Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:81.96.52.167 reported by User:Epluribusunumyall (Result: No violation)

    [edit]

    Page: List of African-American United States representatives (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 81.96.52.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 14:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Stop reverting. The United States House of Representatives website does not include him as an African American Representative: https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Data/Black-American-Representatives-and-Senators-by-Congress/"
    2. 13:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "No where in the article does it say he is "African American". If you type in "adriano espaillat african american" into google it literally states "he is not considered African American". Reverting once again till a source stating he is African American is found."
    3. 12:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Reverting. No sources given that he is African American. If you can find one then it can stay."
    4. 12:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Not African American and was not allowed to join the Black Caucus because he is not Black"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 12:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on List of African-American United States representatives."
    2. 13:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Please check the discussion at Talk:List of African-American United States representatives#RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat"
    3. 14:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on List of African-American United States representatives."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 13:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "/* RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat */ new section"
    2. 13:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "/* RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat */ Reply"

    Comments:

    Have repeatedly tried to bring this up as a conversation on the talk page (including on previous days) however, the IP user seems intend on just reverting their way to a conclusion. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    You have continuously added an unsourced edition to a wikipedia article. You have been told, multiple times, to find a source for your addition and, as of yet, have not been able to find any. I have added sources, in the talk page, yet you have not. 81.96.52.167 (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No violation Per WP:3RRNO, unsourced BLP material is exempt, and that's what this is. Also we should let the RFC on the talk page play out ... it seems to have drawn in other editors and opened discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Inherli reported by User:Magic Fizz (Result: Blocked one month)

    [edit]

    Page: Spain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Inherli (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 15:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Reverted 3 edits by JaierRT (talk)"
    2. 11:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Reverted 2 edits by JaierRT (talk): Promotional blog and children's encyclopedia are unreliable sources"
    3. 10:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1296793967 by JaierRT (talk) A children's encyclopedia and a blog post from a travel booking website are not reliable sources"
    4. 06:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Restored revision 1296516760 by Kefren2002 (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 15:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Spain."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [1]


    Comments:

    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ​This is Inherli's third block for edit warring in only 247 edits, and they were edit warring at other pages besides Spain recently too (see my comment above). 24 hours seems very short, their last block was 2 weeks and apparently failed to make the issue clear. Would ANI be a better venue for future issues? fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 02:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies, I had neglected to look at the block log since this was a pretty clear-cut case. I have extended the block to a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:82.17.145.49 and User:2A00:23C7:848B:B801:842B:3B0B:C5C7:510 reported by User:Czello (Result: Page extended-confirmed protected for a year under CTOPS

    [edit]

    Page: 21st century genocides (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 82.17.145.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Israel */ Unfounded allegations, just accusations from unreliable sources"
    2. 22:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Israel */ Israeli propaganda"
    3. 20:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Israel */ Removed accusations of Palestinians genociding Israelis on October 7th only a single biased source (Times of Israel)"
    4. [6] (as 2A00:23C7:848B:B801:842B:3B0B:C5C7:510 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
    5. [7]


    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 20:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on 21st century genocides."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User clearly switched to editing on mobile as 2A00:23C7:848B:B801:842B:3B0B:C5C7:510 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) after receiving a 3RR warning. Note that this topic (Arab-Israeli conflict) is under CTOPS and the user is not permitted to make more than one revert in a 24 hour period. — Czello (music) 21:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    now thip 71.212.119.156 is editing 21st century genocides which the ip is not post to edit. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    StandardRossoneri99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has now joined in the edit war. Potentially the same user, as their only edits are to this article. — Czello (music) 06:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Page protected by ToBeFree for a year at the extended confirmed level under WP:CT/A-I Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As a note, StandardRossoneri99 has previously been told of the EC requirement, and previously made the same edits under StandardRossoneri. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:190.22.213.119 reported by User:TonySt (Result: Already blocked)

    [edit]

    Page: List of Kosovo Albanians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 190.22.213.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 20:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297033908 by TonySt (talk) Restored the corrected names, the last user didn't provide any argument to mantain the old names, stop vandalism or you are will be reported. - Source: https://archive.org/details/video_20230720"
    2. 20:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297032844 by TonySt (talk) Restored the corrected names - Source: https://archive.org/details/video_20230720"
    3. 19:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297032569 by Joyous! (talk) Restored the corrected names."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 19:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC) "Message about your edit on List of Kosovo Albanians (level 2) (AV)"
    2. 20:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on List of Kosovo Albanians."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Please see diffs. I am not an expert in this subject (found this via AV), but I understand this topic is contentious. The subjects in the list are pretty consistently referred to in their own articles as being Kosovar. The name of the article is "List of Kosovo Albanians." The article links (still) Kosovo Albanians in the lead. I believe this is vandalism but I do not have the requisite knowledge to confidently revert more than twice. — tony 20:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Thehistorianisaac reported by User:Nghtcmdr (Result: Both users blocked 24 hours)

    [edit]

    Tactical Police Vehicle: Tactical Police Vehicle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    Thehistorianisaac: Thehistorianisaac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [8]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [9]
    2. [10]
    3. [11]
    4. [12]


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:
    The user's reverts are part of their wider pattern of harassment [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] directed against me. Nghtcmdr (talk) 01:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nghtcmdr
    You have made edits that are, blatantly, disruptive(and are, in very high likelihood(and ironically), targeted against me) or lack proper sourcing. Reverting bad edits is not WP:HOUNDING. If you are mad at me reverting YOUR disruptive edits, then don't vandalize wikipedia in the first place.
    By the way, Nghtcmdr has a history of incivility which needs to be addressed [20] Thehistorianisaac (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Will put a note at the AN/I about this, although I doubt it will resolve the issue. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:2A01:CB08:85D:5D00:9D46:FDCD:EB72:132 reported by User:Magic Fizz (Result: Article protected)

    [edit]

    Page: Kim Novak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2A01:CB08:85D:5D00:9D46:FDCD:EB72:132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 03:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297089702 by 90.60.239.214 (talk) stop vandalism"
    2. 02:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297082060 by 81.250.233.186 (talk)"
    3. 02:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297077012 by 2A01:E0A:578:1E60:C52B:1070:8B7A:6A98 (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 03:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Kim Novak."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Repeat edit warring from multiple IP addresses (?potentially being used by the same person), see also

    90.60.239.214 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb08:85d:5d00:9d46:fdcd:eb72:132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    81.250.233.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:e0a:578:1e60:c52b:1070:8b7a:6a98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb09:b04b:1a17:25cf:3b78:db0e:86b (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2001:861:8b81:e7b0:1c2:9daa:64aa:ef22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb08:85d:5d00:bc4e:5b15:3f4c:1f67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    88.182.121.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb08:8806:3f00:f93d:ecea:8393:bd56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2001:861:4c00:8bb0:e276:d0ff:fe13:5712 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb09:8002:9bd:256e:d8dc:ca52:372b (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a02:842b:8c7d:401:548c:5446:65b0:d312 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:e0a:32f:2100:d43f:6b84:c072:b373 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb08:85d:5d00:60db:d48f:1419:6aeb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:e0a:edc:a250:295c:1fa8:e96d:3b89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb06:8048:2a86:5dcb:745:2912:dfb0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    77.151.110.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a02:8424:a524:fb01:3c39:2b47:8fe4:fe02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb04:79b:7700:992:b10d:4fbd:10e1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    2a01:cb06:a076:5ef3:94b1:be53:2cc4:a78f (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Magic Fizz (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Sayuuuto reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: Page protected)

    [edit]

    Page: Political status of Western Sahara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Sayuuuto (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 15:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297175165 by Skitash (talk) it's not me who did an edit, it's M.bitton, he created a topic in talk page about it."
    2. 15:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297174512 by Skitash (talk) stop edit warring, there is ongoing talk on this."
    3. 15:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297172730 by M.Bitton (talk) Please refrain from edit warring and bring it to talk page"
    4. 15:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1297151119 by M.Bitton (talk) We agreed to stick to official sources. please refrain from editwarring and make a discussion topic."
    5. 07:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Not an RS, should bring a official source from Paraguay like for Kenya Undid revision 1296209723 by M.Bitton (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 15:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Political status of Western Sahara."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 15:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC) "/* June 2025 */ Reply"

    Comments:

    Please note that their first reported edit (number 5) is a revert of an edit that was made last week. M.Bitton (talk) 16:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    How convenient to not mention that on the talk page. Nor on the revert itself.
    I thought that was your edit and I was the one reverting it, and now you're framing me like it's the opposite.
    It doesn't mean that I'm okay with what's in your edit, What I mean is that I wouldn't have reverted you if I knew. you played me really well good job. Sayuuuto (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Skitash, I don't understand the edit summary of Special:Diff/1297175165 given that material is added rather than removed with it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ToBeFree: Sayuuuto had already violated 3R (4 reverts) by that time, and to be honest, they were edit warring for no reason whatsoever (given that the content was copied from the main article). M.Bitton (talk) 21:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    M.Bitton, I said nothing about that, nor would that alone have given Skitash a reason to revert. I'm just wondering about the inversion of ONUS when someone cites it while adding material. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My mistake; I misspoke earlier about ONUS. What I meant is that once an edit is reverted or contested, the editor should seek consensus rather than keep pushing it through (per WP:BRD). Skitash (talk) 22:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No worries. While BRD itself is an optional process, you're right, thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sayuuuto, you made five reverts while telling people not to edit war in the summaries of these reverts. Do you see how that is an issue independently of who started? Could you follow your own advice in the future? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    M.Bitton, please let me know if this continues. I can't extended-confirmed protect right away, but disruption during semi-protection would be a good reason. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:OdunayoM reported by User:Gommeh (Result: Already blocked)

    [edit]

    Page: List of people from Lagos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: OdunayoM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Consecutive edits made from 17:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC) to 17:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Sports */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
      2. 17:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Sports */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
      3. 17:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Sports */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 17:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC) to 17:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Other */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
      2. 17:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Business */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
    3. Consecutive edits made from 17:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC) to 17:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Sports */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
      2. 17:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Other */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
    4. 17:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Other */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"
    5. Consecutive edits made from 17:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC) to 17:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Business */I removed some people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city, and only Yoruba are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of "list of people from Lagos". It's like saying "List of Chinese people" and adding Donald Trump to the list. Ridiculous right?"
      2. 17:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Sports */I removed the people who are not from Lagos. Lagos is a Yoruba city and only Yoruba people are from Lagos. Non-Yoruba people cannot be on the list of people from Lagos. It's like putting Donald Trump on the list of Chinese people. Ridiculous right?"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 17:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "Message re. List of people from Lagos (HG) (3.4.12)"
    2. 17:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on List of people from Lagos."
    3. 17:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "Final warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 17:57, 25 June 2025 (UTC) "/* Removing non-Yoruba people from the list */ new section"

    Comments:

    User made a personal attack on their talk page against UrielAcosta (talk · contribs) when asked to stop edit warring. Gommeh 🎮 18:00, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Thehistorianisaac reported by User:Nghtcmdr (Result: )

    [edit]

    Page: Army Academy of Armored Forces and Army Special Operations Academy
    User being reported: Thehistorianisaac

    Previous version reverted to: Army Academy of Armored Forces ([21]) and Army Special Operations Academy ([22])

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Army Academy of Armored Forces ([23]) and Army Special Operations Academy ([24])
    2. [diff]
    3. [diff]
    4. [diff]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:
    The user has decided to resume monitoring my activities and edit warring across the pages I had made changes to even though they had just gotten off a block for that offense.[25] They reverted my contributions with no prior discussions on the talk pages even though we had never interacted over those two articles before and they had practically made no edits to them. They have shown they do not intend to stop following and reverting my edits, so I have decided to bypass the usual route of raising this issue on the administrator's noticeboard first and come here directly instead. Nghtcmdr (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nghtcmdr
    I have seen a tendency for you to make bad edits, and I monitor you to make sure you stop making said bad edits.
    For my reverts, I very obviously told you on the talk page that those are reliable sources, and you should not remove sources unless you have proof against their reliability. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Sapedder reported by User:ChanduDev

    [edit]

    Page: Operation Blue Star (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Sapedder (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 1:30 26 June 2025
    2. 2:25 26 June 2025 Uses a false edit summary claiming I proposed moving the content in the lead to another section, I never said anything to that effect. Invokes Bonner’s “hundreds” figure despite me removing it, and him reinstating it.
    3. 2:32 26 June 2025 This edit summary is also ridiculous, he removes a source from Duke University claiming it is "unreliable". Again, Sapedder actually reinstates the contested figure (“Bhindranwale orchestrated militants to kill hundreds of Hindus) from Bonner’s book (whereas I removed the “hundreds” phrase and made no mention of any numbers or figures in my addition), while using his disapproval of Bonner’s figure as justification to revert.

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. [26]

    Comments:

    This user has multiple edit warring notices on his talk page and was blocked before for personal attacks. On top of that he is removing multiple academic sources from the article which contravene his POV. On the talk page, his is frequently manipulating my arguments and accusing me of saying stuff I never said (such as saying that I disputed an Tully’s numbers/figures when I never said anything to that effect, saying that I proposed moving content from the lead which again I never said, claiming that a Duke University book isn't reliable, saying that I am adding sensationalist language even though my addition is perfectly backed up from the sources (any one can verify this), and completely being unable to acknowledge that are numerous, numerous sources which back up the content. ChanduDev (talk) 03:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1297432267"