User talk:Wq4m820

Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Amplifyplantz33. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Raskuly (talk) 07:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no conflict of interest.

I have no conflict of interest nor am I Antonopoulos. Proceed normal operations. Amplifyplantz33 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the time to "proceed normal operations". Why are you so interested in writing about Antonopoulos specifically? He is arguably one of the least notable Fort Lauderdale Strikers players without an article. It would seem more likely to write about his teammates Jorge Valenzuela and Mario Jimenez who seem to have been on the team at the same time as him, played the same position, and made many more appearances. Raskuly (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback on the Chris Antonopoulos article. While I value constructive criticism, I must express concern about the tone of your message, which seems inconsistent with Wikipedia's guidelines on civility and respectful communication (as outlined in Wikipedia:Civility).

Your message included a subjective comparison of Antonopoulos' notability with other players, which, while potentially helpful in identifying future topics, does not directly address whether this article meets Wikipedia's notability standards. I believe this is a misapplication of Wikipedia’s guidelines, as notability is assessed based on reliable, independent sources covering the subject, not on relative comparisons to others.

I have taken care to ensure that the article adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines, including the use of multiple reliable sources and maintaining a neutral point of view. If there are specific issues with the article that you believe do not meet these standards, I welcome your input and will work to address them appropriately.

I also plan to write about other notable figures, including Antonopoulos’ teammates, as applicable in the future. However, the focus on Antonopoulos at this time reflects his contributions to beach soccer and American soccer development. Amplifyplantz33 (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not acting uncivil and this response is a bit of a whiplash to me. I also did not say that Antonopoulos did not meet notability, in fact, I said the opposite. I mentioned Valenzuela and Jimenez as your focus on Antonopoulos in lieu of players like them appears very odd. I certainly look forward to you writing about other Strikers players than just Antonopoulos. Raskuly (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North American Sand Soccer Championships moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to North American Sand Soccer Championships. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 22:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Chris Antonopoulos (soccer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chris Antonopoulos (soccer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Chris Antonopoulos (soccer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chris Antonopoulos (soccer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Antonopoulos (soccer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Lauderdale Strikers. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Amplifyplantz33. Thank you for your work on Chris Antonopoulos (soccer). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. To solidify, IMO it needs a an independent source or two that covers him in depth. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|North8000}} Thank you for reviewing the article! I appreciate the feedback and will work on adding more independent sources that cover Chris Antonopoulos in depth. If you have any suggestions for sources or specific areas to focus on, I’d be happy to hear them. Thanks again! Amplifyplantz33 (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

redundant with Chris Antonopoulos (goalkeeper)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gjs238 (talk) 17:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perry Mansfield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perry Mansfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Mansfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wq4m820. Thank you for your work on Erich Kuhnke. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wq4m820. Thank you for your work on Fredo Dilbert. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erich Kuhnke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erich Kuhnke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Kuhnke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 11:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Alalch E.. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Deletion review seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Alalch E. 02:00, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Asilvering. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. asilvering (talk) 05:24, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to The Paradox (band), even if you intend to fix them later. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Many of the references you have used appear to be halluncinations; the URLS and ISBNs do not lead to the content related to the subject of the article. I suggest you put your articles through AfC but if you choose to publish articles directly, please make sure to check the references. JSFarman (talk) 21:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I understand the concerns regarding the use of large language model (LLM)-generated content, particularly around verifiability and notability. Going forward, I will refrain from publishing any content generated with AI tools unless I can fully verify the information and sources. I appreciate the guidance and will make use of my sandbox and the Articles for Creation process unless I'm fully confident the content meets Wikipedia's standards before placing it in the main space. Wq4m820 (talk) 21:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ldm1954. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There are 30 one-edit articles almost all of which have AI hallucinations, and few of which pass notability. Too many of these have been moved to draft or nominated for deletion . We are all volunteers, you are making work for others. Please stop using a LLM code. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Steven D. Roper, you may be blocked from editing. Please respond to this message. You have not responded to the other four messages this month about your LLM-generated articles, which have significant problems of notability and verifiability, both of which are core Wikipedia policies. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually every source you used on Steven Roper was hallucinated or fabricated. He is notable under WP:NAUTHOR but we cannot have fake sources, especially for WP:BLPs. Please stop' creating articles using AI tools. And please put your articles through WP:AFC so that you minimize the cleanup for other volunteers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize to the Wikipedia community, inlcuding to Ldm1954 and Dclemens1971, for using AI-generated content without proper verification and for my delayed response. I now fully understand the importance of verifiability and source reliability, particularly in biographical articles. My reliance on AI without sufficient fact-checking was a mistake, and I take full responsibility. It was never my intent to burden volunteers or compromise article quality. Going forward, I will not use AI tools for Wikipedia contributions and will follow proper sourcing and the AfC process when appropriate/public domain. Please take whatever actions are needed regarding the articles in question. I respect the community’s judgment and deeply regret the disruption caused. Wq4m820 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was this apology AI-generated? (Just kidding. Glad you came around.) Rift (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wq4, thanks for acknowledging the problems and stopping with article creation for the moment. I also appreciate that you are removing fake citations and adding real ones. In order to help minimize volunteer time on cleanup, would you consider draftifying any remaining articles where you used AI to generate sources? This will give you time to work on improving the articles without having them nominated for deletion. (You can use the "move" feature under "page" at the top, then select "draft" as the name space for the article.) Please don't draftify any articles where there's already a deletion discussion going on, though. Just a thought that will give you more time and help the other volunteers on the project. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wq4m820. Thank you for your work on Luis Montañez (beach soccer). Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I am marking it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 00:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Marcus Strokes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marcus Strokes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 15 § Marcus Strokes until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Farberoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Thomas University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Paradox (American band)

Hello Wq4m820, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Paradox (American band), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Paradox (American band).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mekomo}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mekomo (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard D. Myles, Sr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard D. Myles, Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard D. Myles, Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI - honorifics and infobox content

Hi Wq4m820. Wikipedia doesn't use honorifics (such as Dr. or Judge) in article titles or in the body of articles. If you use the visual editor, the infobox fields have specific information that guide content. (For example, name is for common name, not full name, and spouses are named only if notable.) Give the manual of style a read for more details. JSFarman (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wq4m820. Thank you for your work on Orlando Rivero. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

With an h-factor of 6 he is far from passing WP:NPROF.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando Rivero moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Orlando Rivero. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and far from passing the notability requirements for academics.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Brooks (biologist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Randy Brooks (biologist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and many of the sources are broken. Even if they were OK, he would not pass notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Randy Brooks (biologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Randy Brooks (biologist). Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Harold F. Pryor

Hello Wq4m820, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Harold F. Pryor, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold F. Pryor.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bryan Greenlee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Greenlee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Greenlee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:32, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apor Györgydeák for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apor Györgydeák is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apor Györgydeák until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael D. Martinez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael D. Martinez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael D. Martinez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Clarke (footgolf) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Clarke (footgolf) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Clarke (footgolf) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard S. Conley moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Richard S. Conley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and it has multiple hallucinated/fabricated citations and should not be in mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Chavez (beach soccer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Antonio Chavez (beach soccer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and it has multiple fabricated/hallucinated citations that need to fixed and verified before this comes back to mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Stokes (football) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Marcus Stokes (football). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it consists of machine-generated text and most of sources are nonexistent and appear to be hallucinated or fabricated; unacceptable generally but especially in a mainspace BLP. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Football League moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Minor Football League. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and multiple sources are nonexistent links and appear to have been hallucinated/fabricated by an LLM. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Somerset Academy Canyons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Somerset Academy Canyons, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somerset Academy Canyons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Atkins

The article Sean Atkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of many articles created by Wq4m820 that consists only of LLM slop with fake sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florida Atlantic Owls Hockey Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florida Atlantic Owls Hockey Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Atlantic Owls Hockey Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 03:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oscar Gil (soccer, born 1983) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oscar Gil (soccer, born 1983) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Gil (soccer, born 1983) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 04:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Carry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Carry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Carry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 04:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERCITE

Hey Wq4m820. Thank you for adding real sources to your articles. However, you should be aiming to find one source that verifies an entire sentence, instead of adding four or five sources to a single sentence. The overciting really clutters the articles, especially in editing mode. Plus, it’s easier to verify a sentence with one source than having to look through four or five to verify the information. Cheers, JTtheOG (talk) 00:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, JT! I’ll keep an eye on that and aim to streamline the sourcing a bit more moving forward/on what I have done. Appreciate the note. Wq4m820 (talk) 00:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Wq4m820 (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]