Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Upgrade to extended-confirmed protection until July 6th, when leaked trade to the Phoenix Suns can be confirmed official or not. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. HolyArtThou (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: An administrator of a website associated with this community (LessWrong) posted about the article on the website, calling some passages "inane", accusing editors of editing despite being topic banned, and encouraged his followers to edit the article (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EQJfdqSaMcJyR5k73/#bfzEHGiiNtnRerujL). Since then the article has seen several SPAs show up making disruptive edits that need to be reverted, wasting editors' time. Some diffs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297131380&oldid=1297113741 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297056458&oldid=1297033565 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1296762013&oldid=1296528241 Eigenbra (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced attendance figures by various IP ranges and newly registered accounts. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism 2605:59C0:204E:FB08:719A:45D4:99CF:F4FD (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – UPE(I think would be the appropriate term here?) bouncing between account and IPs. See article talk page as well as Wikipedia:Help desk#Change of page. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user/s repeatedly disrupting the page. Greenman (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Highly visible page. per it being a highly-visible page and per WP:ARBPIA. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Misinformation vandalism 185.84.70.222 (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: History of the team with a fa cup 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continuous since last protection expired. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor: No recent vandalism since 22 June. Will re-request if it resumes. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:06, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors. QalasQalas (talk) 22:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Medium level of IP disruption. PawPatroler (talk) 02:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Correct me if I'm wrong, but not only do I not see any pressing IP disruption on either the target or its talk page, I only see five edits total across both over the past month. Departure– (talk) 02:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Today Axiom Mission 4 is going to launch and the mission is going to take place for 2 weeks minimum. Already the page of the astronaut is having 70,000 views[1] and going to increase more. Also it is speculated that some ip vandal edits is going to happen. So I want to request Semi-Protection for at least 3 weeks so that the page remains unaffected. Ghosted Editor (talk) 03:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion by LTA who games permissions by spam editing in their sandbox to bypass the extended confirmed protection level already in effect. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 04:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Redirect overwrites resumed after last protection expired, now presumed to be the work of IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yishun NCS. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (very similar to that experienced on the 2025 New York City mayoral election article). — Jamie Eilat (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit-warring / content dispute. Left guide (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Subject is now deceased, temporary protection needed. 174.91.6.13 (talk) 06:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for a few weeks to a month due to a recent spike in IP vandalism, likely because of the 2025 film's release. Yue🌙 06:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Is there any reason why the average editor would need to edit this? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Presumably the IP intends to nominate this and the below for deletion based on their other edits. But that doesn't require an unprotection; they can just request that the TfD tag be added using {{edit template-protected}}. However, what makes you think
Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}
? Do you have any actual evidence of this, or are you just guessing? * Pppery * it has begun... 05:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)- quarry:query/94896 shows that it hasn't been used in block logs. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- According to quarry:query/94896, there is a single block from 2021 that did use it, but I'm not sure that that is a good reason for protection if the block has already expired. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This was indef-semied via this request by Daniel Case (his talk page is also protected, hence asking here first). This was probably inappropriate; the report said "repeated IP vandalism over the last 6 months", but there were a mere 2 vandalism edits over that time frame, both on the same day by the same IP. I don't see anything here that ever really rose to protection being needed. Thanks in advance. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: I'm going to leave this to you. Perhaps indefinite pending changes would be fine, but I would also be fine with leaving it unchanged. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the war ended. I would like to edit or suggest an edit that someone could make. I would like to suggest to change the title of the war from "Iran-Israel War" to "The Twelve Day War." Firstly, at least for now, the war has effectively ended. Secondly, the term 12 days' war was coined by President Trump, and President Trump played a big rule in ending the conflict in striking Iranian nuclear facilities and in initiating the eace process by calling for a ceasefire. Therefore, in respect for President Trump, who effectively ended the war, I suggest we change the name of the conflict to the Twelve Day War. PerryHoffmandeism (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- @PerryHoffmandeism: The protection is due to an Arbitration remedy and must be appealed to ArbCom directly. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:13, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. Even if the page will be protected, what do you think of my suggestion to change the page title from Iran-Israel War to the 12 Day War? Considering that the war is no longer limited to just Israel and Iran, and given Trump's success to end th conflict, I think we should allow him the luxury of coining the name for the war, as the 12 Day War. If I cannot edit that, do you want to edit it or pass it along for someone to consider editing it to that name, in respect for the man who ended it? The war only lasted 12 days after all.
- Perry PerryHoffmandeism (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- This page is not the proper venue for a move discussion, and I refuse to involve myself in content decisions in the PIA area. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- This page is not the proper venue for a move discussion, and I refuse to involve myself in content decisions in the PIA area. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
On hold: Hello, Pkk123477. Your edit request has been restored here as we need further input on this, as initially requested by Behappyyar. Would you be willing to post the sources that you have so that they can be reviewed and used to update the article? --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
The join date of the US should be changed to 21 June, the strike Bombers took off from the US right after midnight Eastern Daylight Time on 21 June which would be 21 June 07:30 AM Iran time 2603:300B:E4D:8000:F08A:B088:141E:465F (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Add JD Vance and Marco Rubio to american leaders 2600:387:F:560E:0:0:0:2E (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
The title has been blocked to read this when it should be Mulanthuruthy Marthoman Syrian Church. This needs to be fixed. JvathBdan (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JvathBdan: Start a requested-move discussion on the talk page, making sure to provide sources that can support the name. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
The statement that : "9,000+ Israeli civilians displaced" and "8,000+ Israeli civilians homeless" at the bottom of the "Casualties and losses" panel is misinformation by omission. Civilian infrastructure was also destroyed in Iran (example https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/shock-fear-in-tehran-after-israel-bombs-residential-military-areas) and I think we should either remove the statement about Israeli civilians, or add one for Iranian civilians in case any estimate exists. Otherwise it makes it sound only Iran targeted civilian infrastructure. Chalchiutlicue (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
In the casualties and losses column. There should be civilian losses and casualties specified for Palestine the same as it is for Israel 1.121.196.162 (talk) 05:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.