Jump to content

User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard

This user helped get "32 Old Slip" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2014.
This user helped get "Domino Park" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 29 June 2018.
This user helped get "MTA Arts & Design" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 May 2015.
This user helped "Nine Inch Nails" become a featured article.
This user helped "32 Old Slip" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Amnesiac (album)" become a good article.
This user helped "Better Out Than In" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Clarence Chesterfield Howerton" become a good article.
This user helped "Hasil Adkins" become a good article.
This user contributed to "Jessica Gomes" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Kowloon Walled City" become a good article.
This user made modest contributions to "Second Generation (advertisement)" become a good article.
This user is a member of the Bot Approvals Group.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User
Talk link={{{3}}}
Dashboard
Articles
Scripts
Tools
Templates
Userboxes
Awards

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 111
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 18
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 149
Requested RD1 redactions 2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 27
Open sockpuppet investigations 80
Click here to locate other admin backlogs


News

Administrators' Newsletter
July 2025
 
The Signpost
24 June 2025

Edit filters

Requested edit filters (WP:EF/R)


Edits adding raw text maintenance tags instead of standard templates

  • Task: Log edits meeting above criteria
  • Reason: Editors have been adding maintenance tags in raw text instead of using the correct templates
  • Diffs: Examples of fix: Special:Diff/1293287735, 74 JWB edits

I wish to log edits where editors add Wikipedia:, WP:, Help: (case insensitive) inside of <sup></sup> to check the extent to which new editors use raw text instead of actual maintenance tags, and if a bot will be required for regular maintenance of this or not. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

This might work:
added_lines contains "<sup>[''[[Wikipedia:"
『π』BalaM314〘talk〙 14:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
The basics could be something like 
equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0) &
added_lines irlike "<sup>(\[|&#x5B;)\'\'\[\[(Wikipedia|Help|WP|H)\:"
I haven't checked yet for how many of those edits it works, but it could be a start. Nobody (talk) 06:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
And instead of using equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0), we could just use page_namespace == 0 since there is only one namespace being checked here. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 07:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
I left it like that because I'm not sure if we should add the draftspace too. Nobody (talk) 07:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
The regex looks to be working as intended. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 01:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
I'll test the regex with all of the hits from above. @CX Zoom looks like there's already some more again according to this search. Want to start JWB again or wait until we got the filter in place? Nobody (talk) 06:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Its been quite some time. Can anyone please implement the regex by 1AmNobody24? —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 13:19, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
@CX Zoom I've started the list for edit's to check against the regex at User:1AmNobody24/sandbox. Still missing around 2/3 of the total edits, but I'll get there eventually. Nobody (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I believe we can also exclude bots and check for !removed_lines as well:
equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0) &
!("bot" in user_groups) &
(
    nope := "<sup>(?:\[|&#x5B;)''\[\[(?:Wikipedia|Help|WP|H):";
    
    added_lines rlike nope &
    !(removed_lines rlike nope)
)
Codename Noreste (talk · contribs) 22:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I've checked around 200 edits (some listed here, the others are part of this list). This code:
pattern :="<sup>(?:\[|&#x5B;)''\[\[(?:Wikipedia|Help):";

equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0, 2, 118) &
!contains_any(user_groups, "sysop", "bot") &
added_lines irlike pattern &
!(removed_lines irlike pattern)
worked for all I checked. There's some more variables that could be used like user_editcount for example, but not sure it really matters. Nobody (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Should we exempt sysops - they can make this mistake also? – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
They are not likely to do it, but I am also not really in favour of increasing the complexity of the filter to exclude them when we just log the edits, not prevent or tag it. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
I think it's highly unlikely a sysop makes that kind of mistake. But I'm also unsure if a warn filter with a custom warning wouldn't be better. Nobody (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Adding nonexistent templates

  • Task: Log (and possibly tag?) whenever the user adds a transclusion of a template that does not exist. Also, warn on certain edits. Warning all such edits would be far too bitey in my opinion. However, in my opinion, I think the following categories of edits would likely benefit from a warning. (Also, I think the warnings should mainly be restricted to mainspace or maybe talkspace; drafts and userpages should be free for now.) The categories of edits to warn could be, of course, adjusted once the filter is in.
  • Edits by IPs and new users. In many cases, these are vandalism.
  • Edits made in the mobile Wikipedia app. (Since it doesn't have a visual editor, it's incredibly easy to forget to close your curly braces; a warning would really help with this.)
  • Malformed citations (this could be detected by looking for the word "cite" or a URL in the title).
  • Nonexistent "country data" templates; these can arise from misuse of templates like {{flag}} or {{flagicon}}
  • Nonexistent WikiProject tags in talkspace (which could both arise from vandalism and from AWB mistakes).
(One possible approach could be to pair a log-only filter, which catches all nonexistent templates, with a separate warn filter. This two-filter approach has been tried before, for example in 1296 and 1297, so I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work here. Given the heterogeneity of these categories, it might be even better to have multiple warn filters, so we could show a different warning for each category.)
  • Diffs: For some of these categories:

Duckmather (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

@Duckmather: I'm commenting on the technical aspects here, to see if such a filter (or multiple) could exist. I'm not sure if the abusefilter can check whether a template exists or not; maybe it could check if a the text in a template exists (in the template namespace of course) using page_last_edit_age (if it's not null, then the page exists) but I'm not sure. The mobile app constraint is fairly easy to check (the AbuseFilter extension) has a variable user_app built into it for this exact purpose.
I'm not sure if the "country data" thing is actually possible with an AbuseFilter - that would require crosschecking with whatever module supports those the {{flag}} and {{flagicon}} templates which isn't possible as far as I know. A similar issue occurs with the wikiproject tags issue you bring up; the AbuseFilter can not cross-reference a module as far as I know. I also don't think checking if someone has properly closed template brackets or otherwise is possible with the AbuseFilter in a feasible way; the logic would be pretty complex and would still produce a lot of FPs. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
@PharyngealImplosive7: The filter is in fact doable. The key idea is to use the new_html variable, which uses parsing to detect whether templates exist or not. For example, if I were to write {{fake example}}, this would translate into HTML as <a href="/w/index.php?title=Template:Fake_example&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Template:Fake example (page does not exist)">Template:Fake example</a>. You could in turn detect this redlink using the regex <a href="\/w\/index\.php\?title=Template:[^"]*\;redlink=1\" class=\"new\". Of course, this line of code by itself would generate false positives, as wikilinking a nonexistent template the usual way will also produce identical HTML, so it would need some refining. But I don't see any fundamentally technical barriers preventing you from pulling this off. Duckmather (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
@Duckmather: That indeed is a smart approach; I didn't think of that. However, one more thing to note is that new_html is a large variable, so ideally it should be placed at the end of any filter for performance reasons. I believe that my point of detecting if someone has left brackets closed or not is unfeasible still stands though. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 06:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
After a moderate amount of thought and a lot of procrastination, I have some draft code. Define the following regular expressions:
wikitext_template := "{{[^\||\n|}]*(\||\n|}})";
common_template := "(?x){{(?:
!
|[Aa]nchor
|[Aa]s\ of|[Aa]uthority\ control
|[Bb]irth\ date(?:\ and\ age)?
|[Bb]lockquote
|[Cc]-SPAN
|[Cc]bignore
|[Cc]irca
|[Cc]itation needed
|[Cc]ite\ (?:AV\ media|book|conference|encyclopedia|interview|journal|magazine|news|press\ release|tweet|web)
|[Cc]lear
|[Cc]n
|[Cc]oord
|[Ee]fn
|[Ee]?m(?:dash)?
|[Ff]urther
|[Gg]Burl
|[Gg]loss
|[Gg]oogle\ [Bb]ooks(?:\ URL)?
|[Hh]arvnb
|[Ii]PAc-(?:ar|cmn|en|hu|pl|yue)
|(?:ISBN|isbn)\??
|[Ii]nfobox\ (?:album|book|company|film|football\ biography|musical\ artist|NRHP|officeholder|person|settlement|song|television)
|[Ll]angx?
|[Ll]egend
|[Mm]ain
|[Mm]ath
|[Mm]dash
|[Mm]ultiple\ image
|[Nn]bsp
 |[Nn]owrap
|[Oo]fficial\ website
|[Pp]lainlist
|[Pp]p(?:-(blp|dispute|extended|semi-indef|sock|vandalism))?
|[Pp]roQuest
|[Rr]ef(?:begin|end|h|list)
|[Ss]fnm?
|[Ss]hort\ description
|[Tt]OC\ limit
|[Uu]se\ (dmy|mdy)\ dates
|[Uu]se\ (American|Australian|British|Canadian|Hong\ Kong|Indian|Jamaican|Kenyan|Liberian|New\ Zealand|Nigerian|Pakistani|Philippine|Singapore|South\ African|Sri\ Lankan|Trinidad\ and\ Tobago|Ugandan)\ English
|[Ww]ebarchive
|[Ww]ikiProjectBannerShell

|[Ww]ikiProject\ (Albums|Anthroponymy|Australia|Articles\ for\ creation|Biography|Canada|Cities|banner\ shell|Disambiguation|Football|Film|France|Germany|India|Lepidoptera|Lists|Military\ history|Olympics|Songs|Television|United\ States)
)\s*(?:\||\n|}})";
nonexistent_template = '<a href="\/w\/index\.php\?title=Template:([^" ]*)\;redlink=1\" class=\"new\"';
(To explain: wikitext_template catches the use of any template in wikitext; common_template catches various commonly used templates; and nonexistent_template catches a HTML link to a nonexistent template. Part of why this took so long is that I had to try several different things before I could get a satisfactory list of common templates.)
With these regular expressions in place, the logging filter could be defined as follows:
added_lines rlike wikitext_template &
rcount(common_template, added_lines) < rcount(wikitext_template, added_lines) &
new_html rlike nonexistent_template
and with the same regular expressions in place, the warning filter could be defined as follows:
equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0, 1, 118) &
rcount(common_template, added_lines) < rcount(wikitext_template, added_lines) &
new_html like nonexistent_template &
(
!(contains_any(user_groups, "autoconfirmed", "bot", "confirmed"))
| user_mobile
| user_app
| (summary rlike "^Created by translating the page" & page_id == 0)
| new_html rlike '<a href="\/w\/index\.php\?title=Template:[^" ]*(cite|https?:\/\/|doi|isbn|(IPA|lang-)[\w-]+|\w+\ icon|wikiproject|[^\x00-\xFF\s–—])[^" ]*\;redlink=1\" class=\"new\"'
) &
!(summary irlike "restor(?:ed?|ing)|revert(?:ed|ing)?|und(?:o|id)" & page_id != 0)
Duckmather (talk) 05:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Wouldn't simply looking for class="new" title="Template: in the new_html also work? Nobody (talk) 05:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Also, another thing you could watch out for when it comes to malformed citations are DOIs (example) and ISBNs (example). Duckmather (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest edits where username is suspiciously similar to the page title?

  • Task: see section title
  • Reason: I just reverted two edits by User:AndiArndt8, a username which I noticed is suspiciously similar to the title of the article, Andi Arndt. (This is also why I warned them with {{uw-coi}}.) There are two filters that check for exactly this - 148 and its logging companion 147 - but they only check page creations. Since COI is a huge problem on Wikipedia, this filter could be very beneficial.
  • Diffs: first, second

Duckmather (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey Duckmather, this is Andi Arndt. Are we not allowed to edit info that is about us? I no longer live in the Shenandoah Valley so I updated it along with a few other items. I’m new to Wikipedia so if it’s not allowed we can just pretend I live in Virginia. 172.222.126.162 (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
As a rule of thumb, no. See WP:COI. You should make an edit request instead, or at least cite a reliable source that isn't yourself. Duckmather (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Or, for completely mundane information like having moved somewhere else, you can make an edit request to cite something you verifiably wrote yourself outside of Wikipedia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 05:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Task: This filter applies to users without the "confirmed" group (including IP addresses), and it disallows edits that add content containing "youtube.com/watch".
  • Reason: Today, I saw IP editors add YouTube links to articles and they got reverted.
  • Diffs: Special:Contribs/User talk:180.69.172.41

Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) Tamil speakers: Contribute here 15:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

+1, someone please do this. Currently being discussed on Discord as well. There's some kind of massive spamming effort going on. Toadspike [Talk] 16:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
For clarification, this should not apply only to article space. Most of these edits were made to the user talk pages of IP addresses. Toadspike [Talk] 16:41, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
 Doing... EggRoll97 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
@EggRoll97 It's been added to the spam blacklist [1], so I guess you can mark this as closed now. I'm not sure how that's done. Thanks for all your help with this. Toadspike [Talk] 15:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Y Done Thanks. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Filter 1363 (new) — Actions: none; Flags: enabled,public; Pattern modified
Last changed at 22:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1014 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 21:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1201 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 22:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1301 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 22:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 718 — Flags: disabled

Last changed at 15:43, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 980 — Flags: disabled

Last changed at 15:43, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1240 — Flags: disabled

Last changed at 13:02, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 869 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 05:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1350 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 22:31, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Articles

Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV)

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection (WP:RFPP)

Backlog CLEAN!

Permissions

Account creator (WP:PERM/ACC)

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
AutoWikiBrowser (WP:PERM/AWB)

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:WeWake

Request AWB permissions to assist with several cleanup tasks across my WikiProjects of interests such as Women in Red, India, Computational Biology, and others. Types of cleanups often include fixing typos, especially for WP:INDIA where {{tl:Use Indian english}} is often used but content may not reflect that, or vice-versa. Other general cleanups that I do include fixing line or paragraph breaks, infobox lists, or basic copyediting. I believe I used to have AWB access years ago, but it expired due to inactivity. I intend to use the JS interface of AWS. Thanks!— WeWake (talk) 06:37, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

User:CX Zoom AWB

Need AWB under bot section, per Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CX Zoom AWB 2. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 16:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Mass message sender (WP:PERM/MMS)

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
New page reviewer (WP:PERM/NPR)

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Như Gây Mê

Hi, I'm requesting rights be extended after a one month trial. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 00:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 00:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done, until Sept 2025. Sohom (talk) 03:36, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Eliezer1987

I'm a patroller on the Hebrew Wikipedia with extensive experience in content review and Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with English Wikipedia's guidelines and have been actively participating here, including contributing to article creation and quality control processes. I would like to contribute to New Page Patrol, mainly on topics related to Israel, Judaism, and Hungary, and I would be happy to expand my knowledge and activity into additional areas. Eliezer1987 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, I'm not comfortable at this time giving you the NPP userright. Typically, on enwiki we do not consider cross-wiki experience especially in the context of en-wiki-specific-content heavy permission like NPP. The fact that you want to work on the currently "unstable" area of WP:PIA coupled with your lack of AFD participation and the fact that relatively recently created articles like Rafael Hayun use unreliable sources like Tiktok make this a no for now. Sohom (talk) 03:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Aydoh8

Hi there, my rights expire on the 30th and I would like to request an extension. I did ask a few weeks ago since I know of the perennial backlog here, but got rejected on the basis it was too early. I'm reapplying now since it's a little under a week until that happens. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
They've expired now. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 04:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done, till Sept 2025, noting that an article structured like Julie Andrews (academic) could probably do with a bit of tagging in terms of prose improvements, but I don't see issues with core notability judgements. Sohom (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Taabii

I was granted reviewer rights for two times, both were temporary. I'm here requesting the right again to review the articles and make the burden less for others too. I was not active like before due to some personal issues, but I'm going to be active now. Please consider extending my rights. Thankyou Taabii (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 17:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

User:JustARandomEditor123

Hello there, this is my third time requesting new page reviewer permissions, as the previous two requests were granted on a one-month trial basis and the current trial will end on the 30th of June. I have learnt a lot about the policies for notability and inclusion and will be able to reduce the size of the unreviewed pages backlog significantly. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 06:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 06:10, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Cactusisme

I am currently an AFC reviewer and am familiar with the deletion processes. I would like to help clear the backlog as well as help in identifying spam, copyrighted and promo pages. I believe I meet the criteria for this right. I am requesting a trial. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 09:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done till Sept 2025 Sohom (talk) 03:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Mwwv

Hello, my rights expired and I completely forgot to reapply till now. I would like to request an extension, as I think I didn't do enough patrolling to warrant a permanent grant (thanks AfC backlog drive). Thank you. mwwv converse∫edits 01:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done till Sept 2024, no red flags! Sohom (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Moritoriko

I have had two 1 month trials before which just expired so I am here to ask to continue, or for indefinite, which ever is more appropriate. Moritoriko (talk) 06:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done, until Sept 2025. Sohom (talk) 03:38, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Ambrosiawater

My current NPR rights are due to expire on 1 July 2025. While I may not be reviewing in large volumes, I focus on thorough, policy-aligned reviews that aim to improve or appropriately tag each page. I’d like to keep my NPR rights for continued constructive contributions. Thank You. Ambrosiawater (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

User:ColinSchm

I'm interested in doing NPP reviews. I think I've gone over the rules for creating new pages and and using references pretty thoroughly. ColinSchm (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 413 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 12:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Vestrian24Bio

Hi! I want to help out with NPP as there is been a longstanding backlog. I requested this right last year, but was told participate more in AfD discussions. Since, I have participated and as well as nominated for deletions. I think I'm ready now, thanks! Vestrian24Bio 02:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Mgreason

I saw there was a large backlog and reviewing articles is a nice change of pace. I have review experience from the required review when submitting DYK articles. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 15:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for your interest, but it looks like you are currently pblocked from mainspace for copyright violations. I think this block would need to be removed before you could be considered for NPP. Feel free to re-apply in the future though. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer (WP:PERM/PCR)

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Floating Orb

I found a reviewable edit that was not good and had already been reverted the first time it was placed. I reverted the new version of it, since the edit was not following the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that I should have Reviewing pending changes rights, since I have experience with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating Orb (talk • contribs) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: I added the signature and formatted the request correctly after it was placed (diff). —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, I still don't think your ready yet. In addition to the complaints from before, you've picked up a copyvio warning since your previous request, which does not bode well. And blanking/archiving your talk page right after making this request, while of course procedurally allowed, reeks of a bad-faith attempt to cover your tracks. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Rollback (WP:PERM/R)

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:MakaylaHippo1998

Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Criticize

Hello. do i have any chance to be given rollback rights to fight vandalism better? If possible. Criticize (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). — MusikBot talk 16:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Stop WP:Hat collecting. This request says nothing that the previous requests didn't say before. And while you have now mostly started warning other editors, here's another morsel to consider: only a week ago you said modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second, which is both not true (the average edit rate is around 2 edits per second, or one per 500 milliseconds), and evinces an attitude incompatible with rollback access; it's more important to be correct in what you are reverting, and to take those few seconds to think, than to race to the bottom trying to revert edits as fast as possible. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

BRFAs

Bot Name Status Created Last editor Date/Time Last BAG editor Date/Time
GraphBot 2 (T|C|B|F) Open 2025-07-02, 21:00:07 GalStar 2025-07-03, 16:48:21 Never edited by BAG n/a
AussieBot 2 (T|C|B|F) Open 2025-06-18, 11:00:52 Hawkeye7 2025-07-04, 20:12:09 SD0001 2025-07-04, 15:48:50
IUCNStatusBot (T|C|B|F) Open 2025-03-25, 05:46:08 AidenD 2025-07-03, 06:17:58 TheSandDoctor 2025-07-02, 22:46:23
CX Zoom AWB 2 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2025-06-24, 12:55:26 DreamRimmer 2025-07-03, 16:54:49 DreamRimmer 2025-07-03, 16:54:49
SodiumBot 3 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2025-06-18, 18:16:08 Sohom Datta 2025-07-02, 15:18:13 ProcrastinatingReader 2025-06-29, 10:48:39
VWF bot 2 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2025-05-28, 16:11:04 Primefac 2025-06-08, 13:32:41 Primefac 2025-06-08, 13:32:24
DeadbeefBot II (T|C|B|F) In trial 2025-05-23, 02:10:50 Dbeef 2025-07-04, 05:54:54 Anomie 2025-07-02, 12:14:42
CFA (bot) (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2024-12-31, 05:00:34 Pppery 2025-05-20, 16:03:46 DreamRimmer 2025-02-14, 17:06:11
SodiumBot 2 (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2024-07-16, 20:03:26 Sohom Datta 2025-07-02, 15:09:45 DreamRimmer 2025-01-26, 08:10:11
Ow0castBot (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2024-11-14, 01:51:38 Pppery 2025-05-20, 16:06:16 Primefac 2025-02-26, 14:33:55
C1MM-bot 3 (T|C|B|F) Trial complete 2024-12-12, 04:42:12 Pppery 2025-07-01, 16:36:06 DreamRimmer 2025-05-12, 03:34:43
Bot1058 10 (T|C|B|F) Trial complete 2025-03-07, 17:49:45 Pppery 2025-07-01, 16:37:17 Primefac 2025-06-08, 13:12:35
CanonNiBot 1 (T|C|B|F) Trial complete 2024-12-17, 12:50:01 Primefac 2025-06-23, 23:24:21 Primefac 2025-06-23, 23:24:21
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard&oldid=1013833114"