Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:ROY)

Request for comment

[edit]

I am just requesting comment for this discussion. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015)#Requested move 16 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ecgberht, King of Wessex#Requested move 28 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 03:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Richard III of England#Requested move 30 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy#Requested move 23 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Rexophile (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Knights of Rizal

[edit]

Something about Knights of Rizal doesn't seem quite right to me. I came across this org when editing the page Billy Chan.

It seems like it was established in 1911 but whether it was an official state honor isn't entirely clear. They point to this Act from 1956: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1951/06/14/republic-act-no-646/

I'm not sure if the present day org is the same as the 1911 org, some articles link to "knights-of-rizal.org" which is a dead domain now. Current website is "knights-of-rizal.ph". It seems to me like one of those modern day fake orders where becoming a member is not particularly difficult but I would like some input from others.

They claim on the page that Henry Kissinger was a member which I am skeptical of, only sources I could find were SPS.

Should members of this order have the post-nominals "KGOR" on their page and the title of "Sir"? D1551D3N7 (talk) 23:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Angevin kings of England

[edit]

Angevin kings of England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Borsoka (talk) 04:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mark Antony#Requested move 30 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Babenberg#Requested move 4 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Austria-Este#Requested move 4 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Augustus

[edit]

I have nominated Augustus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Meinhard I, Count of Gorizia-Tyrol#Requested move 14 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm or William?

[edit]

There is currently a discussion over on William I, German Emperor whether it is proper to refer to the figure in question as "William" or "Wilhelm". Should you feel so inclined, please share your thoughts at Talk:William I, German Emperor#Discussion regarding title of article. Emiya1980 (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Eltz#Requested move 26 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr (lets chat) 03:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arabian prince (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) currently redirects to Arabian Prince; but it seems like it should lead to some royalty article, about princes in Arabia, Saudi Arabia, or the Arab world? Is there such an article? -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chao Ratchabut Wongtawan Na Chiang Mai#Requested move 16 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 14:30, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chao Ratchabut Wongtawan Na Chiang Mai#Requested move 16 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 12:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I'm working on restructuring the above article, as it is difficult to navigate. I am emulating the styles of the articles of Christian IX of Denmark and Queen Victoria. If anyone would like to assist in restructuring or including sources, please feel welcome. My draft can be found here. Happy editing! EmilySarah99 (talk) 11:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WT:JAPAN § Signatures in infoboxes of articles about Japanese Imperial Family members. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Royal intermarriage

[edit]

Royal intermarriage has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]