User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive 137
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sphilbrick. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 130 | ← | Archive 135 | Archive 136 | Archive 137 | Archive 138 |
Edit on Draft:Hum Dono (2023 TV series)
You have reverted my edits on Draft:Hum Dono (2023 TV series) as per copyright issue from This Link. The text i copied it from because i add it it the Reception section of the series. So i add the same text as the reviewer states. On another hand you have removed much of the text from the Draft Like Production, Plot and soundtrack section which was not under the copyright claim. Please take a look on your edit. Thanks Beyond the Bond (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- You seem to be under the impression that "production, plot and soundtrack" are not subject to copy right. That's not true. We do cut people some slack with a list of the soundtrack because it's very difficult to rewrite a soundtrack in your own words but you included a lot of material that was subject to copyright. We also permit the use of reviewer's comments if reasonably short, included inside quotation marks or set off with block quotes, and accompanied by attribution. I don't recall that you did that but I handled dozens of article so I'm not remembering the exact form of your edit. I do recall that you copied word for word a number of things from the review without properly identifying them as quotes. I confess I haven't really relooked at your edit to be sure; I can if you want but it didn't seem like it was a close call. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Color Lines
Hello!
The article is about a real game that does exist! And it was only a draft! There is a Wikipedia article about it in Russian Wikipedia: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Lines Game rules were actually taken from a previous (deleted) version of the article from the web archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20100807063847/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Lines Your link is just a description of the same game that was taken from this deleted Wikipedia article. The oldest web archive page is dated only 2012! genina.com is NOT a copyright owner of the game nor the game rules!
Please revert the deletion of the article so I can finish it. Thank you. Margarita byca (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't questioning whether the game existed. Your statement that "it was only a draft" doesn't mean anything with respect to copyright. Wikipedia doesn't permit copyright violations in articles in drafts in user space or anywhere. If you text came from an earlier deleted Wikipedia article that may be fine but you didn't identify the name of the draft. I work on hundreds of articles every week I can track it down but it be easier if you told me which article you are talking about. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't identify the name of the draft, because you have deleted it completely.
- Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Color_Lines
- Here is the deleted article I used: https://web.archive.org/web/20100807063847/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Lines
- If this old article used copyrighted materials, I won't use it. Margarita byca (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I restored the draft.
- I'm not convinced it should exist. This site asserts copyright over the text you used. You claim they don't own the copyright. I think you need to be prepared to defend that. I'll accept that there are legitimate questions about the copyright status, and frankly that's probably a good argument for leaving it deleted until you can prove otherwise but I will reestablish it as a draft and let the discussion continue. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello S Philbrick. I wonder did you see that editor's previous additions? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I did not.
- I just took a brief glance and it looks problematic.
- The current working Wikipedia is significantly reduced from prior years. In earlier years if I saw someone with that username I would provide some information about the problems with the name, but I'm currently limiting my edits to a couple of areas one of which is narrowly looking at reports at copy patrol and responding to them. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. Would it be appropriate to leave advice on their Talk page about copyright violation? Many thanks for your time. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely. My general practice is I leave a note about the copyright issue if they are a registered user and I'm the one who did the reversion. If, as in this case I see that someone else has made the reversion and I simply do the revision deletion I don't leave a message. You're welcome to do so but let me know if you were hinting I should leave a message. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I can leave a standard {{subst:uw-copyright}}, if you think that's appropriate? But not sure what to do with those earlier additions, which look smaller.Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds fine. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely. My general practice is I leave a note about the copyright issue if they are a registered user and I'm the one who did the reversion. If, as in this case I see that someone else has made the reversion and I simply do the revision deletion I don't leave a message. You're welcome to do so but let me know if you were hinting I should leave a message. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. Would it be appropriate to leave advice on their Talk page about copyright violation? Many thanks for your time. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
A Vandalism Case : Need Administrator Intervention
Hii @Sphilbrick. Myself @Callmehelper
there is in my view a vandalism case in the wikipedia page Ahir.
Background of whole matter
i am assuming that in Wikipedia page, it has concensus for long time that Generally Ahir has three Sub-Division. 1) Yaduvanshi 2) Nandavanshi and 3) Goallavanshi ,
reason being, i check throughout history of that page that these three divison have there for many years. But recently one editor changed all that in three edits these are following - 1st edit 2nd edit 3rd edit At first stance , i like their reason of these editing and thought probably this guy has a valid reason for doing that and I ignored.
I myself for the first time came here for the inclusion of a word ' Prakrit' here as it is well known fact with citation see then as being myself an extended user, someone tag and approaches me that this guy edits many factual correct things. pls correct it. then i got into this history contributions n all.
So i did correction with citations along additional quote of that book with page see and this
But that guy again revet all this and said please add citation without reading citation that i actually provided see
So now i go his talk page and told that guy to undo those edits see here last talk
I thought he would give me a valuable reply but instead of this, he just delete or archive my Talk and said that i should go for admin see but i don't know who admin is here.
Now i go again on editing war i guess and edit again all those with three more book reference in consecutive three edits see 1 2 and 3 and left a talk page discussion as well see
But apart from all that that editor still revert all this buy claimig that all sources have no value , and literally suggest me to go talk page see
Now I have no any option for going edits n all and since in talk page , no one give my answer. So i came to your talk page instead of going long vandalism intervantion reports n all .
I don't even belong to any of these caste, but my 2 days intervantion into this say a lot that this Ahir page is hijacked by some of the Biased people who try to manipulate things on their on term. they literally reject 4 to 5 citation book and tell these are no value .
Please look at into this , whenever you have free time.
Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I am scaling back my editing, with emphasis on copyright issues and development of selected articles. While I done vandalism work in the past it's not something I've worked on for some time so I'm sorry but I won't be able to help. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft deletion: End of the American frontier
You deleted my draft: end of the American frontier. I used text from "to be, or not to be" as a placeholder next to an image in a blank section. Was this why it was deleted?
- Yes, looked like vandalism. Very inappropriate. There's rarely a justification for placeholder text, but if you must, do it right Lorem ipsum.S Philbrick(Talk) 01:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Japanese UFC champions
Greetings. It seems you've been redacting pages about mma for decades. May i ask you a question? Page about Kazushi Sakuraba calls him first of two Japanese UFC champions. Don't you know who was the other one? Lyoto Machida?Akaan327 (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry I have no idea. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Henry Dryfuss Deletion
Please see my comments on the Talk:Henry Dreyfuss page. --Zeamays (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Article keeps being deleted: Mandy Lemaire
My article keeps being deleted. I have references and have not violated any copyright Mspi007 (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- The contents appear to be virtually identical to the text at: this site
- Can you explain why this appears to be so? S Philbrick(Talk) 18:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- It was used as a reference. If I rewrite it all, would the article stay up? Mspi007 (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you rewrite in your own words, rather than copying and pasting, it won't be an copyvio. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Let me know if more changes are needed Mspi007 (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you rewrite in your own words, rather than copying and pasting, it won't be an copyvio. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- It was used as a reference. If I rewrite it all, would the article stay up? Mspi007 (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2025
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Incorrect deletions? Please respond to comments left for you.
Hi,
I believe you mistakenly removed some of my changes to a wiki article on Jan. 22, moments after I made it. You left a lengthy boilerplate message on my page saying to contact you if the removal was a mistake. I believe it was a mistake, so I responded to your message on my page the same day. On Jan. 24, I left a second, more extensive explanation in a reply. I still have not received a response back. Please see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting#c-Wikipedian-in-Waiting-20250124121000-Sphilbrick-20250122001300. Wikipedian-in-Waiting (talk) 11:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I responded on your talk page. Unfortunately your attempt to ping me failed, so this is the first I've heard of it. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you reply here, I will see it, if you reply on your talk page you will need to ping me correctly which I urge you to try.
- Example:
- @Wikipedian-in-Waiting: If you reply here, I will see it, if you reply on your talk page you will need to ping me correctly which I urge you to try.~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'll answer here and on my page, hoping you see the response. Yes, please undo the removal you made to both of my changes to the wiki article. On the article's revision log, they were:
- - 20:58, 21 January 2025, (+548) Bible Quilt 1886
- - 23:47, 21 January 2025, (+2,484) Pictorial Quilt 1898 Wikipedian-in-Waiting (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I reverted.
- Sorry about that. The bad habit of many websites to incorporate public domain text into their page and assert copyright over the whole page is annoying. I often catch it, because the general style of writing is different, but I missed it this time. Unfortunately we are dealing with hundreds of reports every week and a tiny handful of volunteers to address them, so occasionally I spend less time reviewing them would be ideal. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Revert because of copyright
Hello, i was recently working on Draft:Siege of Nisibis (350) and you reverted it, for copyright issues, my I know whats the problem in more specifics? Thank you again. Hollowww (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- As I explained on your talk page the material seems to match too closely material at the following site:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ASiege_of_Nisibis_%28350%29&diff=1273104746&oldid=1273104342
- I don't see any evidence that the site is properly licensed. Did I miss it? S Philbrick(Talk) 19:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- which site are you talking about? I'm sorry if I'm causing this much confusion, it's just the first time that's ever happened to me. Hollowww (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- i just understood which website / source was not licensed. May I get a chance to revert you edit and remove this source? Hollowww (talk) 20:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not generally accepted protocol to restore copyright violations to Wikipedia, but I made a copy of the contents of the article just before my reversion and I sent it to you via email. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, again, have a good day. Hollowww (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not generally accepted protocol to restore copyright violations to Wikipedia, but I made a copy of the contents of the article just before my reversion and I sent it to you via email. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- i just understood which website / source was not licensed. May I get a chance to revert you edit and remove this source? Hollowww (talk) 20:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- which site are you talking about? I'm sorry if I'm causing this much confusion, it's just the first time that's ever happened to me. Hollowww (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Technical news
- Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
- A '
Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.
Why delete my unsubmitted draft
Some nutcase here called @Sphilbrick deleted an unsubmitted draft that I'm busy working on. With all the research I was doing on the subject now I must start afresh. This is totally unacceptable and should remain a rule at Wikimedia that no article should be deleted while the editor is working on it; the article was unsubmitted and I don't know who gave you right to it. ZS Khumalo (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- It appeared to be a copyright violation. As explained at the top of this page, if you think I made a mistake, please explain why and if my deletion was an error I will be happy to restore the draft S Philbrick(Talk) 13:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Mathworld
Hi Sphilbrick, I see you've been adding some Mathworld citations today. Maybe you are aware of these past discussions, but I would point you to them just in case: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_432#MathWorld and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics/Archive/2024/Mar#Is_Wolfram_Mathworld_reliable?. All the best, JBL (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've read and I will respond. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- added post here:
- RS Mathworld revisited S Philbrick(Talk) 16:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
RD4
With thanks for your recent help (including correcting for my error in the tag), as you're listed here, would you mind perhaps taking a quick look here? IMO this falls under RD4 (as oversightable on MPJI/KIDS/BLPNAME grounds). Not the 'worst' example. But maybe worth redaction. Guliolopez (talk) 21:48, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with you, and I used to have that tool but I don't at the moment. Please see how to contact at [[Wikipedia:Requests for oversight S Philbrick(Talk) 21:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
File:Logo of Wakulla County Florida in 2013.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo of Wakulla County Florida in 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2025
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Moving the needle:[1]
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
References
References
Groww draft deletion
Good evening. My in-progress draft on the topic, Groww, was deleted, despite it being an encyclopedic draft on the company. I assure you I am in no way, shape, or form connected to the company, and have no malicious intentions. I was working on a neutral, unbiased draft on Groww, and it was deleted without any explanation. Could I request undeletion of the draft? Any copyright violations and/or infringements, if pointed out, shall be removed by me. Thankyou, 2311afaepw4 (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whenever I remove a portion of an article I provide an explanatory note in the edit summary as well as additional explanation to the talk page of registered editors. I realize because the draft is been deleted you did not see the edit summary. I thought the system automatically dropped a note on the editors talk page in the case of the deletion but that doesn't appear to be the case. That doesn't sound like a good process and perhaps somebody will look into that.
- I did look at the content of your draft and it looked to me like a very close paraphrase of this site.
- Do you see it differently? S Philbrick(Talk) 18:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- I acknowledge the error that has occurred from my side and apologize for the mistake caused. Could you please undelete the draft. I'll ensure that this time I do not make the same mistake again and make all the the necessary changes to the article. Thank you! 2311afaepw4 (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- I copied the contents and emailed to you. Good luck. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- I acknowledge the error that has occurred from my side and apologize for the mistake caused. Could you please undelete the draft. I'll ensure that this time I do not make the same mistake again and make all the the necessary changes to the article. Thank you! 2311afaepw4 (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- @2311afaepw4:Sorry, I should have let you know I was responding. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Vsevolod Zaderatsky
You reverted my edits because of a wrong source in a way that I cannot see these edits any more. You could have told me in another way, I would have found a new source! Now all work is gone! At least I cannot see it. If you still can see it, please return it to me, so I can find the correct sources! Lova Falk (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
PS The later edits that I made were NOT made with the source https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages/Z/A/ZaderatskyVsevolod.htm but with another source!Lova Falk (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm on the phone, will respond shortly. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Please share the other source so I can see if it is acceptable licensed. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- The latest edits were all made with this one: https://varianty.lviv.ua/publikatsiyi/avanhard-zaderatskoho#google_vignette
- Thanks for providing the source.
- That source is fully copyrighted.
- I'm sorry that my edits seems so abrupt. Wikipedia is committed to respecting copyrights. Eevery week, hundreds of editors are not fully aware of this requirement and add copyrighted material to articles. It would be nice if we had sufficient resources to handle it differently but there are a small handful of people monitoring reports about potential copyright, and it is our current practice to immediately revert any violations of our copyright policy. It is also our practice, when a copyright issue is identified, to do a rollback of all consecutive edits by the same editor. If you have thoughts on how this process could be improved I'm all ears.
- I did send a copy of the article reflecting your edits to you by email.
- Please make sure to use your own words or use exact words if short and in quotes and attributed. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for sending me the edits, however, I haven't yet received anything. I checked my preferences and the email address there is correct. Is it possible that some old email adress of me is somewhere else registered in WP?
- My next question to you: how do you see that https://varianty.lviv.ua/publikatsiyi/avanhard-zaderatskoho#google_vignette is fully copyrighted? I have also this source: https://rivnenchanka.info/uk/stvoryuvav-shedevry-navit-v-koncztabori-vsevolod-zaderaczkyj-pianist-i-kompozytor-z-rivnogo-pro-yakogo-malo-hto-znaye Is this copyrighted?
- I see what I did wrong, I tried again and you can now check your email; will look into and respond to your other questions shortly. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- The email has arrived, thank you for that! However, the version you sent to me is not at all the latest version that I created. Please - if possible - send me the latest version. I had made a sub-section called Music with a lot of text. Lova Falk (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- If you look at the bottom of the page you will see this notice:
- © Copyright 2018-2024.
- The other site has a similar notice but I think it's in Ukrainian.
- However, if you don't find a notice that doesn't mean it's not copyrighted. Very roughly speaking, anything published in the last century (1929 or later in the US for printed material) is probably subject to copyright unless it is public domain (e.g. US federal employees work) or explicitly licensed in a way that can be used. Unfortunately, copyright can be complicated and it varies by country. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation! If possible, could you send me the latest version of the page that you reverted?
- Furthermore, I have a question. None of the text that I used was verbatim from the source - that was in Ukrainian as you noted. Everything was rewritten (and summarised) in my own words. My question is, if I use my own words, is it not allowed to use copyrighted material as a source? Lova Falk (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- I see that the version I sent you did not have section on music which perplexes me because I deliberately chose the most recent version before my reversion. I haven't figured out why and I don't see any good reason to figure out what went wrong — I tried again with the most recent version and it does have the section on music. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- There is more general information regarding copyright at the Wikipedia article on the subject:
- Copyright
- The article does note that copyright does cover translation of text so you cannot simply translate copyrighted text and use it, you must write it in your own words
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ S Philbrick(Talk) 16:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! The section is there. I checked WP:copyright, and it states clearly: "Since most recently-created works are copyrighted, almost any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material, just as an author of a book does not need permission to cite someone else's work in their bibliography." So what did I do wrong? I put the Ukrainian text in Google translate, and then rewrote in my own words. How is this a copy violation? Lova Falk (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- It is evening in Sweden now, and I turn off the computer. Please reconsider your reverts of this page. I did rephrase the text that I found in the sources. Good night! Lova Falk (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi S Philbrick(Talk), I see that you have been back and done some edits. Would you please address this. I would like to work more on this article, but I cannot do this when you will revert my edits. Lova Falk (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't done any edits other than the initial one to remove your copyright violations.
- As you noted above, "any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material,...."
- That statement is in there because some people were under the impression the providing a link to copyrighted material was a violation of the copyright. It is not. It is not only permissible to link to copyrighted material, it's required. If you translated some text and then rewrote in your own words it's not a copyright violation. I have no idea whether that occurred in this case as I have not looked at any of your edits after my rollback. I've now looked and you have not made any additional edits so when you say you "did rephrase the text that I found in the sources", I don't know what you mean because there are no new edits. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have made no new edits after your rollback, because I was not sure if you would reverse them again. When I say that I rephrased the text that I found in the sources, I mean that when working with this article, all the time I translated what I found, then rephrased, then made the edit in the article. But I understand that there was one edit that I did not rephrase? So now I will redo the other edits that you also removed. I will also be extra careful to not copy the text. Lova Falk (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don't have time for this. I try to be very sympathetic to editors who inadvertently violate copyright rules because they very often new to editing and don't know how this place works. It appears to me you have 18 years of editing experience, over 25K edits, have qualified to be a pending change reviewer and rollbacker. I'm dealing with some personal issues and you persuaded me it's time to step away from Wikipedia. Please visit the teahouse if you have additional questions. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I am sorry to hear that you are not doing so fine, and thank you for spending so much time and energy to me. I get too upset - afterwards I know it, but in the middle of it, I am simply too upset. I am sorry. It is true that I am an experienced editor, but I am also a returning editor after an eleven years gap. Some things I have forgotten, and other things have changed since then, and I am still finding out and making mistakes. But how could you know that? For the record, if you would have told me to turn to the Teahouse with my questions, I would immediately have done that, but I have always read that it is better to sort things out with the editor one has an issue with, instead of asking others to help. Anyway, TL;DR I am sorry and I wish you well!
Lova Falk (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing, that helps explain some things that making sense to me. You are absolutely right it is definitely better to start with the editor and only go to other venues if that doesn't work out. It wasn't my intention to suggest that you should have started with the teahouse. The situation is I have a brother for whom I am the guardian, and he has some severe health problems which has necessitated me stepping away from Wikipedia for a while. I mentioned the teahouse because I can't commit to helping you in a timely way and wanted you to have another option. Best of luck with the article. S Philbrick(Talk) 17:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- I am sorry to hear that you are not doing so fine, and thank you for spending so much time and energy to me. I get too upset - afterwards I know it, but in the middle of it, I am simply too upset. I am sorry. It is true that I am an experienced editor, but I am also a returning editor after an eleven years gap. Some things I have forgotten, and other things have changed since then, and I am still finding out and making mistakes. But how could you know that? For the record, if you would have told me to turn to the Teahouse with my questions, I would immediately have done that, but I have always read that it is better to sort things out with the editor one has an issue with, instead of asking others to help. Anyway, TL;DR I am sorry and I wish you well!
- I don't have time for this. I try to be very sympathetic to editors who inadvertently violate copyright rules because they very often new to editing and don't know how this place works. It appears to me you have 18 years of editing experience, over 25K edits, have qualified to be a pending change reviewer and rollbacker. I'm dealing with some personal issues and you persuaded me it's time to step away from Wikipedia. Please visit the teahouse if you have additional questions. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have made no new edits after your rollback, because I was not sure if you would reverse them again. When I say that I rephrased the text that I found in the sources, I mean that when working with this article, all the time I translated what I found, then rephrased, then made the edit in the article. But I understand that there was one edit that I did not rephrase? So now I will redo the other edits that you also removed. I will also be extra careful to not copy the text. Lova Falk (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi S Philbrick(Talk), I see that you have been back and done some edits. Would you please address this. I would like to work more on this article, but I cannot do this when you will revert my edits. Lova Falk (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- It is evening in Sweden now, and I turn off the computer. Please reconsider your reverts of this page. I did rephrase the text that I found in the sources. Good night! Lova Falk (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
