Jump to content

User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard

This user helped get "32 Old Slip" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2014.
This user helped get "Domino Park" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 29 June 2018.
This user helped get "MTA Arts & Design" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 May 2015.
This user helped "Nine Inch Nails" become a featured article.
This user helped "32 Old Slip" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Amnesiac (album)" become a good article.
This user helped "Better Out Than In" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Clarence Chesterfield Howerton" become a good article.
This user helped "Hasil Adkins" become a good article.
This user contributed to "Jessica Gomes" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Kowloon Walled City" become a good article.
This user made modest contributions to "Second Generation (advertisement)" become a good article.
This user is a member of the Bot Approvals Group.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User
Talk link={{{3}}}
Dashboard
Articles
Scripts
Tools
Templates
Userboxes
Awards

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 87
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 155
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 68
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 218
Requested RD1 redactions 11
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 14
Open sockpuppet investigations 49
Click here to locate other admin backlogs


News

Administrators' Newsletter
May 2025
 
The Signpost
14 May 2025

Edit filters

Requested edit filters (WP:EF/R)

Log possible non-EC creations in other ECR topic areas

We currently have Special:AbuseFilter/1276 logging possible ARBPIA creations. In the interest of fairness and consistency we should do so (either with that filter or with a new filter ID) for the other extended-confirmed-only topic areas.

That would be:

  • Russo-Ukrainian War (contains both "Russia" and "Ukraine"; probably each individually is too broad).
  • Kurds and Kurdistan (probably Kurd case-sensitive would suffice)
  • Armenia/Azerbaijan (this is a smaller area than Russia and Ukraine so probably easy country name individually would suffice)
  • history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (probably too narrow to be findable, listing for completeness)

* Pppery * it has begun... 02:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Block bad moves to project space

Continuing the bad move filter train, another idea would be to block moves by new users from user, draft, or main namespace to the Wikipedia: namespace -- that's rarely where things are supposed to go, and seems to get frequently selected by mistake. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1170 — Pattern modified
Last changed at 15:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Filter 614 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 23:45, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1347 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 06:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Filter 1325 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 06:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Articles

Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV)

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection (WP:RFPP)

Backlog CLEAN!

Permissions

Account creator (WP:PERM/ACC)

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
AutoWikiBrowser (WP:PERM/AWB)

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:VortexPhantom

Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Warriorglance

I would like to do repitative tasks such as adding wikilinks, fixing typos, etc Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Fade258

Hi. I intend to use AWB to assist with repetitive but useful maintenance tasks such as fixing common formatting issues, updating templates, correcting typos, and performing category cleanups. Similarly, I have also reviewed the guidelines and will ensure all edits follow Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with Wikipedia editing conventions and have made constructive edits. Thank you for considering my request and I hope for positive response. Fade258 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

You've requested three different permissions in a week. That looks a lot like WP:Hat collecting. Do you really expect to use all of these? * Pppery * it has begun... 21:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Pppery, Well, You're right to ask. I understand concerns about hat collecting. I had requested these permissions because I have specific or immediate plans to use each permission that I have in more frequently, policy based and in constructive manner. If you'd like, I can explain how I intend to apply each permission in current areas where I'm active. I'm not interested in collecting rights for my own sake only as I intend to help where there's a clear need. Thank You for reviewing my request. Fade258 (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Valorrr

I wish to become an AutoWikiBrowser user to fix Linter, errors along with many other things that can I assist with, I understand that I may have had problems with admins and acted a bit outrageous, but I understand my actions and now been using Twinke, Ultraviolet, Rater and more, I believe I can be trusted with AutoWikiBrowser rights, as I've waited my time, and today/yesterday is my 2 month anniversary of my account. Feel free to ask me any questions.

I also understand that I should be checking every edit before saving it and the other guidelines...
Valorrr (lets chat) 22:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([1][2]). — MusikBot talk 22:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per Special:Diff/1290775826. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Mass message sender (WP:PERM/MMS)

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
New page reviewer (WP:PERM/NPR)

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Scaledish

I'm requesting preliminary new page reviewer to help with the backlog drive. Preliminary because I'm not perfect—I've definitely fallen victim to WP:AKON before with my own creations[1], but I also have created a number of articles that stuck, and edited up articles quite a bit[2]. Importantly each process I've learned and grown. I plan to start small and grow over time as I become more and more confident with the process. Just recently attempted to review a draft with obvious advertising and realized the permissions would be good. Thanks,

References

  1. ^ see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdfense
  2. ^ recently Haight Ashbury Free Clinic
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 18:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JesusisGreat7

I’d like to request the New Page Reviewer right. I meet the criteria and have experience with article creation and deletion processes. Previously, I had a request declined as I applied for several rights at once—I understand this was seen as hat collecting. This time, my intent is focused: I’d like to help with the backlog and review pages containing promotional or disruptive content. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 18:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

User:WeWake

I'm requesting permissions to become a new page reviewer. I acknowledge that I have reviewed the requirements and responsibilities of these user rights. I bring experience creating new pages (>30+ recent articles) in WP mainspace aligned with core content policies and their understanding, 3000+ total edits, good faith interactions with other users, former experience as AfC, and awarness and tooling (Twinkle) to handle page curation processes. In interest of transparency, I also have a AfC request open at the moment and hadn't realized that NPP now includes AfC rights. If this is granted, I will withdraw that request. Thanks!— WeWake (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer (WP:PERM/PCR)

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Toast1454

Hello, I am requesting to be a pending change reviewer. I have around two to three months of experience patrolling RC and approximatly 1,000 edits in mainspace. I constantly find edits to contenuous and controversial pages, and would like to be able to accept or decline them. Toast1454TC 15:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Opm581

I would like to have the pending changes reviewer right so that I can help fight vandalism and deal with pending changes backlogs. I revert vandalism and other inappropriate edits when I come across them when I'm recent changes patrolling or viewing my watchlist. I also believe that I meet the WP:PCCRITERIA. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 23:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

User:HirowoWiki

Hello! I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights. When reviewing changes, it should be well-known constructive edits or inappropriate edits wherever should be accepted or declined. Rollback rights has also been granted. –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Rollback (WP:PERM/R)

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Rahmatula786

Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by ToBeFree (expires 17:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello Rahmatula786, from the list of your rollbacks, please choose five examples that comply with WP:ROLLBACKUSE, and say for each of them which of the 6 possible use-cases for rollback applied. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank You for raising concern. First of all I want to admit that due to my exam I was not able to give much time in editing. However I have maintained monitoring of pages in my watchlist. whatever rollback cations i have taken are in good faith keeping in mind on edit history and my follow up for those pages. Most of the edits I have made is the reason 1 use-causes for roll back ( WP:ROLLBACKUSE). I have like [4] where an editor who has history of editing his own wikipedia pages , I have rolled back . User talk:DarshanAdhikari. Similarly another page [5] . He has been editing similar pages for personal promotion. Like wise I have done for some other pages like [6] , [7], [8] in these pages i saw inappropriate edits.
I want to assure you that I am using this right to contribute whatever i can do for betterment and maintain standard of Wikipedia. Always trying to improve and learn. Thanks You. Rahmatula786 (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, Rahmatula786. Reason 1 is for obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear. Vandalism is intentional damage to the encyclopedia; many of the edits you have rolled back are good-faith contributions. People tried to improve the encyclopedia and failed; such edits need to be reverted with an edit summary that explains the problem. For example, the last three edits you linked to above should have had an edit summary like "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" or "[[WP:BURDEN|Unsourced]]".
Reverting promotion can be done with an edit summary like "[[WP:NOTPROMO|promotional]]".
I've had a look at your list of rollbacks and found it hard to find examples of where the permission has been used properly, but easy to find examples where rollback shouldn't have been used. I can't re-grant rollback in response to this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Regarding the talk page linked above, I do not think that Special:Diff/1289423000 is an example of messaging someone in a professional, commendable manner. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Skratata69

Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Chippla360

Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 06:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

User:TonySt

Hello! I've been using Twinkle which works very well, but I'd like to try out other tools like SWViewer and Huggle. If you'd like to see additional recent edits or vandalism reversions I understand completely! TonySt (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

FYI SWViewer does not require rollback. (Not a decision on this request, which another admin will handle in due time) * Pppery * it has begun... 18:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Are you sure? As far as I understand when I read the page at SWViewer's website, it specifically says To use this application local or global rollback is required and before I had the local rollback right I couldn't use it. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello TonySt and welcome back! I'll grant rollback, but it requires a measurable track record of dealing vandalism, and you've been (successfully, as far as I can see) starting this record a few days ago. Please ask on my talk page in two weeks and I'll likely grant rollback. In the meantime, please already have a look at User:ToBeFree/rollbackgiven which contains important advice for how to deal with feedback you may receive on your talk page when reverting edits. My only condition for granting rollback is that if people complained, you provided good answers to their concerns. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the response, and thank you for the info in that page. I look forward to talking with you in a few weeks when I have a more extensive record of recent helpful anti-vandalism activity. --TonySt (talk) 00:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done yet ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Lemonademan22

An example

Hi! I am once again peitioning for rollback rights, I currently have 4,000 edits under my belt and edit consistently, though I happen to run into a lot of vandalism. On the articles I edit, it can get excessive and rollback could come in use right about now. Quite frankly, it is quite difficult and time consuming to revert all edits made by a user, who is either vandalising an article or making unconstructive edits, with it also clogging up the edit history. It would be very useful if I could please obtain this tool to make it easier. Also please see the image! Thank you for reading. Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot talk 22:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Lemonademan22, all you're looking for is clicking the timestamp of a good revision, then "edit", and then publish changes. Or Twinkle to automate the task.
For advanced undoing of multiple edits that were made in a row but are not the latest ones, you can even select two revisions, show the difference between them and then click "undo" which magically applies to the entire set of edits. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
@ToBeFree None of them work for me, I don't think. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Lemonademan22, you manually clicked "undo" and "publish changes" 10 times in the revision history of Double or Nothing (2025) that is displayed in the screenshot. Rollback wouldn't have helped because all you could have reverted with it was the one single edit from the IP starting with 2601. Clicking the left round button next to "17:33, 15 May 2025", then the right round button next to "20:27, 15 May 2025", "Compare selected revisions", "undo" and "publish changes" would have been 5 clicks achieving the same result where rollback wasn't even an option. Please familiarize yourself with Help:Reverting instead of requesting the wrong tool for the task. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
@ToBeFree To be fair, I'm still new at all of this and I've had to figure a lot of this own my own. That's my excuse at least. Thanks for your time. Lemonademan22 (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
All good, no worries. The request is understandable and you've received a new tool; you had it all the time but it has been activated by new knowledge. It isn't rollback but it's a step forward. Rollback may well be a later step. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:ArachnidInner

Hey there :3

I'm looking for rollback perms so I can speed up my vandal reversion by using tools such as huggle. I don't have any issues with RedWarn but my more experienced friends tell me that huggle is much nicer and faster to use. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 00:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

BRFAs

Bot Name Status Created Last editor Date/Time Last BAG editor Date/Time
DreamRimmer bot III 9 (T|C|B|F) Open 2025-03-21, 04:50:16 1AmNobody24 2025-04-03, 13:25:14 Never edited by BAG n/a
Bot1058 10 (T|C|B|F) Open 2025-03-07, 17:49:45 Wbm1058 2025-03-27, 15:40:30 Anomie 2025-03-09, 00:12:51
AnomieBOT 84 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2025-04-11, 00:29:13 Anomie 2025-05-11, 22:31:28 DreamRimmer 2025-04-29, 14:45:51
C1MM-bot 3 (T|C|B|F) Extended trial 2024-12-12, 04:42:12 C1MM 2025-05-15, 13:00:06 DreamRimmer 2025-05-12, 03:34:43
CFA (bot) (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2024-12-31, 05:00:34 CFA 2025-03-27, 02:24:46 DreamRimmer 2025-02-14, 17:06:11
CanonNiBot 1 (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2024-12-17, 12:50:01 DreamRimmer 2025-02-14, 17:07:41 DreamRimmer 2025-02-14, 17:07:41
SodiumBot 2 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-07-16, 20:03:26 DreamRimmer 2025-01-26, 08:10:11 DreamRimmer 2025-01-26, 08:10:11
AussieBot 1 (T|C|B|F) Extended trial 2023-03-22, 01:57:36 DreamRimmer 2025-02-02, 11:19:10 DreamRimmer 2025-02-02, 11:19:10
Ow0castBot (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-11-14, 01:51:38 Primefac 2025-02-26, 14:33:55 Primefac 2025-02-26, 14:33:55
RustyBot 3 (T|C|B|F) Trial complete 2025-03-25, 18:34:23 Rusty Cat 2025-05-10, 23:10:04 DreamRimmer 2025-05-10, 15:59:26
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard&oldid=1013833114"