User talk:EricAhlqvistScott
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Louis Upton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricAhlqvistScott -- EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Gardenista. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- Contesting this. Talk:Gardenista clearly states decision was to keep. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Louis Upton you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Louis Upton for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricAhlqvistScott -- EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, EricAhlqvistScott, and welcome to Women in Red. On the basis of the work you've recently done on Julie Carlson, you are going to be a useful member. I hope you will soon be creating new biographies yourself. If so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. As a Swede, you might be inspired to pick someone from our redlist on Sweden or from one of our other redlists. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Greetings. Would you care to elaborate which "religious views" you think motivated the AfD nomination of the above article, and what led to to the conclusion that I possess them? Thanks. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello EricAhlqvistScott. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EricAhlqvistScott. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EricAhlqvistScott|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- No I'm not being paid for any of my posts. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The file File:EricAhlqvistScott.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, EricAhlqvistScott,
Thank you for creating Robert Schleip.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We would need to see a substantial piece on him as a notable person in a quality independent source, as I don't think he meets WP:NPROF for academics. A lot of the references are primary, or not really about him. thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Aszx5000 (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Aszx5000,
- I appreciate the general curation process. I've addressed the points on the talk page: Talk:Robert_Schleip. Please give it a lookover, and hopefully I've addressed the concerns.
- Thanks,
- EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I'd love another passover on the article's talk page. I believe I've made a solid case to remove the notices. If you agree, I'd really appreciate it if you removed them yourself, since you added them I think it says more than if I, the author, removes it myself. If you have further doubts, also feel free to express them and I'll do my best to address it as well as I can. EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 15:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Moving the needle:[1]
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
References
Announcements (Events facilitated by others):
Tip of the month:
Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements (events facilitated by others):
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Robert Schleip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently notable for an article; see WP:NPROF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bon courage (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Are you WP:PAID to edit Wikipedia? Bon courage (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Nope, are you? EricAhlqvistScott (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- No, and I strongly encourage you to fuck right off with your repeated assertions that I am. Bon courage (talk) 17:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Schleip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Bon courage (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
TarnishedPathtalk 16:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TarnishedPathtalk 16:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)