User talk:Ssmn20

This is Ssmn20's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enrico Labriola (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enrico Labriola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssmn20! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Gregory Andrews, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. R0paire 12:48, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well noted, Will mention valid reason while editing Ssmn20 (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajikumar Sreedharan (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sajikumar Sreedharan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standard cryptocurrency/blockchain notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

David Gerard (talk) 07:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleksandar Trajkovski (April 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Alalch E. were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This page is a consequence of long-term cross-wiki LTA. The title (i.e. the topic) is title-blacklisted both locally (Special:Diff/1236060562; discussion) and globally (meta:Special:Diff/27848697/27870275; discussion) as targeted by spammers (including the autobiographer and the globally locked socks), and this draft is also fundamentally spam, even though it was created by a disclosed paid editor (disclosing is a positive, but that does not automatically make the product not-spam), and somewhat cleaned up by a patrolling administrator (albeit the edit summaries are telling: rmv non-WP:RS : paid placement / advertorial and rmv non-WP:RS : user generated material / open content platform).

The page was created at the WP:GAMEd name Draft:Dr. Aleksandar (Poet) designed to circumvent the blacklist, which is a sign that the interested party is adapting their strategy and still trying to make it so that the article is published on the English Wikipedia, and probably also other language editions

—Alalch E. 22:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You must not participate in WP:GAME efforts. I think that you are innocent because, probably, the client told you to use the (unnatural and unlikely) title "Dr. Aleksandar (Poet)", and this was probably not your idea. However, it is still your responsibility to undertake a modicum of due diligence before attempting to satisfy a client's order so as not to become entangled with others' harmful efforts. Some clients are recognized bad actors, and actions taken on their behalf are not going to be taken well. You can be a paid editor, but you still need to exercise independent judgement. Sincerely —Alalch E. 22:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ekramy el Zhagat moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ekramy el Zhagat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because does not satisfy sourcing requirements for biographies of living persons (WP:BLP). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Alalch E. 22:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well Noted Ssmn20 (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregg Masuak (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregg Masuak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosures needed

Please ensure you add your paid editing disclosures for Draft:Isabelle Freidheim.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the required disclosures for this article have not yet been posted to your user page; please do so prior to making further edits.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Isabelle Freidheim has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Isabelle Freidheim. Thanks! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Freidheim (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These sources do not appear to be real. Please double-check them and ensure that the information in the draft can be verified by the sources provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Freidheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horacio Gennari (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horacio Gennari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]