User talk:Ibraheemch333

This is Ibraheemch333's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaggar Khurd (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaggar Khurd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ibraheemch333! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaggar Khurd (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CptViraj was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaggar Khurd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CptViraj (talk) 04:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaggar Khurd (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Must be reliably sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaggar Khurd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gaggar Kalan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gaggar Kalan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaggar Khurd

Hello, Ibraheemch333

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gaggar Khurd, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NLC, Dina moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NLC, Dina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 05:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NLC, Dina

The article NLC, Dina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NLC, Dina moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NLC, Dina, An article you recently created, NLC, Dina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gaggar Khurd

Hello, Ibraheemch333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaggar Khurd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gaggar Kalan

Hello, Ibraheemch333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaggar Kalan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NLC, Dina

Hello, Ibraheemch333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NLC, Dina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Muhammad Ali Mirza, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gaggar Khurd

Hello, Ibraheemch333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaggar Khurd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NLC, Dina

Hello, Ibraheemch333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NLC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Pakistani general election

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Pakistani general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Owais Al Qarni. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Owais Al Qarni (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Celjski Grad. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Reactions to the 2025 Pahalgam attack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 09:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Operation Bunyanun Marsoos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 14:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2025 India-Pakistan ceasefire agreement, you may be blocked from editing. SKAG123 (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contententious topics alert

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 13:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for No responses on talk page.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 18:27, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibraheemch333 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Doug Weller, I respectfully request an unblock. I understand the reasons behind the block and am willing to cooperate fully with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I assure you that I will contribute constructively and follow all Wikipedia norms. I am also available to discuss this further here on my user talk page. Thank you for considering my request. Ibraheemch333 (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to questions. -- asilvering (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review the block, but you are addressing the blocking administrator. If you want to negotiate with them first, you don't need to make an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot, I respectfully request an unblock.I kindly request that you please forward my message to the Wikipedia unblocking team. I would like to appeal my block and explain my situation. I am open to discussing any concerns and willing to cooperate fully. Thank you for your time and assistance. Ibraheemch333 (talk) 03:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no specific "unblocking team"; your request is open and visible to admins. Adding additional requests does not speed the process, so I have made your above statement a standard comment. The time to explain your situation is now. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who should I contact? Ibraheemch333 (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no specific administrator to address. Your unblock request is in the queue of unblock requests, and it is one of many. There is no specific response time expressed or implied - your request will wait in the queue until an admin responds. In the meantime, post any further explanations below, with the understanding that an admin will respond at some indeterminate time. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]