User talk:Kvng/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Question from Uboent (22:30, 5 March 2025)

Hello, I am working on a Wiki page for a visual artist, journalist and photographer and am having a tough time getting the citations in correctly. How can I do this? --Uboent (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

@Uboent, I assume were talking about Draft:Stephanie Taylor. Looks like you've correctly formatted the footnotes. I have adjusted so that they appear in the References section. You'll want to move individual references from the top to the end of the sentence or paragraph each supports. See WP:INLINE for general information about placement. Let me know if you need further assistance with placement. The other stuff already in the References section could use a little cleanup but that's a lesser concern. ~Kvng (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@KvngI added published works by Stephanie Taylor. I may have some more links to add later, I am going through all of my notes tomorrow to see what is left. I am curious if I should also add the other writings or reporting about public works and published works by Stephanie Taylor as well as my independent sources that were already added into the article here but that you had moved into the article itself. - Cheers, Aaris @Uboent Uboent (talk) 02:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

@Uboent, it looks like User:Kuru has been making improvements. You definitely should be concentrating on independent sources because that's what WP:AFC reviewers will be focusing on. It is often acceptable to include a bibliography of works by the subject but this does not typically help establish notability of the subject (notability is the primary criteria for inclusion of your article draft into the encyclopedia) and such a list is sometimes seen as WP:PROMOTIONAL. ~Kvng (talk) 14:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello @kvng,

I can not find all of the Published works that were added the last few days. Please let me know where they are. I did have two-three independent sources, should I share them here with you or add them in and let me know if they are independent or not? I previously did and you moved those somewhere as well.

- Aaris Uboent (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

@Uboent, they were removed by User:Kuru. They are still in the article history and you can restore them. Let me know if you need help with this. ~Kvng (talk) 18:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Okay,

Yea, I don't know where they are, so that woold be helpful. Why wouldn't I list resources under resources though?

I also need to add this artist's artwork and will need help with that but this job is taking a long time and my employer needs to have me wrap it up. I did find 2-3 independent sources that are in here somewhere and were also on that list that was moved or removed. One was from the Sacramento Library, California State University of Sacramento and Sacramento Railroad Museum. Those would work if they were independently created and are not a media or press source, correct? Uboent (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Click here for article history. The removal was here. This edit by Kuru deletes the list and also improves some malformed links. Restoring the list while retaining the link fixes will require some manual work. I'm happy to help you with this if restoring the list is what we want to do.

As I said above, I suspect that Kuru saw a WP:PROMOTIONAL concern with the list. Their edit summary was c.e, rmv open wiki ref, rmv amazon links, rmv unnecessary directory of every article written The best thing to do is start a discussion with them about this and the other list you say you intend to add on the draft's talk page.

Sources associated with a museum where the artist has shown their work are not necessarily WP:INDEPENDENT because these institutions have a stake in how the show and the work is presented. ~Kvng (talk) 14:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

It is just so hard to find the independent sources as this is an artist who doubles in the press as a journalist, illustrator and photographer. Any ideas? Yes, if you can reverse that and help me organize the list better, that will work. Not sure about an Amazon link, unless her works were mentioned in a book? Maybe there is a different link but books are for sale and not available to read for free online so how would I independently source it? 2605:59C0:209D:3B10:5E0:B60F:6CB5:BF25 (talk) 23:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@kvingthat last message from 2605:59C0:209D:3B10:5E0:B60F:6CB5:BF25 was from me, I forgot to login. Uboent (talk) 23:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The last message from 2605:59C0:209D:3B10:5E0:B60F:6CB5:BF25 was from me, I forgot to login. Uboent (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@kving I tried to remove the changes and it wouldn't let me and said it had to be done manually? Uboent (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@Uboent unfortunately, if independent sources are not available, it doesn't make much sense for either of us to pursue this further, see WP:OVERCOME. ~Kvng (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Question from Docto pilot (22:18, 25 March 2025)

Hello, please advise how to proceed. I recently discovered the following link, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoelmans_Eiland_Airstrip?utm_source=chatgpt.com that mentions and aircraft accident with a Cessna 337 PZ-PAS at this airstrip. I am the pilot of that accident and like to state that the accident took place at Washabo near the Corantijn river in western Suriname (Stoelman's eiland is at the eastern frontier). I propose the following text: "On 23 August 1974 a Cessna 337E Super Skymaster, registered PZ-PAS, from the Pater Albrinck Stichting took off at Washabo missionary airstrip near the Corantijn river in West Suriname (Stoelman's eiland is on the Marowijne at the Eastern frontier of Suriname). There were thunderstorm conditions and the aircraft experienced a strong downdraft just after getting airborne. A landing was made but the aircraft overshot the end of the runway into a soft patch that broke off the nose wheel and bent the front propeller. The four passengers and the pilot F. Siem Tjam were not hurt". My interest is only to set the record straight. Please advise how to proceed. --Docto pilot (talk) 22:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@Docto pilot, I have removed the information about this incident from the page. There was no citation provide there and you have also provided only firsthand information which does not Wikipedia sourcing standards. I don't see any entries in the safety database that would help support any of the information I have removed. I hope this is an acceptable remedy. ~Kvng (talk) 21:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Request from AwkoTaco19 (06:31, 18 March 2025)

Ronald Prent was on the Professional sound project page, requested articles to create. I created it, and within less than 24 hours User:Frank Ken moved it to draft without explaining what was wrong. I added one not-so-signifcant line and asked him to move it back, and he told me to move it back. I saw the previous discussion on his talk page was an editor telling him that he was moving a page too quickly into draft, so I asked that editor to look at the page, and this editor admittedly is not familiar with music and award requirements for notability. She is tagging grammy.com as a primary source not in his name, when it should make the subject notable, and in fact, it is in his name. Do you think you can take a look at this page and help? Thank you! AwkoTaco19 (talk) 06:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @AwkoTaco19, sorry if this is frustrating. We can promptly move it back to mainspace for you per WP:DRAFTOBJECT but the editors that have raised questions (Frank Ken and Significa liberdade) may then just nominate it for deletion and I'm not sure you want to go through that. I would suggest you leave it in draft and spend some time trying to address their notability concerns. It appears the Grammy nomination is for NMUSIC not Ronald Prent so I'm not sure this meets WP:MUSICBIO #8. Do we have multiple independent sources to establish notability? I can have a closer look at the draft itself once you reply. ~Kvng (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, @AwkoTaco19! I want to clarify what I stated to you on Frank Ken's talk page. If I had not seen the Grammy nomination, I would have informed you that notability has not been established. However, because of the Grammy nomination, I think he may be, though I admitted I am less clear about what constitutes being the "direct recipient of a nomination in their own name" per WP:NMUSIC. Personally, I would be wary about nominating for deletion because I am less familiar with that specific criterion. However, I provided much more feedback to you in hopes of showing how you could improve the article. I apologize if any of that was unclear. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, comments, and/or concerns about this draft, and I'd be happy to help in what ways I can. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Kvng, @Significa liberdade, no worries! Thank you both for taking the time to improve the article rather than just nominate it for deletion. I've added a few more citations (LATimes, Variety, Billboard, etc.) verifying Prent's Grammy nomination and his work at Galaxy Studios with Darcy Proper, and took off the respective tags. I'll continue to work on the page, but let me know if there's anything in particular you think I should improve. Best, AwkoTaco19 (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@AwkoTaco19, as an AfC reviewer, I find the best way to get articles improved is to get them into mainspace. What stands in the way of doing the move? ~Kvng (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Kvng, User:Ipigott has moved the page into mainspace. As I believe you are in the Professional sound production project page, would you be able to take a look at the citations for Ronald Prent? I don't see how mixonline.com is not a secondary eliable source for verifying a fact, rather than notability. Similarly, wouldn't AES be a reliable, secondary source to verify Prent speaking at it? I’ve added Grammy, billboard, and variety to verify his Grammy nomination but I don't think there's a better source than AES to verify his affiliation with them. Best, AwkoTaco19 (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@AwkoTaco19, thanks for putting this together and congratulations. Mix is usually considered a reliable source for this topic area. AES is a primary source when announcing their own events. But primary sources are often acceptable in situations like this, see WP:PRIMARY. Significa liberdade has assessed your sources and I agree with some but not all of their criticisms. WP:SIGCOV is required from sources for the purposes of establishing notability but not necessarily for verification. ~Kvng (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I want to add that my concerns about SIGCOV were separate to concerns regarding verification. I was specifically concerned about failed verification in situations where a source listed did not include information stated in the sentence. For example, the source titled "Now there's an alternative to the world's ultimate analogue music console..." follows a sentence stating that Prent met Proper while working at Galaxy Studio in Belgium. However, that source doesn't mention Proper. As such, the source fails to verify the information in the sentence. In my initial assessment, I reviewed each of the sources and provided in-line commentary and tagging for clarity. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question from Comsats777 (08:08, 31 March 2025)

Is i can delete expire links from the articles? --Comsats777 (talk) 08:08, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Waiting. Comsats777 (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) People have real lives too y’know… Danners430 (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Comsats777, I'm not sure what you mean by expire links. I'm going to guess you're asking about link rot. No, we don't want to summarily delete those. ~Kvng (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Bear1909 on Nankai Trough (10:32, 31 March 2025)

Hello. I made a minor edit correcting Japanese language on an article, but it doesn't show up in the 'Summary' list. Is it automatic? --Bear1909 (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

@Bear1909, I assume you're referring to this edit. Can you clarify what you mean by summary list? ~Kvng (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anderson Bridge (Singapore) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

help in expanding a stub

Hello,

I'm currently working on expanding a stub article about a company I’m familiar with from my hometown. I’ve drafted a revised version in my sandbox and would appreciate any feedback you may have. I'm a student and learning as I go, so your input would be really helpful in making sure the draft meets Wikipedia's standards.

Thanks in advance! MrMacmur (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

@MrMacmur, thanks for the contribution. There is a WP:PROMOTIONAL tone in this new material that is not present in the stub. I would delete the Concept section since it is promotional and unsourced. The Future developments section is very marginal material due to WP:CRYSTAL. The content here also part of the promotional problem. ~Kvng (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, this is really helpful. I’m still getting accustomed to Wikipedia’s rules and learning as I go. I’ve rewritten the article based on your feedback, including removing the promotional tone and trimming speculative content. Once I finish improving this one, I’d like to work on expanding other stubs as well—and I’ll be sure to check in for guidance as I go. Is it better now?

Thanks again for taking the time to review it. MrMacmur (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Greader34 (17:58, 2 April 2025)

Hi how do I do organized research on Wiki? --Greader34 (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@Greader34, we generally discourage doing research here. Sounds crazy I know. See WP:OR for details. ~Kvng (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

where do you recommend doing research? Greader34 (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

You might consider checking out Wikiversity! Tule-hog (talk) 21:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

XT

Hey Kvng! Noticed after-the-fact that I re-added an acronym you previously removed - it is listed at XT, but thought I'd give a heads-up in case it seems undue. Tule-hog (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks for letting me know ~Kvng (talk) 22:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nonmetal on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Alicia Ponce Valencia (16:44, 7 April 2025)

Hola qué tal, cómo puedo introducir una palabra y si definición?? --Alicia Ponce Valencia (talk) 16:44, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Hola Alicia Ponce Valencia, Wiktionary ~Kvng (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from WhitegirlwastedDa1 (16:09, 9 April 2025)

Hello! I am trying to write an autobiography for my music, I create music under the alias "whitegirlwasted" and have a few songs close to 100,000 in less then a year, im hoping to grow and wanted to get my name on here. ill work hard to make sure i have citations and stuff, any help would be great --WhitegirlwastedDa1 (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

@WhitegirlwastedDa1 @User: Astrogichingajmn ":" Your creativity, passions and desires multiplies with infinite supply store app for the universal energy and provisions of intellectual tools for the next level racing: with the manifestation energy of the Earth's cosmic benefits. Astrogichingajmn (talk) 21:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

@WhitegirlwastedDa1, that's a very bad idea. See WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY ~Kvng (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from SophiaSMaria (19:30, 11 April 2025)

Hi there. I'm a student in college and my professor assigned a group project for me and two others to collaboratively write/edit a wikipedia article. I'm a complete newbie. How do I edit the same article with multiple people, and is there a way to track who makes what changes, so that our professor will know who contributed what? Thanks, Sophia --SophiaSMaria (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi @SophiaSMaria and welcome. Wikipedia articles are routinely edited by multiple people so this shouldn't be a problem. Each of you should have your own Wikipedia user account. The edits made by each of you are listed by user name in the article history accessible from the View History tab at the top of the article. Here is the history page for the page you're reading now. From the history page you can use the Compare selected revisions feature to see what exactly each of you changed.

Be aware that if two of you are editing the same part of the same article at the same time, one of you may experience an edit conflict which you will need to resolve. Assigning different sections of the article for each of you to work on can help avoid this. ~Kvng (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

VLAN

Hello. Then article should be moved to virtual local area network. It depends on common name. Eurohunter (talk) 18:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

@Eurohunter, it was moved from Virtual LAN to VLAN in 2022. I doubt there will be consensus to go to a longer title. You're reordering of the terms in lead isn't improving anything and we like to avoid the unnecessary overhead of editors flopping these things back and forth. I see you've reverted. I'll go find something else to do. ~Kvng (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

I wouldn't agree with "isn't improving anything" because order was wrong. Eurohunter (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

@Eurohunter readers expect to see and are more likely successfully parse Three letter acronym (TLA) construct than TLA (three letter acronym). This is so regardless of whether the article title is Three letter acronym or TLA ~Kvng (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

As a reader I expect that the lead title will follow article title and infobox (order) according to common name and probably I'm not the only one. Eurohunter (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

OK, so we disagree. Normal procedure for resolving is WP:BRD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

biography creation

how to add biography in Wikipedia Erick Mbithi Mutinda (talk) 11:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

@Erick Mbithi Mutinda, Welcome! Biographies are articles. Here's a help page with information about creating your first article: WP:YFA ~Kvng (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from SophiaSMaria (03:15, 13 April 2025)

Hi there, I'm trying to figure out how to create a draft for an article and allow my classmates to edit it. I'm a little confused on the namespace, user page, article wizard, etc options. Which would be the best one to use? I can't seem to figure out how to create one that I can go back to and share with my group. Thanks, Sophia --SophiaSMaria (talk) 03:15, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

@SophiaSMaria, I can help you create a draft, what do you want to call it? ~Kvng (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

We were thinking of writing about digital ethics. 70.240.156.229 (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

@SophiaSMaria, If you search for Digital ethics you get sent to our existing article on Information ethics. This is because editors have claimed the two are synonyms. We also have related articles Digital divide and Digital rights which cover specific digital ethics topics. In this context, I can think of a few options available to you:

1. Improve the existing Information ethics article. This article is already pretty well developed but there's always room for improvement.
2. Try to argue that there should be a separate Digital ethics article if you consider this to somehow be a separate topic from Information ethics
3. Start a new article similar to Digital divide or Digital rights providing more detail on a specific digital ethics topic.

Let me know if one of these options looks interesting to you or if you want to explore an option I haven't thought of. ~Kvng (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

H again,

Thank you for the tips. I wasn’t sure which would be the best way. I read over the information ethics page when I noticed the cyber ethics wiki page is closer to our kind of digital ethics—which focuses more on the interconnection or social interactions online as well as how information is communicated through digital networks, algorithms, and visual design. I’m okay with editing and contributing to an existing page, but which do you think would be best to work with?

thanks again,

sophia 70.240.156.229 (talk) 02:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Sophia, please remember to sign in before editing. It helps us know for sure who is saying what and also, counterintuitively, protects your privacy.

It is not immediately clear to me where the lines are drawn between these topics. If Cyberethics is what feels right to you then start there. On Wikipedia if you make a mistake or start to go off in the wrong direction, someone else in the community will let you know (not necessarily politely, I'm afraid).

I'd suggest you start by reviewing the Cyberethics talk page at Talk:Cyberethics. There is some discussion there about previous rewrite and reorganization initiatives. You're welcome to post there also to outline and announce your intentions and workshop any improvement ideas with other editors before making changes. Or if you're feeling WP:BOLD just start making changes and work out any objections with the WP:BRD process.

I've put Cyberethics on my WP:WATCHLIST and will try to help as you go. What are the usernames of the other editors involved in this project? ~Kvng (talk) 13:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Will do. Yes, I think our sources would fit in more with the cyberethics article and making a separate one would probably be a little redundant. Is there a way to work on it as a draft, or sandbox, with my team members? I noticed the last reply on the talk page of cyberethics had an editor who did something like that for an assignment. I wouldn't want to run into any other editors or have our worked changed before we can submit, even if it ends up being edited afterwards or not used at all.

I have to check in with them to see if they made their accounts yet, but will get back to you on that with their usernames.

Thanks again,

Sophia SophiaSMaria (talk) 17:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

We can make a copy of the article as it currently stands into a draft or sandbox where your team can work on it without interference. The potentially tricky part comes when you believe you are done. We will need to get consensus to replace the article with your updated version. This may be no problem as was apparently the case with Jetam2 (paid)'s improvement. But if there is an issue, it is typically harder to resolve if the updates are significant and shared all at once than if you all make the changes towards the updated version incrementally on the live version.

I encourage you to give working on the live version together a try; this is how most of the improvements to Wikipedia articles are achieved. If that doesn't sound workable or you try it and it doesn't work, we can set up a sandbox copy for your work. ~Kvng (talk) 04:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi again,

I think we'd prefer to work in a sandbox draft rather than the live version. How should I go about taking a copy of the cyberethics article to a draft/ in my sandbox?

My team member's logins are:

Vickidale1221!

SmithShelby22

Thank you SophiaSMaria (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

I've created a copy of Cyberethics at User:SophiaSMaria/Cyberethics for you. To be clear, this is not a private page but should be a quite corner on Wikipedia for collaboration with your team members. ~Kvng (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Feralgypseykreations on Wikipedia:Editing on mobile devices (15:29, 23 April 2025)

Just want to add pictures can't seem to figure out how to do it --Feralgypseykreations (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Feralgypseykreations, the wizard may be the quickest place to start: Wikipedia:File_upload_wizard ~Kvng (talk) 02:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

"Ghana road accident" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ghana road accident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24 § Ghana road accident until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from UntLinux (12:51, 24 April 2025)

Hello! I am fairly new to Wikipedia, and I was wanting to ask how to replace an existing image in an article with a new one? --UntLinux (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi UntLinux, the first step is to upload the new image. The File upload wizard is the place to start. The second step is to edit the article to use the new image. ~Kvng (talk) 12:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! UntLinux (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Is this the merge target you meant?

Hi, in this edit summary and when you removed two other related proposed deletions, you suggested merging to a redlink, International Coffee Reign. Is that what you meant? Maybe you mean that the redlink should be created? I'm not clear on this. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

@Bri, sorry, clerical error. The suggested target is Reinado_Internacional_del_Café ~Kvng (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Okay! ☆ Bri (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Piyushrajput07 (12:00, 28 April 2025)

Hello, I know some notable persons and want add their biography, how can I do this. Or can you add their biography, I will help you to gather all details about them. --Piyushrajput07 (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

@Piyushrajput07, Writing a new article isn't the easiest place to start your Wikipedia experience but here's the tutorial. If this person is truly notable, it is likely other editors will contribute to the article once you've started it. I'm afraid I personally don't do much constructive work on biographies. ~Kvng (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minnie Mills has been accepted

Minnie Mills, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:37, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Apologies for the awkward talk page notice here - I was cleaning up Wikipedia:Database reports/Possibly out-of-process deletions which saw that a deletion was done to make way for an acceptance of this AfC draft a day ago and yet that acceptance was never done, so to get the bookkeeping right I accepted it myself. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:38, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Presidency of Martín Vizcarra (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Presidency of Martín Vizcarra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Kvng! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Saaremaa Parish

added links pointing to Kakuna, Aru, Puka, Poka, Kaali, Asuka, Kalli, Atla, Are, Reo, Koki, Kalju, Upa, Selja, Kaisa, Ula, Mäeküla, Metsaküla, Oti, Reina, Koigi, Aste, Viki, Kargi, Kalma, Järve, Iide, Nava, Kipi, Salu, Imavere, Koidula, Liiva, Tutku, Männiku, Nurme, Kungla, Kurevere, Aaviku, Järveküla, Kõnnu, Parila, Triigi, Vanamõisa, Randvere, Rannaküla, Sääre, Laheküla, Metsküla, Kõrkküla, Linnuse, Kuke, Järise, Keskvere, Haeska, Uuemõisa, Tagavere, Rootsiküla, Väljaküla, Pulli, Metsaääre, Leina, Tõlli, Viira, Käo, Ariste, Kogula, Põlluküla, Sakla, Soodevahe, Endla, Abaja, Möldri, Imara, Sandla, Metsapere, Kasti, Kellamäe, Sutu, Kaimri, Oju, Neeme, Jaani, Laadla, Laoküla, Kaubi, Levala, Külma, Lilbi, Mäebe, Saareküla, Tagamõisa and Nenu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338 Online events: New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (events facilitated by others): WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period! 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women) Tip of the month: Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question from Destiny Udensi (15:44, 29 April 2025)

Hi, how can I add to Wikipedia? --Destiny Udensi (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

You can use the edit button to add to existing articles. We suggest improving existing articles as the best way to start contributing to Wikipedia. ~Kvng (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)