User:TFOWR/Dashboard
| TFOWR · talkpage · dashboard · sandbox · monobook.js · monobook.css · sub-pages | WP:AIV · WP:RFPP · WP:SPI · WP:AN · WP:ANI |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 74.66.83.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- 149.140.187.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 957 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of article lead, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- 112.202.248.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- DreamsquadRecords (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]176.116.164.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Added fake non-existent shows to List of programs broadcast by CBS https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programs_broadcast_by_CBS&oldid=1298685108 and disrupted other pages as well it seems. Somebody should revert the CBS page as I can't at the moment and address the other pages. newsjunkie (talk) 03:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- The page has been reverted. Keep in mind that the reporting user is unable to edit the page as they have been blocked from editing the page due to edit warring the page in the past. As for the IP, their talk page shows them disruptive editing beginning 3 years ago. NacreousPuma855 (talk) 03:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Coolknightwiki.coming (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Clearly NOTHERE. See User:Coolknightwiki.coming/sandbox. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 04:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- 35.39.104.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On :Chomp Kitty (diff): vandalism after final warning. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 5 |
| Empty articles | 1 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 9 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 3 |
| Other candidates | 25 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 196 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Omghowmanyusernamerestrictions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Username might also be disruptive per WP:NOTHERE. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Bonervile (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "boner" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- OBA AHMED MOROOF OLAKUNLE OGUNNAIKE OGUNDERU (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Account used on kiwi browser for testing (main is PerryPerson) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dirty Magazines (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Carlolololo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Username572847482 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sami official 095 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dishantlfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Corporate.kuldeep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jean Prix R (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:00, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: prick. Violating string: jean pricks r" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:00, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- RevernDoshit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheStupidTimesOfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Xpotstrump (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Родион Полянский (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ownyourfascism (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "fascis(m|t)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Vijaybhaskarup43gonda271602 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 101st prior service (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Idiotdisease (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Mgomesofc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SteadyRainDigitalMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Official madavz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Μητέρα πρωί (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Cockfightermaster1969 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Gave me a chuckle, though. Gommeh 🎮 16:39, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: I'm unsure here; there are legitimate uses of the word "cock", cockfighting, South Carolina Gamecocks. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- The "1969" part might indicate it is not referring to chickens fighting? Iljhgtn (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think this is a good candidate for WP:RFCN The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The "1969" part might indicate it is not referring to chickens fighting? Iljhgtn (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Parrot Vacations (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 18:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Metalroofingonline (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. Sandbox with spammy links deleted under G11. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fonds de dotation Philippe Smit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See https://www.philippesmit.com/section/?id=Fonds%20de%20dotation. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- DreamsquadRecords (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. TLJ7863 (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 193.63.80.86 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – IP edit warring to include disputed content in contentious topic. XYZ1233212 (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have warned them once. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Mellk (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 178.230.112.94 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Dear Sir, I hereby requesting you to please enable the suitable protection level for Merahi Village. Thank Rahulkrsah (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None really apparent, actually. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IPs edit warring. 88.97.192.42 (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protection would keep you from editing. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding unsourced content, mostly about someone by the name 'Pt. Umrao Dutt Sharma' (possible WP:COI, WP:PROMO) and keeps edit warring about it [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] despite warnings and explanation in the edit summaries and their talk page. IPs editing history [7]. May be a sock, since I remember the 'Pt. Umrao Dutt Sharma' being added in one of the articles in the past. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. According to your last post to their talk page, it's at the latter already. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding unsourced content, mostly about someone by the name 'Pt. Umrao Dutt Sharma' (possible WP:COI, WP:PROMO) and keeps edit warring about it [8] [9]. Also note the similar pattern in another article [10]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Per your report on Satya Pal Malik. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism as soon as protection expired. Mellk (talk) 12:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 49.178.196.201 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: One IP address constantly vandalizing the page GiraffeLover19 (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They haven't edited since getting a level 3 warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism and low-quality edits from IP users. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing's been reverted for almost a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sushidude21! (talk) 21:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just those two edits today after almost three months of inactivity. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced edits. Hunterb212 (talk) 21:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 22:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 198.96.83.4/30 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from page and Ali Abdullah Saleh for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism & warring edits. The talk page has suggested locking the thread. Nearly half or more of the edits since January have been vandalism or grossly biased in nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oil Observer (talk • contribs) 23:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Oil Observer: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Oil Observer: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 00:09, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2803:6000:E001:B89:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent non-constructive edit of a living person. Srich0731 (talk) 04:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing. I am almost certain the edits are being made in good faith. Several IPS are updating stats which is great, but there it is generally agreed on at WP:Cricket to not update stats until a match has ended. I suggest semi-protection for 4 or 5 days as the Test will definitely be done by then. Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Reduce to indefinite semi-protection since no other NFL teams' pages are ECP (been in place for 4 years), feels a bit unfair to new users who actually have good edits to make on the team. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please correct the Iranian civilian casualties in paragraph three. First it was changed without reason from 200 to 600. Then someone changed and separated the estimate by Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency (HRANA) estimate to be over 1,100 civilians killed which is conflating all deaths with civilians. No source was added to support this. The sources currently listed next to these sentences actually say 200 but these are out off date. HRANA's latest figure is actually 431 civilians killed. The source is presently used in the infobox for their own estimate of 1,190 total deaths. The Iranian government hasn't released updated figures so that should be removed until they have an estimate. I suggest adding the following sentence:
"According to the anti-government Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency, 1,190 Iranians were killed including at least 431 civilians."
102.17.120.130 (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 20 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Underbar dk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- +1 This editor writes awesome articles. Toadspike [Talk] 15:20, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Done asilvering (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- M.Billoo2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yoblyblob (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([11]). — MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Etzedek24 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 pages created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Human Right Wiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Note: This request is not for myself.
Dear admins, please grant the WP:APAT to User:BlaUser234. Otherwise, we see many cockroaches in WP:NPP every day:) Thank you. HumanRight 14:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has created roughly 13 articles. — MusikBot talk 14:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done Human Right Wiki, you accidentally asked for this for yourself. Can you resubmit? Thanks. -- asilvering (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ctxz2323 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Ctxz2323 has created nearly 170 articles, none of which were deleted. All the ones I've checked are very solid and well-sourced. Toadspike [Talk] 15:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The copyright note from Diannaa from less than a year ago on their talk page makes me a bit nervous. How exhaustive were those source checks? Translationvio in particular tends to be easy to miss if you're not really intentionally looking. -- asilvering (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- BlaUser234 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Vestrian24Bio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I have initiated a couple of RMs myself, and participated in many as well. I also make requests at WP:RMT. I also revert undiscussed page moves while patrolling changes.
Now, I want to contribute more by closing RMs and helping at WP:RMT and this right would also be useful while reverting undiscussed page moves as well.
I have made 170+ RM-related edits and 30+ edits to RMT page. Thanks for considering... Vestrian24Bio 02:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Floating Orb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I found a reviewable edit that was not good and had already been reverted the first time it was placed. I reverted the new version of it, since the edit was not following the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that I should have Reviewing pending changes rights, since I have experience with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating Orb (talk • contribs) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I added the signature and formatted the request correctly after it was placed (diff). —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Sorry, I still don't think your ready yet. In addition to the complaints from before, you've picked up a copyvio warning since your previous request, which does not bode well. And blanking/archiving your talk page right after making this request, while of course procedurally allowed, reeks of a bad-faith attempt to cover your tracks. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- ZachH007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’m a very active recent changes patroller, very comfortable identifying vandalism and using WP:TW to revert, warn, and report vandals. I’m careful to avoid using immediate revert unless the edit is obviously vandalism. Rollback would allow me to more efficiently fight very active vandals before an administrator is able to block them. I would still use WP:TW in most cases, for routine recent changes patrol. ZachH007 22:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done Malinaccier (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- ItsCheck (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’ve been using Twinkle to revert vandalism from recent changes and warn users for a while now. I’ve been doing this for about two years, with some breaks because of school and life, but I’ve stayed consistent overall. I know what counts as vandalism and what doesn’t, and I always try to assume good faith. I’d really appreciate rollback to help make reverting quicker and save time. I can be trusted with the tool and use it properly. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- MakaylaHippo1998 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Criticize (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. do i have any chance to be given rollback rights to fight vandalism better? If possible. Criticize (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([13][14]). — MusikBot talk 16:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Stop WP:Hat collecting. This request says nothing that the previous requests didn't say before. And while you have now mostly started warning other editors, here's another morsel to consider: only a week ago you said
modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second
, which is both not true (the average edit rate is around 2 edits per second, or one per 500 milliseconds), and evinces an attitude incompatible with rollback access; it's more important to be correct in what you are reverting, and to take those few seconds to think, than to race to the bottom trying to revert edits as fast as possible. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Kwameghana(Bright Kwame Ayisi) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like request for "Extended confirmed users" so that I can participate in Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos 2025. Thank you. Kwameghana(Bright Kwame Ayisi) (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 470 total edits and has 0 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 13:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done You are very lost; the correct place to request extended confirmed access is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed, but extended confirmed access is almost never granted early and will be granted automatically once you make 30 more edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:25, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- 500 edits and 30 days, I think Pppery meant. So when after you make another approximately 30 edits, you should get it automatically — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I said:
30 more edits
. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:14, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I said:
- 500 edits and 30 days, I think Pppery meant. So when after you make another approximately 30 edits, you should get it automatically — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links