Jump to content

User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive 138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 135Archive 136Archive 137Archive 138

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous


Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 67

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 67, January – February 2025

  • East View Press and The Africa Report join the library
  • Spotlight: Wikimedia+Libraries International Convention and WikiCredCon
  • Tech tip: Suggest page

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Re: Your comment on Mathworld

You said "While truly bad sources are worse than nothing, I think sources that may be less than gold standard are far better than the sea of unsourced claims." I heartily agree, and I think it also applies to restrictions on sources. To my mind, it's why slavishly following WP:MEDRS causes bad editing. — Charles Stewart (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, a lot to chew on, I'm currently on a bit pf a hiatus from Wikipedia between basketball season and some personal issues, but hope to get re-involved in another couple months. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)