User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four
Hello. I did not practice. I identified an important point that I needed to reflect on in the article and provided it to a model to enhance its literary and formal quality. The original point was challenging to understand, and I am not an expert in English. The important thing is that it is read and understood. I consider you to be one of those who truly grasp that concept. Thellane (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please use the article talk page (Talk:Consciousness) to discuss the article. Johnuniq (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Disability benefits, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello. Please review Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For edits like this, which copy/pasted a relatively large amount of content without clear attribution from another article, the edit summary "WP:REFSPAM" didn't really explain anything. Additionally, this edit introduced several errors, redundant wikilinks, and unexplained changes. Did you partially reverted the article to an older version? Regardless, it would be much better if you explained what you were doing, especially when copying from other articles. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)