User talk:Doniago
![]() | Welcome to my Talk page. Please note the following-
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
DRN Case Status
[edit]Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
Persecution of Muslims during the Ottoman contraction | On hold | John Not Real Name (t) | 35 days, 7 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 3 hours | Bogazicili (t) | 6 hours |
Shenyang J-35 | In Progress | ZLEA (t) | 25 days, 6 hours | Mesocarp (t) | 16 days, 10 hours | Nafis Fuad Ayon (t) | 8 days, 21 hours |
2025 IndyCar Series | Closed | SteeledDock541 (t) | 24 days, | Mesocarp (t) | 18 days, 20 hours | Mesocarp (t) | 18 days, 20 hours |
Drag pageantry | Closed | ZimZalaBim (t) | 20 days, 7 hours | Mesocarp (t) | 19 days, 11 hours | Mesocarp (t) | 19 days, 11 hours |
Bono state | In Progress | Kowal2701 (t) | 6 days, 17 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 23 hours | Norcer (t) | 2 days, 7 hours |
Creep (Radiohead_song)#Covers | New | Chrisdevelop (t) | 5 days, 22 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 19 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 19 hours |
2025 India–Pakistan conflict | New | SheriffIsInTown (t) | 5 days, 21 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 5 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 5 hours |
Ba 'Alawi sada | New | Abo Yemen (t) | 2 days, 12 hours | None | n/a | Abo Yemen (t) | 2 days, 12 hours |
People's Liberation Army Rocket Force | New | Nghtcmdr (t) | 16 hours | None | n/a | Nghtcmdr (t) | 16 hours |
Taylor Hill (model) | New | 162 etc. (t) | 6 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 hours | 162 etc. (t) | 1 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
List of time travel works of fiction
[edit]Hi, not only have you removed the external link, you have removed my entire contribution.
When adding my contribution, I followed the existing format.
If my contribution contravenes policies or regulations, removing the link for my contribution should be sufficient, rather than removing my entire contribution. Chuacheewee (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Without the external link, your entry contained neither a bluelink nor any reliable source that a reader could use to verify the existence of the film. You're welcome to re-add your entry with an appropriate source. DonIago (talk) 01:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Your response is ridiculous. The link is a reliable source. Chuacheewee (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- I explained my reasoning, and you chose to insult me. We have nothing else to discuss unless you'd like to apologize. DonIago (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- I said your response is ridiculous in the sense that the linked source is reliable and could be used to verify the existence of the film, not "you are ridiculous". Instead of reading it neutrally, you chose to interpret it as an insult to your ego, and insist on an apology.
- You should apologize for misinterpreting my words. Chuacheewee (talk) 03:39, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- If you feel the linked source is reliable, why not reinsert it as a citation instead of arguing with me about it? DonIago (talk) 16:23, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- I explained my reasoning, and you chose to insult me. We have nothing else to discuss unless you'd like to apologize. DonIago (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Your response is ridiculous. The link is a reliable source. Chuacheewee (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
[edit]I noticed on the May 6 edit that you have removed the categories of "Pulling Double Booty", even though these are actually the plot of the episode. Can you explain WHY you removed these categories? 2600:8801:8E:9900:352E:494B:92E3:2CBD (talk) 13:55, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Please read WP:DEFCAT and consider whether all of these categories are really defining with regards to this episode, or merely incidental to it. Among other things, I don't recall any serious discussion of insects, nor am I convinced that it really gives the notion of rape any serious consideration. DonIago (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am not here trying to discuss these subjects, they are very serious subjects that I am also uncomfortable with. Having that said, many TV episode articles to TV shows have used categories to describe episodes based on the plot. 2600:8801:8E:9900:352E:494B:92E3:2CBD (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Since you didn't provide examples, perhaps those episodes are more specifically focused on those subjects, or perhaps they're also miscategorized. You don't need to discuss the subjects in any case, but the episode needs to have them as a major plot point before they should be included in the categories. DonIago (talk) 18:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am not here trying to discuss these subjects, they are very serious subjects that I am also uncomfortable with. Having that said, many TV episode articles to TV shows have used categories to describe episodes based on the plot. 2600:8801:8E:9900:352E:494B:92E3:2CBD (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
"Antisocial Personality and Co." listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Antisocial Personality and Co. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 31 § Antisocial Personality and Co. until a consensus is reached. BlockArranger (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
About my source in Superman IV
[edit]Hello. I know Scribd isn't a reliable source, but it was the only one I could find, since the one I consulted at the time doesn't have that canceled script available; https://www.supermanhomepage.com/superman-in-the-movies/. I hope you can help me with that. Thanks. 2800:484:7385:F0:C7FA:18D9:E152:EB0 (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'd recommend asking at the article's Talk page to see whether other editors may have access to resources that we don't, or are just better researchers. No reason to limit it to us! DonIago (talk) 23:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
"Trip the light fantastic" edit
[edit]Sorry, but what exactly do you mean by "source doesn't include any discussion of the use of the phrase"? The linked source is to the group's official site, specifically a page that shows the lyrics for the song in question (which shows that the phrase is included, and has an embedded version of the music video itself) - the entry directly above it, regarding Marillion's "Heart of Lothian" is almost identical. 2603:7080:DD00:4DF0:E143:EB21:342C:2AC (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:IPCV, a source should be provided that doesn't just establish that the song uses the phrase but that their use of it either attracted some attention (i.e. discussion) from sources or that the band itself has discussed their use of the phrase. We shouldn't be including every incidental mention of the phrase. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Inquiry at 3O
[edit]Hi! Saw you recently removed one of my queries at WP:3O, reason being involvement of more than two users, without commenting on the target page. Still, it would be great to have another opinion to kill the apparent bias and accusations happening, and to obtain an external point of view about the article's notability and neutrality. Please, thank you! M. Billoo 20:08, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'd recommend neutrally asking for additional opinions at the related WikiProjects, which you can find at the top of the Talk page. Really, generally I'd recommend that prior to requesting a 3O in general (unless you think it's a really easy case), since that way you'll attract editors who may be more familiar with the subject matter. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)