Jump to content

User:Lazulilasher/toolbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here are some things I use a lot. I stole a lot of this from Ruhrfisch & Finetooth.

[edit]
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
The Signpost
1 May 2025


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 2
Requests for unblock 66
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 143
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 241
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 24
Open sockpuppet investigations 205
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]
FP PhilKnight (talk) 02:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

[edit]


CSD / PRODs

[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 13
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 10

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 66 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 12 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Mark Pellegrino

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous BLP violations. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Wik

[edit]

Indefinite full protection: It may be time to do this, given the long-standing consensus that any message posted to this page gets reverted. (I know this is a bit of an WP:IAR situation, but look at who posted the request to have all new messages removed from this page [Jimbo Wales]... and then you have editors like me who post a message generated by Twinkle ... just to have the message later reverted by another editor, which apparently has been happening for over 20 years per the talk page's edit history.). Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Draft:West Camp Friends

[edit]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax content from LTA.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Cooper Flagg

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Salleh Said Keruak

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 02:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Maximus Ongkili

[edit]

Reason: vandalism 118.101.143.217 Normal rookie (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

2024–25 USL Super League season

[edit]

Reason: A user: Bilrit67 made several edits that messed up the page which included deleting a significant portion of the page HavanaHeat (talk) 02:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Eurovision Song Contest 2025

[edit]

Reason: User:JLStevenNgao consistently making disruptive edits; ÉC week commencing and therefore more such edits are expected Pdhadam (talk) 04:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes! Sir Mr. Pdhadam Thank You JLStevenNgao (talk) 04:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Ultimate Disney Princess

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping hijacker. Also targeting Disney's Princess Favorites and other album articles such as Brave (Jennifer Lopez album).  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Asian elephant

[edit]

Reason: I would like to correct certain scientific data on the page as I am the leading researcher on size in Asian elephants. GDB tusker (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Then you should know that we require published sources and that you have a blatant conflict of interest if you cite your own papers. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

[edit]

Add “Forensic Obliterated (including vaporized)” category (~10,000 bodies) in the Death infobox. From high temperature bombs mainly (15% - 25% of total dropped). It’s as important as the “under rubble” category. 2601:645:8500:5960:FDA0:7E8B:C170:A01F (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

You need to provide a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Anontools (request) 2025-05-01 12:08 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Sudirman Cup (request) 2025-05-12 09:31 Fully protected, expires 2025-05-17 at 09:48:43 UTC (log) Protected by The Bushranger on 2025-05-10: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
11 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox comics creator (request) 2025-05-08 21:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-05-10 20:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox gymnast (request) 2025-05-11 15:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Listen/styles.css (request) 2025-05-12 00:24 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2022-06-26: "Highly visible template, match parent"
Template:As of (request) 2025-05-12 02:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Album chart (request) 2025-05-13 01:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)


WP:RFA

[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:CherryPie94

[edit]

New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Kjansen86

[edit]

I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

User:-Verso-

[edit]

78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Seconded. These are well-sourced, well-written, clean articles (with talk pages) being created at a sufficient pace that having the AP flag would help reduce the burden for patrollers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Hteiktinhein

[edit]

Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) At the pace this editor is creating, I would expect granting the flag to help reduce the backlog. These are solid articles; talk pages are created, which helps as well. I am AGF'ing on the Burmese language sources but have no concerns. @Hteiktinhein, a couple nits: on Padein Prince rebellion, the section of "Members" with an unexplained bulleted list is a bit confusing, and on Thetpan Mibaya, the "see also" section should go above the references section per MOS:LAYOUT. But these are just small things to keep in mind for the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Fade258

[edit]

Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Hello fellow New Page Patroller @Fade258! One question I have is: are you going to boost your article creation? I see only one new actual article created since October 2023, so at that pace adding the AP flag wouldn't do much to reduce the backlog. You do seem more active in creating redirects, so once you get to 100 uncontroversial redirects created, you could apply for the pseudo-right at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list, which I would endorse you for and which would autopatrol your redirects and reduce the backlog there. As for your one recent creation, a couple notes. On Saumya Saraswat, the article subject should be bolded at the beginning of the first sentence. Two of your sources are unbylined WP:NEWSORGINDIA sources ([1], [2]), which are of questionably reliability. Hope this helps! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Dclemens1971, Thank you for reviewing my request and for the feedback! I appreciate your suggestions and I will aim to increase my article creation rate moving forward. Currently, I have some articles on my plate to create but due to my personal reason I am not doing that. In the meantime, I will also focus on creating uncontroversial redirects to reach the 100 mark and apply for the redirect autopatrol pseudo-right as advised. I will also take care to bold article titles properly and be more selective with sourcing and avoiding unbylined or questionable sources. In future , I will also select those references considering the NEWSORGINDIA. Thanks again for the helpful guidance and your offer to endorse! Fade258 (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User:MerlinVtwelve

[edit]

Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Reviewed the last several articles, and while your grasp of notability is strong, I did find an instance of WP:CLOP on your most recent creation that is very close to the line of copyvio if not over it. See Copyvio Detector results. This article is otherwise very well done! Two other things to consider when creating articles: create talk pages (the WP:RATER tool is helpful here) and make sure at least one other page links to yours. If you were to be autopatrolled, orphaned pages would likely stay orphaned longer. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Phantomdj

[edit]

Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I reviewed @Phantomdj's last 10 article creations, and they are overall quite good. Well-formatted, clean copy. They all appear to be compliant with WP:NASTRO. It would be helpful if they could create talk pages for their creations (the WP:RATER tool is helpful for this) but otherwise I think the project would benefit from Phantomdj being autopatrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Owais Al Qarni

[edit]

I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I spot-checked several recent pages, and they are in good shape: notable topics, in-line citations, MOS-compliant, talk pages created, etc. Eight pages deleted, but the most recent one was nearly three years ago; knowledge of notability appears to have improved as makes sense for a New Page Reviewer. My one suggestion to @Owais Al Qarni: since you seem to create pages with multiple smaller edits, I recommend creating in your user sandbox or in a draft and then moving to mainspace once the page is largely complete. But that's not a requirement and I would support granting this perm. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
 Done please review the notes left by @Dclemens1971:, if you run into any problems feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Huligan0

[edit]

This user has created a huge number of articles, mostly to do with football in Switzerland. A cursory review shows that the articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, but the subjects are consistently notable and the articles are generally well-researched and -referenced, so I don't see much for NPP to do here. Toadspike [Talk] 15:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done When you say articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, that's the exact opposite of what autopatrolled is for, especially the latter issue. Schwede66 21:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
@Schwede66 I'm not going to push you to reconsider, but if you don't mind, I'm going to rant a bit. I realize it's been discussed elsewhere and there's no clear community consensus on what "clean" articles means, but I think this is a very clear case where the core functions of NPP are unnecessary and our AP standards reveal themselves to be a romantic fantasy of how patrolling should work. The articles are notable, there are no two ways about it, and they contain a huge number of sources. Take their most recent article, 1961–62_Swiss_Cup, which has 26 sources in various locations; this seems about average for this user. They are not a native English speaker and they put their refs in weird places – so what? An NPPer would, at most, slap on one or two useless tags that will take years to get fixed, if ever; more likely they will punch the review button as fast as they can, while sighing in relief that for once they aren't reviewing AI-generated UPE garbage, and move on without taking any action. These articles even have categories, (auto-generated) shortdescs, and aren't orphans. What more do you expect an NPPer to do here? Toadspike [Talk] 00:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
The prose of the first two sections of 1961–62 Swiss Cup is completely unreferenced. I would prefer a reviewer to tag that, Toadspike. Not so much so that some random editor fixes that over the next few years, but to communicate to the article creator that unsourced prose isn't ok, so that hopefully they will change their practices. Huligan0, would you mind adding inline referencing to your articles so that there aren't unreferenced sections? Schwede66 00:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
I understand. The unfortunate reality is that tagging is not a mandatory part of the NPP process, which nowadays means it basically isn't part of the NPP process, especially when inline citations are generally not required. I clicked on three of these cup articles at random earlier, each of which was marked as patrolled by a different reviewer without any edits or tags. (I don't remember which articles they were but I'm sure you can replicate the experiment.) I think our best bet is to encourage editors like Huligan, as you have now done, to make specific improvements to their creation habits, but then to accept that NPP isn't serving any purpose here. Toadspike [Talk] 01:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Huligan0, could you please comment? Schwede66 03:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians, sorry, but I have only just noticed this conversation a couple of hours ago. In the meantime I have read your conversation and all the notes concerning autopatrolled. I notice some critic in this discussion and would, therefore, like to clear a fact or two before I start: I was born and breed on the south coast of England, attended school there and studied Business Studies in college there and completed my appenticeship there, so I am indeed a native English speaker, and yes I have lived in Switzerland for about 50 years, so perhaps my English does not always reach the highest level any more. However, further in the critic you state that I put refs in weird places. I do not understand this remark, please explain. To my feelings; my aim is (and been since 15 years) to improve the coverage of Swiss football in the English Wiki. I have writen all the FC Basel seasons, have added some 500 or 600 FC Basel players in this time. I have added all the Swiss 1. Liga seasons and modified all the Nationalliga seasons as well. I am now completing the Swiss Cup seasons. I have always added as many sources as possible and think I have done pretty well. But, I do not want to become an admin. No nothing like that. I am too old for that, how much longer may I live? I am pround to think that someone nominated me to become an autopatrolled editor. However, I would not be disappointed if this was not accepted. All I want to do is continue my project and improve the coverage of Swiss football in the English Wiki. If you have a suggestion or two on how I could improve my edits, then please let me know, any suggestion would be welcomed. I send you friendly greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Greetings from New Zealand to Basel. Thanks for your note, Huligan0. You asked for suggested improvements. Sticking with the example discussed here, i.e. the 1961–62 Swiss Cup, no article should have unreferenced paragraphs. The best improvement you could provide is to add references that confirm the prose that is currently unreferenced. Do you think you could do that? And keep doing that going forward?
To have written 500 to 600 bios is quite some achievement. Well done! Schwede66 05:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Kimikel

[edit]

Recommending Kimikel for autopatrolled. A little over the threshold with 27 articles created, but they are all clean, polished, notable, well-sourced -- and do not require the attention of patrollers. No deletions. Three GAs in the mix, which is where I first encountered this editor. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Bransonphan239&

[edit]

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Nickeldeon Bransonphan239& (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Iljhgtn

[edit]

There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

@Iljhgtn even though the permission gives you the technical ability to move categories, category moves should still go through WP:CFD/WP:CFDS. Do you have uses for the permission other than moving categories? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Sure, for helping draftify of new articles etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
The scripts: User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft and User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify both look like they would be particularly useful. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:FarmerUpbeat

[edit]

I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

@FarmerUpbeat have you requested any mass messages be sent out yet? It's generally expected you have a few successful requests at Wikipedia talk:Mass message senders#MassMessage Delivery Requests before requesting the permission yourself. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
@Elli I have :) Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
You've made one request two months ago, which was processed eleven minutes later. Sorry, I'm not seeing a convincing need for this yet, hence  Not done for now but would be more willing to grant if you make a few more requests and they are fulfilled. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:The Seal F1

[edit]

Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done — Wug·a·po·des 23:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Destinyokhiria

[edit]

Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done for now. You have been editing actively for a little over a month, and the limited number of reverts don't have helpful edit summaries. I'd suggest doing a bit more recent changes patrolling to establish more of a track record of responding to vandalism and other content issues. — Wug·a·po·des 00:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Chippla360

[edit]

Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 21:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
{{not done}} I appreciate your recent changes patrolling, but I think you should still get more experience. Femke said last time that you need to give user talk warnings after reverting vandalism, and this still is not happening consistently. I also checked some of your reverts and I think you could use more experience. For example, you made this revert saying it's "spammy" but the real issue seems to be WP:BLP vandalism, not spam. — Wug·a·po·des 00:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
@Wugapodes It’s been over a month, which is the requirements I met after my last decline, I had Minimal reverts as of then. I had to wait for a month. so I gained the experience already and I’m experienced, the checklist says there should be an explanation for reverting edits and I some warn editors also on there talk page , you can further check that, @User:The Seal F1 Has spent equal duration on the platform with me. Here Warning, I have others I’ve warned, I can’t possibly warn all the user I revert there edits on talk page, that should be very stressful. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
@Chippla360:  Done You're right that you've improved a lot. I checked more of your reverts and they are generally good even if you could be more specific and consistent in your edit summaries and warnings. As a note, you should be warning everyone, especially IPs, and using warning templates like {{uw-vandalism1}} for even simple reverts of potential vandalism. It's helpful for admins and other editors keeping track of issues. You can do this automatically with Twinkle. That aside, I think you'll do a fine job reviewing pending changes. Thanks for following up. — Wug·a·po·des 01:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User:SKAG123

[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done — Wug·a·po·des 00:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Lionel Cristiano

[edit]

Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Yovt

[edit]

Hello editors, I request permission to review pending changes to help out the community on pages needing the RPC verification; I want to verify good content on the platform and this is one part that I would really appreciate access to. I would be reviewing and approving edits per Wiki guidelines, and I have read all policies on vandalism, copyright, BLP, etc. thanks! 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 02:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Như Gây Mê

[edit]

Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki and here), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted Pending changes reviewer rights on enwiki to make it easier to anti-vandalism here (aside from rollback right). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 10:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:AllCatsAreGrey

[edit]

Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Fneskljvnl

[edit]

Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -‪Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Như Gây Mê

[edit]

Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Nahida

[edit]

Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[4]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
See above. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Faster than Thunder

[edit]

I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I have used a similar feature with Twinkle, but am prompted to add an edit summary. "Vandalism" doesn't require a summary, but only affects the most recent revision. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Effectively canvassing for your RfRollback in an ill-fated RfA nom that you then transcluded against policy does not speak well to your suitability. While that doesn't directly go to rollback-related policies, the main thing we worry about with rollback is people rushing into things without understanding what's going on, and this sure seems like that. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 07:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I was going to say much the same thing. FTT seems to be rushing things already; we don't need to enable them to go even faster. I'm also unimpressed with the lack of acknowledging recent errors, and worry that there will be a similar lack of concern if they roll something back with no edit summary incorrectly. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per concerns expressed above. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Destinyokhiria

[edit]

Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Too little recent anti-vandalism work. Spend some time patrolling vandalism with Twinkle first (Twinkle rollback doesn't require this permission despite the name), and only then request rollback. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Fade258

[edit]

Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Rahmatula786

[edit]

Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by ToBeFree (expires 17:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

User:ExplorerofSpace

[edit]

I am request this right because lately, there has been a lot of vandalism during the evening to night hours. I could not revert all of it because I had to click the article, go to view history, and undo. With this, I could much more easily revert vandalism. Please note that my account is pretty new, but I had an account before with around 1 year experience; that account was when I lived in Chicago, the reason I cannot access the account is because I forgot the username and password (it was a created a while ago). Thank you for your consideration of this request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Do you administrators see this? ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Permission requests appear to be currently backlogged. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Yes, administrators have seen this. I'm not confident enough to grant rollback myself so am letting another admin handle, but I assure you this request isn't lost. And it's only been 3 days - patience is a virtue. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Skratata69

[edit]

Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JesusisGreat7

[edit]

I would like to request rollback rights for my account in order to prevent pages from vandalism etc, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6][7]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lazulilasher/toolbox&oldid=710992831"