User talk:Somajyoti

Start a new discussion thread

This is Somajyoti's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Somajyoti! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Adakiko (talk) 04:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Document camera, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 04:19, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the article to its previous version, where there are many paragraphs without sources. I did not add anything new. Rather, I removed some extra text that actually does not need to be in this article. Somajyoti (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nitish Chandra Debnath (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nitish Chandra Debnath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cinder painter (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Somajyoti! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cinder painter (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nitish Chandra Debnath has been accepted

Nitish Chandra Debnath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekti na bola golpo (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not pass WP:NFILM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ekti na bola golpo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 15:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rong Dhong (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rong Dhong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 15:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftified article

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Xenocycloheptatrisulfurane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Xenocycloheptatrisulfurane where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to find any direct references to xenocycloheptatrisulfurane (hypothetical) Somajyoti (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then it absolutely does not deserve an article on Wikipedia. See our WP:OR and WP:V policies. DMacks (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swarochish Sarkar has been accepted

Swarochish Sarkar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Expecting reliable sources written about Wikipedia articles doesn't make sense

You recently closed an edit request about a discrepancy in an article. The body is sourced, but the lead didn't match. You closed it asking for a reliable source. Who do you think writes books about Wikipedia articles? Or do you mean you want to put sources in the lead, instead of using the sources in the body? You should stay away from edit requests until you are more familiar with policy. 107.116.165.135 (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see another edit request you denied because you didn't understand what the user was asking for. They provided sources, but it was you who didn't understand. You should probably undo that. 107.116.165.135 (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:107.116.165.135 - Wikipedia:NOBITING

A quote from above, "Wikipedia is improved through the work of both regular editors and newcomers. All of us were new editors once, and in some areas, even the most experienced are still newcomers. Treat newcomers with kindness and patience—nothing scares valuable contributors away faster than hostility.

Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was not clear what changes you wanted to be made. The precise changes must be mentioned in a "change X to Y" format, and if applicable, a reliable source must be cited.

You also can use the textdiff template.

SMYTI (tk|CNTBTN)

09:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Hello, I'm GrabUp. I noticed that you recently removed content from Republic Bangla without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 08:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some information from Republic Bangla because they were not properly sourced. Instead, I have written a summary of the previous disorganized texts with sources from a reliable newspaper link. I have mentioned this in the edit summary. Thanks! Somajyoti ✉ 09:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 01:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Student abuse at Islamic University, Kushtia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not be putting this in article space. It is clearly not ready for it. Drmies (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Pls clarify. Somajyoti ✉ 03:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not ready for main space. It is a huge swath of unverified text. It is not ready. Drmies (talk) 03:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
78	Naogaon District (talk)	Add sources
11	Bangali River (talk)	Add sources
60	Manikganj District (talk)	Add sources
65	Madaripur District (talk)	Add sources
121	Barisal Division (talk)	Add sources
57	Timeline of Bangladeshi history (talk)	Add sources
35	Mohibul Hasan Chowdhury (talk)	Cleanup
2,060	Shakib Khan (talk)	Cleanup
5	Ulania Union (talk)	Cleanup
150	Padma River (talk)	Expand
362	Non-cooperation movement (2024) (talk)	Expand
20	Tungiparar Miya Bhai (talk)	Expand
7	Umapati Dhara (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
84	Culture of West Bengal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
43	Music of West Bengal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7	Sebastian Haion (talk)	Merge
99	Malaysian diaspora (talk)	Merge
231	Invented tradition (talk)	Merge
839	Durga Puja (talk)	Wikify
207	Discrimination against atheists (talk)	Wikify
6	Dandabhukti (talk)	Wikify
3	Shiva temple of stone (talk)	Orphan
12	Emmanuelle Mattana (talk)	Orphan
4	Adama Dramé (talk)	Orphan
13	Gournadi Upazila (talk)	Stub
3	Chandana River (talk)	Stub
6	Baral River (talk)	Stub
5	Bhodra River (talk)	Stub
30	My TV (Bangladeshi TV channel) (talk)	Stub
11	Chhagalnaiya (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Somajyoti! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 09:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:École nationale supérieure des beaux-arts alumni

A tag has been placed on Category:École nationale supérieure des beaux-arts alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick Hawdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Five-Year Plans of Bangladesh

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Five-Year Plans of Bangladesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AC Method moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to AC Method. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TarnishedPath^talk 03:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide proper attribution when translating

It seems you translated many article from Bengali Wikipedia without giving proper attribution (26 articles so far). Please provide proper attribution including a link to Bengali Wikipedia's article in edit summary or use {{Translated page}} on article's talk page. This is a must, see WP:TFOLWP. Thank you. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks. Somajyoti ✉ 15:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly add the interwiki link as well. See Help:Interlanguage_links#Adding_a_new_link for instructions on how to do it, or this Bangla Tutorial. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But sometimes Waikidata pages are not created for certain articles. Somajyoti ✉ 15:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Rokomari.com website screenshot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Rokomari.com website screenshot.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Nitish Chandra Debnath.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nitish Chandra Debnath.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request parameter

Hello, I'm twisted!

I wanted to let you know that you recently responded at Talk:Javanshir (clan) but forgot to set the edit request to answered. I've already set it as answered but, please remember to change the |answered=no or |ans=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category.

I see you use editProtectedHelper, when making a response, there is a blue "Respond" button. When you click on it, and choose you response template along with any additional messages, there should be a "Answered" tick-box.

Happy editing! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 00:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. Somajyoti ✉ 04:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rokomari.com website screenshot.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rokomari.com website screenshot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AC method

A standalone article for "AC method" looks like a hard sell. I suggest you add it as a section on quadratic equation, where several methods of solving them are discussed. Certainly enough sources to justify the add, IMO. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Quad (April 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Literally a copy of Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. This is not the venue to request page moves.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 15:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I had no idea. Somajyoti ✉ 15:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek J. Grossman (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derek J. Grossman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Hey, thanks for participating in AfDs. Articles for Deletion is a very weird place where you run into all kinds of articles and editors, who are trying their brst to either delete the article or to keep it. There are various policies and guidelines we follow there to establish the notability of the article and then to keep it or delete it.
Though not an admin, I'm active in the region, relisting and trying to determine the consensus of the discussion. I have seen you around and would love to offer a piece of friendly advice.
Please go through Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and Wikipedia:Arguments to make in deletion discussions to get the gist of !voting there. Also, we have multiple venues to delete an article, such as speedy deletion, proposed deletion, and the king, AfD. There are others too, but these are the major ones for articles in general. So pick the battle you want to indulge in and discuss accordingly.
You are doing a good job and I hope you'll learn more and learn better. Thanks and happy editing. — Benison (Beni · talk) 11:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for mentioning the two articles on the deletion policy. I had never read those pages before. I will skim through them. Somajyoti ✉ 13:09, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, read WP:Three and WP:AfD. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BangladeshiEditorInSylhet User:RoySmith/Three best sources and WP:AfD have already been seen and I am well aware of this. Somajyoti ✉ 17:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of 2018 Bengali teacher recruitment movement

The article 2018 Bengali teacher recruitment movement has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

Please update your date format when adding references to your pages, and also fix it when you have time, i tried to fix the date format on United States sanctions on Bangladesh but it took way too much time and only a fraction was fixed, instead of writing "2025-04-18", use the Day/Month/Year or Month/Day/Year format like "18 April 2025" or "April 18, 2025". BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2017 textbooks criticism

The article 2017 textbooks criticism has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nihar Ranjan Gupta's house has been accepted

Nihar Ranjan Gupta's house, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input on Ryan Holiday article

Hello! There's an ongoing discussion about neutrality, tone, and sourcing on the Ryan Holiday article involving editors me and Vegantics. Given your experience with biographies and Wikipedia guidelines, your perspective would be valuable. If you have a moment, please share your thoughts here. Thanks in advance for your help! IndyNotes (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Somajyoti. Thank you for your work on Arial Khan River. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

News and notes: India cut off from Wiki money; WMF annual plan and Wikimedia programs seek comment

In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status

Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia

Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom

Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions

Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man

Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media

News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan

Humour: Crisis erupts as furious admins, functionaries complain about crappy t-shirts

Comix: By territory

In focus: Using AI on the Russian Wikipedia: opportunities or challenges?

Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia

Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing

Gallery: Meet the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024

Obituary: JarrahTree, JohnClarknew and Yashthepunisher

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017 textbooks criticism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 textbooks criticism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 textbooks criticism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.