This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
"The gunmen then left the scene, shouting (according to witnesses), "We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad. We have killed Charlie Hebdo!"[66][67][62][61]"
Why "according to witnesses"? We have video. Please remove this part in parentheses.
In the first paragraph the article reads, "and the first massacre ever to have occurred at a studio associated with an entertainment company, and the animation industry."
Wouldn't the Charlie Hebdo shooting be the first shooting of an Entertainment company in the animation industry? I get if you want to argue that animation isnt the same as cartooning, but it was clearly a massacre of illustrators at satire magazine.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The article states that Coco Rey’s daughter was with her when the attackers came to Charlie Hebdo. I have read several articles in English and French — interviews with Coco — that state she was on her way to pick up her daughter from daycare, and her daughter was not with her at the time. The included source (French) for that sentence says the same. 149.71.62.174 (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We shouldn't use unreliable sources in Wikipedia, and particularly not ones found to be generally unreliable in a broad general RFC. Is there a reason the source is so apposite here that it would be a failure of NPOV not to include it? Doesn't seem to be. You could take the question for a spin at WP:RSN. so as to avoid risking an invalid WP:LOCALCONSENSUS - David Gerard (talk) 23:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@David O. Johnson I think it's an absolutely ridiculous removal. The citation was there simply to state that the publication in question reposted the cartoons, which is true. The citation isn't used for making any other factual claim. The same is true of Gawker, which is listed right beside it.
Both WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:NEWSOPED state that self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves. FreeBeacon and Gawker reposted the cartoons, and that is the only thing being asserted - not any editorial commentary or reporting. This is a straightforward case of verifying that a source published something, not assessing the truth of the underlying material. Removing the Gawker and Free Beacon citations on the basis of general reliability completely misunderstands the context in which they're being used.
"Some English-language media outlets republished the cartoons on their websites in the hours following the shootings. Prominent examples included Bloomberg News, The Huffington Post, The Daily Beast, Gawker, Vox, and The Washington Free Beacon."
On an slightly unrelated note, we had consensus to keep those citations in a footer note. They shouldn't have been removed from the note and re-inserted directly into the text again. It's once again very hard to read. They should be put back.
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Simon Fieschi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Simon Fieschi until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Valorrr (talk) 04:11, 23 March 2025 (UTC)