Jump to content

Talk:Adolph Bieberstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Adolph Bieberstein/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 03:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 19:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • he also competed in track and field wrestling missing an "and".
    • Done.
  • After football season, I think "the" would sound better before "football".
    • Done.
  • If you can, try to change up a few "He..." sentences, especially near the end.
    • Changed some.
  • References:
    • All appear appropriate for what is being cited
    • All are consistently formatted
    • Spot checks: 2, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 376 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was expanded over 5× within seven days of nomination (395 B → 5327 B; ~13.5×) and is long enough; it is now a good article as well. Article is neutral, well-cited, and contains no close paraphrasing that I could detect. Hook is broadly interesting to a wide audience. QPQ fulfilled.

Not a showstopper, but I found this source from 1928 saying that he returned to the Badgers even earlier as a coach in 1928. Maybe the article should reflect this. DigitalIceAge (talk) 03:46, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BeanieFan11 courtesy ping. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DigitalIceAge: Added in the 1928 coaching mention. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now. Approve ALT0. DigitalIceAge (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]