now supported with inline <ref> citations. - Reliable secondary sources have been added, including:

 • Fortune Korea  
 • Chosun Biz  
 • The Korea Daily  
 • AMCHAM Korea  
 • Golf Inc. (via Sports Chosun)

- Duplicate or unreliable references have been removed. - The draft follows the guidelines for Biographies of Living Persons (BLP).

Kindly review the updated draft at your convenience.

Thank you very much! 방명호 (talk) 14:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@방명호 It was already reviewed by another reviewer, who had left some comments there. Please take a look. I also suggest reading through sources. Thanks. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your follow-up and suggestion.

I have carefully reviewed the previous comments and made substantial improvements to the draft based on that feedback.

Specifically:

- All sources have now been converted to inline citations using <ref> and the {{cite news}}: Empty citation (help) template, per WP:CITE guidelines.

- The article relies exclusively on independent, secondary sources such as BusinessKorea, Korea JoongAng Daily, Yonhap News, and The Korea Herald—there are no interviews, press releases, or social media links.

- Any primary or non-independent sources were removed, and the article content was restructured to ensure neutrality and verifiability.

Please let me know if any additional improvements are required. I sincerely appreciate your time and guidance.

Thank you once again for reviewing this submission.

All content has been thoroughly updated to meet Wikipedia's verifiability and notability standards. Please feel free to suggest any additional improvements. I truly appreciate your time and consideration.

Respectfully,

방명호

--> 방명호 (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@방명호 It was declined again by @Sophisticatedevening, please ask the reviewer for more comments. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft

you know that this submission is Contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia because the title shows it but you cannot have only decline it because of its title. 38.96.255.213 (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is blatant vandalism and it was a deleted page. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 22:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Miscellaneous Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Walther Dobbertin on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Trialeti culture on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338

Online events:

New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!

21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Megalobulimus dryades on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Women of the Young Lords on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Administrator changes

Rusalkii

NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)

Interface administrator changes

Galobtter

Guideline and policy news

Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.

Miscellaneous

A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Humaniki".

[1] "Humaniki".

[1]